Tag: Accra Accra High Court

  • Court strikes Democracy Hub’s suit seeking to disqualify Baba Jamal in Ayawaso-East by-election

    Court strikes Democracy Hub’s suit seeking to disqualify Baba Jamal in Ayawaso-East by-election

    A lawsuit seeking to disqualify the National Democratic Congress’ (NDC) candidate in the upcoming Ayawaso East by-election scheduled for Tuesday, March 3, 2026, has been thrown out by the High Court in Accra.

    The High Court gave the ruling on Monday, March 2, after it described the lawsuit as “incompetent”.

    On Tuesday, February 17, the pressure group, Democracy Hub, challenged the Ayawaso East by-election. The group alleged vote-buying during the NDC’s parliamentary primaries held on February 7.
    Democracy Hub prayed the High Court to direct the Electoral Commission (EC) to conduct a fresh primary in accordance with democratic principles.


    In the suit, the NDC is cited as the first defendant, the Electoral Commission as the second, and the Attorney-General as the third.
    The suit further added, “An order of mandamus directed at the 2nd Defendant to refuse to accept or act upon the nomination of the said candidate unless and until a primary conducted in accordance with democratic principles is held.”


    “A declaration that the parliamentary primary conducted by the 1st Defendant for the Ayawaso East Constituency, having been found to have been characterised by widespread vote buying, inducement and monetisation, did not conform to the democratic principles required under Article 55(5) of the Constitution, and that the continued reliance on the outcome thereof and the presentation of a candidate founded on that process constitute actions contrary to and inconsistent with the Constitution in violation of section 9 of the Political Parties Act, 2000 (Act 574).”


    Meanwhile, a new poll by Global InfoAnalytics has predicted Baba Jamal to secure about 75% of the votes ahead of his main contender, Baba Ali of the New Patriotic Party (NPP).


    According to the poll, the New Patriotic Party’s Baba Al will trail with 21%, independent candidate Umaru Sanda Muhammed is expected to poll 3% of the vote, with other remaining candidates, Ibrahim Iddrisu and David to garner less than 1%.


    The survey was conducted between February 28 and March 1, sampling 972 voters across the constituency.


    The EC has scheduled the Ayawaso East by-election for March 3, 2026, the by-election has attracted heightened attention in recent days amid internal developments within the NDC, including allegations of vote buying during its parliamentary primary.


    Mr Baba Jamal Mohammed Ahmed won the Ayawaso East Constituency primary and is set to represent the NDC as its parliamentary candidate in the March 3 by-election, following the party’s internal primary held on February 7, 2026.


    After the close of polls, provisional results showed that Baba Jamal polled 431 votes out of the total votes cast, followed by the widow of the late Ayawaso MP, Naser Toure Hajia Amina Adam who secured 399 votes. Mr Mohammed Ramne, the Ayawaso East NDC Constituency Chairman, placed third with 88 votes.


    Dr Yakubu Azindow obtained 45 votes, while Mr Najib Mohammed Sani recorded one vote.


    The closely contested primary attracted more than 1,100 accredited delegates from across the constituency, reflecting the high stakes involved in selecting a candidate for the by-election in a seat widely regarded as a stronghold of the governing NDC.


    Five aspirants contested the race: Hajia Amina Adam, Mr Baba Jamal, Dr Yakubu Azindow, who had previously contested the late MP in the 2023 primary, Mr. Mohammed Ramne, and Mr Mohammed Sani.


    Although the race was initially considered open, it later narrowed into a tight contest among Mr Jamal, Hajia Amina Adam and Dr Azindow.

    Even though the election was peaceful on Saturday, reports of vote buying emerged on the eve of the election and on election day, involving some candidates, including Baba Jamal, who at the time was Ghana’s High Commissioner to Nigeria and allegedly offered television sets and other items to delegates.


    Videos circulating on social media showed some delegates leaving polling centres carrying television sets and other items.Reacting to the vote-buying allegations, the NDC, in a statement signed by its Secretary, Fiifi Kwetey, announced that it would investigate the allegations.

    It noted that a three-member committee had been set up to probe the matter.


    In a statement issued on the same day, the NDC said its national executives had taken note of what it described as widespread incidents of inducement and vote buying allegedly perpetrated by some aspirants.
    The party condemned the acts, describing them as an affront to its values and principles, and announced that it had launched investigations into the matter.


    “In line with the Party’s commitment to internal democracy, transparency, and ethical political conduct, the Committee will investigate the allegations and make appropriate recommendations, including sanctions where necessary,” the statement said.


    The Presidency has announced the recall of Ghana’s High Commissioner to Nigeria, Baba Jamal, over voter inducement during the just-ended Ayawaso East primaries held on Saturday, February 7.


    In a statement titled “President recalls Ghana’s High Commissioner to Nigeria,” shared by the Spokesperson to the President, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, and dated February 7, it noted that “President John Dramani Mahama has directed the immediate recall of Mohammed Baba Jamal Ahmed (Baba Jamal) from his position as Ghana’s High Commissioner to the Federal Republic of Nigeria.


    The decision follows allegations of voter inducement during today’s National Democratic Congress (NDC) primaries in the Ayawaso East Constituency, in which Mr Baba Jamal, a candidate, participated.”


    The President stressed that reports of vote buying were made against several candidates seeking to win the Ayawaso East seat, but Baba Jamal stood out because he was the only serving public officer at the time, making his case a peculiar one.


    “In his directive to the Minister for Foreign Affairs recalling Mr Baba Jamal as High Commissioner, the President noted that while allegations of vote-buying were made against multiple candidates who contested the primaries, Baba Jamal was the only serving public officer among them.”


