Tag: Anti-LGBTQ+ bill

  • Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill could become law within six months – Ntim Fordjour

    Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill could become law within six months – Ntim Fordjour

    The Member of Parliament (MP) for Assin South, Rev. Ntim Fordjour, has indicated that Parliament could take less than three months to give a final verdict on the controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill (anti-LBGTQ+).

    He explained that the current bill before Parliament will not go through extensive consultations and debates, as those processes have already been completed. According to him, the upcoming discussions will resume from where the previous deliberations ended. He made this known while speaking to the media on Wednesday, October 22.

    “Within 3 months to 6 months, we should be able to pass this bill. We’ve had bills more complex than this, which even came under a certificate of urgency. So, I don’t see why this should go beyond three months,” Rev. Fordjour said.

    The bill was presented to then President Nana Akufo-Addo, who was expected to sign it into law or refuse to assent to it within seven days.

    Initially tabled in 2021, the bill stalled following legal challenges at the Supreme Court questioning its constitutionality. Despite the pending case, the sponsors say reintroducing the motion ensures the process remains active.


    The bill has been criticized by rights organizations and other groups. Nonetheless, A coalition of ten Members of Parliament from both sides of the House has revived the contentious Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, reopening one of Ghana’s most polarising national discussions.


    In a post shared on X by journalist Kwaku Asante on October 21, 2025, the group, co-led by Ningo-Prampram MP Sam George (NDC) and Assin South MP John Ntim Fordjour, announced the return of the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, 2021.


    The proposed legislation criminalizes LGBTQ+ activities, advocacy, and funding, prescribing a maximum three-year jail term for same-sex acts and up to ten years for promoting or supporting such activities.


    The coalition members John Ntim Fordjour, Samuel Nartey George, Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzra, Helen Adjoa Ntoso, Nurideen Muhammed Mummuni, Vincent Ekow Assafuah, Alhassan Tampuli Sulemana, Rita Naa Odoley Sowah, Dr Tiah Abdul Kabiru Mahama, and Anthony Mmieh argue that the bill is intended to preserve Ghana’s cultural identity and protect family values.

    International bodies, including the United Nations and human rights organizations, have strongly criticized the bill, describing it as an infringement on human rights.

    The move marks an uncommon show of bipartisan unity in Parliament. Lawmakers are expected to engage in intense debates in the coming weeks as the Speaker refers the bill to the appropriate committee.
    Faith-based groups continue to throw their weight behind the legislation, while civil society organizations and rights advocates are mobilizing fresh opposition.


    Ten Members of Parliament have once again brought before the House the divisive Anti-LBGTQ+ Bill, reigniting heated national discussions over sexuality and cultural values.


    A post by Kwaku Asante on X on October 21, 2025, revealed that the coalition led by Ningo-Prampram MP Sam George and Assin South MP John Ntim Fordjour had reintroduced the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, 2021.


    The proposed law seeks to outlaw LGBTQ+ practices and related advocacy or financing. Offenders could face up to three years in prison for engaging in same-sex acts and up to ten years for promoting or funding such activities.


    According to the document shared online, members of the coalition include John Ntim Fordjour, Samuel Nartey George, Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzra, Helen Adjoa Ntoso, Nurideen Muhammed Mummuni, Vincent Ekow Assafuah, Alhassan Tampuli Sulemana, Rita Naa Odoley Sowah, Dr Tiah Abdul Kabiru Mahama, and Anthony Mmieh.


    They argue that the legislation is essential to upholding Ghana’s moral and cultural heritage. The bill, first introduced in 2021, was stalled earlier this year due to court injunctions challenging its legality. Despite the pending court decision, the sponsors insist the new motion keeps the debate alive.


    The reintroduction reflects a rare bipartisan alignment in Parliament, as both NDC and NPP MPs rally behind it. The Speaker is expected to forward the bill to the appropriate committee for further scrutiny, as Parliament braces for passionate exchanges.


    Two female legislators, Deputy Minority Leader Patricia Appiagyei and Minister of Trade, Agribusiness, and Industry Elizabeth Ofosu Adjare, are introducing the Property Rights of Spouses Bill.


    Last year, the United States Department spokesperson Matthew Miller indicated that the US government will restrict foreign aid to Ghana if the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, also known as the anti-LGBT Bill, is signed into law.


    Engaging the press, Mr Miller said, “If this bill becomes law, it will only have a chilling effect on investment. For instance, in Ghana, you’ve seen that same chilling effect bear fruit in Uganda, which passed a very similar law in the past. I can say that should the bill pass, it would potentially have ramifications for US assistance in the country.”


    He noted that both governments have had intensive conversations on the matter, which were done behind closed doors.


    The US provided over $211 million in assistance to Ghana in fiscal year 2022, supporting various sectors including agriculture, malaria prevention, and AIDS combat efforts.


    The United States has expressed deep concern over the passage of the stringent anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in Ghana, stating that it threatens constitutional freedoms.

  • I can risk my life to make sure anti-gay bill is assented – Bagbin

    I can risk my life to make sure anti-gay bill is assented – Bagbin

    Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has pledged to work effortlessly in order for the controversial anti-gay bill to be passed this year.

    According to him, he plans to approach the newly appointed Attorney General and Minister for Justice for guidance on the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

    Speaking to members of the Ghanaian community in Côte d’Ivoire on January 26, 2025, Bagbin underlined the significance of the bill, which had been approved by Parliament but was not signed into law by former President Akufo-Addo, a move Bagbin considered unconstitutional.

    “The LGBTQ bill was passed by Parliament, the former president refused to assent to it, which was unconstitutional. There is no law allowing the president to refuse or fail to assent to a bill passed by Parliament.

    “Parliament is the authority for passing laws, not any other person, not the president. That decision was wrong, and all of you punished him for that,” Bagbin stated.

    He reiterated his commitment to having the bill passed this year, stressing its vital importance.

    “I am going to write to the new Attorney General and Minister for Justice for his comments for us to resend it to the new president for his assent. So it is not going to take time it will be passed this year. It is anti-God…Nobody should joke with me when it comes to that area. I can lose my life because of that,” he added.

  • File a fresh motion on anti-LGBTQ+ Bill – Supreme Court orders Richard Sky

    File a fresh motion on anti-LGBTQ+ Bill – Supreme Court orders Richard Sky

    The Supreme Court has postponed Richard Sky’s application seeking a declaration of nullity for the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the anti-gay bill, to May 17, 2024.

    Chief Justice Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo adjourned the case to allow the plaintiff’s counsel to “submit a revised motion paper along with supporting affidavit and statement of case.”

    Thaddeus Sory, counsel for the first defendant, proposed to the court that the applicant amend paragraphs five and seven of his applications to align with his reliefs.

    Paragraph five of the applicant’s writ seeks “an order restraining the Speaker of Parliament and the Clerk to Parliament from presenting The Human and Sexual Values Bill, 2024 to the President of the Republic for his assent.”

    Paragraph seven of the application is also seeking “an injunction barring any attempts to enforce the provisions of The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bil 2024, particularly those criminalizing same-sex relationships and related advocacy efforts.”

    The Chief Justice, in her ruling, supported the suggestion of the counsel for the first defendant and postponed the amendment to May 17.

