TIG Post

Tag: anti-LGBTQ Bill

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill: No country can tell us how to live by our values – Sam George

    Anti-LGBTQ bill: No country can tell us how to live by our values – Sam George

    The Minister for Communication, Digital Technology and Innovations, Sam Nartey George, has warned foreign countries against interfering in Ghana’s internal affairs, particularly regarding the controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly known as the anti-LGBTQ bill.


    Speaking to the BBC on Thursday, February 12, Sam George who doubles as the Ningo-Prampram Member of Parliament (MP) noted that Ghana has the sovereign right to decide on same-sex issues without external influence.


    “So Ghana is a sovereign country. If we choose to go the other way, I don’t think that is against the law. If in the UK it is okay for you to withdraw the teaching licence and medical licence of Christians who don’t believe they should support same-sex activity, why should Ghana not also be in a position to say that we will do this?,” he added.


    The bill, which was originally introduced in Parliament in 2021 by Sam George and other advocates, is currently inactive, because it did not receive Presidential assent under former President Nana Akufo-Addo’s tenure after being passed by the then Parliament.


    Having expired with the conclusion of the previous 8th Parliament’s session, the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has directed the Business Committee to schedule the reintroduced bill for parliamentary deliberation.

    The bill, which aims to outlaw LGBTQ+ activities and criminalise their promotion, advocacy, and funding, was previously passed by the 8th Parliament.


    Meanwhile, President John Dramani Mahama has confidently stated that he will sign anti-LGBTQ bill once it is successfully approved by parliament.


    During a courtesy visit by the Christian Council of Ghana on Tuesday, November 18, at Jubilee House, the president mentioned all the factors that must come to play for him to assent to the bill.


    “I believe that we have no questions or equivocations about what we believe. I believe that we are completely aligned with the Christian Council in terms of your belief. We agree with the Speaker to relay the bill and let Parliament debate it.”


    “And if there are any amendments or adjustments that need to be made, if the people’s representatives in Parliament endorse the bill, vote on it, and pass it, and it comes to me as president, I will sign it,” President Mahama said.


    Before his return to office, President Mahama had already expressed a cautious approach toward the bill, emphasizing the need for a constitutional review.


    Speaking with BBC Africa on December 4, he elaborated: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”


    When asked if he would sign the bill into law if elected, Mahama responded cautiously, stating, “It depends on what is in the Bill.” He emphasized that any decision would be based on a thorough examination of the bill’s content and legal compliance. “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.


    While proponents argue the bill is necessary to safeguard Ghanaian cultural and moral values from external influences, human rights advocates have raised concerns, stating it infringes on freedoms of expression, association, and equality under the law.


    The bill previously faced legal opposition from journalist Richard Dela Sky and academic Dr. Amanda Odoi, who contested its passage, citing a lack of parliamentary quorum.

    The Supreme Court, however, dismissed their challenge, with Justice Lovelace Johnson clarifying that a bill can only be subject to constitutional scrutiny after receiving presidential assent.

  • “I will sign it” – President Mahama as he awaits parliamentary approval on anti-LGBTQ bill

    “I will sign it” – President Mahama as he awaits parliamentary approval on anti-LGBTQ bill

    President John Dramani Mahama has confidently stated that he will sign anti-LGBTQ bill once it is successfully approved by parliament.

    During a courtesy visit by the Christian Council of Ghana on Tuesday, November 18, at Jubilee House, the president mentioned all the factors that must come to play for him to assent to the bill.

    “I believe that we have no questions or equivocations about what we believe. I believe that we are completely aligned with the Christian Council in terms of your belief. We agree with the Speaker to relay the bill and let Parliament debate it.”

    “And if there are any amendments or adjustments that need to be made, if the people’s representatives in Parliament endorse the bill, vote on it, and pass it, and it comes to me as president, I will sign it,” President Mahama said.

    The controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the anti-LGBTQ bill, has been reintroduced in Parliament, according to Assin South MP, Reverend John Ntim Fordjour.

    In an interview with The Independent Ghana on Thursday, February 27, Ntim Fordjour urged President John Dramani Mahama to sign the bill into law if Parliament approves it again.

    He emphasized that the legislation reflects Ghanaian cultural values and called for swift action to ensure its implementation.

    The bill, which aims to outlaw LGBTQ+ activities and criminalize their promotion, advocacy, and funding, was previously passed by the 8th Parliament. However, it did not receive Presidential assent under former President Nana Akufo-Addo’s tenure.

    President John Dramani Mahama has declared that the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, formally known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, is no longer active, as it expired with the previous Parliament’s session.

    Speaking during a meeting with clergy, Mahama clarified the bill’s current status, explaining, “As far as I know, the bill did not get to the President for assent. And so the convention is that all bills that are not assented to before the expiration of the life of Parliament expired, and so that Bill is effectively dead, it has expired.”

    He underscored the importance of reinitiating discussions on the bill, suggesting a collaborative review process. “I do think that we should have a conversation on it again, so that all of us, if we decide to move that bill forward, moving forward with a consensus,” Mahama stated.

    Proposing a shift in the bill’s sponsorship, the former president argued that it should no longer be introduced as a private member’s bill but rather receive formal government backing. “I don’t know what the promoters of the bill want to do, but we should have a conversation about it again… probably it shouldn’t be a private members bill. It should be a government bill with government behind it after consultation with all the stakeholders to see how to move this forward,” he noted.

    Before his return to office, Mahama had already expressed a cautious approach toward the bill, emphasizing the need for a constitutional review. Speaking with BBC Africa on December 4, he elaborated: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”

    When asked if he would sign the bill into law if elected, Mahama responded cautiously, stating, “It depends on what is in the Bill.” He emphasized that any decision would be based on a thorough examination of the bill’s content and legal compliance. “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.

    The non-existent Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill sought to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities, including the promotion and funding of related advocacy efforts. If reintroduced and passed, the bill would impose sanctions on individuals and organizations supporting LGBTQ+ causes.

    While proponents argue the bill is necessary to safeguard Ghanaian cultural and moral values from external influences, human rights advocates have raised concerns, stating it infringes on freedoms of expression, association, and equality under the law.

    The bill previously faced legal opposition from journalist Richard Dela Sky and academic Dr. Amanda Odoi, who contested its passage, citing a lack of parliamentary quorum. The Supreme Court, however, dismissed their challenge, with Justice Lovelace Johnson clarifying that a bill can only be subject to constitutional scrutiny after receiving presidential assent.

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill has been reintroduced, Mahama must sign it – Assin South MP

    Anti-LGBTQ bill has been reintroduced, Mahama must sign it – Assin South MP

    The controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the anti-LGBTQ bill, has been reintroduced in Parliament, according to Assin South MP, Reverend John Ntim Fordjour.

    In an interview with The Independent Ghana on Thursday, February 27, Ntim Fordjour urged President John Dramani Mahama to sign the bill into law if Parliament approves it again.

    He emphasized that the legislation reflects Ghanaian cultural values and called for swift action to ensure its implementation.

    The bill, which aims to outlaw LGBTQ+ activities and criminalize their promotion, advocacy, and funding, was previously passed by the 8th Parliament. However, it did not receive Presidential assent under former President Nana Akufo-Addo’s tenure.

    Below is his engagement with The Independent Ghana.

    President John Dramani Mahama has declared that the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, formally known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, is no longer active, as it expired with the previous Parliament’s session.

    Speaking during a meeting with clergy, Mahama clarified the bill’s current status, explaining, “As far as I know, the bill did not get to the President for assent. And so the convention is that all bills that are not assented to before the expiration of the life of Parliament expired, and so that Bill is effectively dead, it has expired.”

    He underscored the importance of reinitiating discussions on the bill, suggesting a collaborative review process. “I do think that we should have a conversation on it again, so that all of us, if we decide to move that bill forward, moving forward with a consensus,” Mahama stated.

    Proposing a shift in the bill’s sponsorship, the former president argued that it should no longer be introduced as a private member’s bill but rather receive formal government backing. “I don’t know what the promoters of the bill want to do, but we should have a conversation about it again… probably it shouldn’t be a private members bill. It should be a government bill with government behind it after consultation with all the stakeholders to see how to move this forward,” he noted.

    Before his return to office, Mahama had already expressed a cautious approach toward the bill, emphasizing the need for a constitutional review. Speaking with BBC Africa on December 4, he elaborated: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”

    When asked if he would sign the bill into law if elected, Mahama responded cautiously, stating, “It depends on what is in the Bill.” He emphasized that any decision would be based on a thorough examination of the bill’s content and legal compliance. “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.

    The non-existent Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill sought to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities, including the promotion and funding of related advocacy efforts. If reintroduced and passed, the bill would impose sanctions on individuals and organizations supporting LGBTQ+ causes.

    While proponents argue the bill is necessary to safeguard Ghanaian cultural and moral values from external influences, human rights advocates have raised concerns, stating it infringes on freedoms of expression, association, and equality under the law.

    The bill previously faced legal opposition from journalist Richard Dela Sky and academic Dr. Amanda Odoi, who contested its passage, citing a lack of parliamentary quorum. The Supreme Court, however, dismissed their challenge, with Justice Lovelace Johnson clarifying that a bill can only be subject to constitutional scrutiny after receiving presidential assent.

  • Anti-LGBTQ Bill is currently dead, expired – Mahama

    Anti-LGBTQ Bill is currently dead, expired – Mahama

    President John Dramani Mahama has declared that the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, formally known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, is no longer active, as it expired with the previous Parliament’s session.

    Speaking during a meeting with clergy, Mahama clarified the bill’s current status, explaining, “As far as I know, the bill did not get to the President for assent. And so the convention is that all bills that are not assented to before the expiration of the life of Parliament expired, and so that Bill is effectively dead, it has expired.”

    He underscored the importance of reinitiating discussions on the bill, suggesting a collaborative review process. “I do think that we should have a conversation on it again, so that all of us, if we decide to move that bill forward, moving forward with a consensus,” Mahama stated.

    Proposing a shift in the bill’s sponsorship, the former president argued that it should no longer be introduced as a private member’s bill but rather receive formal government backing. “I don’t know what the promoters of the bill want to do, but we should have a conversation about it again… probably it shouldn’t be a private members bill. It should be a government bill with government behind it after consultation with all the stakeholders to see how to move this forward,” he noted.

    Before his return to office, Mahama had already expressed a cautious approach toward the bill, emphasizing the need for a constitutional review. Speaking with BBC Africa on December 4, he elaborated: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”

    When asked if he would sign the bill into law if elected, Mahama responded cautiously, stating, “It depends on what is in the Bill.” He emphasized that any decision would be based on a thorough examination of the bill’s content and legal compliance. “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.

    The proposed Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill seeks to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities, including the promotion and funding of related advocacy efforts. If reintroduced and passed, the bill would impose sanctions on individuals and organizations supporting LGBTQ+ causes.

    While proponents argue the bill is necessary to safeguard Ghanaian cultural and moral values from external influences, human rights advocates have raised concerns, stating it infringes on freedoms of expression, association, and equality under the law.

    The bill previously faced legal opposition from journalist Richard Dela Sky and academic Dr. Amanda Odoi, who contested its passage, citing a lack of parliamentary quorum. The Supreme Court, however, dismissed their challenge, with Justice Lovelace Johnson clarifying that a bill can only be subject to constitutional scrutiny after receiving presidential assent.

    Meanwhile, Ningo-Prampram MP Sam Nartey George has reaffirmed that Mahama would have no alternative but to approve the bill if elected president. “That is a misconception that has been put out. I listened to that interview. President Mahama has been clear that he will sign that bill and he has no option than to sign that bill,” George said in a recent media briefing.

    Tamale South MP Haruna Iddrisu has also announced plans to present personal recommendations on the bill to Mahama. While keeping the details of his suggestions private, he expressed optimism that his inputs would help shape the bill while aligning with the national interest and constitutional standards.

    “I have some ideas on the LGBTQ but I am yet to share them with the president as to how he can re-own the bill, get national consensus around it, and be consistent with the laws of Ghana and the constitution,” Iddrisu stated at the National Muslim Prayer and Thanksgiving event on January 10, 2025.

    “There is a way to deal with it. Commenting here will mean that I am reducing it to a religious matter, but indeed it is a social problem of our country that collectively we have to deal with and solve,” he added.

    https://twitter.com/Citi973/status/1879094083722907659

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill should be reintroduced as a government-sponsored initiative – Mahama

    Anti-LGBTQ bill should be reintroduced as a government-sponsored initiative – Mahama

    President John Dramani Mahama has expressed his desire for the reintroduction of the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, officially known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, as a government-sponsored initiative rather than a private member’s bill.

    Addressing a gathering of clergymen, President Mahama clarified the bill’s current status, stating, “As far as I know, the bill did not get to the President for assent. And so the convention is that all bills that are not assented to before the expiration of the life of Parliament expired, and so that Bill is effectively dead, it has expired.”

    Mahama stressed the importance of national consensus in revisiting the bill, emphasizing a collaborative approach. He remarked, “I do think that we should have a conversation on it again, so that all of us, if we decide to move that bill forward, [we do so] with a consensus.”

    The former president further proposed that the bill be reintroduced with formal government backing following stakeholder consultations. “I don’t know what the promoters of the bill want to do, but we should have a conversation about it again… probably it shouldn’t be a private members bill. It should be a government bill with government behind it after consultation with all the stakeholders to see how to move this forward,” he explained.

    Before his inauguration, Mahama had previously maintained that his decision on the bill would be guided by a detailed constitutional review. Speaking in an interview with BBC Africa on December 4, he clarified: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”

    When questioned whether he would sign the bill into law if elected, Mahama responded, “It depends on what is in the Bill.” He reiterated that he would have scrutinized the bill thoroughly with advisory bodies before making a final decision. “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.

    The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill seeks to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities, including advocacy, promotion, and financial support for related causes. If passed, it would introduce punitive measures against individuals and organizations involved in such activities.

    Supporters of the bill argue it is necessary to uphold Ghanaian cultural and moral values against external influences. However, human rights organizations oppose the bill, citing concerns about the violation of fundamental freedoms, including expression, association, and equality.