    Consequently, to protect the integrity of public office and to avoid any public suspicion of misconduct or violation of the Government’s Code of Conduct for Political Appointees, the President stated:


    “Without prejudice to the ongoing internal party processes, and strictly in view of the standards of conduct expected of public officers, the President considers it necessary to act decisively to preserve the integrity of public office and to avoid any perception of impropriety or conflict with the Government’s Code of Conduct for Political Appointees.”


    The statement continued that “the recall takes effect immediately, and the Minister for Foreign Affairs has been directed to take the necessary administrative and diplomatic steps to give effect to this directive.”

  • We don’t know the whereabouts of arrested protesters – Democracy Hub

    We don’t know the whereabouts of arrested protesters – Democracy Hub

    A member of the Democracy Hub legal team, Prince Ganaku, has alleged that the Ghana Police Service made unlawful arrests of more than 46 protesters during a three-day demonstration.

    This protest was organized to express discontent with the government’s management of the economic crisis and the issue of illegal mining, commonly referred to as galamsey.

    Ganaku also stated that the police have not provided a complete list of those arrested, forcing members of the group to search the streets of Accra for the missing protesters. In an interview with Umaru Sanda Amadu on Citi FM’s Eyewitness News, he claimed that the detained individuals are being held in various cells across the country, are being denied legal representation, and are scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday, September 23.

    “In our attempt to get them bail, we engaged with the police and they declined to give us the list of people who have been arrested. We were told, and to quote the police, ‘to go and roam the streets of Accra and if we find them, fine. If we don’t find them, fine.”

    “We heard that there was an order from above that they should not allow those that they arrested to get access to legal representation and so they have taken them to different locations and the information we are getting is that they will detain them and arraign them for court tomorrow. All these are deliberate measures taken to punish the people.”

    “We only know what the police told us. We know where certain people are but we don’t have a firm number as to the total number of people arrested,” Prince Ganaku added.

  • Inheriting your husbands’ surname is archaic – Judge to wives

    Inheriting your husbands’ surname is archaic – Judge to wives

    A High Court Judge, Justice Alexander Osei Tutu, has characterized the tradition of married women adopting their husbands’ surnames as antiquated and discriminatory towards women.

    In a recent interview with JoyNews, Justice Tutu underscored the necessity of reevaluating this practice, which he argued is rooted in English customs that historically marginalized women but now lacks legal relevance.

    He highlighted that historically, women took their husbands’ names due to legal incapacitation, as a form of identity and recognition.

    “This practice originated as an English custom intended to demean women, but its significance has diminished over time.”

    He highlighted the significant changes in today’s laws, which empower women to own property and manage legal affairs independently.

    “The era where women were infringed by law is no more. So why do women continue to adopt the surnames of husbands when they tie the knot?”

    He pointed out that religious texts do not explicitly require women to change their names upon marriage.

    “If you want to use the Bible to justify it, you may get it wrong because nowhere in the Bible did we have a woman changing her name because she got married. Eve was never called Adam Eve. Jesus’ mother was not called Mary Joseph.”

    Justice Tutu urged Ghanaian society to abandon traditions that no longer serve a legal or societal purpose in modern times.

  • Even the court is in court over their lands – Ablakwa

    Even the court is in court over their lands – Ablakwa

    Member of Parliament (MP) for North Tongu, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, has stated that Ghanaian courts are currently embroiled in legal disputes over land that they possess.

    Mr Ablakwa highlighted the complexities and challenges faced by the judiciary in handling cases where government actions impact land ownership.

    Speaking on Metro TV he indicated that the Minister of Local Government and Decentralisation, Martin Kwaku Adjei-Mensah Korsah has become helpless due to government’s actions.

    “So when we talk about the state capture, judges have to run to their colleague judges to save them. You wonder what is happening is there no adult in the room. Look at the Local Minister, he is helpless, he wants to protect the land. Look at this Cantoments land, government took one out of two containers. The local has to run to goverment. Now the court is in court with the government. What is going on in this country?,” he added.

    In recent weeks, the MP has leveled accusations against government officials, alleging state capture.

    Ablakwa specifically cited additional instances of government selling state properties, purportedly including assets belonging to the Ghana Prisons Service and the Department of Parks and Gardens.

    Meanwhile, the MP has affirmed his unwavering commitment to combating state capture and government corruption, asserting that no amount of intimidation would deter him.

    as he wants to safeguard land interests, pointing out instances wherehave led to legal confrontations.

  • Spare the judiciary from divisive partisanship – GBA Boss

    Spare the judiciary from divisive partisanship – GBA Boss

    The President of the Ghana Bar Association (GBA), Yaw Acheampong Boafo, has emphasized the need for Ghanaians to refrain from politicizing issues related to the judiciary, particularly concerning judges.

    Addressing attendees at the Martyrs of the Rule of Law event held at Cavalry Baptist Church in Accra on Sunday, June 30, Acheampong Boafo highlighted that judges are trained to maintain impartiality.

    He expressed concern over recent public discussions on court cases, which he believes have been unnecessarily politicized, posing a threat to the country’s democratic values.

    “We must spare the judiciary from our divisive partisanship. It is sad that public commentary relative to cases of public interest pending in court has taken on political colouration.

    Acheampong Boafo stressed that judges do not undergo training based on political affiliations such as NPP, NDC, or CPP, affirming that Ghana’s judiciary, established under Chapter 11 of the 1992 Constitution, operates independently.

    “There is no training module at the judicial training school known as NPP judge, NDC judge, CPP judge for anyone to tag a judge as NPP, NDC, or CPP. There is only one judiciary established in Chapter 11 of the 1992 Constitution,” he is quoted to have said.

    He also cautioned that politicizing the judiciary risks repeating the tragic events that led to the martyrdom of judges, citing the 1982 killings of three High Court justices as a stark reminder of the dangers of such actions.