    “By listening to all the counsels, the court agrees with the suggestion of counsel for the first defendant and orders the plaintiff applicant to file a fresh motion paper with supporting affidavit and statement of case. Plaintiff is also given leave to address any matters of fact and issues of law in the new process.

    “Plaintiff applicant is given up to May 17, so now you have moved from May 9 to file the new process on May 17, 2024. Counsel for defendants are given seven days after service on them to file any processes that they may wish to.”

  • Akufo-Addo has no respect for Ghana’s customs, traditions – Okletey Tet Larbi

    Akufo-Addo has no respect for Ghana’s customs, traditions – Okletey Tet Larbi

    Former Deputy Eastern Regional Minister Okletey Tet Larbi has accused President Akufo-Addo of disregarding Ghana’s customs and traditions while also neglecting to pass the anti-LGBTQ+ bill into law.

    The controversy stems from a viral video showing President Akufo-Addo allegedly instructing traditional leaders to stand before greeting them at a funeral event.

    Larbi criticized this behavior, citing it as evidence of the President’s lack of respect for Ghanaian customs.

    Larbi went on to express his disappointment, questioning how a president could command chiefs to greet him by his guard.

    ‘How can a president meet chiefs and order his guard to use his left hand to command Chiefs to greet. President Akufo-Addo lacks respect for Ghana’s customs and traditions,” Okletey Tet Larbi stated in an interview on UTV.

    He emphasised that such actions reflect a disregard for the traditions that should be upheld.

    Additionally, Larbi called on the President to publicly explain his refusal to sign the anti-LGBTQ+ bill into law, emphasizing that Akufo-Addo’s allegiance should prioritize the people of Ghana over personal interests.

    Watch video below:

  • “Just give me a human answer, for goodness’ sake!” – Richard Quest’s ‘heated’ moment with Ghana’s Finance Minister

    “Just give me a human answer, for goodness’ sake!” – Richard Quest’s ‘heated’ moment with Ghana’s Finance Minister

    CNN’s Richard Quest’s interview with Ghana’s Finance Minister, Mohammed Amin Adam, turned tense over the country’s controversial anti-LGBT+ bill.

    The exchange, which took place at an event in the United States, saw Quest seeking a personal viewpoint from Adam, given his significant roles in the government.

    Quest probed, “If the court rules in favor of the law, what would you advise?”

    Dr. Adam stated, “Well, I would subject myself to the laws of my country. I do not live on an island. I live in a country that is governed by laws.”

    Quest, unsatisfied with the response, pushed for a more personal take, “What do you think of the law? Just give me a human answer. Just for goodness sake, [hitting on the table loudly] give me a human answer on what you think of the law.”

    Dr. Adam maintained, “The most important thing is to discuss the effects of the law when passed… having said that, it is not for me (Richard Quest interjects [it is!]) to give the determination to the Supreme Court of our country.”

    A frustrated Quest removed his glasses, stating, “You are going in circles here.”

    Dr. Adam countered, “I am not.”

    Quest, raising his voice, continued, “You have said this several times, and I understand your point! [gesturing towards Dr. Adam]. I understand that you don’t want to answer it.”

    Dr. Adam repeated, “Let me state my point clearly again, there is a case before the Supreme Court and I am not going to prejudice the determination of the Supreme Court.”

    Quest then questioned the minister’s responsibility regarding the law, to which Dr. Adam replied, “The responsibility I am taking is, if the Supreme Court rules in favor and the president assents to it, I will subject myself to the laws of my country.”

    Quest inferred, “So you are in favor.”

    Dr. Adam concluded, “I have told you, I will subject myself to the laws of my country, once it becomes law. Until then, the Supreme Court has to make a determination on it and that issue is currently before the Supreme Court. And I am not going to prejudice the determination by the Supreme Court.”

    The interview concluded with Quest thanking Dr. Adam, who responded, “It’s been my pleasure.”

    The anti-LGBT+ bill, which was passed by Ghana’s parliament, is now awaiting the decision of President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo.

    The president’s signature is on hold until the Supreme Court addresses the challenges to the bill’s constitutionality. Two cases are currently before the Supreme Court, contesting the legality of the bill.

    Watch the video below;

  • Was CNN’s Richard Quest ‘angry’ with Ghana’s Finance Minister over his answer on anti-LGBTQ+ bill?

    Was CNN’s Richard Quest ‘angry’ with Ghana’s Finance Minister over his answer on anti-LGBTQ+ bill?

    During a recent event in the United States, CNN’s Richard Quest had a notably tense exchange with Ghana’s Finance Minister, Mohammed Amin Adam, concerning Ghana’s newly passed anti-LGBT+ bill.

    Quest, in pursuit of clarity on Adam’s personal view of the law, considering his influential positions as both a Member of Parliament and a senior government official, pressed for a direct answer.

    Quest asked, “If the court rules in favor of the law, what would you advise?”

    Dr. Amin Adam responded, “Well, I would subject myself to the laws of my country. I do not live on an island. I live in a country that is governed by laws.”

    Quest, seeking a more personal response, pressed further, “What do you think of the law? Just give me a human answer. Just for goodness’ sake, [hitting on the table loudly] give me a human answer on what you think of the law.”

    Dr. Adam replied, “The most important thing is to discuss the effects of the law when passed… having said that, it is not for me (Richard Quest interjects [it is!]) to give the determination to the Supreme Court of our country.”

    Quest, visibly frustrated, removed his spectacles and remarked, “You are going in circles here.”

    Dr. Adam insisted, “I am not.”

    Quest continued, “You have said this several times, and I understand your point! [gesturing towards Dr. Adam]. I understand that you don’t want to answer it [his voice raised].”

    Dr. Adam reiterated, “Let me state my point clearly again, there is a case before the Supreme Court and I am not going to prejudice the determination of the Supreme Court.”

    Quest challenged, “You weren’t in Parliament when it was voted, you aren’t going to answer whether you like the law or not because that is prejudicial, you are one of the most senior members of the government, it is not immediately clear to me minister, what responsibility you are taking for this law.”

    Dr. Adam clarified, “The responsibility I am taking is, if the Supreme Court rules in favor and the president assents to it, I will subject myself to the laws of my country.”

    Quest inferred, “So you are in favor.”

    Dr. Adam concluded, “I have told you, I will subject myself to the laws of my country, once it becomes law. Until then, the Supreme Court has to make a determination on it and that issue is currently before the Supreme Court. And I am not going to prejudice the determination by the Supreme Court.”

    Quest ended the interview with a simple “Thank you,” to which Dr. Adam replied, “It’s been my pleasure.”

    The anti-LGBT+ bill, passed by Ghana’s parliament in late February, awaits President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo’s decision on whether to sign it, pending the resolution of a challenge to the bill’s constitutionality. Two cases contesting the legality of the bill are currently before the Supreme Court.

    Watch the interview below;

  • Parliament Clerk’s letter to Presidency on anti-LGBTQ+ bill offensive – Ablakawa

    Parliament Clerk’s letter to Presidency on anti-LGBTQ+ bill offensive – Ablakawa

    Member of Parliament for North Tongu, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, has openly criticized the Clerk of Parliament, Cyril Nsiah, for his correspondence with the presidency regarding the Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill.

    Ablakwa voiced his concerns on Metro TV’s “Good Morning Ghana” on April 12, 2024, while discussing the passage of the anti-LGBTQ+ bill, the subsequent response from the Presidency, and the Clerk of Parliament’s recent letter to the president’s office.