    The bill previously faced legal challenges from journalist Richard Dela Sky and Dr. Amanda Odoi, who argued that it lacked the required parliamentary quorum during its passage. However, the Supreme Court dismissed the challenges, with Justice Lovelace Johnson clarifying that a bill can only face constitutional scrutiny after receiving presidential assent.

    Meanwhile, Ningo-Prampram MP Sam Nartey George has asserted that President Mahama would have no choice but to sign the bill into law if he assumes office. “That is a misconception that has been put out. I listened to that interview. President Mahama has been clear that he will sign that bill and he has no option than to sign that bill,” Sam George stated during a media interaction.

    Tamale South MP Haruna Iddrisu has also indicated plans to present recommendations to President Mahama on the bill. Though he withheld details, he expressed confidence that his suggestions would balance national values with constitutional alignment.

    “I have some ideas on the LGBTQ but I am yet to share them with the president as to how he can re-own the bill, get national consensus around it, and be consistent with the laws of Ghana and the constitution,” Iddrisu stated at the National Muslim Prayer and Thanksgiving event on January 10, 2025.

    “There is a way to deal with it. Commenting here will mean that I am reducing it to a religious matter, but indeed it is a social problem of our country that collectively we have to deal with and solve,” he added.

    https://twitter.com/Citi973/status/1879094083722907659

  • I will submit recommendations on anti-LGBTQ Bill to Mahama – Haruna Iddrisu

    I will submit recommendations on anti-LGBTQ Bill to Mahama – Haruna Iddrisu

    Tamale South Member of Parliament, Haruna Iddrisu, has announced his intention to submit recommendations regarding the controversial anti-LGBTQ Bill to President John Mahama.

    Though he withheld specifics of his proposed suggestions, the legislator expressed confidence that his recommendations would align with national interests and help shape the bill appropriately.

    Speaking ahead of the National Muslim Prayer and Thanksgiving event at the National Mosque on Friday, January 10, 2025, Haruna Iddrisu said:

    “I have some ideas on the LGBTQ but I am yet to share them with the president as to how he can re-own the bill, get national consensus around it and be consistent with the laws of Ghana and the constitution.

    “There is a way to deal with it. Commenting here will mean that I am reducing it to a religious matter, but indeed it is a social problem of our country that collectively we have to deal with and solve,” he stated.

    The controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill seeks to criminalize activities related to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI) advocacy. If passed, it would impose penalties on individuals promoting or funding LGBTQI-related activities, including indirect support.

    Proponents of the bill argue that it is essential to safeguard Ghanaian cultural and family values from foreign influences, while critics, including human rights groups, contend that the bill violates fundamental rights such as freedom of expression, association, and equality under the law.

    The bill faced legal challenges at the Supreme Court from journalist Richard Dela Sky and Dr. Amanda Odoi, who argued that it failed to meet constitutional quorum requirements under Articles 102 and 104 during its legislative process, rendering its passage unconstitutional.

    However, the Supreme Court dismissed the petitions, stating that the bill had not yet become law. Justice Lovelace Johnson emphasized that a bill must receive presidential assent before it can be subjected to constitutional review.

    Prior to being declared president, Mahama indicated that his decision to assent to the “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill,” commonly known as the Anti-LGBTQI+ Bill, would depend on a thorough review to ensure its provisions do not violate the Constitution.

    In an interview with BBC Africa on Wednesday, December 4, Mahama clarified: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”

    When asked if he would sign the bill into law if elected president, Mahama responded: “It depends on what is in the Bill.” He emphasized that if he had been president at the time the bill was passed, he would have ensured a detailed examination of its provisions and consulted relevant advisory bodies.

    “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.

    Meanwhile, Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampram, Sam Nartey George, has strongly stated that John Dramani Mahama, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Presidential Candidate, will have no choice but to sign the controversial anti-LGBTQI bill if he becomes president.

    “That is a misconception that has been put out. I listened to that interview. President Mahama has been clear that he will sign that bill and he has no option than to sign that bill,” Sam George said while speaking to the media.

  • Mahama will have no option than to sign anti-LGBTQ bill – Sam George

    Mahama will have no option than to sign anti-LGBTQ bill – Sam George

    Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampram, Sam Nartey George, has strongly stated that John Dramani Mahama, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Presidential Candidate, will have no choice but to sign the controversial anti-LGBTQI bill if he becomes president.

    “That is a misconception that has been put out. I listened to that interview. President Mahama has been clear that he will sign that bill and he has no option than to sign that bill,” Sam George said while speaking to the media.

    He added, “President Mahama will know no peace from Sam George until he signs that bill”.

    Mahama’s statement on the bill has stirred debate after he indicated that his decision to assent to the “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill,” commonly known as the Anti-LGBTQI+ Bill, would depend on a thorough review to ensure its provisions do not violate the Constitution.

    https://twitter.com/citi973/status/1865428937532215392?s=46

    In an interview with BBC Africa on Wednesday, December 4, Mahama clarified: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”

    When asked if he would sign the bill into law if elected president, Mahama responded: “It depends on what is in the Bill.” He emphasized that if he had been president at the time the bill was passed, he would have ensured a detailed examination of its provisions and consulted relevant advisory bodies.

    “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.

    The bill, which seeks to impose criminal penalties on individuals engaging in or promoting LGBTQI+ activities, was passed by Parliament in February 2024. However, its transmission to the President for assent has been stalled due to lawsuits challenging its legality.

    In March, the Office of the President formally requested Parliament to halt the transmission of the bill, citing pending legal challenges. The Attorney-General also advised President Akufo-Addo against taking action on the bill until the Supreme Court addresses the concerns raised in the lawsuits.

    The bill has drawn strong opposition from figures such as journalist Richard Dela Sky, gender activist Dr. Amanda Odoi, and law lecturer Prince Obiri-Korang, who argue that it infringes on individual rights and freedoms.

    https://twitter.com/citi973/status/1865428937532215392?s=46

  • I’ll sign Family Values Bill if its content isn’t unconstitutional – Mahama

    I’ll sign Family Values Bill if its content isn’t unconstitutional – Mahama

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) Presidential Candidate, John Dramani Mahama, has indicated that his decision to assent to the controversial anti-LGBTQI bill, formally titled the “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill,” will hinge on a thorough review to ensure its provisions do not violate the Constitution.

    In an interview with BBC Africa on Wednesday, December 4, Mahama stated: “It is not an anti-LGBTQI Bill; it is a Family Values Bill. It was approved unanimously by our Parliament. [LGBTQI] is against our African culture, it is against our religious faith, but I think we must look at the Bill, and the president must indicate what he finds wrong with that bill and send it back to Parliament or alternatively he must send it to the Council of State and get the Council of State’s advice.”

    When asked whether he would sign the bill into law if elected president, Mahama responded: “It depends on what is in the Bill.”

    He added that if he had been president at the time the bill was passed by Parliament, he would have ensured a detailed examination of its provisions and consulted relevant advisory bodies.

    “That is what I would have done,” he affirmed.

    The “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill,” commonly referred to as the Anti-LGBTQI+ Bill, seeks to impose criminal penalties on individuals engaging in or promoting LGBTQI+ activities. While Parliament passed the bill in February 2024, lawsuits challenging its legality have stalled its transmission to the President for assent.

    In March, the Office of the President formally requested Parliament to halt the transmission of the bill, citing two pending applications for interlocutory injunctions before the Supreme Court. A letter signed by Nana Asante Bediatuo, Secretary to the President, emphasized that it would be inappropriate for any action to be taken until the legal challenges were resolved.

    The Attorney-General also advised President Akufo-Addo against taking action on the bill until the Supreme Court addresses the concerns raised in the lawsuits.

    The bill has faced opposition from journalist Richard Dela Sky, gender activist Dr. Amanda Odoi, and law lecturer Prince Obiri-Korang, who argue that the legislation infringes on individual rights and freedoms.

    The Judicial Service of Ghana clarified in September that procedural requirements in these cases remain incomplete. A statement noted that both Parliament and the Attorney-General had failed to file necessary documents in the cases brought before the Supreme Court, causing significant delays.

    Public pressure to advance the bill has grown, with hundreds of demonstrators taking to the streets on October 8, demanding its immediate approval. Organized by proponents of the bill, the protest drew activists, community leaders, and citizens urging expedited judicial proceedings.

    Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin has also intensified calls for the President to act. At a media briefing on November 7, Bagbin said, “I have earlier instructed the Clerk of Parliament to transmit the anti-LGBTQ+ bill to the President for assent.”

  • Hypocrisy! – Sister Debby’s comment to Asiedu Nketia over anti-LGBTQ bill

    Hypocrisy! – Sister Debby’s comment to Asiedu Nketia over anti-LGBTQ bill

    Ghanaian socialite, Debora Vanessa, better known as Sister Debby, has voiced her displeasure with the National Chairman of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Asiedu Nketiah, following his recent remarks about the legalization of the anti-LGBTQ bill.

    In a post on X on November 13, 2024, Sister Debby accused Asiedu Nketiah of hypocrisy for criticizing President Akufo-Addo’s decision not to sign the bill into law.

    To back up her claim, Sister Debby referenced an incident from Asiedu Nketiah’s 2015 visit to Germany, where he wore a women’s fur coat during an official trip.

    She pointed out that Asiedu Nketiah wore women’s attire at the time, yet now believes he has the moral authority to denounce LGBTQ+ activities.

    “A Ghanaian man who in 2015 wore a women’s coat during an official visit to Germany wants an anti-LGBTQ bill that will jail people for cross-dressing to become law. Hypocrisy!” she posted on X.

    Background

    At a recent NDC campaign rally in Kumasi, Asiedu Nketiah criticized President Akufo-Addo for delaying the signing of the anti-LGBTQI bill.

    The National Chairman of the NDC emphasized that religious leaders in Ghana, including Muslims, have voiced strong opposition to homosexuality, adding that the NDC introduced the bill to address these concerns.

    “The NDC has shown its disapproval of homosexuality in the country, which is why we introduced a bill against it. Even Muslims and other religious leaders are fighting against LGBTQ. But Akufo-Addo has refused to sign the bill,” he said.

    Three years ago, a group of Members of Parliament, spearheaded by Sam George, the MP for Ningo-Prampram, presented the anti-LGBTQ+ bill. After much debate, the bill failed to receive the necessary approval from President Akufo-Addo.

    Currently, the bill remains a point of contention, as it has been referred to the Supreme Court for further review.

    Watch the video below:

    https://twitter.com/deborahvanessa7/status/1856648023033455000

  • Bagbin presses Akufo-Addo to sign anti-LGBTQ bill as Parliament resumes

    Bagbin presses Akufo-Addo to sign anti-LGBTQ bill as Parliament resumes

    Speaker Alban Bagbin has intensified pressure on President Akufo-Addo to sign the Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, also known as the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, into law.

    Speaking at a media briefing ahead of Parliament’s upcoming session on November 7, Bagbin said, “I have earlier instructed the Clerk of Parliament to transmit the anti-LGBTQ+ bill to the President for assent.”

    Alban Bagbin voiced strong criticism against both President Nana Akufo-Addo and the Judiciary, accusing them of constitutional violations concerning the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    The Office of the President in March officially requested Parliament to refrain from transmitting the Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values, commonly referred to as the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, to President Akufo-Addo for his assent.

    In a letter addressed to Parliament on March 18, and signed by the Secretary to the President, Nana Asante Bediatuo, the request was made in light of two pending applications for an order of interlocutory injunction currently before the Supreme Court.

    The letter emphasised that it would be improper for Parliament to proceed with transmitting the Bill to President Akufo-Addo for any action until the matters before the court are addressed.

    Furthermore, it was disclosed that the Attorney-General has advised the President against taking any action regarding the Bill until the issues raised by the ongoing legal suits are resolved by the Supreme Court.

    In his address today, Bagbin alleged that the President and the Judiciary have undermined Parliament’s authority by stalling the bill’s progress, despite it being duly passed by the legislative body.

    Bagbin claimed that both institutions had “sinned against the constitution” and emphasized that they “must seek the opportunity to confess and repent to be forgiven.”

    The Anti-LGBTQ+ bill, formally known as the “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill,” proposes criminal penalties for individuals engaging in or promoting LGBTQ+ activities. Parliament passed the bill in February, but subsequent lawsuits have prevented it from reaching the President for assent. Among the legal challenges are cases filed by journalist Richard Dela Sky, gender activist Dr. Amanda Odoi, and law lecturer Prince Obiri-Korang, each raising concerns about the bill’s impact on individual rights and freedoms.

    The Judicial Service of Ghana has addressed these delays, clarifying that procedural requirements are yet to be fulfilled in the two Supreme Court cases. A statement from the Judicial Service on September 13, 2024, noted that “essential procedural requirements are yet to be fulfilled by the parties involved,” and outlined that key defendants, including Parliament and the Attorney General, have not completed necessary filings.

    In Sky’s case, initiated in March, both Parliament and the Attorney General had reportedly not submitted their Statements of Case by July 31, 2024, just before the Court’s recess. In Odoi’s case, which dates back to June 2023, the Attorney General has yet to submit the required documentation, contributing to further delays.

    Hundreds of demonstrators flooded the streets on Tuesday, October 8, demanding swift judicial action and the immediate assent of the anti-LGBTQ bill, formally known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Act, 2024.

    The protest, organised by proponents of the controversial bill, saw a diverse group of participants, including activists, community leaders, and concerned citizens, rallying for the acceleration of legal proceedings that have stalled the bill’s final approval.

  • Akufo-Addo, Judiciary have sinned against the constitution – Speaker Bagbin on anti-LGBTQ bill

    Akufo-Addo, Judiciary have sinned against the constitution – Speaker Bagbin on anti-LGBTQ bill

    Speaker of Parliament Alban BagbinAlban Bagbin re-elected as CoSPAL Chair has voiced strong criticism against both President Nana Akufo-Addo and the Judiciary, accusing them of constitutional violations concerning the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Speaking at a media briefing ahead of Parliament’s upcoming session on November 7, Bagbin alleged that the President and the Judiciary have undermined Parliament’s authority by stalling the bill’s progress, despite it being duly passed by the legislative body.

    Bagbin claimed that both institutions had “sinned against the constitution” and emphasized that they “must seek the opportunity to confess and repent to be forgiven.”

    His remarks come amid delays that have stalled the bill’s enactment, with the President declining to receive the bill due to ongoing legal challenges.