    “I want to place on record that at no stage of the interview and evaluation process of an appointment to any level of the judiciary is the political affiliation or leanings of an applicant a requirement,” he added.

  • Panama Papers scandal: Court acquits all 28 individuals on money laundering charges

    Panama Papers scandal: Court acquits all 28 individuals on money laundering charges

    A Panamanian court has acquitted all 28 individuals charged with money laundering in relation to the Panama Papers scandal, concluding a trial that began in April.

    The leaked financial documents from 2016 exposed how some of the world’s wealthiest and most influential individuals use tax havens to conceal their wealth.

    Among those acquitted were Jurgen Mossack and the late Ramon Fonseca, founders of Mossack Fonseca, the now-defunct law firm at the center of the scandal.

    Judge Baloisa Marquinez stated that the evidence presented was “not sufficient” to establish the criminal responsibility of the defendants.

    During the trial, the prosecution sought a maximum sentence of 12 years for money laundering for both Mr. Mossack and Mr. Fonseca, who passed away in May.

    Mr. Mossack and Mr. Fonseca maintained that neither they nor their firm had engaged in illegal activities.

    The trial in Panama City lasted 85 hours, included testimony from 27 witnesses, and reviewed over 50 pieces of documentary evidence, as reported by local news outlets.

    After extended deliberation, the judge ruled that the evidence from Mossack Fonseca’s servers had not been collected in accordance with due process, leading to the dismissal of all charges against the defendants.

    The Panama Papers, the largest data leak in history, involved the release of 11 million documents to the German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung, which were then shared with an international team of journalists.

    In 2017, Mossack Fonseca claimed the firm had been hacked and that the leaked information was being misrepresented.

    High-profile figures such as former UK Prime Minister David Cameron, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, and Argentinian football star Lionel Messi were scrutinized following the leak.

    Overall, the documents linked 12 current or former heads of state and government, including dictators accused of embezzling funds from their own countries.

  • Government to revise Chieftaincy Act – Stephen Asamoah

    Government to revise Chieftaincy Act – Stephen Asamoah

    The Minister for Chieftaincy and Religious Affairs, Stephen Asamoah Boateng, has revealed ongoing efforts within his ministry to amend the Chieftaincy Act, granting traditional leaders authority to adjudicate minor disputes within their jurisdictions.

    A contentious issue highlighted by the Minister involves Section 63(D) of the Act, currently under dispute at the Supreme Court, which restricts traditional authorities from adjudicating local matters and limits their operational scope.

    Speaking at the sidelines of a royal conference organized by the Church of Pentecost in Gomoa Fetteh, Central Region, Stephen Asamoah Boateng emphasized the importance of supporting and strengthening the institution of chieftaincy.

    “The government appreciates your impact on the sound character formation of several thousands of generations of men and women in our country.

    “Nananom, you administer a lot of work for the government, and in my interaction, we are amending the Chieftecy Law. In its place, we want to include some very clear authority to be given to the Nananom to be able to resolve petty disputes in your communities.

    “This already exists in Act Section 62(D), but you and I know that it has been disputed in the Supreme Court, but we need to make some amendments. They will appreciate that we need to give Nananom back the authority, but it should be slightly amended, which I am working on very closely,” he stated.

    Additionally, the Minister outlined plans to establish a Chieftaincy Development Fund, similar to the National District Assembly Common Fund, aimed at providing financial support to traditional authorities.

    This fund would include living allowances, adjusted periodically to accommodate changes in living conditions and exchange rates.

    “Beyond that, we need to also look at resourcing Nananom. The central government takes resources, and some must go back if we are given responsibilities to administer on our behalf and on behalf of the people.

    “So, we are proposing a Chieftaincy Development Fund, similar to the National District Assembly Common Fund, and we are also looking at giving a living allowance, not the legal money that you come for sitting. These are living allowances, which means they will be adjusted when the exchange rate or the living condition changes, so Nananom can be comfortable when they are administering the country for all of us, he added.

  • Present ballot boxes containing votes cast during NPP Primary – Court to Walewale EC

    Present ballot boxes containing votes cast during NPP Primary – Court to Walewale EC

    The Tamale High Court has issued an order directing officials of the Electoral Commission (EC) in the West Mamprusi Municipality to produce the ballot boxes containing votes from the NPP Walewale primary held on January 27, 2024.

    Additionally, the court has mandated the Electoral Commission to submit the election register used during the primary to the court’s registry by the end of tomorrow, June 26, 2024.

    The court’s decision follows a motion filed by the Plaintiff Hajia Lariba Zuwera, seeking the production of the ballot box and register by the Electoral Commission of the Walewale Constituency.

    This ruling marks the second relief granted to the plaintiff within two days.

    Earlier, on June 24, Justice Richard Kugyapaw of the Tamale High Court had issued an injunction against Dr. Mahama Tia Kabiru, preventing him from claiming the parliamentary candidacy of the NPP for the Walewale Constituency in the North East Region.

    The court’s actions stem from a challenge to the election results by the incumbent Member of Parliament, Hajia Lariba Zuweratu.

    Dr. Abudu Kabiru had been declared the winner by the Electoral Commission in Walewale after securing 145 votes, defeating Hajia Lariba Abudu.

    Following the dispute, Hajia Lariba Abudu filed a case at the Tamale High Court contesting the election outcome. Efforts by the NPP to resolve the matter through an out-of-court settlement were previously requested.

    In a related development, the Tamale High Court, presided over by Justice Richard Kogyapwah, granted the NPP’s request for a six-week period to settle the internal dispute out of court on March 27, 2024.