    In a letter dated April 10, 2024, Clerk Cyril Nsiah contacted Nana Bediatuo Asante, the Executive Secretary to the president, to determine a suitable time for presenting the contentious bill to President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo.

    This was in response to a letter from the Office of the President signed by Bediatuo Asante, requesting that the bill not be sent to the President until suits filed in court against the bill have been duly addressed.

    In his letter, Nsiah stated, “I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your Letter No. OPS 140/1/24/235 dated 18th March 2024, on the above subject matter and received in my Office on 19th March 2024.”

    He further noted, “I have taken note of the contents of the letter, particularly the text in the last paragraph, which states that ‘In the circumstances, you are kindly requested to cease and desist from transmitting the Bill to the President until matters before the Supreme Court are resolved.’”

    “Accordingly, I await an indication in writing from your Office on when to present the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024, to His Excellency the President for his consideration, pursuant to Article 106(7) of the Constitution, 1992,” Nsiah concluded. The unfolding situation raises questions about the balance of power and the independence of Ghana’s legislative body.

    Ablakwa, however, found the Clerk’s approach particularly troubling, saying “I feel offended by this letter” and contrary to constitutional procedures. He vowed to seek clarification from the Clerk’s office once Parliament reconvenes.

    “I don’t know what the strategy is, but I feel offended by this letter, particularly the third paragraph. Are you subjecting our constitutional mandate to the whims and caprices of the president or Secretary to the president? What happened to our constitutional independence? These are constitutional matters,” Ablakwa stated.

    “So now Nana Bediatuo Asante is going to dictate to Parliament when we should communicate with the executive? When we should move forward with our mandate? What is the meaning of this? When the house resumes, the clerk better have some explanation because we will take him on,” he added.

  • “You better have some explanation for this!” – Ablakwa ‘rips into’ Parliament Clerk over anti-LGBTQ+ bill

    “You better have some explanation for this!” – Ablakwa ‘rips into’ Parliament Clerk over anti-LGBTQ+ bill

    Member of Parliament for North Tongu, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, has strongly criticized the Clerk of Parliament, Cyril Ansah, regarding his correspondence with the presidency concerning the Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, widely known as the anti-LGBT bill.

    Speaking on Metro TV’s Good Morning Ghana programme, Ablakwa expressed concern over the approach taken by the Clerk.

    Describing the action as offensive, Ablakwa accused the Clerk of deviating from constitutional norms by sending the letter to the presidency.

    He pledged to seek clarification from the Clerk’s office once Parliament resumes session.

    “I don’t know what the strategy is, but I feel offended by this letter, particularly the third paragraph. Are you subjecting our constitutional mandate to the whims and caprices of the president or Secretary to the president? What happened to our constitutional independence? These are constitutional matters.

    “So now Nana Bediatuo Asante is going to dictate to Parliament when we should communicate with the executive? When we should move forward with our mandate? What is the meaning of this? When the house resumes, the clerk better have some explanation because we will take him on,” Ablakwa asserted.

    On April 10, 2024, Cyril Nsiah, the Clerk to Parliament, wrote to Nana Bediatuo Asante, Executive Secretary to the president, seeking clarity on when to transmit the controversial bill to President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo.

    In his letter dated Wednesday, April 10, Mr. Nsiah acknowledged receipt of Mr. Bediatuo Asante’s letter and expressed his intention to transmit the Bill as per Article 106(7) of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana.

    “I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your Letter No. OPS 140/1/24/235 dated 18th March 2024, on the above subject matter and received in my Office on 19th March 2024,” Mr. Nsiah wrote.

    “I have taken note of the contents of the letter, particularly the text in the last paragraph, which states that ‘In the circumstances, you are kindly requested to cease and desist from transmitting the Bill to the President until matters before the Supreme Court are resolved.”

    “Accordingly, I await an indication in writing from your Office on when to present the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024, to His Excellency the President for his consideration, pursuant to Article 106(7) of the Constitution, 1992,” the Clerk noted.

  • Lydia Forson mocks Dormaahene’s decision to forfeit his salary in support for antiLGBTQ+bill

    Lydia Forson mocks Dormaahene’s decision to forfeit his salary in support for antiLGBTQ+bill


    A recent viral video has captured Dormaahene’s bold assertion that he would relinquish his salary if President Akufo-Addo approves the controversial anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    This declaration has sparked widespread debate and attention on social media platforms.

    The bill in question has been a subject of heated controversy following Parliament’s decision to pass it, awaiting the President’s approval.

    However, President Akufo-Addo has delayed assenting to the bill, citing ongoing legal challenges against Parliament’s decision.

    President Akufo-Addo emphasised that the approval process should be halted until the Supreme Court delivers a verdict on the matter.

    This move has further intensified discussions and reactions across the nation.

    Dormaahene, also known as Osagyefo ƆseadeƐyƆ Dr Agyemang Badu, serves as both a High Court Judge and the President of the Bono Regional House of Chiefs.

    During the Sumaman Akwantukɛse Festival at Suma Ahenkuro over the weekend, he expressed his readiness to sacrifice his judicial salary in solidarity with Ghana’s stance on the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    “I am prepared to forfeit my salary should President Akufo-Addo pass the anti-LGBTQ+ bill. Ghana can thrive independently,” Dormaahene declared.

    In response to Dormaahene’s statement, a popular Ghanaian actress Lydia Foron reacted with a laughing emoji, highlighting the diverse range of opinions surrounding this contentious issue.

    Watch video below:

  • Reformation of homosexuals must be a priority to parliament – Ekow Assafuah

    Reformation of homosexuals must be a priority to parliament – Ekow Assafuah

    The Deputy Minister-designate for the Ministry of Local Government, Decentralisation and Rural Development, Ekow Assafuah, has called on Parliament to focus on the rehabilitation of homosexuals rather than solely resorting to punitive measures.

    He emphasized that Parliament bears the responsibility of ensuring the reformation and seamless integration of individuals with different sexual orientations back into society.

    Expressing his support for the anti-LGBTQ+ bill during his vetting by Parliament’s Appointments Committee in Accra on March 11, 2024, Mr. Assafuah underscored his backing for the legislation, aligning it with his Catholic beliefs and cultural background.

    “In principle, the LGBTQ bill that has been passed or approved by Parliament is one that I support wholeheartedly because it is in consonance with my tradition and culture. It is in consonance with my formation as a catholic person or practising catholic,” he stated.

    While he endorsed the bill, which criminalizes and prohibits LGBTQ activities, he cautioned against merely isolating individuals with different sexual orientations, emphasizing the need for a more holistic approach to address the issue.

    The controversial bill, unanimously passed by Parliament on February 28, 2024, criminalizes and prohibits the promotion, advocacy, and funding of LGBTQ activities in the country.

    Mr. Assafuah, however, expressed reservations about the punitive measures outlined in the bill, advocating for a focus on reformative approaches to address the underlying issues.

    He stressed the importance of punishment being aligned with principles of reformation, urging Parliament to prioritize the responsibility of reforming individuals and reintegrating them into society.

    Mr. Assafuah rejected the notion of society giving in to despair and suggested that proper forums and engagements should be established to devise effective strategies for dealing with individuals with different sexual orientations, emphasizing Parliament’s role in fulfilling this responsibility.