    “The courts are replete with debates and proceedings of Parliament,” Bagbin said, adding that it is concerning that some of these cases have been initiated by Members of Parliament (MPs) themselves. “Most worrying is these proceedings are initiated by some Members of Parliament—even leaders of Parliament—who are to know better,” he noted, expressing frustration that MPs, who should be “loyal to Parliament,” frequently turn to the Supreme Court “to undermine Parliament.”

    Citing the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill as a prime example, Bagbin criticized President Akufo-Addo’s refusal to accept the bill. According to him, the President’s stance reflects “disdain” for Parliament’s work, a sentiment that he believes is further enabled by the Judiciary’s decision to process related lawsuits filed by activists.

    The Anti-LGBTQ+ bill, formally known as the “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill,” proposes criminal penalties for individuals engaging in or promoting LGBTQ+ activities. Parliament passed the bill in February, but subsequent lawsuits have prevented it from reaching the President for assent. Among the legal challenges are cases filed by journalist Richard Dela Sky, gender activist Dr. Amanda Odoi, and law lecturer Prince Obiri-Korang, each raising concerns about the bill’s impact on individual rights and freedoms.

    The Judicial Service of Ghana has addressed these delays, clarifying that procedural requirements are yet to be fulfilled in the two Supreme Court cases. A statement from the Judicial Service on September 13, 2024, noted that “essential procedural requirements are yet to be fulfilled by the parties involved,” and outlined that key defendants, including Parliament and the Attorney General, have not completed necessary filings.

    In Sky’s case, initiated in March, both Parliament and the Attorney General had reportedly not submitted their Statements of Case by July 31, 2024, just before the Court’s recess. In Odoi’s case, which dates back to June 2023, the Attorney General has yet to submit the required documentation, contributing to further delays.

  • Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill cases still not qualified for court review – Judicial Service

    Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill cases still not qualified for court review – Judicial Service

    The Judicial Service of Ghana (JSG) has announced that the cases related to the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and the Ghanaian Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, are not yet ready to be heard by the Supreme Court.

    These cases involve Richard Sky, Amanda Odoi, and Rockson-Nelson Etse K. Dafeamekpor. In a statement shared with Citi News on Tuesday, the JSG indicated that, as of October 3 to 7, 2024, the defendants had not submitted any statements of the case.

    Furthermore, the JSG noted that there were no individual or joint memoranda of issues filed for consideration.

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill demo sees hundreds hit the street for expedited court case

    Anti-LGBTQ bill demo sees hundreds hit the street for expedited court case

    Hundreds of demonstrators flooded the streets on Tuesday, October 8, demanding swift judicial action and the immediate assent of the anti-LGBTQ bill, formally known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Act, 2024.

    The protest, organized by proponents of the controversial bill, saw a diverse group of participants, including activists, community leaders, and concerned citizens, rallying for the acceleration of legal proceedings that have stalled the bill’s final approval.

    Protesters expressed frustration over the prolonged delay in finalizing the bill, which Parliament passed on February 28, 2024, but has yet to be signed into law by President Nana Akufo-Addo. The delays have been exacerbated by a Supreme Court ruling in July, which deferred judgments on related legal challenges until all ongoing legal matters are addressed.

    “We are urging the Chief Justice to make a ruling on the injunction against the bill’s passage. As Ghanaians, we do not support LGBTQ+,” declared Rita Naa Odoley Sowah, MP for La Dade Kotopon, one of the vocal supporters at the demonstration.

    Similarly, Papa Wuli, Chairman of the Concerned Drivers Association of Ghana, reiterated the group’s strong opposition to LGBTQ+ activities, calling them taboo in Ghanaian society. “We call on President Akufo-Addo to assent to the bill without delay,” he stated, echoing the sentiments of many at the protest.

    The demonstration also highlighted the lead advocate of the bill, Samuel Nartey George, MP for Ningo-Prampram, who criticized the judicial delays.

    Speaking on Citi FM’s Eyewitness News on Monday, George emphasized that the Chief Justice has the authority to expedite the resolution of the legal challenges. He argued that justice delayed is justice denied, calling for urgent action to bring the bill into law.

    The bill, which criminalizes LGBTQ+ activities, as well as the promotion and financial support of such actions, has sparked intense national debate. If enacted, individuals found guilty could face imprisonment ranging from six months to five years, depending on the severity of the offense.

    Despite its passage in Parliament, legal battles from activists, including lawsuits from private lawyer Richard Dela Sky, gender activist Dr. Amanda Odoi, and law lecturer Prince Obiri-Korang, have further complicated the bill’s future, leaving its fate in the hands of Ghana’s judiciary.

    The Judicial Service of Ghana has clarified the delays in two Supreme Court cases concerning the Anti-LGBTQ Bill, stating that essential procedural requirements are yet to be fulfilled by the parties involved.

    In a statement issued on September 13, 2024, the Judicial Service explained that both cases—one filed by journalist Richard Sky and another by Dr. Amanda Odoi—have been delayed because key defendants, including Parliament and the Attorney General, have not completed the necessary legal filings.

    These filings are crucial for the next steps in the court proceedings, particularly the submission of a Memorandum of Issues, which must be done before the Supreme Court can schedule a hearing.

    For Richard Sky’s case, which was initiated on March 5, 2024, the Judicial Service noted that both Parliament and the Attorney General had not submitted their Statements of Case as of July 31, 2024, when the Court went on recess.

    Similarly, in Dr. Odoi’s case, filed in June 2023, while Parliament has submitted its statement, the Attorney General has yet to provide the required document, further contributing to the delay.

    The Judicial Service emphasized that the cases cannot move forward until all the necessary documentation has been filed. It reassured the public that the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, and High Court registries remain open during the legal vacation and that the courts are ready to hear any matter that is prepared for adjudication.

  • Bawumia prepared to sign anti-LGBTQ bill if it is correctly drafted – Kojo Oppong Nkrumah

    Bawumia prepared to sign anti-LGBTQ bill if it is correctly drafted – Kojo Oppong Nkrumah

    New Patriotic Party (NPP) flagbearer, Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia, will not hesitate to sign the anti-LGBTQ bill into law, provided there are no legal obstacles, according to Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, Vice Chair of the Party’s Manifesto Committee.

    Speaking on Joy News’ PM Express on Monday, Oppong Nkrumah stated that Dr. Bawumia has made it clear that he opposes LGBTQ activities and will not support any efforts to normalize or legalize them in Ghana.

    The Housing Minister also noted that the bill is currently under legal review to ensure it adhered to the correct legislative procedures before its passage.

    “It’s being litigated, and I’m not going to make a pronouncement on the legality of that bill, but he has said clearly that he will protect Ghanaian family and cultural values.

    He does not support all these LGBT things that some people are trying to promote. He’s totally against it,” he stated.

    In May this year, Dr. Bawumia reaffirmed his stance, making it clear that LGBTQ activities would not be tolerated in Ghana if he is elected president.

    “On this matter of LGBTQ, I want to say again without any equivocation that we will not allow it in Ghana. It is not going to be allowed. Our Bible says no, our Quran says no, and our people say no. So no. That is the answer,” he declared.


    “No man will be marrying a man, no woman will be marrying a woman. It is not our value. And I will stand firm no matter the consequences. We will safeguard our country, and we will safeguard our people,” he added.

    Meanwhile, Ho West MP Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzrah has challenged Dr Bawumia to compel President Akufo-Addo to sign the bill into law now, arguing that Bawumia, as Vice President, should influence the president to act.

    “If he is man enough to rule this country, he should be able to tell his boss, ‘Look, my boss, this is our cultural value, please sign this bill,’” the MP said on Joy FM’s Top Story.

    On the other hand, Ofoase Ayirebi MP Kojo Oppong Nkrumah expressed a different view, asserting that

    “If a bill properly constructed has gone through the processes and is legally laid before him unless there’s something fatally wrong with the bill, he will pass it into law,” Mr Oppong Nkrumah stated.

    He further explained that the current bill is being contested because “There was a decision that had to be made by the Speaker of Parliament whether or not that bill will impose a charge on the public purse.

    “Those who have sued are arguing among other things that the Speaker did not make that determination, and, therefore, could not have admitted it properly as a private member’s bill for it to be passed.

    That is one of the fatalities they are complaining about,” he clarified.

  • Sponsors of anti-LGBTQ bill to protest on Aug. 21

    Sponsors of anti-LGBTQ bill to protest on Aug. 21

    Proponents of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill also known as the anti-LGBTQ bill have announced their decision to protest on August 21, 2024, over the Supreme Court’s delay in ruling on the injunction applications against the transmission of the bill to President Nana Akufo-Addo.

    Ningo-Prampram Member of Parliament, Sam Nartey George, made this known when expressed displeasure with Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkornoo, presiding over a five-member panel hearing the case.

    According to him, the matter should have been dealt with already but the Chief Justice keeps prolonging the case.

    The Supreme Court of Ghana has postponed its ruling on the injunction applications filed by Broadcast Journalist Richard Dela Sky and Researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi regarding the transmission of the controversial anti-LGBTQ bill to President Nana Akufo-Addo.

    The court announced that it will deliver its ruling on the injunction applications concurrently with the final judgment.

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, presiding over a five-member panel, emphasized that an expedited trial would better serve the interests of justice in this matter.

    The decision comes amidst heightened public interest and legal scrutiny surrounding the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill recently passed by Parliament.

    During separate hearings, the Supreme Court addressed the concerns raised by Richard Dela Sky and Dr. Amanda Odoi. Mr. Sky challenges the constitutionality of the bill, arguing that it violates multiple provisions of the 1992 constitution and encroaches upon fundamental human rights.

    Dr. Odoi, on the other hand, expressed specific reservations about certain provisions within the bill and sought an injunction to halt its transmission to the President for approval. Her legal counsel, Dr. Ernest Ackon, contended that the bill’s passage lacked a fiscal impact analysis, potentially infringing Article 108 of the constitution.

    In response, the Attorney-General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, defended Parliament’s actions, asserting that the Speaker’s discretion in transmitting bills to the President is constitutionally bound and does not require additional fiscal scrutiny beyond what is explicitly stated in the bill.

    Thaddeus Sory, representing the Speaker of Parliament, argued against the injunctions, emphasizing that the legislative process remains ongoing until the bill receives presidential assent, thus placing it outside the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction to intervene prematurely.

    Parliament on Wednesday, February 28, passed the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill also known as the anti-LGBTQ bill after three years following its introduction.

  • Interlocutory injunctions against Anti-LGBTQ bill to be ruled on July 17

    Interlocutory injunctions against Anti-LGBTQ bill to be ruled on July 17

    The Supreme Court of Ghana has scheduled July 17, 2024, as the date for delivering rulings on two separate lawsuits challenging Parliament’s passage of the controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill.

    The cases were filed by Broadcast Journalist Richard Dela Sky and Researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi, each raising distinct concerns about the bill.

    Richard Dela Sky, in his lawsuit, challenges the constitutionality of the bill, asserting that it breaches several provisions of the 1992 constitution and infringes upon fundamental human rights guaranteed by Ghanaian law. He seeks a declaration from the court that the bill is unconstitutional.

    Meanwhile, Dr. Amanda Odoi’s lawsuit focuses on specific provisions within the bill that she finds problematic. She has also requested a restraining order to prevent the Speaker of Parliament, the Attorney General, and the Clerk of Parliament from forwarding the bill to President Akufo-Addo for his approval.

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo informed the court that the cases would be treated separately, following a request by Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame. This decision means that each lawsuit will receive its own distinct ruling.

    During the proceedings, Dr. Ernest Ackon, representing Dr. Amanda Odoi, argued that the bill imposes a direct charge on public funds, which he claims violates Article 108 of the constitution. He also highlighted the absence of a fiscal impact analysis prior to the bill’s submission to the President.

    In response, Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame defended the constitutionality of the bill, arguing that the Speaker’s discretion in handling such matters is within legal bounds and does not require a fiscal impact analysis as claimed by Dr. Ackon.

    Counsel for the Speaker of Parliament, Thaddeus Sory, countered the arguments, stating that the bill’s transmission to the President is still an ongoing process and therefore not yet subject to the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction.

    Sory emphasized that previous applications for injunctions related to the bill had been dismissed by the courts, suggesting a precedent that could influence the current case.

    As the Supreme Court chaired by Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo continues to deliberate, stakeholders await the rulings that will determine the fate of the contentious Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill in Ghana.

  • Dr Odoi’s lawyers file injunction to stop Parliament from sending anti-LGBTQ bill to Akufo-Addo

    Dr Odoi’s lawyers file injunction to stop Parliament from sending anti-LGBTQ bill to Akufo-Addo

    Researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi who is one of the defendants challenging the constitutionality of the controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill has filed an injunction application to halt Parliament from sending the bill to President Akufo-Addo.

    The application was filed by Dr Odoi’s legal counsel.

    Parliament has formally made a request to the Office of the President for a specific date regarding the transmission of the Human Sexual and Family Values Bill for presidential assent.

    This action follows a directive from Nana Bediatuo Asante, the secretary to President Akufo-Addo, on March 18, urging Parliament to withhold the presentation of the bill, also referred to as the anti-LGBT+ bill, to the President.

    Asante’s request was issued pending the resolution of pertinent matters currently under consideration by the Supreme Court.

    Acknowledging the President’s office’s request to pause the bill’s progression, Cyril K. O. Nsiah, the Clerk to Parliament, communicated in a letter dated April 10, 2024.

    However, Mr Nsiah also requested the President’s office to specify a suitable day for Parliament to present the Human Sexual and Family Value Bill, 2024, to the President for his deliberation.

    “Accordingly, I await an indication in writing from your office on when to present the Human Sexual and Family Value Bill, 2024 to His Excellency the President for his consideration, pursuant to Article 106(7) of the Constitution, 1992” the letter read.

  • LIVESTREAMING: Anti-LGBTQ bill trial resumes today

    LIVESTREAMING: Anti-LGBTQ bill trial resumes today

    The Supreme Court of Ghana is currently deliberating on an application challenging the constitutionality of the controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill recently passed by Parliament, brought forth by media personality and lawyer, Richard Dela Sky, alongside researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi.