    The blame for the party’s internal discord in the Walewale Constituency has been directed at Vice President and NPP flagbearer Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia by Professor Naa Nabila Sulemana, the North East Regional Chairman of the NPP Council of Elders. According to Sulemana, Dr. Bawumia has the ability to mediate the issue given his familial connection to the former MP, who is his sister.

  • I was sacked from the military for misconduct – Jakpa tells court

    I was sacked from the military for misconduct – Jakpa tells court

    Today, on Tuesday, June 18, during the court proceedings of the Ambulance case, the third accused, Richard Jakpa, openly acknowledged that he was dismissed from the Armed Forces due to misconduct and insubordination.

     The cross-examination by the prosecution, led by the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), uncovered significant revelations.

    Jakpa disclosed that he had been commissioned into the Armed Forces in 1998 but was subsequently dismissed in 2007. 

    He cited allegations of insubordination and repeated failure to pass mandatory intelligence exams as the reasons for his dismissal, occurring five times in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2006, and 2007. 

    “Japka confirmed that he was commissioned in the Armed Forces in 1998 and got dismissed in 2007 for misconduct/ insubordination and failure to pass the required intelligence exams 5 times within 7 years.

    “He failed in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2006 and 2007. He however claimed he was only victim of victimization by the senior officers of the Armed Forces because they were envious of his exceptional performance as a soldier,” he added.

    Jakpa maintained that his dismissal was unjust, asserting that senior officers victimized him due to jealousy over his exemplary performance as a soldier.

    During the proceedings, Jakpa also admitted that the conversation between himself and the Attorney-General (AG), presented in court as Exhibit 10 by the defense, did not encompass the entire dialogue.

     He claimed that only portions favorable to their defense were included in the submission.

    “Japka confirmed in open court that the conversation between him and the AG that is in circulation and which was tendered in court by the accused persons as Exhibit 10, is actually not the full conversation. And that, they only presented the aspects of the conversation that will help their case,”.

    The current Minority Leader in Parliament, Dr. Ato Forson,  and businessman Richard Jakpa face allegations of deliberately causing financial loss to the state amounting to 2.37 million euros through the procurement of ambulances. 

    Both have pleaded not guilty and are currently standing trial.

  • Academic qualifications alone not grounds for promotion – Court dismisses suit against IGP

    Academic qualifications alone not grounds for promotion – Court dismisses suit against IGP

    The Kumasi High Court has dismissed Chief Inspector Samuel Krah’s lawsuit against the Inspector-General of Police and the State regarding his promotion.

    Justice Kwasi Anokyi Gyimah, delivering the judgment on June 14th, 2024, ruled that Chief Inspector Krah is not entitled to automatic promotion solely based on his higher academic qualifications.

    The Court stated that the “plaintiff has failed to prove his claim on the preponderance of probability. The Plaintiff’s attainment of higher academic qualification is not entitled to promotion by reason only that he attained academic qualification.

    “Thus, depending on the mode of recruitment, an entry to the Police Academy is by competitive examination or by special recommendation in line with Police Service Regulation,” the judgement noted.

    The court emphasized that the plaintiff failed to substantiate his claim on the balance of probabilities.

    It clarified that attaining higher academic qualifications does not automatically warrant promotion.

    According to the judgment, entry into the Police Academy is contingent upon competitive examination or special recommendation as per Police Service Regulation, depending on the recruitment method.

    Furthermore, the court encouraged the plaintiff to continue participating in entrance examinations, suggesting that he might succeed in future exams.

    Chief Inspector Krah’s case argued that despite serving between 25 and 30 years in the police service, the Police Administration had promoted his junior colleagues under a special amnesty but had not extended the same opportunity to him to facilitate his admission to the Police Academy and subsequent promotion to Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP).

  • Court to decide on accepting leaked tape involving AG, Richard Jakpa on June 16

    Court to decide on accepting leaked tape involving AG, Richard Jakpa on June 16

    The High Court, presided over by Justice Afia Serwah Asare Botwe, has scheduled Thursday, June 13, to rule on an application submitted by the lawyers of Minority Leader Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson.

    The application aims to admit an audio recording of a conversation between Richard Jakpa and Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame into evidence.

    Dr. Abdul Bassit Bamba, counsel for Dr. Ato Forson, presented the application on Tuesday, arguing that the recording is pertinent to their earlier motion for a mistrial, which the court had dismissed.

    Justice Afia Serwah Asare Botwe requested that the audio tape be played in open court after confirming that all parties had received copies and that the tape had been officially submitted.

    She explained that playing the recording was essential to determine its admissibility as evidence and to ensure that it was the same tape provided to both the prosecution and Dr. Ato Forson’s lawyers.

    After listening to the tape, Director of Public Prosecution Yvonne Attakora Obuobisa objected to its admission into evidence.

    She argued that the recording was irrelevant and violated the Attorney General’s privacy.

    Madam Obuobisa stressed that the court had already considered the tape in its ruling that dismissed the applications filed by both Dr. Ato Forson and Richard Jakpa.

    “We object to the tendering of this recording into evidence. Insufficient foundation has been laid for its inclusion in the ongoing trial. My Lady will note that in its ruling on June 6, this court admitted into evidence this same recording that counsel seeks to tender of the third accused (Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson),” she stated.

  • Appiah Stadium sued for GHC5m in defamation case

    Appiah Stadium sued for GHC5m in defamation case

    Kumasi-based road contractor, Kofi Job Gyebi, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Frank Kwaku Appiah, also known as Appiah Stadium, in the Kumasi High Court.

    The CEO of Kofi Job Company Limited is seeking GH₵5 million in damages, alleging that video content circulated by Appiah Stadium has tarnished his reputation and caused significant embarrassment.

    According to the court filing, Kofi Job claims that Appiah Stadium’s false publication on social media platforms, including TikTok, has negatively impacted his business and personal reputation.