    “There are reasons for punishment to be meted out to people. There is a principle behind punishment and one of the principles is to ensure that a person is being reformed out of a criminal activity. And so, if we have to reform persons, do we have to mete out punishment that seems to ostracise the person from society? It seems that as a society, we are bringing out our failures in the sense that we are showing our inability or incapacity to be able to reform people or if you like put people through sessions that reintroduce such persons into society. If we are not able to do so. That is where I see the failure,” he explained. 

    “It seems we are throwing our hands in despair. I am making a strong point that as a Parliament, we should be very interested in reforming our people. That is our responsibility as a people. We cannot say that there is a supposed anticipation of gay persons being lynched if they are given community service and so because of that as the people’s representatives we are throwing our hands in despair to allow such persons just to go astray.

    “That cannot be our course. Let’s have a proper forum, let’s have proper engagements to see how best we can deal with such persons. It is our responsibility to do so,” Mr Assafuah stated.

  • Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill: It lacks ‘sensible thinking and analysis” – IMANI’s Franklin Cudjoe

    Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill: It lacks ‘sensible thinking and analysis” – IMANI’s Franklin Cudjoe

    Founder and President of IMANI Africa, Franklin Cudjoe, has condemned the decision to incarcerate individuals based on their sexual orientation, calling it ‘unreasonable.’

    On February 28, 2024, Parliament approved legislation criminalising LGBTQ activities and prohibiting their advocacy, promotion, and financial support.

    Under this law, individuals found guilty could face imprisonment ranging from six months to three years, while those promoting and financing such activities may face sentences of three to five years.

    During an interview on The Big Issue with Selorm Adonoo on Citi TV, Mr. Cudjoe criticised the bill, arguing that it lacked thorough analysis and consideration, particularly regarding the imprisonment of LGBTQ individuals.

    “I don’t think it is sensible to imprison anyone who you believe is gay unless, of course, that person must have raped; you think they must have unduly influenced other people, especially minors and you found them.

    “But how are you going to police people who are doing their acts in the bedroom? I think the law was limited in terms of sensible thinking and analysis in that regard,” he stated.

  • Anti LGBTQ+ bill: Succumbing to external pressure undermines Ghana’s independence – National Chief Imam’s Spokesperson

    Anti LGBTQ+ bill: Succumbing to external pressure undermines Ghana’s independence – National Chief Imam’s Spokesperson

    The Spokesperson of the National Chief Imam, Sheikh Armiyawo Shaibu, voiced concerns about external influences impacting critical national decisions, particularly in the wake of the recent passage of the anti-LGBTQ+ bill in Parliament.

    Sheikh Shaibu asserted that succumbing to such external pressure would compromise the very essence of Ghana’s independence, coincidentally marking its 67th year on March 6.

    Sheikh Shaibu, highlighting the widespread objection to LGBTQ+ activities among Ghanaians, emphasised the collective rejection of these practices as a nation grounded in strength, might, and deep spirituality.

    He questioned the authenticity of Ghana’s independence, expressing concern that external forces challenge the nation’s autonomy in decision-making.

    “In my view, it makes complete nonsense of our independence. Ghana will be marking its 67th year of independence on the 6th of March as a nation. 67 years!”

    The United States’ warning of dire economic implications following the enactment of the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill added a layer of complexity to the situation.

    Sheikh Shaibu, however, stood firm, underlining the religious foundation of the country as evident in the constitution, national anthem, and pledge—all referencing the Almighty God.

    “And majority of the people in our country see these gay and lesbian activities as something opprobrious that we must all reject with all the strength and the might and the spirit as a nation that has a deep sense of God.”

    As Ghana grapples with the divisive Anti-LGBTQ+ bill, Sheikh Shaibu urged citizens to reflect on the implications of external pressure on decision-making.

    “Now it is not even about our concerns, feelings, and beliefs as citizens of this country, but because of a certain pressure from outside which didn’t begin today is trying to influence us. This shows that as a nation we are not truly independent as we claim and it must be a worry for every citizen in this country.”

    He stressed that true independence should empower Ghana to shape its destiny without undue influence from external sources.

    The Finance Ministry’s call for the President to engage stakeholders, including faith-based organisations, and its suggestion to involve conservative countries like Arab nations and China, further underscored the geopolitical implications of the bill.

    Meanwhile, human rights groups in Ghana have threatened legal action, with two lawsuits already before the Supreme Court, prompting President Akufo-Addo to await the court’s decision before taking action on the bill.

    The unfolding events raise critical questions about Ghana’s independence and its ability to navigate internal issues without succumbing to external pressures.


  • Akufo-Addo approved E-levy amid a lawsuit yet claims he is unable to do same for anti LGBTQ+ bill – Sam George

    Akufo-Addo approved E-levy amid a lawsuit yet claims he is unable to do same for anti LGBTQ+ bill – Sam George

    The controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill has become the spotlight of a brewing conflict between its lead sponsor, Sam George, and President Akufo-Addo.

    George alleges that the President is using a pending legal challenge as a shield to avoid assenting to the contentious legislation.

    Speaking on JoyFM’s Top Story on March 5, George pointed to the President’s past actions, highlighting instances such as the Electronic Transaction Levy, where Akufo-Addo proceeded despite legal challenges.

    The Prampram lawmaker argued that if the President genuinely supported the anti-LGBTQ+ bill, he would have assented to it, court action notwithstanding.

    “The President is being the puppet master here with a few other players here. The President is trying to find an excuse not to sign, but again you want to find out if the President is being principled or not,” George asserted.

    Furthermore, George revealed his plan to suggest to co-sponsors to reintroduce the bill to Parliament if President Akufo-Addo declines to sign.

    He emphasised the possibility of putting it to a 2/3rd majority vote in such a scenario.

    President Akufo-Addo reassured the international community of Ghana’s commitment to upholding human rights, emphasising the ongoing legal challenge as the reason for the delay in action.

    He made these remarks during a diplomatic engagement on March 4, addressing concerns surrounding the bill.

    Adding a layer of complexity to the situation, on March 5, journalist and lawyer Richard Dela Sky filed a lawsuit against Parliament at the Supreme Court, seeking an order to restrain the President from assenting to the bill.

    The lawsuit also aims to prevent the Speaker of Parliament and the Clerk from presenting the bill to the President.

    However, legal experts, including Associate Professor Prof Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua from the Ghana Law School, have labelled certain portions of the lawsuit as premature.

    Appiagyei-Atua noted that arguing against the bill on the grounds of constitutional violations may weaken the case.
    As the legal battle unfolds, the fate of the Human Sexual Rights Bill remains uncertain, with political and legal figures locked in a contentious struggle over its future.

  • Richard Sky calls on Supreme Court to declare Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill null and void

    Richard Sky calls on Supreme Court to declare Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill null and void

    Private legal practitioner, Richard Dela Sky, has lodged an application with the Supreme Court, seeking a declaration that the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the anti-gay bill, is null, void, and without legal effect.

    Sky argues that the enactment of the bill contravenes Article 33(5) of the 1992 Constitution, as well as various provisions including Articles 12(1) and (2), 15(1), 17(1) and (2), 18(2), and 21(1)(a)(b)(d) and (e) of the Constitution.

    He asserts that the bill’s provisions “raise profound concerns regarding the potential infringement of the fundamental human rights and freedoms guaranteed to every Ghanaian by the Constitution.”