    The petitioners have directed their challenge towards both the Parliament of Ghana and the Attorney General, asserting that the bill violates multiple provisions of the 1992 constitution.

    They argue that the legislation not only contradicts existing national laws but also infringes upon fundamental human rights enshrined in the constitution of Ghana.

    The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, which has sparked widespread debate and protests within Ghana and internationally, seeks to impose strict penalties on LGBTQ+ activities, advocacy, and relationships in the country.

    Supporters of the bill argue that it upholds traditional family values and societal norms, while opponents decry it as discriminatory and a violation of individual freedoms.

    Follow the court proceedings below:

  • Media granted full access to broadcast all anti-LGBTQ+ bill cases

    Media granted full access to broadcast all anti-LGBTQ+ bill cases

    The Judicial Service of Ghana has granted media outlets full access to court proceedings concerning the controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill 2024, commonly known as the anti-gay Bill.

    This decision, confirmed in a communiqué issued on Tuesday, May 28, permits both radio and television media to cover all court proceedings related to the bill. The move comes in response to widespread public interest in the legislation, which has sparked significant nationwide debate.

    By granting media access, the Judicial Service aims to ensure transparency and keep the public informed about the legal process as it unfolds.

    “Reference instructions from Management of the Judicial Service of Ghana regarding the public interest in cases on the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill 2024 (the “Bill”), permission has been granted for the media (including Radio and Television) to have full access to the relevant courts to undertake a coverage of all proceedings in those cases concerning the Bill,” an excerpt of the statement said.

    Four separate lawsuits are currently challenging the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill 2024.

    Amanda Odoi and Richard Dela Sky have filed cases directly with the Supreme Court, questioning the bill’s passage. In addition, Paul Boama-Sefa and Prince Obiri-Korang have brought separate challenges to the High Court.

    President Akufo-Addo has refrained from signing the bill into law until these outstanding cases are resolved. However, this position has been condemned by the minority in parliament, as well as other groups and individuals.

  • I’ll march to Jubilee House – Lawrence Tetteh declares, if Akufo-Addo doesn’t sign anti-gay bill

    Dr. Lawrence Tetteh, the Founder and President of Worldwide Miracle Outreach, has expressed significant dissatisfaction with his fellow religious leaders’ silence regarding the controversial Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

    He criticised their apparent lack of response, labelling it “cowardice,” particularly following President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo’s decision not to sign the Bill.

    Dr. Tetteh has pledged to organise a protest march to the Jubilee House if the President does not approve the bill, contingent upon the Supreme Court’s endorsement of its passage.

    “I’ll march to the Jubilee House. I think it’s about time we let politicians know we voted them into power. The cowardice that Christian leaders and religious leaders have been reduced to is a shame and I’m embarrassed by some of our clergymen.

    “As much as we are interested in our titles, in the big titles, and in who we are and how long we’ve served, I’m yet to hear certain people speak against these manners. And for me, that is a shame. And so, it starts at home too.

    He added, “It starts with the clergymen. It starts with the religious clerics. It starts at the home of the Chief Iman. It starts with the Chairman of the Christian Council. It starts with the Apostolic leaders. It starts with the Apostolic Fathers. It also starts with the Catholics, Methodists, Presbyterians, and Anglicans. But also, beyond that, it starts with the charismatic leaders.

    “We’ve been too quiet. And as much as we are grumbling, everybody wants to impress certain people and that nonsense, for me, must stop.”

    The Presidency has formally requested that Parliament to refrain from sending the anti-gay bill for approval, citing legal concerns. Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, criticised this decision by the President.

    On February 28, 2024, Parliament passed the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Act, 2024, criminalising LGBTQ+ activities, promotion, advocacy, and funding.

    Offenders may face imprisonment from 6 months to 3 years, while promoters and sponsors could face 3 to 5 years’ imprisonment.

    Currently, there’s a deadlock between the Executive and Legislative branches over the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Legal challenges have been mounted by two private legal practitioners, Richard Dela Sky and Gender Activist Dr. Amanda Odoi, seeking the annulment of the bill.

    The Supreme Court adjourned Richard Sky’s application, seeking a declaration of the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill as null and void, to May 17, 2024.

    The adjournment, as ruled by the Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, is to enable counsel for the plaintiff to “file a fresh motion paper with a supporting affidavit and statement of the case.”

    Counsel for the first defendant, Thaddeus Sory, suggested to the court that the applicant be given time to amend paragraphs five and seven of his applications to sync with his reliefs.

    Paragraph five of the applicant’s writ is seeking “an order restraining the Speaker of Parliament and the Clerk to Parliament from presenting The Human and Sexual Values Bill, 2024 to the President of the Republic for his assent.”

  • I’m embarrassed by some of our clergymen – Dr Lawrence Tetteh on anti-LGBTQ bill

    I’m embarrassed by some of our clergymen – Dr Lawrence Tetteh on anti-LGBTQ bill

    Founder and President of the Worldwide Miracle Outreach, Dr. Lawrence Tetteh, has criticized his fellow clergymen and women for their silence on the anti-LGBTQ+ bill passed in February this year.

    Despite the bill’s subsequent landing in the Supreme Court due to two private individuals filing separate suits seeking to declare its passage by Parliament as illegal, and with the president citing this as his reason for not entertaining or assenting to it, Dr. Tetteh believes President Akufo-Addo should have signed the bill into law without hesitation.

    He has vowed to march to the seat of government should the president fail to sign the bill if the Supreme Court endorses its passage.

    “I’ll march to the Jubilee House. I think it’s about time we make politicians know we voted them into power. The cowardice that Christian leaders and religious leaders have been reduced to is a shame and I’m embarrassed by some of our clergymen.

    “As much as we are interested in our titles, in the big titles, and who we are and how long we’ve served, I’m yet to hear certain people speak against these manners. And for me, that is a shame. And so it starts from my home too.

    “It starts from the clergymen. It starts from the religious clerics. It starts from the home of the Chief Iman. It starts from the Chairman of Christian Council. It starts from the Apostolic leaders. It starts from Apostolic fathers. It also starts from the Catholics, Methodists, Presbyterians, and Anglicans. But also beyond that, it starts from the charismatic leaders.

    “We’ve been too quiet. And as much as we are grumbling, everybody wants to impress certain people and that nonsense, for me, must stop,” he stressed.

    Parliament of Ghana on Wednesday, February 28, 2024, passed the Promotion of Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill.

    The bill proscribes Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) activities and criminalises their promotion, advocacy, and funding.

    Dr. Lawrence Tetteh is among numerous religious leaders and groups urging President Akufo-Addo to sign the anti-LGBTQ+ bill into law. However, the presidency, in a letter to the Clerk to Parliament on March 18, 2024, stated that the President would withhold his assent due to pending court cases against the bill.

    If passed, individuals engaged in LGBTQ+ acts could face up to a three-year jail term, while promoters and sponsors could face three to five years. President Akufo-Addo has indicated that he will make a decision on the bill only after the Supreme Court resolves the suits against it.

  • Dr. Lawrence Tetteh marches to Jubilee House over anti-LGBTQ+ bill

    Dr. Lawrence Tetteh marches to Jubilee House over anti-LGBTQ+ bill

    Founder and President of the Worldwide Miracle Outreach, Dr. Lawrence Tetteh, has vowed to march to the seat of government should the president fail to sign the anti-LGBTQ bill if the Supreme Court endorses its passage.

    He criticized his fellow clergymen and women for their silence on the anti-LGBTQ+ bill passed in February this year.

    Despite the bill’s subsequent landing in the Supreme Court due to two private individuals filing separate suits seeking to declare its passage by Parliament as illegal, and with the president citing this as his reason for not entertaining or assenting to it, Dr. Tetteh believes President Akufo-Addo should have signed the bill into law without hesitation.

    “I’ll march to the Jubilee House. I think it’s about time we make politicians know we voted them into power. The cowardice that Christian leaders and religious leaders have been reduced to is a shame and I’m embarrassed by some of our clergymen.

    “As much as we are interested in our titles, in the big titles, and who we are and how long we’ve served, I’m yet to hear certain people speak against these manners. And for me, that is a shame. And so it starts from my home too.

    “It starts from the clergymen. It starts from the religious clerics. It starts from the home of the Chief Iman. It starts from the Chairman of Christian Council. It starts from the Apostolic leaders. It starts from Apostolic fathers. It also starts from the Catholics, Methodists, Presbyterians, and Anglicans. But also beyond that, it starts from the charismatic leaders.

    “We’ve been too quiet. And as much as we are grumbling, everybody wants to impress certain people and that nonsense, for me, must stop,” he stressed.

    Parliament of Ghana on Wednesday, February 28, 2024, passed the Promotion of Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill.

    The bill proscribes Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) activities and criminalises their promotion, advocacy, and funding.

    Dr. Lawrence Tetteh is among numerous religious leaders and groups urging President Akufo-Addo to sign the anti-LGBTQ+ bill into law. However, the presidency, in a letter to the Clerk to Parliament on March 18, 2024, stated that the President would withhold his assent due to pending court cases against the bill.

    If passed, individuals engaged in LGBTQ+ acts could face up to a three-year jail term, while promoters and sponsors could face three to five years. President Akufo-Addo has indicated that he will make a decision on the bill only after the Supreme Court resolves the suits against it.

  • Supreme Court to hear anti-LGBTQ+ bill suit today

    Supreme Court to hear anti-LGBTQ+ bill suit today

    Broadcast journalist Richard Dela Sky and researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi are set to present their respective lawsuits against the passage of the LGBTQ+ Bill before the Supreme Court today, Wednesday, May 8, 2024.

    These legal challenges have halted the bill’s progress from parliament to potential presidential assent.

    The lawsuits, led by Sky and Odoi, question the constitutionality of Parliament’s approval of the LGBTQ+ Bill, which aims to restrict LGBTQ+ activities and advocacy.

    President Nana Addo Dankwah Akufo-Addo has refrained from receiving the bill, citing the ongoing legal disputes.

    Sky’s case specifically targets the “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill,” seeking a declaration of its nullity on constitutional grounds.

    His claims cite multiple constitutional articles, arguing that the bill infringes upon fundamental human rights guaranteed by Ghana’s Constitution.

    Among Sky’s requests are an order to declare Parliament’s actions unconstitutional and an injunction against enforcing certain provisions of the bill.

    The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear these cases from May 7 to May 9, 2024, as outlined in its cause list.

    President Akufo-Addo has pledged to await the Supreme Court’s ruling before making any decisions regarding the contentious LGBTQ+ legislation.

    Reliefs sought

    Mr. Sky in his writ is seeking four declarations and four orders as follows;

    i. A declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of Article 33(5) of the Constitution of 1992, in light of Article 12(1)(2), 15(1), 17(1) of the ‘Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024’ by Parliament on 28th February 2024, Contravened the Constitution and is to that extend null, void and of no effect.

    ii. A declaration that the Speaker of Parliament contravened Article 108(a) (11) of the Constitution, in light of Articles 296(a)(b)(c), by admitting and allowing Parliament to proceed upon and pass The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024 into law as the same imposes a charge upon the Consolidated Fund or other public funds of Ghana.

    iii. A declaration that Parliament exceeded its authority under Articles 106(2) and 108(a)(ii) in passing “The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill 2024, as the same imposes a charge upon the Consolidated Fund or other Public funds of Ghana.

    iv. A declaration that, upon the true and proper interpretation of Articles 102 and 104(1) of the Constitution, Parliament lacked the requisite quorum to pass “The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values BilI, 2024.”

    v. An order restraining the Speaker of Parliament and the Clerk to Parliament from presenting The Human and Sexual Values Bill, 2024 to the President of the Republic for his assent.

    vi. An order restraining the President of the Republic from assenting to The Human and Sexual Values Bill, 2024, as such action will directly contravene the Constitutional safeguards of liberties and rights of Ghanaians.

    vii. An injunction barring any attempts to enforce the provisions of The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bil 2024, particularly those criminalizing same-sex relationships and related advocacy efforts.

    vii. Such further orders or directions as to this Honourable Court may seem to meet.

  • AG calls for live coverage of anti-LGBTQ+ Bill proceedings

    AG calls for live coverage of anti-LGBTQ+ Bill proceedings

    The Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Godfred Yeboah Dame, has requested the Chief Justice to allow live coverage of proceedings concerning the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, popularly known as the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    In his letter to the Chief Justice, the Attorney General highlighted the considerable public interest in the anti-gay bill as the rationale for the request.

    In his words, “Respectfully, in view of the public interest in the cases concerning the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill 2024 (the Bill) I would like to recommend that the media (including radio and television) be given full access to the relevant courts to undertake coverage of all proceedings in those cases concerning the Bill.”

    “The cases under reference are as follows: Supreme Court 1. Dr. Amanda Odoi v The Speaker of Parliament and Another (Suit No. J1/13/2023), and 2. Richard Dela Sky v The Parliament of Ghana and Another (Suit No. J1/9/2024).

    “High Court 1. Mr. Paul Boama-Sefa v The Speaker of Parliament and Another (Suit No. D45/SF.128/2023), and 2. Dr. Prince Obiri-Korang v The Attorney-General (Suit No. J1/18/2021)

    “It is my respectful view that the transparency to be engendered by a coverage of the proceedings would be in the best interest of the administration of justice.”

    Broadcast Journalist, Richard Dela Sky, and Researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi are set to appear before the Supreme Court today, Wednesday, May 8, 2024, to move their respective lawsuits challenging the passage of the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill and its possible assent.

    Richard Sky, a private legal practitioner, is challenging the constitutionality of Parliament’s passing of the bill, contending that it violates several provisions of the 1992 Constitution. He is seeking various declarations and orders to nullify the bill and prevent its enforcement.

    The bill, which prohibits LGBTQ activities and their promotion, advocacy, and funding, was passed by Parliament on Wednesday, February 28, 2024.

    However, President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo has yet to assent to the bill, awaiting the Supreme Court’s ruling.

  • Enough of the codswallop! – Sam George reacts to High court judgement on “Akufo-Addo and Anti-LGBTQ bill”

    Enough of the codswallop! – Sam George reacts to High court judgement on “Akufo-Addo and Anti-LGBTQ bill”

    Leading advocate for the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, as well as the anti-LGBTQ+ bill, and Member of Parliament (MP) for Ningo Prampram, Sam George, has criticized the High Court’s ruling on the legal challenge aiming to compel President Nana Akufo-Addo to assent to the anti-LGBTQ bill passed by Parliament.