    In addition to monetary compensation, Kofi Job is demanding a retraction and a public apology from the defendant, along with legal costs.

    Appiah Stadium, a known supporter of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), is accused of disseminating false information about Kofi Job’s road construction company.

    The court case aims to uncover the truth behind these allegations, with Kofi Job determined to restore his name and protect his business reputation.

    This legal battle has garnered significant attention in the Kumasi community, with many closely following its developments.

    The outcome of this case may set a crucial precedent for defamation lawsuits in Ghana, underscoring the importance of responsible speech and the protection of individual reputations.

    Watch video below:

  • Dragging my sick client to your custody was unfair – LilWin’s lawyer to police

    Dragging my sick client to your custody was unfair – LilWin’s lawyer to police

    The counsel for actor LilWin, Margaret Mary Twum, has shared how she successfully convinced the court to grant bail to her ailing client amidst his accident case.

    During the hearing, Margaret requested bail for her client, citing his health condition and the potential repercussions it might have on him.

    The prosecution did not oppose the bail plea but suggested that the suspect, as part of the bail conditions, should report weekly to the police to assist in the investigation.

    Judge Buaben Quansah dismissed the prosecution’s suggestion and set bail at GH¢50,000 with two sureties. The suspect is required to appear in court again in four weeks, allowing time for recovery.

    In an interview with TV3, LilWin’s lawyer expressed her dismay over the police detaining her client during his hospital treatment.

    “You saw the condition of my client. He’s not well, but we must respect the law. In fact, we were bulldozed here. We didn’t come on our own. Fortunately, his statement was taken and the court saw his current condition. So bail was granted,” she said.

    Meanwhile, LilWin was taken into police custody on Monday, June 3, 2024, after being discharged from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital.

    He has since been granted bail of GH¢50,000 with the case adjourned to June 27, 2024.

    About the Accident

    The accident involving actor LilWin took place on May 25, 2024, in front of Grace Baptist Church in Amakom, Kumasi. LilWin’s Benz collided head-on with another vehicle, causing injuries to some passengers and resulting in the death of a 3-year-old boy.

    All injured parties, including LilWin, were promptly taken to the Accident and Emergency Unit of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital. Despite his injuries, the actor made a determined appearance at the premiere of his new movie, “A Country Called Ghana,” at the KNUST CCB Auditorium later that day.

    LilWin’s management, in response to the incident, pledged their full support to the grieving family following the tragic loss of the child.

  • Ambulance trial: Jakpa dares AG

    Ambulance trial: Jakpa dares AG

    Power abuse is one of the charges leveled against, Attorney General, Godfred Dame.

    The third accused in the ongoing ambulance case, Richard Jakpa, has hinted that he has solid proof linking Gofred Dame to a number of illegal activities.

    According to him, Godfred Dame must feel comfortable going to court to clear his name if he has nothing to conceal.

    It is believed that Jakpa’s position is a brave attempt to guarantee government transparency and hold public servants responsible.

    For Godfred Dame, appearing in court to deny these allegations could either exonerate him or expose him to further scrutiny, he added.

    Allegedly, the AG pleaded with Jakpa to give a specific kind of testimony in court.

    Concerning the authenticity of the leaked tape, Jakpa has issued a challenge to anyone who questions it, asking them to provide a tape of their own as proof.

    Jakpa expressed his confidence in obtaining justice in an interview with JoyNews prior to the hearing on Tuesday, June 4, 2024.

    He made it clear that the accusations he had made were grave and ought to be handled by the legal system.

    Jakpa said “He [Dame]] should come to court and come and refute the allegations and set the records according to his opinion straight and the way it is supposed to be. I have done mine in court, and I am expecting him to come and do his part. The case is in court and not in public opinion.”

    The tape’s release has sparked a great deal of controversy and cast doubt on the fairness of the legal proceedings against Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, the Minority Leader in Parliament, who is accused of causing financial loss to the state in connection with the purchase of ambulances.

    Reactions to Jakpa’s audacious challenge have been all over the Ghanaian public and media landscape.

    For justice and accountability in the nation, many believe that this is a crucial time.

  • Court sentences two retired soldiers, 9 others to 252 years

    Court sentences two retired soldiers, 9 others to 252 years

    Two retired soldiers and nine others who robbed a gold-buying company at Wassa Akropong in the Western Region have been sentenced to a total of 252 years in hard labor by the Tarkwa Circuit Court.

    Emmanuel Tetteh, alias ‘Rocky Study,’ a retired soldier now working as a private security officer, and Samuel Agbadoku, an unemployed retired soldier, along with Isaac Adjei, a private security officer, Frank Afavi, alias ‘Hero,’ a fetish priest, Yaw Adzevi, a kente weaver, and Anthony Ayivie Kwame Senyo, alias ‘Shoto,’ a driver, were each sentenced to 17 years in prison.

    Pascal Korku Atatsitsey, alias ‘Mezaya,’ and Dodzi Awali, both fetish priests, Dickson Kumedzro, alias ‘Jaggar,’ a farmer, and Ruben Kportufe, alias ‘Offei,’ a self-proclaimed businessman, were each handed 25-year sentences. Meanwhile, Mohammed Buzu, alias ‘Meme,’ an ex-convict, will serve 50 years.

    Charged with conspiracy and robbery, they denied the offence, which occurred in 2018, and pleaded for leniency. However, Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) Isaac Babayi urged the court to impose severe punishments to deter others, stating, “These offenders do not deserve mercy.”

    The complainant, Mr. Prince Dennis, is the Wassa Akropong branch manager of AU Resources Ghana Limited, a gold dealership, and Adjei was a security guard at the company. The remaining convicts reside in various locations across the Greater Accra and Volta Regions.