    Additionally, Richard Sky claims that “the Speaker of Parliament contravened Article 108(a)(ii) of the Constitution, in light of Article 296(a)(b) and (c), by admitting and allowing Parliament to proceed upon and pass “The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024″ into law as the same imposes a charge upon the Consolidated Fund or other public funds of Ghana.”

    The bill was approved by Parliament on Wednesday, February 28, 2024, and it forbids funding, advocacy, and promotion of LGBTQ activities.

    Sky, in its writ, also wants the Supreme Court to give an “order restraining the President of the Republic from assenting to ‘The Human and Sexual Values Bill, 2024,’ as such action will directly contravene the constitutional safeguards of liberties and rights of Ghanaians.”

    He further prayed for “an injunction barring any attempts to enforce the provisions of “The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill 2024,” particularly those criminalising same-sex relationships and related advocacy efforts.”

  • We will comment on anti-LGBTQ+ bill after it becomes a law – IMF

    We will comment on anti-LGBTQ+ bill after it becomes a law – IMF

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has announced that it will provide comments on the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill after it is officially signed into law.

    The IMF states that its evaluation will specifically focus on the economic and financial consequences of the legislation.

    In a released statement, the IMF emphasized its commitment to diversity and inclusion as integral values. “We cannot comment on a bill that has not yet been signed into law and whose economic and financial implications we have yet to assess.”

    The institution underscores its internal policies prohibiting discrimination based on personal characteristics, including gender, gender expression, or sexual orientation.

    “Diversity and inclusion are values that the IMF embraces.”

    “Our internal policies prohibit discrimination based on personal characteristics, including but not limited to gender, gender expression, or sexual orientation. Like institutions, diverse and inclusive economies flourish,” the statement from the Fund added.

    The IMF asserts that diverse and inclusive economies thrive, aligning with its principles.

    This statement follows the recent passage of the bill by Ghanaian lawmakers on March 28, with support from both the ruling party and the opposition.

    The legislation aims to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities, along with their promotion, advocacy, and funding.

    Offenders may face jail terms ranging from 6 months to 5 years, depending on the nature of the violation.

    Acknowledging the significance of the situation, the IMF states that it is closely monitoring developments in Ghana. However, it refrains from commenting on a bill that has not been signed into law, pending a comprehensive assessment of its economic and financial implications.

    Ghana, facing economic challenges and seeking an IMF bailout, may see uncertainties in securing the third tranche due to the recent legislation.

    The country’s dollar bonds have experienced a decline, ranking as the second-worst performers in an index monitoring emerging-market sovereign hard-currency debt.

    All 14 of Ghana’s dollar notes in the gauge saw a drop in value, with bonds maturing in 2034 experiencing the most significant impact.

    Pressure is mounting on President Akufo-Addo to assent to the bill amid these developments.

  • Secret ballot would have altered fate of anti-LGBTQ+ bill – Afenyo-Markin

    Secret ballot would have altered fate of anti-LGBTQ+ bill – Afenyo-Markin

    The Majority Leader in Parliament, Afenyo-Markin, has revealed that a significant number of Members of Parliament (MP) would have opposed the LGBT+ bill if a secret vote had been conducted.

    Speaking on GHOne TV’s State of Affairs with Francis Abban, the legislator disclosed that a majority of MPs were against the penalties outlined in the bill.

    Afenyo-Markin shared that many lawmakers were waiting for the Speaker’s decision to allow a secret ballot, as opposed to the usual voice vote during consideration. He explained that his call for a secret ballot was supported by numerous colleagues who preferred the anonymity of voting.

    The lawmaker emphasized that the issue revolved around the severity of the prescribed punishment, expressing concern about sending individuals to jail for their involvement with the LGBT+ community.

    He clarified that his stance was not a mere suggestion but a statement of fact, underscoring the importance of prioritizing convictions over political considerations.

    Afenyo-Markin acknowledged the risks associated with his position, stating that focusing on matters of conviction rather than electoral concerns was essential, even if it meant taking unpopular stances.

    “When I raised the issue of a secret ballot, it was actually a call from a lot of colleagues. Because normally at consideration, we use voice vote. So they wanted should the Speaker rule in my favour for a secret ballot then they will come in a slot in their ballot,” Mr. Afenyo-Markin stated.

    “I am not suggesting… I am stating so as a statement of fact, it is not a suggestion. I am telling you what it is. What’s the first rule of nature, reservation? It was a risk I took and I have said that I really don’t mind because if a politician is always thinking about the next election and not looking at issues of conviction, this is how I feel,” the lawmaker stated.

  • “Ghana likely to lose US$3.8b in World Bank financing if Akufo-Addo signs Anti-LGBTQ+ bill” – Finance Ministry

    “Ghana likely to lose US$3.8b in World Bank financing if Akufo-Addo signs Anti-LGBTQ+ bill” – Finance Ministry

    The Finance Ministry has raised apprehensions regarding the possible repercussions of President Akufo-Addo’s approval of the recently passed Anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Just days following the bill’s passage, the Ministry highlighted the adverse effects the legislation could have on government expenditure, key plans, and projects.

    The Ministry is urging President Akufo-Addo to refrain from enacting the bill into law, cautioning that it could lead to significant financial losses for the country.

    Among the risks cited is the potential loss of $850 million in budgetary support from the World Bank for the current year alone.

    In the 5-page document, the Ministry explained that “for 2024 Ghana will lose US$600 million Budget support and US$250 million for the Financial Stability Fund.”

    “This will negatively impact Ghana’s foreign exchange reserves and exchange rate stability as these inflows are expected to shore the country’s reserve position.

    Over the next six years, the Ministry explained that “Ghana is likely to lose US$3.8 billion in World Bank Financing.”

    Below is the full text of the World Bank implications projected by the Ministry;

    i. The expected US$300 million financing from the First Ghana Resilient Recovery Development Policy (Operation Budget Support) which is currently pending Parliamentary approval might not be disbursed by the Bank when it is approved by Parliament.;

    ii. On-going negotiations on the Second Ghana Resilient Recovery Development Policy Operation (Budget Support) amounting to US$300 million may be suspended:

    iii. On-going negotiations for US$250 million to support the Ghana Financial Stability Fund
    may be suspended;

    iv. Disbursement of undisbursed amounts totalling US$2.1 billion for ongoing projects will be suspended; and

    v. Preparation of pipeline projects and declaration of effectiveness for two projects totalling US$900 million may be suspended. Full details of the World Bank portfolio are attached as Appendix 1 & 2.

    vi. In total, Ghana is likely to lose US$3.8 billion in World Bank Financing over the next five to six years. For 2024 Ghana will lose US$600 million in Budget support and US$250 million for the Financial Stability Fund. This will negatively impact Ghana’s foreign exchange reserves and exchange rate stability as these inflows are expected to shore up the country’s reserve position.

    It comes in the wake of warnings by the United States of dire implications for the Ghanaian economy after Parliament enacted a Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill.

    Already, some human rights groups in Ghana have threatened to head to the Supreme Court if President Akufo-Addo gives assent to the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values bill passed on Wednesday.

    On the back of all these, the Finance Ministry is urging the President to engage stakeholders including faith-based organisations to communicate the bill’s implications.

    Aside from that, it called for effective engagement with conservative countries including Arab countries and China.