    In a tweet, the Ningo MP accused the President and the Office of the Attorney General of colluding to secure such a ruling. He expressed his lack of surprise regarding the court’s decision.

    “I am not surprised at this ruling. It is a contrived verdict predetermined between @NAkufoAddo, the Attorney-General’s Office, and the Judiciary” parts of the tweet read.

    He went on to challenge the duo to deny his accusations reminding the President of a meeting held in his office on 22n April.

    “I dare them to challenge me on this. The President should remember the meeting in his office on Monday 22nd April. Enough of the codswallop, Mr. President!” he added.

    Sam George’s reaction comes after a legal challenge was presented to the Supreme Court on March 5, 2024 that sought to compel President Nana Akufo-Addo to immediately act on the anti-LGBTQ bill passed by Parliament

    However, on Monday, April, 2024, the court ruled that it would be inappropriate to force the President to accept the bill for possible assent while there are two pending Supreme Court challenges against it.

    The NDC MP has been vocal and active in the legislative process, expressing gratitude to his colleagues in Parliament for passing the bill.

    Sam George has also been urging President Akufo-Addo to sign the bill into law following its passage by Parliament.

  • High Court declines request to force Akufo-Addo to receive anti-LGBTQ+ bill

    High Court declines request to force Akufo-Addo to receive anti-LGBTQ+ bill

    The Accra High Court has rejected a plea to compel President Akufo-Addo to receive the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    This comes after a lawsuit was filed by National Democratic Congress (NDC) Member of Parliament Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor on March 25.

    In his suit, the MP sought several declarations and orders regarding the President’s powers under the 1992 Constitution of Ghana.

    Mr. Dafeamekpor asked for a declaration that, according to Article 106(1) and (7) of the Constitution, a President can only assent to or refuse to assent to a bill within seven days, unless the bill has been referred to the Council of State.

    He also sought a declaration that the President cannot prevent Parliament from transmitting a bill that has been passed to him.

    Additionally, the MP wanted a declaration that a letter dated March 18, 2024, addressed to the Clerk of Parliament and signed by the Secretary to the President, Nana Bediatuo Asante, is in contravention of the Constitution, and therefore, the President must withdraw the letter.

    However, the Attorney-General, represented by Chief State Attorney Sylvia Adeso, argued that the High Court had no jurisdiction to grant the application filed by Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor.

    Justice Ellen Mireku, in her ruling, indicated that the Court has jurisdiction but dismissed the application using her discretionary powers. She noted that two suits filed by private citizens Prof Amanda Odoi and Richard Dela Sky had direct implications on the mandamus application and hence could not approve the reliefs being sought by the South Dayi Member of Parliament.

    Regarding the Anti-LGBTQ Bill, Parliament passed the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill on Wednesday, February 28.

    The bill punishes those who take part in LGBTQ sexual acts, as well as those who promote the rights of gay, lesbian, or other non-conventional sexual or gender identities with time in prison.

    Despite public support for the bill, concerns have been raised, including by the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), regarding discrimination and the potential infringement of constitutional freedoms. Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampram, Sam George, has defended the bill, stating that it does not violate the laws in the 1992 constitution.

    The Finance Ministry has advised President Akufo-Addo against signing the bill, citing potential financial challenges, including the loss of funding from the World Bank.

    However, President Akufo-Addo has reassured the international community of Ghana’s commitment to upholding human rights and the rule of law, noting that the bill is facing a legal challenge at the Supreme Court, and no action will be taken until a decision is made.

  • Watch Finance Minister talk with CNN’s Richard Quest on anti-LGBT+ bill

    Watch Finance Minister talk with CNN’s Richard Quest on anti-LGBT+ bill

    Ghana’s Finance Minister, Mohammed Amin Adam, faced probing questions from CNN’s Richard Quest regarding the controversial anti-LGBT+ Bill that Parliament recently passed.

    During an event in the United States, Quest sought the minister’s personal stance on the bill, given his dual role as a Member of Parliament and a senior government official.

    “The most important thing is to discuss the effects of the law when passed… having said that, it is not for me to give the determination to the Supreme Court of our country. Let me state my point clearly again, there is a case before the Supreme Court, and I am not going to prejudice the determination of the Supreme Court,” Minister Adam stated in an interview later shared by Asaase Radio.

    When pressed on whether he was shirking responsibility, Minister Adam clarified, “The responsibility I am taking is, if the Supreme Court rules on this case and the president assents to it, I will subject myself to the laws of my country.”

    The bill’s fate hangs in the balance as President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo awaits the Supreme Court’s ruling on its constitutionality before deciding on his endorsement.

    Meanwhile, two legal challenges against the bill’s constitutionality are currently pending before the Supreme Court.

  • Akufo-Addo is not against anti-LGBTQ bill; he will sign it when he receives it – Miracles Aboagye

    Akufo-Addo is not against anti-LGBTQ bill; he will sign it when he receives it – Miracles Aboagye

    Presidential staffer and spokesperson for Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia’s campaign team, Dennis Miracles Aboagye, has expressed confidence that President Akufo-Addo will sign the controversial Sexual Human Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, also known as the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

    He emphasized that President Akufo-Addo has consistently opposed the activities of the LGBTQ community and has not shown any support for them.

    During an interview on JoyNews’ AM Show on Friday, April 12, Mr. Aboagye reiterated his belief that President Akufo-Addo will give his assent to the bill once it reaches his table.

    “The President has never said he will not sign the bill. So I believe that he will sign it when it gets to him,” he said.

    He urged Ghanaians to be open to criticism of the bill, emphasizing that no law is perfect and constructive criticism is essential for refining legislation to better serve the country’s interests.

    The spokesperson’s call for accepting criticism of the bill underscores the importance of engaging in constructive dialogue to address concerns and improve legislation. It also reflects the broader societal discourse surrounding LGBTQ+ rights in Ghana and the complexities involved in navigating cultural, religious, and legal considerations.

    These remarks from Professor Kobby Mensah follow the recent declaration by the New Patriotic Party (NPP) flagbearer, who expressed his opposition to LGBTQ+ activities in Ghana during his address to thousands of Muslims in Kumasi on Thursday, April 11, as they observed Eid prayers. It marks Dr. Bawumia’s first public commentary on the contentious issue, and he did not hesitate to make his stance clear.

    Dr. Bawumia firmly rejected LGBTQ+ practices, aligning his personal beliefs with the teachings of Islam, as well as the social and cultural norms prevalent in Ghana.

    Addressing the gathered Muslim community, Dr. Bawumia emphasized his non-support for LGBTQ+ activities, aligning his stance with the broader religious and societal values upheld in Ghana.

    “I will like to take this opportunity to personally comment on the raging issue of LGBTQ in Ghana. First of all, it is important to note that our cultural and societal norms and values as Ghanaians frown on the practice of homosexuality,” Dr. Bawumia said.

  • Give us a date we can present anti-LGBTQ bill for consideration – Parliament tells presidency

    Give us a date we can present anti-LGBTQ bill for consideration – Parliament tells presidency

    Parliament has formally made a request to the Office of the President for a specific date regarding the transmission of the Human Sexual and Family Values Bill for presidential assent.

    This action follows a directive from Nana Bediatuo Asante, the secretary to President Akufo-Addo, on March 18, urging Parliament to withhold the presentation of the bill, also referred to as the anti-LGBT+ bill, to the President.

    Asante’s request was issued pending the resolution of pertinent matters currently under consideration by the Supreme Court.

    Acknowledging the President’s office’s request to pause the bill’s progression, Cyril K. O. Nsiah, the Clerk to Parliament, communicated in a letter dated April 10, 2024.

    However, Mr Nsiah also requested the President’s office to specify a suitable day for Parliament to present the Human Sexual and Family Value Bill, 2024, to the President for his deliberation.

    “Accordingly, I await an indication in writing from your office on when to present the Human Sexual and Family Value Bill, 2024 to His Excellency the President for his consideration, pursuant to Article 106(7) of the Constitution, 1992” the letter read.

  • Lawsuit against anti-LGBTQ bill was masterminded by Akufo-Addo – Asiedu Nketia alleges

    Lawsuit against anti-LGBTQ bill was masterminded by Akufo-Addo – Asiedu Nketia alleges

    The National Chairman of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Asiedu Nketia, has strongly asserted that President Akufo-Addo orchestrated the lawsuit that is supposedly preventing him from assenting to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill recently passed by Parliament.

    Speaking on Joy News’ PM Express on Wednesday, April 10, the seasoned politician claimed that it was not a coincidence that the President could refer to a lawsuit that had not yet been filed as the basis for his decision not to sign the bill.

    As a result, Asiedu Nketia concluded that the President was part of an alleged plan to thwart the anti-LGBTQI+ bill from becoming law.

    “It is clearly an excuse and it’s a wrong excuse because he [President Akufo-Addo] was citing the court case even before anybody could file it. It tells you that he [President Akufo-Addo] orchestrated the filing.”

    As at the time the President spoke, nobody had gone to court. If there’s an intention to file and the person has not filed, how do you restrain yourself over that? So, it means that you don’t want to do something but you want an excuse to cite not to do it. Because if you have heard that somebody is going to court, the person has not gone to court and yet you are injuncting yourself, then it means that you’re part of an orchestration to go to court in the first place.”

    Based on this, Mr Asiedu Nketia said, “I don’t trust in the independent-mindedness of whoever that filed the process.”

    The NDC Chair pointed to Richard Dela Sky, a private legal practitioner and journalist who filed the suit, suggesting that he was closely aligned with the government.

    “Who doesn’t know the Citi FM man, Richard Sky? Richard Sky works in the chamber of the Attorney-General, and he was sponsored to do his law course by this government. And the man has returned and he’s working with the Majority Leader. There’s circumstantial evidence and that’s my belief.”

    When the host raised the issue of the wild claims, the NDC Chair insisted that he was aware of those details about the plaintiff and had evidence to support them.

    The NDC National Chairman expressed particular disappointment that the President requested Parliament not to transmit the bill to him.

    “I am on the side of Parliament because the President has no reason to ask that Parliament should not submit the bill because the cases that are in court, the last time I checked, there’s no application for an injunction or any actual injunction granted that prevents the President from receiving the bill.

    The only application for an injunction that I have seen is to block the President from signing the bill. Receiving and signing are different things. So, if you don’t want to receive the bill, you don’t blame anyone who has gone to court because the reliefs being sought in court do not border on you not receiving. They say don’t work on it. But for the office receiving it, it’s a matter of impunity that is being shown by the President to frustrate the work of parliament” he argued.

    Mr Asiedu Nketia believes the President does not want to sign the bill but simply lacks the courage to state that clearly.

    “Because parliament has done their work up to a point, and they say to transmit this to the President. You don’t have the right not to receive. You can receive it, and after receiving it, you have options that have been provided under the constitution.

    And somebody is in court trying to injunct you from acting on the bill; that injunction does not say don’t receive the bill. So, for you to write to parliament that because I am on some injunction not to sign it, don’t bring it at all, it means you have a pre-meditated agenda. You don’t want to receive it or work on it or do anything with it, but you are not man enough to tell Ghanaians that I don’t want to do it” he noted.

    Meanwhile, Ghana’s Supreme Court is yet to sit on the case filed against the bill.

  • Akufo-Addo is a coward for hiding behind injunction application to reject anti-LGBTQ bill – Asiedu Nketia

    Akufo-Addo is a coward for hiding behind injunction application to reject anti-LGBTQ bill – Asiedu Nketia

    The National Chairman of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Asiedu Nketia, has claimed that President Akufo-Addo lacks the courage to openly state his opposition to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill, also known as the anti-gay bill.

    Despite the bill being unanimously passed by Parliament, it remains on the President’s desk. President Akufo-Addo has stated that he will not sign the bill until the Supreme Court decides on a lawsuit challenging its passage.

    This stance has drawn criticism, especially from the NDC, which accuses the President of double standards.

    During an appearance on JoyNews’ PM Express on Wednesday, the NDC Chair stated that the President’s rationale for not assenting to the bill clearly indicates his unwillingness to sign it, but he lacks the courage to outrightly express this position.

    “Because parliament has done their work up to a point, and they say transmit this to the President. You don’t have the right not to receive. You can receive it, and after receiving it, you have options that have been provided under the constitution.

    And somebody is in court trying to injunct you from acting on the bill; that injunction does not say don’t receive the bill. So, for you to write to parliament that because I am on some injunction not to sign it, don’t bring it at all, it means you have a pre-meditated agenda. You don’t want to receive it or work on it or do anything with it, but you are not man enough to tell Ghanaians that I don’t want to do it” he noted.

    The NDC National Chairman expressed particular disappointment that the President requested Parliament not to transmit the bill to him.

    “I am on the side of Parliament because the President has no reason to ask that Parliament should not submit the bill because the cases that are in court, the last time I checked, there’s no application for an injunction or any actual injunction granted that prevents the President from receiving the bill.

    The only application for an injunction that I have seen is to block the President from signing the bill. Receiving and signing are different things. So, if you don’t want to receive the bill, you don’t blame anyone who has gone to court because the reliefs being sought in court do not border on you not receiving. They say don’t work on it. But for the office receiving it, it’s a matter of impunity that is being shown by the President to frustrate the work of parliament,” he argued.

    The former NDC scribe alleged that President Akufo-Addo orchestrated the lawsuit that is supposedly preventing him from assenting to the bill.

    He suggested that it was not a coincidence that the President could refer to a lawsuit that had not yet been filed as the basis for his decision not to sign the bill. As a result, he concluded that the President was involved in a plan to frustrate the anti-LGBTQI+ bill from becoming law.

    “It is clearly an excuse and it’s a wrong excuse because he [President Akufo-Addo] was citing the court case even before anybody could file it. It tells you that he [President Akufo-Addo] orchestrated the filing.”

    “As at the time the President spoke, nobody had gone to court. If there’s an intention to file and the person has not filed, how do you restrain yourself over that? So, it means that you don’t want to do something but you want an excuse to cite not to do it. Because if you have heard that somebody is going to court, the person has not gone to court and yet you are injuncting yourself, then it means that you’re part of an orchestration to go to court in the first place.”