    In September 2018, Adjei informed Tetteh about the company’s gold and proposed a robbery. Tetteh enlisted Agbadoku, who then recruited more accomplices, including Atatsitsey, Afavi, Kumedzro, Adzevi, Awali, and Peter Adoku, now at large.

    On October 1, 2018, the group traveled to Wassa Akropong and attempted the robbery, but lacked weapons. Afavi then contacted Buzu and Adoku, who joined with weapons on October 5, 2018.

    The next day, Atatsitsey, Kumedzro, Awali, Buzu, and Adoku, armed with guns and knives, robbed the company of 7.5 kilograms of refined gold worth GH¢1,543,500, six mobile phones valued at GH¢4,800, and GH¢250,000 in cash. The robbery was captured on CCTV.

    The robbers fled to Kasoa and were later arrested following a tip-off. A search revealed an Italian pistol, knives, a hammer, and a talisman. During the investigation, several convicts confessed and implicated others.

    Awali was later arrested near Dzodze, while Tetteh was apprehended at Kyebi. Agbadoku was traced and arrested in Akatsi. The gold and cash were reportedly in Buzu and Adoku’s possession, but Buzu claimed Adoku took them to Benin.

    The court declared Adoku wanted and ordered his apprehension for prosecution.

  • Family of slain soldier curses, ‘attacks’ Benlord while exiting court

    Family of slain soldier curses, ‘attacks’ Benlord while exiting court

    Tension flared outside the Achimota District Court as the family of a slain soldier, killed in a land dispute at Kasoa Millennium City, sought to confront the prime suspect, Benlord Ababio, following court proceedings on May 16, 2024.

    Amidst heightened emotions, family members gathered outside the court premises, expressing anger and attempting to physically confront Ababio, who they blame for the death of their relative.

    The situation quickly escalated into chaos, prompting police intervention to prevent further violence. In a video circulating on social media, distraught family members can be seen grappling with officers in their attempt to reach Ababio.

    Thanks to the swift action of the police, a potentially more violent altercation was averted.

    Officers managed to restrain the family members and safely escort the suspect away from the scene.

    Watch video below:

  • My vote will depend on Akufo-Addo’s final verdict on anti-LGBTQI bill – Edem Senanu

    Co-chair of the Citizens Movement against Corruption, Edem Senanu, has expressed his intention to cast his vote in the upcoming elections based on how the Presidency handles the anti-LGBTQI bill.

    He voiced dissatisfaction with the way the bill has been handled thus far by the Presidency.

    During an appearance on the Key Points program on TV3, he criticized the unprecedented situation where the President claimed awareness of a lawsuit even before its filing, emphasizing the political implications of the issue.

    “It has never happened in the history of this country that a bill is sent to the president before he receives it he says he is aware of a suit which has not even been filed. this is a political issue, it has implications for us, the party must recognize that those of us watching will vote based on how the bill is treated.

    “My vote will count on its bill, let us serve this notice.”

    Senanu emphasized that voters like himself will consider the treatment of the bill in deciding their votes, issuing a notice to that effect.

    The Supreme Court indefinitely adjourned the case related to the anti-LGBTQI bill, citing documents presented by the Speaker of Parliament containing objectionable language.

    The court instructed the Speaker’s lawyers to submit new documents. Despite the dismissal of the Speaker’s lawyer’s preliminary objection, the court permitted amendments to the motion for injunction sought by broadcast journalist Richard Sky, over the Speaker’s objections.

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkoornoo, leading the Apex Court, criticized the unnecessary preliminary objection and emphasized parties’ rights to present appropriate formulations of their reliefs.

    The Chief Justice rebuked the Speaker’s lawyers for wasting the court’s time.

    Meanwhile, Ghanaian journalist Richard Dela Sky and researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi are scheduled to appear before the Supreme Court to advance their respective lawsuits contesting the passage of the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

  • ATU land encroachment case to be heard in court on May 23

    ATU land encroachment case to be heard in court on May 23

    The management of Accra Technical University (ATU) is deeply concerned about the continuous encroachment on portions of its 17-acre property located in Mempehusem, within the Ga West Municipality of the Greater Accra Region.

    According to ATU’s management, efforts to erect a protective fence around the land have been thwarted by legal injunctions obtained by some of the encroachers.

    During a session of the Public Accounts Committee held in Ho, Volta Region, Professor Amevi Acakpovi, the Acting Vice Chancellor of Accra Technical University, brought this issue to light.

    Professor Acakpovi informed the committee that the matter is slated for a hearing on May 23.

    “There are encroachers on the land at Mempehusem and the final resolution is that we should build a fence around the land to strongly show our presence and then our determination that we believe the land belongs to us.

    “We began this partnership with the 49th Regiment and they started building the fence for us but unfortunately, some of the encroachers we suspect have taken the matter to court and sought an injunction for the construction work to stop and so work has stalled.

    “We have also filed a statement of defence and a counterclaim. The court has actually issued a hearing notice to both parties and we shall be heard in court on May 23, 2024.”

  • NAM1’s lawyer commended us in a letter – Investigator to Court

    NAM1’s lawyer commended us in a letter – Investigator to Court

    In the ongoing trial of Nana Appiah Mensah, also known as NAM1, the investigator has rebuffed claims from the accuser’s lawyer of shoddy work, affirming the professionalism exhibited by the investigative team.

    DSP Charles Nyarko, the 8th Defence Witness, refuted accusations of incompetence, stating that the investigation was conducted meticulously, prompting commendation from the accused’s counsel.

    Despite cross-examination challenges from lawyer Kwame Boafo Akuffo, DSP Nyarko maintained the integrity of the investigation, highlighting the absence of independent verification regarding the sum of money mentioned in court.