    “This could help trigger resources to fill in the potential financing gaps to be created.”

  • Ghana’s forex reserves, stability at risk if Akufo-Addo signs Anti-LGBTQ+ bill – Finance Ministry

    Ghana’s forex reserves, stability at risk if Akufo-Addo signs Anti-LGBTQ+ bill – Finance Ministry

    The Finance Ministry has raised apprehensions regarding the possible repercussions of President Akufo-Addo’s approval of the recently passed Anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Just days following the bill’s passage, the Ministry highlighted the adverse effects the legislation could have on government expenditure, key plans, and projects.

    The Ministry is urging President Akufo-Addo to refrain from enacting the bill into law, cautioning that it could lead to significant financial losses for the country.

    Among the risks cited is the potential loss of $850 million in budgetary support from the World Bank for the current year alone.

    In the 5-page document, the Ministry explained that “for 2024 Ghana will lose US$600 million Budget support and US$250 million for the Financial Stability Fund.”

    “This will negatively impact Ghana’s foreign exchange reserves and exchange rate stability as these inflows are expected to shore the country’s reserve position.

    Over the next six years, the Ministry explained that “Ghana is likely to lose US$3.8 billion in World Bank Financing.”

    Below is the full text of the World Bank implications projected by the Ministry;

    i. The expected US$300 million financing from the First Ghana Resilient Recovery Development Policy (Operation Budget Support) which is currently pending Parliamentary approval might not be disbursed by the Bank when it is approved by Parliament.;

    ii. On-going negotiations on the Second Ghana Resilient Recovery Development Policy Operation (Budget Support) amounting to US$300 million may be suspended:

    iii. On-going negotiations for US$250 million to support the Ghana Financial Stability Fund
    may be suspended;

    iv. Disbursement of undisbursed amounts totalling US$2.1 billion for ongoing projects will be suspended; and

    v. Preparation of pipeline projects and declaration of effectiveness for two projects totalling US$900 million may be suspended. Full details of the World Bank portfolio are attached as Appendix 1 & 2.

    vi. In total, Ghana is likely to lose US$3.8 billion in World Bank Financing over the next five to six years. For 2024 Ghana will lose US$600 million in Budget support and US$250 million for the Financial Stability Fund. This will negatively impact Ghana’s foreign exchange reserves and exchange rate stability as these inflows are expected to shore up the country’s reserve position.

    It comes in the wake of warnings by the United States of dire implications for the Ghanaian economy after Parliament enacted a Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill.

    Already, some human rights groups in Ghana have threatened to head to the Supreme Court if President Akufo-Addo gives assent to the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values bill passed on Wednesday.

    On the back of all these, the Finance Ministry is urging the President to engage stakeholders including faith-based organisations to communicate the bill’s implications.

    Aside from that, it called for effective engagement with conservative countries including Arab countries and China.

    “This could help trigger resources to fill in the potential financing gaps to be created.”

  • Ghana remains a sovereign state with cultural norms that must be respected – Gabby Otchere-Darko on LGBTQ+

    Ghana remains a sovereign state with cultural norms that must be respected – Gabby Otchere-Darko on LGBTQ+

    In the aftermath of the recent passage of an anti-LGBTQ+ bill by parliament, Gabby Otchere-Darko, a prominent member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), has emphasized that Ghana remains a sovereign state with cultural norms that demand respect.

    Gabby Otchere-Darko underscored that the recently passed anti-LGBTQ+ bill in Ghana mirrors the will of the people, as articulated by members of parliament.

    However, he acknowledged the potential political ramifications that led to a culture of silence among MPs who might have opposed the bill.

    In a series of tweets, Mr Otchere-Darko affirmed the democratic nature of parliament, emphasizing that the decision, though harsh, enjoys substantial popular support in the country.

    He urged transparency from the media and politicians in presenting the pros and cons of imposing stricter penalties against the LGBTQ+ community, recognizing the inevitable consequences of such choices.

    Encouraging those who believe the law is constitutionally flawed, Otchere-Darko advocated for legal challenges through proper channels, expressing confidence in the strength of Ghana’s democratic institutions.

    He called for respect for the choices made and their consequences, emphasizing Ghana’s status as a sovereign state with cultural norms that demand respect.

    Additionally, Otchere-Darko proposed the need to balance traditional family values with tolerance and diversity, cautioning against values based on hypocrisy.

    He identified side relationships as a significant threat to family values and questioned the apparent indifference of Members of Parliament towards addressing this issue.

    The objective of the bill is to establish proper human sexual rights and uphold Ghanaian Family Values, explicitly prohibiting activities related to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+) individuals.

    The bill prescribes penalties, including imprisonment, for engaging in or promoting such activities, awaiting presidential assent to become law.

    “Ghana’s parliament, in which is vested the sovereign will of the people, has democratically passed a harsher anti-LGBTQ Bill. Yes, democratically!

    “In fact, the threat of being unseated for standing for the rights of gays, etc, certainly created its own culture of silence in the House! But, it is the decision of parliament and one which enjoys huge popular support in the country.

    “The world must understand that. But Ghanaians must also understand that it comes with consequences. Choices have consequences. We expect the media and the politicians to be fair to the people by letting them know the pros and cons of this decision to impose stiffer penalties against gays, etc,” he said.

    “We also expect those who believe the bill is constitutionally wrong to do what is right and go to court. That is democracy! Our institutions of democracy are still strong and alive. Let’s have faith in our democracy.

    “Let’s respect the choices we make and their consequences and believe in the process. Ghana remains a sovereign state, with cultural norms that cannot be wished away but must be respected,” he added.

    “Values should not be premised on hypocrisy. That is, I suspect, ungodly. The biggest threat to family values in our society is caused by side chicks and side dudes. They break homes and family values cannot survive in broken homes. But, our MPs don’t care. Do they?” he questioned.

  • Catholic Bishops, Christian Council express joy after passage of Anti-LGBTQ+ bill by parliament

    Catholic Bishops, Christian Council express joy after passage of Anti-LGBTQ+ bill by parliament

    The Christian community has expressed its enthusiasm following the passage of the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill by Parliament on Wednesday, February 28, after three years of deliberation.

    The bill criminalizes behavior that proponents deem deviant and its promotion.

    While the news has sparked mixed reactions, with some Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) threatening legal action if it becomes law, the Christian community views the passage as a positive and exciting development.

    The group of CSOs argues that the objectives of the bill are unnecessary.

    Rev. Father Clement Kwesi Adjei, Secretary General of the Catholic Bishops Conference, spoke to JoyNews a day after the bill’s passage, stating that the church is delighted by the development as it aligns with Christian principles.

    “The leadership of the Catholic Church is very happy about the passage and hoping that the President will assent to this bill so that it becomes law.

    “Congratulations to Parliament for the 100 per cent and that is our objective. From the Christian point of view, the bill seeks to promote what Christianity is all about,” he said.

    Rev. Dr. Kwabena Opuni Frimpong, Former General Secretary of the Christian Council, urged the president to approve the bill, citing widespread support among citizens.

    “We have seen enough and where we have reached, it’s the President who must put this matter to sleep by assenting to the bill.

    “Let us build our country. The president raised this, that we must build Ghana Beyond Aid. This is the time… even if people will run away from us with their aid, let them do what in our own consciousness we know this is right for us. Even if we are wrong, we must be sincerely wrong,” he added.