    Based on this, Mr Asiedu Nketia said, “I don’t trust in the independent-mindedness of whoever that filed the process.

    The NDC Chair pointed to Richard Dela Sky, a private legal practitioner and journalist who filed the suit, suggesting that he was closely aligned with the government.

    “Who doesn’t know the Citi FM man, Richard Sky? Richard Sky works in the chamber of the Attorney-General, and he was sponsored to do his law course by this government. And the man has returned and he’s working with the Majority Leader. There’s circumstantial evidence and that’s my belief.”

  • All Ghanaian pastors to unite to fight Akufo-Addo?

    All Ghanaian pastors to unite to fight Akufo-Addo?

    The Country Director of Awsome Bible College in Kumasi and a prominent religious figure, Rev. Emmanuel Boakye, has expressed his concerns over the delay in passing the anti-LGBTQ bill into law.

    The proposed anti-LGBTQI bill in Ghana has sparked a contentious debate, raising significant concerns about human rights, religious beliefs, and political implications.

    President Akufo-Addo’s decision not to assent to the bill, despite its passage by parliament, has led to criticism from religious bodies and traditional leaders.

    Rev. Emmanuel Boakye emphasized the potential consequences if the bill is not promptly signed into law.

    Rev. Emmanuel Boakye

    During a recent press conference, Rev. Boakye highlighted that homosexuality is considered an abomination and a threat to both Christianity and Ghanaian traditions in the Christian society.

    He stated that religious leaders are prepared to take all necessary actions to compel President Akufo-Addo to sign the Anti-LGBTQI Bill.

    Rev. Boakye warned that if President Akufo-Addo does not sign the bill immediately, he will mobilize all religious leaders to prevent the upcoming 2024 elections from taking place.

    Parliament on Wednesday, February 28, passed the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill also known as the anti-LGBTQ bill after three years following its introduction.

    The Anti-LGBTQ+ bill aims to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities in Ghana. It proposes strict penalties, including imprisonment, for individuals engaged in activities related to homosexuality and LGBTQ+ advocacy.

    Additionally, the bill seeks to prohibit the promotion of LGBTQ+ rights, organizations, and events in Ghana.

    Prior to its passage, there had been several amendments to the bill. After deliberation, Parliament decided that the minimum custodial sentence has been set at three years, with a maximum of five years for promoters and sympathisers.

    Additionally, individuals caught directly engaging in these activities will face a minimum sentence of six months, extendable to a maximum of three years.

    Ghana is among many African countries that are working to eliminate LGBTQ activities from the society. Uganda enacted one of the world’s harshest anti-gay laws in May, which calls for the death penalty for certain same-sex acts.

    Already, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, has described the passage of bill as “profoundly disturbing.”

    Presently, President Akufo-Addo has withheld his assent to the bill over the fact that the constitutionality of the bill is being contested at the Supreme Court due to a case filed by one Richard Dela Sky.

  • We will stop 2024 elections from happening if Akufo-Addo doesn’t sign anti-LGBTQ bill – Pastor

    We will stop 2024 elections from happening if Akufo-Addo doesn’t sign anti-LGBTQ bill – Pastor

    The proposed anti-LGBTQI bill in Ghana has sparked a contentious debate, raising significant concerns about human rights, religious beliefs, and political implications.

    President Akufo-Addo’s decision not to assent to the bill, despite its passage by parliament, has led to criticism from religious bodies and traditional leaders.

    Rev. Emmanuel Boakye, the Country Director of Awsome Bible College in Kumasi and a prominent religious figure, has expressed his concerns about the bill. He emphasized the potential consequences if the bill is not promptly signed into law.

    During a recent press conference, Rev. Boakye highlighted that homosexuality is considered an abomination and a threat to both Christianity and Ghanaian traditions in the Christian society.

    He stated that religious leaders are prepared to take all necessary actions to compel President Akufo-Addo to sign the Anti-LGBTQI Bill.

    Rev. Boakye warned that if President Akufo-Addo does not sign the bill immediately, he will mobilize all religious leaders to prevent the upcoming 2024 elections from taking place.

    Parliament on Wednesday, February 28, passed the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill also known as the anti-LGBTQ bill after three years following its introduction.

    The Anti-LGBTQ+ bill aims to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities in Ghana. It proposes strict penalties, including imprisonment, for individuals engaged in activities related to homosexuality and LGBTQ+ advocacy.

    Additionally, the bill seeks to prohibit the promotion of LGBTQ+ rights, organizations, and events in Ghana.

    Prior to its passage, there had been several amendments to the bill. After deliberation, Parliament decided that the minimum custodial sentence has been set at three years, with a maximum of five years for promoters and sympathisers.

    Additionally, individuals caught directly engaging in these activities will face a minimum sentence of six months, extendable to a maximum of three years.

    Ghana is among many African countries that are working to eliminate LGBTQ activities from the society. Uganda enacted one of the world’s harshest anti-gay laws in May, which calls for the death penalty for certain same-sex acts.

    Already, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, has described the passage of bill as “profoundly disturbing.”

    Presently, President Akufo-Addo has withheld his assent to the bill over the fact that the constitutionality of the bill is being contested at the Supreme Court due to a case filed by one Richard Dela Sky.

  • FLASHBACK: Anti-LGBTQ Bill won’t meet constitutional test – Dr Poku Adusei

    FLASHBACK: Anti-LGBTQ Bill won’t meet constitutional test – Dr Poku Adusei

    Three years ago, Dr. Poku Adusei, the Director of Legal at the National Communications Authority (NCA), criticized the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, describing it as unconstitutional.

    In an interview on Newsfile, Dr. Adusei argued that certain provisions of the bill violate the 1992 Constitution.

    He specifically pointed out that aspects of the bill aim to punish individuals who oppose the mistreatment of LGBTQ individuals, as well as dictate what is deemed acceptable in terms of sexual behavior. Dr. Adusei emphasized that penalizing individuals for advocating for less severe penalties for those involved in same-sex activities is unacceptable.

    Based on his analysis, Dr. Adusei concluded that the current form of the bill would likely face constitutional challenges if passed into law.

    “If you look at the tenure of the bill, you don’t need anyone to tell you that it won’t meet a constitutional test going forward. When you get a law in which adverbs and other descriptive words are used to qualify nouns and verbs, it tells you there is something wrong. So the use of the word ‘proper’ in the name of the law in itself should tell you that there is something wrong.

    “What is proper in this world when scholars over the years have established that going into people’s private affairs in that nature is not the right thing to do. What infringes on the rights of those persons is that you are now saying they cannot decide to live their private lives if it doesn’t come into the public sphere. If someone is being liberal and says you can’t maltreat this person, then that person is also committing a crime. That is way out of order. “

    “The bill in its current state, even if it is passed as law, will not be able to survive the threshold of constitutionality when it goes to the Supreme Court of Ghana.”

    On the show, Dr Poku Adusei stated categorically he holds the position that gay rights are not human rights. But he was quick to add that having a legislation in order to make the fight against the LGBTQ community constitutional, is not the way to go.

    “I won’t say homosexuality and its related activities is human right. I will not accept that. However, I will not also accept a situation in which you can also say that I’m legislating to antagonize and infringe the rights of certain individuals who have certain orientations that way it will be unconstitutional. It is so overboard that you are now telling us that these are the proper values of our humanity. That way, you are mistaken,” he said.

    Dr Poku Adusei urged Ghanaians to refrain from describing groups and individuals against the said bill as promoters of same-sex related activities.

    According to him, pointing out the flaws in the Anti-LGBTQ Bill is not the same as encouraging individuals to engage in homosexuality.

    “We should not lose sight that the group with Akoto Ampaw and Professor Takyiwaa Manu and the rest who are advocating against the bill are in no way saying that they are supporters of lesbianism and gayism. That is one thing Ghanaians must understand. It doesn’t mean they will go and take their kids that they should convert from heterosexual relationships into homosexuality.

    “They are rather saying that the route you are taking is a wrong one,” he added.

    His comment came after Private legal practitioner, Akoto Ampaw who is a member of the Coalition of Lawyers, Academics and other Professionals that submitted a memorandum requesting that Parliament throws out the Anti LGBTQ Bill, has faced criticism from members of the public for standing against the bill.

    According to Mr Ampaw, the bill is in direct conflict with a number of constitutionally-protected fundamental freedoms and human rights and the coalition’s position has no relation with members’ personal preference for same-sex activities.

    “Our position as a group is that every person who is a human being is entitled to certain basic rights and that what the bill is doing is launching an assault on the rights of a particular group in our society.

    “Our position has nothing to do with our personal preference or not for homosexual activities. Our position is a principled position that we take to defend the rights of every person in Ghana and subject to the public interest.”

  • 12 months jail term for child marriage but 5 years for supporting LGBTQ activities – Gabby chides Sam George, others

    12 months jail term for child marriage but 5 years for supporting LGBTQ activities – Gabby chides Sam George, others

    A prominent member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Gabby Otchere-Darko, has questioned why individuals seeking to protect Ghana’s family values have not called for harsher sentences for individuals caught engaging and promoting child marriage.

    Mr Otchere-Darko made the comment amidst investigations into a contentious marriage between a minor and Nungua’s elder, Nuumo Borketey Laweh Tsuru XXXIII, aged 63. 

    Per the Children’s Act 1998 (Act 560), an adult caught forcing a minor into marriage faces a maximum jail term of 12 months or fines of up to 5 million cedis (500 Ghana Cedis).

    In a post on the X platform, wondered why the country is seeking to impose a “stiffer” sentence on consenting adults in the LGBTQ community who decide to have an amorous relationship, or any promotion, sponsorship or support of LGBTQ activities when a situation such as child marriage which involves an adult and a minor prescribes a lighter sentence.

    In what appears to be a jab to anti-LGBTQ bill promoters including Ningo-Prampram MP, Sam George, Gabby Otchere-Darko wrote, “In Ghana, you face a maximum jail term of 12 months if you force a minor into marriage, according to Children’s Act 1998 (Act 560).”

    “Once assented, the law that seeks to presumably protect our family values (which ignores child marriage by the way) will impose a prison sentence of up to five years for the “wilful promotion, sponsorship or support of LGBTQ+ activities”. In fact two consenting adults of same sex face a stiffer sentence if they are found kissing in public than the 70-year old man who marries a 14-year old girl.”

    The Children’s Act 1998 (Act 560), amended in 2016, safeguards children’s rights against forced betrothal and marriage.

    The Constitution of Ghana also defines anyone below 18 as a child, ineligible for marriage. Sections 14 and 15 of the Children’s Act explicitly state the right of children to reject betrothal and marriage, setting the legal marriage age at 18.

    The recent alleged marriage has ignited a fierce debate, with many condemning the act on social media and demanding the arrest of the Ga-Dangme States’ Overlord. Despite the uproar, some authorities have defended the marriage, citing cultural practices.

    Presently, the Supreme Court is set to hear the unconstitutional claims levelled against the anti-LGBTQ bill which has been approved by Parliament but yet to receive a presidential assent by Nana Akufo-Addo.

  • Methodist Church to hold discussions with Akufo-Addo to expedite anti-gay bill assent

    Methodist Church to hold discussions with Akufo-Addo to expedite anti-gay bill assent

    The Methodist Church of Ghana has expressed its desire to engage in discussions with President Akufo-Addo regarding the status of the .

    The Church has raised concerns about the prolonged delay by President Akufo-Addo in giving assent to the law, noting that it is causing unease among Ghanaians.

    Speaking during the annual Methodist Church Easter Media Engagement, Dr. Paul Kwabena Boafo, the Presiding Bishop of the Methodist Church of Ghana, emphasized the significance of the President heeding the voices of the Ghanaian people.

    “Now we are praying that the President will also give his assent to it so that it becomes what Ghanaians have asked for.

    “We are also planning to come up with a paper so we are planning to meet the president at the Jubilee House so that we can all think about the best way to go on this thing.”

  • There will be no economy for Ghana if anti-LGBTQ bill is made law – Stanford University Professor

    There will be no economy for Ghana if anti-LGBTQ bill is made law – Stanford University Professor

    A Democracy Scholar at the Hoover Institute and Stanford University, Professor Larry Diamond, has cautioned Ghana about the potential consequences of passing the controversial anti-gay bill into law.

    The Ministry of Finance has advised President Akufo-Addo to refrain from approving the anti-LGBTQ+ bill recently endorsed by Parliament. The Ministry has cautioned that the bill’s enactment could result in significant financial repercussions for Ghana.

    According to the Ministry, Ghana stands to lose a substantial amount of World Bank funding, estimating a potential loss of USD$3.8 billion over the next five to six years.

    During an interview with Bernard Avle on Citi TV’s The Point of View, Professor Diamond argued that passing the bill would have severe economic implications for Ghana. He highlighted the restrictions that foreign investors might impose on a country seen as violating the rights of a minority group.

    Professor Diamond further asserted that Western nations are primarily driving the anti-gay agenda in Africa.

    “I would remind people of what some friends of Ghana have been saying. This act will be a disaster for Ghana economically [if passed into law]. Because Western companies are not going to come and invest in a country that is pummeling minority rights.

    “The extreme religious rights have failed to achieve this religious agenda in the United States. And so now they are coming to Africa to try and push the agenda. People who complain about neo-colonialism? Shouldn’t they be asking questions about this? he asked.

    The Presidency halted the transmission of the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill for assent to Parliament on March 18, citing legal issues.

    Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin criticized President Akufo-Addo for this decision.

  • Richard Sky’s anti-LGBTQ bill case is “frivolous”, throw it out – Sam George tells Supreme Court

    Richard Sky’s anti-LGBTQ bill case is “frivolous”, throw it out – Sam George tells Supreme Court

    Member of Parliament for Ningo Prampram, Samuel Nartey George, has entreated the apex out to throw out Richard Dela Sky’s case involving the passage of the anti-LGBTQ bill as it is “frivolous.”

    He made this statement when he expressed surprise at the Supreme Court’s prioritization of legal cases.

    “The principle the Supreme Court has espoused here, if you apply that to the Richard Sky case, that case also has to be thrown out, because it is equally very frivolous because the Supreme Court has no power to stay the hands of the president.”