    Acknowledging the absence of the commendation letter in his witness statement, DSP Nyarko defended the team’s impartiality and highlighted their neutral approach to the case.

    Regarding Menzgold Ghana Limited’s representation to investors, DSP Nyarko clarified that while the investigation didn’t establish direct communication regarding SEC authorization, the nature of the representation implied legitimacy.

    The trial commenced on December 20, 2023, with several witnesses called by the prosecution, including an engineer, sales manager, businesswoman, miner, trader, and businessman, culminating in DSP Nyarko’s testimony on March 26, 2024.

    With the prosecution’s case concluded, the High Court has directed Defence counsel Kwame Boafo Akuffo to submit a no-case filing by April 15, with the prosecution responding by May 6.

    “I am suggesting to you that the sum of money bandied about in your evidence-in-chief does not have any independent verification before this court,” lawyer Kwame Boafo Akuffo put to the witness.

    “Our team did a very neutral job without any bias involved in this case,” the investigator stated, “My lord, to the extent that counsel (Mr Kwame Boafo Akuffo) for the accused wrote a letter of commendation for the team for doing a good job,” the witness told the Court.

    “However, as I mentioned earlier, the representation made between A2 (Menzgold Ghana Limited) and our complainants, that it had a clear and qualified right to deal in gold suggested that our complainants were dealing with an entity authorized to do such a business,” the investigator told the court.

    Justice Ernest Owusu Dapaa will hear submissions from both parties on May 14 before issuing a ruling.

    NAM1, alongside Menzgold Ghana Limited and Brew Marketing Consult Ghana Limited, faces 39 charges including operating without a license, fraudulent inducement, and money laundering, involving approximately GH¢340,835,650.

    Maintaining his innocence, NAM1 is currently on bail of GH¢500 million with four sureties.

  • A-Plus directed by court to retract defamation statements and pay 100k to Hassan Zein

    A-Plus directed by court to retract defamation statements and pay 100k to Hassan Zein

    Kwame Asare Obeng, widely known as A Plus, has opted for a settlement in the defamation lawsuit initiated against him by Ghanaian business magnate and philanthropist, Hassan Zein.

    The legal action stemmed from defamatory remarks made by the controversial musician-turned-politician, damaging Zein’s reputation.

    According to court documents, A Plus has chosen to resolve the matter through an agreement with the businessman.

    As part of the settlement, A Plus is obliged to retract and apologize for the defamatory comments that led to the legal proceedings.

    Mr Zein filed the defamation suit in 2022, seeking GH¢10 million in general damages and various orders, including a public apology and the removal of defamatory content.

    Despite the case progressing in the High Court in Accra, A Plus and Zein reached an agreement on January 22, 2024.

    Subsequently, on January 29, 2024, the court, presided over by Justice Kwasi Adjenim-Boateng, adopted the settlement terms as the consent judgment.

    In adherence to the agreement, A Plus will retract the comments and images of Zein through the same medium where the defamatory content was posted.

    Additionally, an apology will be issued using the same medium, and A Plus is required to pay GH¢100,000 in costs to Zein.

    The court documents affirm that these terms constitute the comprehensive understanding between the parties, effectively concluding the legal dispute arising from the defamation suit.

    Despite Mr. Hassan Zein’s expressed concern about such occurrences in a civilized state like Ghana, attempts to reach A Plus’s legal counsel remained unanswered.

  • Cecilia Dapaah’s hearing rescheduled to January 25

    Cecilia Dapaah’s hearing rescheduled to January 25

    The Accra High Court has deferred the hearing of the case involving former Sanitation Minister, Cecilia Abena Dapaah, to Thursday, January 25, 2024.

    The case pertains to the former Minister’s alleged failure to disclose her income and property to the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP).

    Furthermore, the OSP’s application to confirm freezing and seizure orders related to bank accounts and assets at Cecilia Dapaah’s residence has also been rescheduled to January 25.

    Lawyers for Madam Dapaah filed an injunction application against the OSP on October 10, 2023, citing potential irreparable damage if the OSP is not restrained.

    “This Court is enjoined to balance the economic right of the affected persons against the State’s power to fight corruption. It is the Applicants’ considered view that they would suffer irreparable harm if the Respondent is not restrained pending the final determination of the substantive matter.”

    The Human Rights Court in Accra is hearing this application filed by Cecilia Abena Dapaah and her husband, Daniel Osei Kuffuor.

    The case, which seeks to restrain the OSP from continuing to freeze Madam Dapaah’s accounts and seizing cash recovered from their residence, has been adjourned to February 1, 2024.

    Background:

    Two house helps who worked for Cecilia Abena Dapaah and her husband, Daniel Osei Kuffour, are facing charges for allegedly stealing monies and items worth millions of cedis from the couple’s residence at Abelemkpe in Accra.

    The main accused individuals, Patience Botwe and Sarah Agyei, have been charged with conspiracy to commit crime and five counts of stealing. The alleged thefts occurred between July and October 2022.

    The accused individuals were arraigned before an Accra Circuit Court on Thursday, July 20, 2023. Ms. Botwe and her alleged accomplices have been remanded into lawful custody, while Sarah Agyei has been granted bail.

    The complainants reported the theft case to the police in June 2023 after discovering the missing cash and personal effects.

    Investigations revealed that Patience, with the help of her alleged accomplice Sarah, had hidden the stolen money and used it to purchase properties and expensive items. The Special Prosecutor announced that his office was investigating the matter, starting with the arrest of Madam Cecilia Dapaah.

    “This Court is enjoined to balance the economic right of the affected persons against the State’s power to fight corruption. It is the Applicants’ considered view that they would suffer irreparable harm if the Respondent is not restrained pending the final determination of the substantive matter.”