  • We will face off in court – Anti-LGBTQ+ bill proponents to coalition of 18 Civil Society Groups

    We will face off in court – Anti-LGBTQ+ bill proponents to coalition of 18 Civil Society Groups

    Proponents of the controversial Proper Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill in Ghana are gearing up for a court battle with the Coalition of 18 Civil Society Groups, also known as the ‘Big 18.’

    The Coalition, strongly opposing the legislation, is considering legal action if President Akufo-Addo signs the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill into law, arguing that it infringes on Ghana’s diverse cultural and religious landscape.

    The Anti-LGBTQ+ bill, which aims to criminalize LGBTQI+ activities in Ghana, was unanimously passed by Parliament on February 28 after nearly three years of deliberation.

    The legislation proposes penalties of up to 3 years in jail for individuals and 5 years for promoters of such activities, including forming or funding LGBTQ+ groups.

    Despite frustrations from MPs who sought to replace prison sentences with community service and counselling, the bill has now become a focal point for a legal clash.

    Board Chair of the Ghana Center for Democratic Development and Coalition member Audrey Gadzekpo expressed disappointment that Parliament did not consider the bill incompatible with the country’s democracy.

    Proponent of the bill, Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzrah, MP for Ho West, asserted their readiness for any legal challenge.

    “We are prepared since the inception of this bill in 2021. In any case, we are prepared,” he stated in an interview with JoyNews.

    The ‘Big 18’ is set to make presentations to President Akufo-Addo, urging him not to assent to the passage of the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Prof Audrey Gadzekpo compared the legislation to criminal libel introduced by colonialists, expressing concerns that it might be misused against individuals, reminiscent of past legal controversies.

    As both sides brace for a legal battle, the fate of the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill hangs in the balance, leaving the nation divided over issues of human rights, cultural values, and the trajectory of Ghana’s democratic ideals.

  • Anti-gay bill: It is unjust to penalize people because their actions differ from others – Human rights researcher

    Anti-gay bill: It is unjust to penalize people because their actions differ from others – Human rights researcher

    A human rights researcher, Dr. Michael Gyan Nyarko, has voiced his dissent against the anti-LGBTQ+ bill, emphasizing that his apprehensions extend beyond mere suggestions of non-custodial sentences.

    In his view, a democratic society should embrace diverse perspectives and viewpoints, even amidst disagreement with others’ beliefs.

    During an appearance on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, February 17, he argued that penalizing individuals for actions or beliefs divergent from others’ opinions is unjust and incompatible with democratic principles.

    “It’s okay to disagree with such views or conduct but the idea that because you disagree with a particular view, then the people should suffer criminal consequences for it, is completely overbroad and it’s something that the democracy should not admit.”

    “If you disagree with LGBTQ rights because of your religion, that is fair enough, you should have the right as a religious person to say I disagree with it. I will protect your rights too to say that,” he said.

    Dr. Nyarko underscored the difference between moral disapproval of an action and imposing criminal penalties for that action.

    He highlighted that while society may morally disapprove of numerous activities, it doesn’t necessarily warrant criminalization of those actions.

    “People might disapprove of smoking or drinking alcohol but to the extent that, you will say that, because I have a moral disagreement to that particular conduct, then the person should be criminally liable, it’s wrong“he said.

    On Thursday, February 8, Parliament passed a law imposing a three-to-five-year prison sentence for those who intentionally promote or financially support LGBTQ activities. Additionally, individuals caught engaging in such activities themselves will face sentences ranging from a minimum of 6 months to a maximum of 3 years.

    The advancement of the bill had been at a standstill for months, provoking frustration among its supporters. They accused certain Members of Parliament of conspiring with pro-LGBT advocates to obstruct its passage.

    During a passionate press conference, Sam George, the leading advocate for the anti-LGBT bill, stated:”Those who have gone and gotten influenced by persons who have an interest in the LGBTQ should return whatever influence they have collected because we will fight, and the next time we address the media, I will mention names.”

  • Watch Bagbin’s inspirational Ghanaian look in parliament

    Watch Bagbin’s inspirational Ghanaian look in parliament

    On Thursday, February 15, 2024, Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin took charge of the debate during the second consideration of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values, commonly referred to as the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    For a considerable period, the speaker has actively advocated for Members of Parliament (MPs) to participate in proceedings adorned in traditional attire.

    “I expect our members to present themselves in parliament dressed in traditional attire going forward,” he declared, receiving unanimous agreement from the house.

    In line with his dedication to transforming the dress code and conduct norms of MPs, Alban Bagbin was observed on Thursday wearing a blue Fulani attire, complete with a large white scarf wrapped around his head.

    Chief of the Fulani Community in the Ashanti Region, Alhaji Osman Bin Ahmed



    This ensemble closely resembled the customary clothing worn by Muslims during significant traditional gatherings.

  • Akufo-Addo will assent to anti-LGBTQ+ bill, he has no choice – Alban Bagbin

    Akufo-Addo will assent to anti-LGBTQ+ bill, he has no choice – Alban Bagbin

    The Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, declared that no individual, including President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, possesses the authority to prevent parliament from passing the anti-LGBTQ+ bill currently under consideration.

    Bagbin emphasized that once the bill is passed, President Akufo-Addo would be obligated to sign it into law.

    These remarks were made during the parliamentary session on Tuesday, December 12, 2023, as the house deliberated on the draft Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values bill, commonly known as the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Bagbin further stated that individuals opposed to the bill would have the option to challenge it in court once it becomes law.

    “It is not the case, constitutionally, that when a person finds problems with the laws we pass that have concerns that are constitutional in nature, it is not only that, they could be legal, not constitutional, they may be even matters of policy. But the president is not indulge with veto power.

    “He only makes comments and resubmits it to the house, If the house insists that what we have passed is the right thing. The president has no option than to assent to it,” he said.

    The speaker added, “Ghanaians are after that permitted to take it to any court for interpretation. So, we are not bound to be looking over our shoulder because the present is there to make comments”.

  • Anti-Gay Bill sparks controversy: Dafeamekpor, Anyimadu Antwi clash on clause 4 deletion

    Anti-Gay Bill sparks controversy: Dafeamekpor, Anyimadu Antwi clash on clause 4 deletion

    Tensions erupted on the parliamentary floor during the discussion of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, commonly known as the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    Sponsors of the bill clashed with the Chairman of the Constitutional, Legal, and Parliamentary Affairs Committee of Parliament, Kwame Anyimadu Antwi, regarding a proposed amendment.

    According to a report from myjoyonline.com, Anyimadu Antwi suggested removing Clause 4 of the bill, deeming it not only ambiguous but also highly subjective. His proposed amendment was in alignment with a recommendation from the Minister of Justice and Attorney General, Godfred Dame, on the bill.

    “Though this clause creates an offence relating to undermining proper human sexual rights and Ghanaian family values what constitutes ‘undermine’ is not defined and therefore the basis of the offence cannot be determined.

    “Mr. Speaker this is the advice the learned Attorney General gave to the committee and the entire committee agreed on this advice. And that’s why we agreed as has been said by ranking that it was too much of subjectivity and ambiguities and that is why we propose that in deleting and creating an offence we shouldn’t be having ambiguities and subjectivities. That is why the proposal is to delete the entire clause,” he is quoted to have said.