    Specifically, he was shocked by the Supreme Court’s decision to address the case of South Dayi MP Rockson Nelson Dafeamekpor before that of private legal practitioner Richard Dela Sky.

    Dela Sky filed an application on March 5 with the Supreme Court, seeking a declaration that the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly known as the anti-gay bill, is null, void, and of no effect.

    Sam George believes that the court’s order of proceedings would have been fairer if it had first heard the case regarding the anti-gay bill before addressing the matter involving the South Dayi MP.

    “What is surprising to me is that the Chief Justice has not called the Richard Sky case, which is almost four weeks old, before the court to hear that, but has called the case that was less than a week old. Because it is the same principle.

    “But if the judiciary is not being biased, if the judiciary is showing a mind of its own, especially the chief justice, showing a mind of their own, they would have called those cases because common sense is part of legislation and the work of the judiciary.”

    Meanwhile, the apex court has dismissed the case brought to it by Mr Nelson Dafeamekpor, noting that it is frivolous.

  • FULL TEXT: NDC reacts to CJ’s decision to hear anti-LGBTQ bill case later than sooner

    FULL TEXT: NDC reacts to CJ’s decision to hear anti-LGBTQ bill case later than sooner

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has expressed concerns about the scheduling of political cases in the Supreme Court, alleging bias on the part of the Chief Justice.

    The party is particularly troubled by the prioritization of the case filed by South Dayi MP, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, over the case of Richard Dela Sky v. the Parliament of Ghana and the Attorney-General.

    PRESS STATEMENT
    For Immediate Release

    NDC REACTS TO PALPABLE JUDICIAL BIAS IN THE SCHEDULING OF POLITICAL CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has become aware of the decision by the Chief Justice of Ghana to list the case of Rockson-Nelson Etse K. Dafeamekpor v. the Speaker of Parliament and Attorney-General (SUIT NO: J1/12/2024) for hearing on Wednesday, 27th March, 2024.

    The NDC is intrigued by the listing of the Dafeamekpor case for hearing, ahead of the case of Richard Dela Sky v. the Parliament of Ghana and the Attorney-General.

    It is interesting to note, that Richard Dela Sky filed his writ of summons in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024, on the 5th of March 2024. This was almost two (2) clear weeks before Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor filed his writ of summons on 18th March, 2024 challenging the constitutionality of the latest ministerial nominations by the President.

    Given the recent political deadlock that these two legal suits have created between the Executive arm and the Legislative arm of government, one would have expected that the date of filing of the cases would have informed the timing of their hearing by the apex Court.

    Yet, for some strange reasons, the case of Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor which was last in time to be filed, has been hurriedly listed for hearing, while that of Richard Dela Sky which predated the Dafeamekpor case by two weeks, has not been listed for hearing at all. This is in spite of the fact that, no application for abridgment of time, has been filed by any of the parties in the Dafeamekpor case.

    It’s quite apparent, that this is a ploy by the Chief Justice to fast-track the determination of the suit filed by Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor, while the determination of the Richard Dela Sky suit is deliberately and unduly delayed, to enable the President shelve the crucial Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill that has been passed by Parliament.

    Even more bizarre is the fact that, the case filed by some NDC Members of Parliament, challenging the constitutionality of the passage of the Electronic Transfer Levy (E-Levy) Bill,
    as far back as 2022, has not been listed for hearing by the Supreme Court till date.

    The arbitrary exercise of administrative discretion by the Chief Justice, particularly in the scheduling of cases in the Supreme Court, goes to fortify the high perception of bias on the part of the judiciary.

    Such judicial manipulations go to confirm the growing public perception that the current Chief Justice, is a pliant accomplice and abettor of the misrule of the despotic Akufo-Addo/Bawumia/NPP government.

    While the Constitution of Ghana vests discretionary powers in the Chief Justice in the discharge of her administrative duties over the judiciary, it is important that such discretionary powers are not exercised arbitrarily, capriciously and whimsically.

    Judicial independence must mean exactly that. At no point should the Judiciary act in a manner that lends itself to the grounded belief that it is willing to aid an overbearing executive in a standoff with the legislature.

    The Chief Justice must appreciate that justice emanates from the people and that the judiciary exists to serve the overall interest of the state and not the interest of any particular political party or government. As such, fairness and balance must at all times shine through their work.

    The listing of this particular case filed much later than the Sky case does not reflect these vital prerequisites.

    We have come too far in our constitutional journey to allow such glaring manipulation to pass without protest. Such behavior as constantly exhibited by the Chief Justice against entities opposed to the NPP has gone on for too long.

    This does not only undermine public confidence in the judiciary but it also makes mockery of our democratic arrangements.

    There can be no earthly justification for listing the Defeamekpor case ahead of the Richard Sky case and we demand an immediate rectification of this travesty.

    As the political tradition that birthed the fourth republican democracy and constitution, we are extremely concerned about this biased handling of cases by the Chief Justice, which appears to be fueling the ever-festering perception of judicial bias in the country.

    These acts of judicial arbitrariness tilted in favour of the ruling Akufo-Addo/Bawumia/NPP government, do not engender public confidence and trust in our justice delivery system. And this should give every well-meaning Ghanaian legitimate cause for concern.

    SIGNED.
    FIFI FIAVE KWETEY
    GENERAL SECRETARY

    TUESDAY, 27th MARCH, 2024
    ACCRA.

  • NDC accuses ‘biased’ Chief Justice of delaying Richard Sky’s anti-LGBTQ bill case

    NDC accuses ‘biased’ Chief Justice of delaying Richard Sky’s anti-LGBTQ bill case

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has raised concerns about the scheduling of political cases in the Supreme Court, accusing the Chief Justice of bias against them.

    The party’s alarm stems from the prioritization of the case filed by South Dayi MP, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, for hearing, over the case of Richard Dela Sky v. the Parliament of Ghana and the Attorney-General.

    According to a statement issued by the NDC on Wednesday, March 27, 2024, it is intriguing that “Richard Dela Sky filed his writ of summons in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024, on the 5th of March 2024. This was almost two (2) clear weeks before Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor filed his writ of summons on 18th March, 2024 challenging the constitutionality of the latest ministerial nominations by the President.”

    However, the Chief Justice has scheduled Dafeamekpor’s case for today, Wednesday, March 27, ahead of the Dela Sky matter, which was filed earlier.

    Fifi Fiavi Kwetey, NDC’s General Secretary, noted in a statement that “given the recent political deadlock that these two legal suits have created between the Executive arm and the Legislative arm of government, one would have expected that the date of filing of the cases would have informed the timing of their hearing by the apex Court.”

    The statement also alleges that the scheduling of the cases is a tactic by the Head of the Judiciary to support the President’s intention to shelve the anti-LGBTQ bill, which has become a matter of concern in the country.

    “It’s quite apparent, that this is a ploy by the Chief Justice to fast-track the determination of the suit filed by Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor, while the determination of the Richard Dela Sky suit is deliberately and unduly delayed, to enable the President shelve the crucial Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill that has been passed by Parliament,” it added.

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill is a commitment to upholding traditional values – Speaker Bagbin

    Anti-LGBTQ bill is a commitment to upholding traditional values – Speaker Bagbin

    Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has reiterated his strong support for the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, also known as anti-LGBTQ bill, recently passed by parliament.

    Speaking at the 2024 Suma Akwantu Kesie Festival in Suma in the Bono Region, his aide, Mr. Peter Bamfo, delivered the keynote address on his behalf.

    The Speaker emphasized that the passage of the bill was a significant milestone for Ghana’s democratic principles and a clear indication of the nation’s commitment to preserving traditional values. He urged traditional leaders to continue advocating for the preservation of these values.

    Mr. Bagbin praised the Suma Traditional Council for its forward-thinking leadership in using the festival as a platform for development in the region.

    He also commended the council for its initiative to establish a modern social center in honor of the late Nana Kwadwo Adinkra, the inventor of the Adinkra symbols.

    “The Adinkra Center will serve as a beacon of hope and opportunity, providing invaluable resources for youth training, cultural education, and socio-economic empowerment,” Speaker Bagbin said.

    The Speaker also called on the people of Suma to rally behind their leaders to ensure the development of the area.

  • Mahama using anti-gay bill to avoid talking about gay ‘friend’ Andrew Solomon – NPP’s Ahiagba

    Mahama using anti-gay bill to avoid talking about gay ‘friend’ Andrew Solomon – NPP’s Ahiagba

    Communications Director of the NPP, Richard Ahiagbah, has tweeted an old photo of the NDC flagbearer and former president of Ghana, John Mahama, alongside LGBTQ activist and human rights advocate Andrew Solomon.

    The caption of the tweet implied that Mahama supports the LGBTQ community but is being hypocritical about his stance because his party is advocating for the passage of the anti-gay bill.

    The NPP government, according to Ahiagba, has made a clear position on the anti-gay bill; however, the former president has refused to answer questions on what relationship he has Mr Andrew Solomon.

    “NPP and Akufo-Addo have made their positions on same-sex and related activities in Ghana clear.

    However, some people who support the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill are using this support as a means to deflect questions about their association with the known LGBT activist, Mr. Andrew Solomon, ” he tweeted.

    He went ahead to laud Akufo-Addo’s government for its “diligence” in handling the controversies surrounding the bill and assenting to it.

    “Akufo-Addo’s diligence is commendable, given the potential social impact of the bill. What is going on here?” he added.

    Meanwhile, former President John Dramani Mahama has taken a firm stance against the promotion of LGBTQ+ activities in Ghana, aligning himself with his Christian faith as a member of the Assemblies of God Church.

    He has made it clear that he does not support gay marriage or transgender rights, citing conflicts with both his personal beliefs and the teachings of his faith.

    In regards to President Akufo-Addo’s handling of the anti-gay bill, Mahama has criticized the President’s Secretary for a letter sent to Parliament, which he deemed disrespectful. The letter requested Parliament to withhold sending the anti-LGBTQ+ bill to President Akufo-Addo for assent due to pending applications for an interlocutory injunction before the Supreme Court.

    Mahama found the tone and content of the letter offensive and disrespectful to the democratic process, arguing that it undermines the foundations of Parliamentary democracy and neglects the role of the Clerk of Parliament.

    Mahama also suggests that President Akufo-Addo’s reluctance to sign the anti-LGBTQ+ bill stems from concerns about losing foreign aid.

    The Ministry of Finance has indicated that Ghana could face significant losses in World Bank financing if the bill becomes law, which Mahama sees as a factor influencing the President’s stance on the matter.

  • Respect the constitution by assenting to anti-LGBTQ bill – Catholic Bishops Conference tells Akufo-Addo

    Respect the constitution by assenting to anti-LGBTQ bill – Catholic Bishops Conference tells Akufo-Addo

    Reverend Father Clement Kwasi Adjei, the Secretary General of the Catholic Bishops Conference, has urged President Akufo-Addo to reconsider his decision not to assent to the recently passed Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, popularly known as the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Speaking on JoyNews’ PM Express, the cleric argued that the presidency’s letter to Parliament, instructing them not to transmit the bill to the presidency, contravenes the established constitutional process wherein all laws enacted by Parliament must be forwarded to the presidency for consideration.

    He reminded the president of his vow to uphold the constitution of the country.

    Despite this, the presidency’s letter addressed to Parliament on Tuesday cited the acknowledgment of two pending applications for an order of interlocutory injunction before the Supreme Court as the basis for the decision.

    Expressing dismay over recent events, Reverend Father Adjei called for a dialogue between religious bodies and the president to address the apparent deviation from constitutional norms.

    “The constitution is the supreme law of Ghana and any law that is inconsistent with any provision in the constitution, for the sake of its inconsistency is null and void.

    “So how can you write a letter telling parliament not to transmit the bill to the presidency? The constitution must be seen as the supreme law of the country. And in that constitution, any law enacted by parliament must be sent to the presidency,” he told host Aisha Ibrahim.

    Tensions among MPs have escalated since Parliament received the letter from the presidency. Parliament suspended the consideration of the nomination of Ministers and Deputy Ministers of State by President Akufo-Addo, which appears to be a retaliatory move by the Speaker over the president’s position on the controversial bill.

    Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, stated that the legislature could not approve the President’s appointees due to an interlocutory injunction filed at the Supreme Court by MP for South Dayi, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor.

  • Injunction application should not deter Akufo-Addo from assenting anti-LGBTQ bill – Dafeamekpor

    Injunction application should not deter Akufo-Addo from assenting anti-LGBTQ bill – Dafeamekpor

    Co-sponsor of the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, has expressed disagreement with President Akufo-Addo’s decision to suspend assenting to the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill until court challenges are resolved.

    The Office of the President officially requested Parliament to hold off transmitting the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill to President Akufo-Addo for his assent. This request, made in a letter addressed to Parliament on Monday, March 18, and signed by the Secretary to the President, Nana Asante Bediatuo, cited two pending applications for an order of interlocutory injunction currently before the Supreme Court.

    The letter emphasized that it would be improper for Parliament to proceed with transmitting the Bill to President Akufo-Addo for any action until the matters before the court are addressed.

    However, the South Dayi MP stated that no pending court case can prevent the president from performing his constitutional duty.

    Speaking on JoyFM’s Top Story on March 19, he argued that in many instances where there was a court case to challenge the authenticity of election results, the President was not hindered from performing his duty.

    Mr. Dafeamekpor clarified that in this same instance, an interim injunction cannot prevent the President from carrying out his duty, including assenting to a bill.

     “If you read the Supreme Court decision in the dismissal of the Electoral Commissioner Charlotte Osei, no court can injunct a president from performing his functions under the constitution.

    “That is why there is a presumption of regularity of performance of functions of the president until a court otherwise removes him.

    “So for instance, when a president is elected into office, sworn in, and takes the oath of office, and another who contested is aggrieved and goes to the Supreme Court, what the President does until the court pronounces on the validity or otherwise of the election of that President is not declared venality. So you cannot say that because the election of the President is challenged, you can bring an action to injunct the President not to perform the functions imposed upon the office of the President,” he said.

     “It can only be, going forward, the decision of the court can only be going forward but it cannot affect any decision that he takes whilst occupying that office. That is why if anybody and in any case let’s this make clear you can only challenge an act of Parliament, a bill is not an act of Parliament properly so called.