  • Man sentenced to 15 years for sexually abusing stepdaughter

    Man sentenced to 15 years for sexually abusing stepdaughter

    A 47-year-old driver in Tetegu, Accra, has been sentenced to 15 years in prison by the Gender-Based Court at the police headquarters for engaging in sexual acts with his 13-year-old stepdaughter.

    Joseph Yankson took advantage of the victim’s mother’s absence, defiling her twice and promising appeasement with a sheep. Yankson pleaded guilty to the defilement charge, and the court, presided over by Dora Eshun Inkumasah, convicted him based on his own plea.

    Chief Inspector Opoku Aniagyie, presenting Chief Inspector Simon Tekpor’s case, explained that the complainant, a teacher and friend of the victim’s mother, reported that Yankson, the stepfather, committed the offenses while the mother was away.

    The accused lived with the victim, her siblings, and her mother in the same Tetegu house near Weija.During the mother’s absence in 2023, Yankson engaged in sexual intercourse with the victim and repeated the act later, promising appeasement with a sheep.

    Upon the victim’s mother’s return, she confronted Yankson, who admitted to the offense during family deliberations.

    The second incident occurred on December 26, 2023, leading the victim to disclose her ordeal to the complainant.

    The complainant lodged a report with the Domestic Violence and Victims Support Unit at the Weija Divisional Police Command on January 4, 2024. A medical examination and treatment for the victim were initiated based on the issued medical form.

  • Atebubu gets new court complex from Chief Justice

    Atebubu gets new court complex from Chief Justice

    The Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Torkornoo, has inaugurated a dual courtroom complex in Atebubu-Amantin to enhance justice delivery.

    The newly opened twin-court building accommodates both circuit and high courts, featuring ancillary facilities such as judges’ chambers, registrars’ offices, recorders’ offices, cashiers’ offices, bailiffs’ offices, and docket and washroom facilities.

    Chief Justice Torkornoo commended the Atebubu-Amantin municipal assembly, led by Chief Executive Hon. Edward Owusu, for funding the project from internally generated resources, dubbing him “my man of the year.”

    In her address at the inauguration ceremony, the Chief Justice highlighted the significance of the facility, emphasizing that it would improve access to justice, especially considering that the nearest circuit court is 142.5 kilometers away in Techiman.

    The Chief Justice stressed the importance of adherence to the law, asserting that it ensures order, fairness, justice, and ultimately leads to prosperity. She cautioned court staff against extorting money from court users, emphasizing that such behavior would not be tolerated.

    Bono East Regional Minister Hon. Kwasi Adu-Gyan applauded the Atebubu-Amantin municipal assembly for its commitment to justice delivery and security, aligning the court’s establishment with sustainable development goal 16, which emphasizes peace, justice, and strong institutions.

    Member of Parliament for the Atebubu-Amantin constituency Hon. Sanja Nanja urged the Chief Justice to revamp the Legal Aid outfit in the municipality to facilitate easy access to justice for the less privileged.

    Atebubu-Amantin Municipal Chief Executive Hon. Edward Owusu expressed joy on this significant day, highlighting the previous inconvenience faced by residents who had to travel to Wenchi or Sunyani for high court services. He urged citizens to resort to the law courts for dispute resolution and encouraged court staff to honor their appointments.

    Delegations from the Atebubu and Amantin traditional councils, led by Nana Kwabena Kyere III and Barima Osei Poku, graced the occasion. The event was chaired by The Bassamanhene Nana Owusu Sakyi III, who also serves as the Vice President of the Bono East Regional House of Chiefs.

  • Pastor jailed 519 years for defrauding over 100 people

    Pastor jailed 519 years for defrauding over 100 people

    The Accra Accra High Court has sentenced the Chief Executive Officer of erstwhile Career Link Marketers Company Limited, Reverend Edward to 519 years imprisonment.

    According to a report by the Chronicle newspaper, Reverend Buabeng was handed the sentence on Monday, January 16, 2023 after being found guilty on 173 counts of conspiracy to commit a crime and defrauding by false pretenses.

    The ruling by the court presided over by Evelyn Asamoah brought an end to three years of trial where 12 witnesses testified against the reverend minister.

    The convict, Reverend Asamoah will serve 8 years of each of the 173 accounts with the sentences running concurrently.

    Particulars of the case

    According to the Chronicle, the complainants in the case are a husband and wife, John Osei-Kumi who is a marketer, and Brenda Adolphine, a banker.

    The facts of the case presented by the state prosecutor, Chief Inspector Benneh show that the complainants who are residents of Dansoman invested an amount of $7,000 jointly into the company of Reverend Buabeng who was operating some form of a Ponzi scheme.

    On her own, Brenda Adolphine Amoah invested $6,000 with the expectation of gaining 40% in interest for a period of three months.

    But when the investments which were made in July 2018 were due for the complainants to enjoy their benefits, the convict failed to honor his obligation to his clients.

    After failed attempts to get their monies, the couple lodged a complaint with the Dansoman Police where it turned out that over 100 complaints had been filed about the same Reverend Buabeng.

    Police investigations revealed that Reverend Buabeng went into hiding after all the complainants made an investment of about GH¢1,193,136 and US$185,408.00 into his company.

    He was subsequently arrested.

    The prosecutor informed the court that Reverend Buabeng admitted to defrauding the complainants but offered to refund the monies as his firm had the resources to do so.

    An agreement was reached and payment arrangements were made but Reverend Buabeng failed to honor the terms of the agreement which led to his re-arrest and trial.

    He was found guilty of all the charges leveled against him and the judge handed him the sentence.

    His wife whose name the report gives as Mrs. Asamoah was along with the second accused Wilfred Brown acquitted and discharged.

    Meanwhile, a bench warrant has been issued for the third accused, Aubrey des-Bodes Mends who is said to have jumped bail.