    “So it only when a bill is declared unconstitutional that its effect can be challenged,” he added.

    During the same program, Associate Professor at the University of Ghana Law School, Professor Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, expressed the view that the current situation should not escalate into a constitutional crisis.

    He explained that the President’s decision to await the court’s verdict on the issue might stem from a desire to act in accordance with the law. He referenced a previous incident involving the E-levy, where the minority criticized the President for assenting to the bill despite an injunction application. This time, President Akufo-Addo may be seeking to act in the best interest of the people.

     “If the President decides not to sign the bill or assent to the bill but to wait for the court to pronounce on it, I think the President is doing the right thing. So, all we have to do is to wait for the President for him to make the determination of the injunction. I think that is what the President is trying to say,” he said.

    Regarding the letter conveying the President’s position on the matter, he noted that having the Executive Secretary’s signature on the letter instead of the President’s might not lend the necessary credibility to the content of the letter.

    “As for the letter signed by the Executive Secretary, I don’t think it carries any weight because it is not the President himself,” he added.  

  • Accept LGBTQ community and Ghana will flourish – IMF Boss

    Accept LGBTQ community and Ghana will flourish – IMF Boss

    Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Kristalina Georgieva, has emphasized the significance of inclusive society, particularly in response to Ghana’s Parliament passing the anti-LGBTQ bill.

    Speaking on the Point of View with Bernard Avle on Monday, March 18, she voiced support for a community that embraces all irrespective of their sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, while insisting that greater inclusivity contributes to a nation’s overall success.

    “I understand that people in Ghana have taken the bill to the court. All I can say is that a more inclusive society is a more successful society. You want Ghana to flourish, make it so that everybody can contribute to the fullest of this country.”

    On Wednesday, February 28, Parliament unanimously passed the anti-LGBTQ+ bill after completing the third reading. The bill has been a subject of intense debate and discussion since its introduction to the legislature three years ago.

    Proponents argue that it is necessary to uphold cultural and religious values, while opponents argue that certain provisions violate human rights and promote discrimination.

    Since its passage, many opponents have expressed their displeasure, with some civil society groups threatening legal action should President Akufo-Addo assent to the bill for it to become law.

    President Akufo-Addo has withheld his accent as the constitutionality of the bill is being contested at the Supreme Court.

    On the show, the IMF boss attributed Ghana’s recent economic challenges to a combination of factors, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and fiscal imprudence during the 2020 election period.

    Georgieva emphasized the importance of drawing lessons from past experiences and applying them to future policy-making.

    She underscored the effectiveness of robust macroeconomic and financial governance in navigating economic uncertainties.

    Georgieva stressed the necessity of implementing strong fiscal and monetary strategies capable of withstanding global financial pressures and fostering sustainable growth.

    “The best avenue to pursue that is to get your policies in good order, get your institutions to deliver transparently for the economy for people. Nothing is more effective than strong macroeconomic and financial performance in a country.

    “We have seen in Ghana, yes it was the COVID-19 shock that brought so much hardship on people. But it was also the excessive spending during the general elections period. Learn lessons from the past, apply for the future,” she quoted by Citinewsroom.com to have said.

  • An inclusive society will make Ghana flourish – IMF boss on anti-LGBTQ bill

    An inclusive society will make Ghana flourish – IMF boss on anti-LGBTQ bill

    Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), has emphasized the significance of inclusivity, particularly in response to Ghana’s Parliament passing the anti-LGBTQ bill.

    Speaking on the Point of View with Bernard Avle on Monday, March 18, she voiced support for a more inclusive society, highlighting that greater inclusivity contributes to a nation’s overall success.

    “I understand that people in Ghana have taken the bill to the court. All I can say is that a more inclusive society is a more successful society. You want Ghana to flourish, make it so that everybody can contribute to the fullest of this country.”

    On Wednesday, February 28, Parliament unanimously passed the anti-LGBTQ+ bill after completing the third reading. The bill has been a subject of intense debate and discussion since its introduction to the legislature three years ago.

    Proponents argue that it is necessary to uphold cultural and religious values, while opponents argue that certain provisions violate human rights and promote discrimination.

    Since its passage, many opponents have expressed their displeasure, with some civil society groups threatening legal action should President Akufo-Addo assent to the bill for it to become law.

    President Akufo-Addo has withheld his accent as the constitutionality of the bill is being contested at the Supreme Court.

    On the show, the IMF boss attributed Ghana’s recent economic challenges to a combination of factors, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and fiscal imprudence during the 2020 election period.

    Georgieva emphasized the importance of drawing lessons from past experiences and applying them to future policy-making.

    She underscored the effectiveness of robust macroeconomic and financial governance in navigating economic uncertainties.

    Georgieva stressed the necessity of implementing strong fiscal and monetary strategies capable of withstanding global financial pressures and fostering sustainable growth.

    “The best avenue to pursue that is to get your policies in good order, get your institutions to deliver transparently for the economy for people. Nothing is more effective than strong macroeconomic and financial performance in a country.

    “We have seen in Ghana, yes it was the COVID-19 shock that brought so much hardship on people. But it was also the excessive spending during the general elections period. Learn lessons from the past, apply for the future,” she quoted by Citinewsroom.com to have said.

  • A-G advised Akufo-Addo not to sign anti-LGBTQ bill – Presidency

    A-G advised Akufo-Addo not to sign anti-LGBTQ bill – Presidency

    A letter from the Office of the President has revealed that the Attorney-General is the reason behind President Akufo-Addo’s decision to withhold his assent to the anti-LGBTQ bill.

    In a statement issued and signed by Nana Bediatuo on Monday, the office revealed that the Attorney-General had informed the President, via a letter dated March 18, 2024, that he had been duly served with both applications over the bill.

    Thus, the Attorney-General advised the President not to take any action regarding the Bill until the issues raised by the suits are resolved by the Supreme Court.

    The Office of the President made this known when it requested Parliament not to forward the anti-gay bill to President Akufo-Addo for his assent.

    “It is the understanding of this Office that both applications have also been duly served on Parliament. Therefore, it would be improper for you to transmit the Bill to the President and equally improper for this Office to receive the Bill until the Supreme Court determines the matters raised in the suits,” it added.

    The Office also clarified that it is a well-established legal principle that during the consideration of an interlocutory injunction application, the status quo should be maintained. This means that no action should be taken that could prejudice the requested injunctive relief or undermine the authority of the court.

    “In the circumstances, you are kindly requested to cease and desist from transmitting the Bill to the President until the matters before the Supreme Court are resolved,” it added.

    On Wednesday, February 28, Parliament passed the anti-LGBTQ+ bill unanimously after completing the third reading. The bill has been a topic of intense debate and discussion since its introduction to the legislature three years ago.

    Proponents argue that it is necessary to uphold cultural and religious values, while opponents argue that certain provisions violate human rights and promote discrimination.

    Following its passage, many opponents have expressed their discontent, with some civil society groups threatening legal action if President Akufo-Addo signs the bill into law.

    President Akufo-Addo has withheld his assent pending the resolution of the bill’s constitutionality, which is being contested at the Supreme Court.

  • Presidency ‘warns’ Parliament against sending anti-LGBTQ bill to Akufo-Addo

    Presidency ‘warns’ Parliament against sending anti-LGBTQ bill to Akufo-Addo

    The Office of the President has requested Parliament not to forward the anti-LGBTQ bill to President Akufo-Addo for his assent.

    This decision, according to Nana Bediatuo Asante, the Secretary to the President, is based on the recognition of two pending applications for an order of interlocutory injunction before the Supreme Court.

    These applications aim to prevent Parliament from sending the bill to the President and to restrain the President from giving his assent to the bill until the final determination of the matter.

    In a statement issued and signed by Nana Bediatuo on Monday, the office revealed that the Attorney-General had informed the President, via a letter dated March 18, 2024, that he had been duly served with both applications.

    The statement further disclosed that the Attorney-General had advised the President not to take any action regarding the bill until the issues raised by the suits are resolved by the Supreme Court.

    “It is the understanding of this Office that both applications have also been duly served on Parliament. Therefore, it would be improper for you to transmit the Bill to the President and equally improper for this Office to receive the Bill until the Supreme Court determines the matters raised in the suits,” it added.

    The Office also clarified that it is a well-established legal principle that during the consideration of an interlocutory injunction application, the status quo should be maintained. This means that no action should be taken that could prejudice the requested injunctive relief or undermine the authority of the court.

    “In the circumstances, you are kindly requested to cease and desist from transmitting the Bill to the President until the matters before the Supreme Court are resolved,” it added.

    On Wednesday, February 28, Parliament unanimously passed the anti-LGBTQ+ bill after completing the third reading. The bill has been a subject of intense debate and discussion since its introduction to the legislature three years ago.

    Proponents argue that it is necessary to uphold cultural and religious values, while opponents argue that certain provisions violate human rights and promote discrimination.

    Since its passage, many opponents have expressed their displeasure, with some civil society groups threatening legal action should President Akufo-Addo assent to the bill for it to become law.

    President Akufo-Addo has withheld his accent as the constitutionality of the bill is being contested at the Supreme Court.

  • Jubilee House workers reportedly ordered by Akufo-Addo to reject anti-LGBTQ bill from Parliament

    Jubilee House workers reportedly ordered by Akufo-Addo to reject anti-LGBTQ bill from Parliament

    According to information obtained by The Herald from the Jubilee House, President Nana Akufo-Addo has directed that nobody from his office should receive the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Values Bill, also known as the anti-LGBTQI+ bill, which was passed by Parliament on February 27, 2024.

    Despite three attempts by Parliament to submit the Bill for the President’s assent, officials from the legislative arm were turned away each time.

    Interestingly, the President had previously accepted bills such as the Witchcraft Accusations Bill and legislation against the death penalty, which were also passed by Parliament through private member’s sponsorship. However, these bills had not received presidential assent due to concerns about their financial implications.

    The anti-LGBTQI+ bill imposes a prison sentence of up to three years for anyone convicted of identifying as LGBTQI+ and a maximum five-year jail term for forming or funding LGBTQ+ groups.

    Sources indicate that Cyril Kwabena Oteng Nsiah, the Clerk of Parliament, has attempted to deliver the bill to the President for his signature, but no one has been available at the Presidency to receive it.

    The Herald’s checks showed that the last attempt made by the Clerk of Parliament was March 11, 2024, but was told that the President through the Secretary to the President, Nana Asante Bediatuo, has directed that, nobody from his office, should receive the bill prohibiting LGBTQ+ activities.

    The bill also proposes a jail term of up to 10 years for anyone involved in LGBTQ+ advocacy campaigns aimed at children.

    It also encourages the public to report members of the LGBTQ+ community to authorities for “necessary action”.

    Interestingly, Amnesty International (AI) and its partner, Civil Society Organisations (CSO’s) Centre, led by its country director, Genevieve Partington, have paid a courtesy call on the office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General to discuss some human rights issues in Ghana.

    On the Witchcraft Accusations Bill, she expressed concern with the continued prevalence of witchcraft accusations in Ghana, saying “such accusations often lead to violence, discrimination and human rights abuses against innocent individuals, particularly elderly women.”

    She called on President Akufo-Addo, to protect people from being physically and mentally abused because of witchcraft accusations.

    She urged the government to take decisive action to address this issue, “including implementing comprehensive awareness campaigns, providing support services for victims, and enforcing laws to hold perpetrators accountable.”

    Francis Nyantakyi, the board chair of AI Ghana, has expressed concern over President Akufo-Addo’s refusal to sign the Armed Forces Bill Amendment, which seeks to abolish the death penalty.

    He emphasized that the death penalty violates fundamental human rights and the President’s stance could undermine Ghana’s progress in upholding human rights standards.

    Nyantakyi also inquired about the process for reintroducing the bill to parliament and how Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) could support its final abolishment. He suggested commuting the sentences of those on death row to life imprisonment and sought guidance on the steps and support from civil society organizations (CSOs).

    During the discussion, other human rights issues, such as prison conditions and overcrowding, were highlighted by partner CSOs. They sought updates on the progress of the Community Sentencing Bill, aimed at reducing prison overcrowding and improving offender rehabilitation methods.

    Madam Partington emphasized the importance of addressing these human rights concerns promptly, stating that upholding human rights is not just a legal obligation but also a moral imperative for justice and equality. She expressed AI’s willingness to collaborate with the government and other stakeholders to advance human rights in Ghana and ensure dignity and respect for all individuals.

  • It is not your business if we hang ourselves – Nyaho-Tamakloe slams US Ambassador over anti-LGBTQ bill opposition

    Former Ghanaian Ambassador to Serbia and Montenegro, Dr. Nyaho Nyaho-Tamakloe, has accused the United States Ambassador to Ghana, Virginia Palmer, of interfering in the country’s internal affairs.

    Nyaho-Tamakloe criticized Palmer for her recent comments, including threats, regarding the approval of a bill against same-sex activities in Ghana, calling it a direct attack on the nation’s sovereignty.

    “We have countries in the Arab world, have they been able to push this down their throats? America at times really surprises me. They talk of democracy and they do the other thing.

    “The ambassador here should have left this country long ago… I am telling you; she is interfering in the internal affairs of our country.

    “Look at the comments she made, even the threats. This is a sovereign nation. If we choose to hang ourselves tomorrow that is our business not hers. Why should she impose?” he told Joynews in an interview.

    Virginia Palmer, the United States Ambassador to Ghana, has reacted to the recently approved anti-LGBTQ Bill by Parliament.

    She stated that the prohibition of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) activities, as well as the criminalization of their promotion, advocacy, and funding, infringes on human rights.

    Virginia Palmer further warned of potential economic and reputational damage to Ghana should the bill be assented into law by the president.

    “I am saddened because some of the smartest, most creative, most decent people I know are LGBT. The bill Parliament passed takes away not only their basic human rights but those of all Ghanaians because it undermines their constitutional rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of the press. It will be bad for public order and public health. If enacted, it will also hurt Ghana’s international reputation and Ghana’s economy.” #USAmbPalmer,” she tweeted.

    In response to the ambassador’s comment, Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe noted that Virginia Palmer’s actions contravened the Vienna Convention. The former diplomat also criticized a statement issued by the Ministry of Finance as irresponsible, warning of significant economic implications should the bill be approved into law.