    However, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, the South Dayi Member of Parliament and the bill’s sponsor, refused the legal committee chairman’s suggestion to delete the passage.

    He maintained that since the clause is essential to the legislation, it cannot be removed.

    “Mr. Speaker the essence of four is so cardinal to this legislation. So, so cardinal, so, so fundamental to it. I’ve been struggling to appreciate the point made by the ranking member that this offence in Article 39, he’s not been able to point it out. The subjectivity element that he points to that, too I am struggling to appreciate.

    “Because you see when we enacted the provision this way, subject to the enhancement contained in the amendments listed thereafter, there will be investigations if somebody makes a complaint that Clause 4 which subsequently will become section four has been breached, that is not the end of it. Investigations will be conducted. It is the investigation that will establish a prima facie that indeed Clause 4 subsequently section 4 of the law has been breached or not,” he explained.

    What Clause 4 of the anti-gay bill states:

    Prohibition against undermining proper human sexual rights and Ghanaian family values

    4. (1) A person shall not
    (a) undermine the proper human sexual rights and Ghanaian family values specified in section 2 of this Act; or
    (b) directly or indirectly, instigate, command, counsel, procure, solicit, or in any other manner purposely aid, facilitate, encourage or promote, whether by a personal act or presence or otherwise, an act that undermines the proper human sexual rights and Ghanaian family values.

    (2) A person who contravenes paragraphs (a) or (b) of subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine of not less than one thousand penalty units and not more than two thousand penalty units or a term of imprisonment not less than two months and not more than four months.

    The MPs also considered Clause 6 of the bill which covers punishment for offenders.

    Under the bill, homosexuality will be treated as a misdemeanour. The chairman of the committee proposed a prescribed punishment of “not less than 3 years and not more than 5 years” imprisonment.

    Meanwhile, some MPs have proposed a minimum sentence of 3 months.

  • Sam George is a hypocrite, his campaign manager is ‘gay’ – John Mantse Akwetey alleges

    Sam George is a hypocrite, his campaign manager is ‘gay’ – John Mantse Akwetey alleges

    New Patriotic Party (NPP) Parliamentary candidate aspirant for the Ningo-Prampram Constituency, John Mantse Akwetey, has alleged that the incumbent MP, Sam Nartey George, is not being entirely honest with Ghanaians in his quest to have Parliament pass the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    In an interview on JoyNews’ AM Show on Wednesday, November 29, monitored by The Independent Ghana, John Mantse Akwetey accused Sam George of having close affiliation with a member of the LGBTQ community.

    According to Mr Mantse Akwetey, Sam George’s campaign manager is a homosexual. He referenced the residents of Prampram as the source of this information.

    “When we talk about LGBTQ, I don’t want to go there. But the sort of hypocrisy Sam George exhibits is overwhelming. Ask everybody in Prampram who Sam George’s campaign manager is and his sexual orientation.

    “It is an open secret in the town of Prampram. Everybody knows it. So when you see a character like Sam George, jumping from place to place,” Mr Mantse Akwetey said.

    Despite being informed of the risk of defaming an individual, Mr Akwetey reiterated his allegation.

    “Send your reporters to Prampram and make your own judgement. I’m sitting on live television and I’m telling you. Sam George’s hypocrisy is untold. Your personal person is a known gay in Prampram. Why don’t you deal with his first?” he stressed.

    This is not the first time such a claim has been made. Michael Tettey Kwetey, a former Ningo-Prampram NDC Parliamentary aspirant also made such claim ahead of the NDC Parliamentary primaries that saw him lose to Sam George.

    “In his campaign, a known gay is the chairman of his campaign. All his political meetings are held in the residence of that known gay,” he said.

    Mr Kwetey also alleged that a lesbian is also a part of Sam George’s campaign team.

    The identity of Sam George’s campaign manager remains unknown.

    Sam George is one of the sponsors of the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill. He has been vocal on calls for the immediate passing of the bill that seeks to criminalize and impose severe penalties on the practice and promotion of homosexuality.

    In his fight against the LGBTQ community, Sam George has been accused by Ghanaian musician Wanlov the Kubolor of being sponsored by an American organization to advocate for anti-LGBTQ+ laws in Ghana.

    Kubolor’s claims and the recent allegations by John Mantse Akwetey are yet to receive a reaction from Mr Sam Nartey George.

    The Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill was laid in the house on March 30, 2023, by the Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee.

  • Anti-gay bill to be passed by end of year – Speaker

    Anti-gay bill to be passed by end of year – Speaker

    The Ghanaian Parliament is expected to approve the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill 2021, commonly referred to as the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, by the conclusion of the year 2023.

    According to a report from 3news.com, Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, provided an affirmation of this commitment to a delegation representing the Coalition of Muslim Organizations of Ghana.

    Led by Hajj Abdul Rahman, the delegation acknowledged and praised the speaker for his significant efforts in upholding and preserving Ghanaian values and traditions in the face of the LGBTQ issue.

    In his acceptance statement, Alban Bagbin told the organization that parliament will pass the LGBTQ Bill by the end of 2023.

    “Parliament will pass the anti-LGBTQ bill by the end of the year,” he said.

    The Coalition conferred on the speaker the title Saifu_llah, which means the Sword of God, at Parliament House.

    Alban Bagbin expressed appreciation to the group for the honour of conferring on him such a title.

    Parliament debated the report on the bill by the Committee on Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs on Wednesday, July 5, 2023.

    The report emphasised the issues brought up by both supporters and opponents of the law.

    According to the report, those who are opposed to the bill claim that “LGBTQ+ activities form part of what the Constitution contemplates under Article 33 (5) about recognition of certian rights and freedoms that are inherent in a democracy and which is intended to secure the rights, freedoms, and dignity of the people.

    “Consequently, any attempt to prescribe different treatment to different people on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender will be discriminatory and an affront to Articles 17(1) and (2) of the Constitution,” part of the report read.

  • AIDS Commission clarifies position on Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill

    AIDS Commission clarifies position on Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill

    Ghana AIDS Commission has refuted claims suggesting that they are opposed to the enactment of the Promotion of Proper Sexual Human Rights and Ghanaian Cultural Values bill.

    The Commission added that it only wanted some portions of the bill amended and was not totally against the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

    The Commission further stated that it pointed out portions that could create difficult situations for the public.

    In an interview with Citi News, the Director General of the Ghana AIDS Commission, Dr. Kyeremeh Atuahene said that his outfit is going to engage with the Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs of Parliament to clarify the distorted impression.

    “I will like to state categorically that Ghana Aids Commission did not object to the passage of the bill. Ghana Aids Commission rather identified a number of clauses that had the potential risk of creating difficult situations for individuals, families and communities and suggested that those clauses must be given a second look and have them amended,” he emphasised.

    “A number of people and institutions that submitted memos also agreed with what Ghana Aids Commission said. And in fact, some of the issues we raised were also agreed by the Attorney General in the advise paper he gave to the committee,” he added.

    “And I am very happy that I have read portions of the report and recognise that the efforts we made in bringing public health perspectives to bare on the bill have been taken in good faith as we see them reflected in the bill.”

    “So the contribution of the commission either in the form of the memo we submitted or my appearance before the committee to answer and clarify issues to the committee all clearly indicated that we wanted an amendment to the bill and not to object to the passage of the bill as reported by the committee,” he further said.

    In September 2021, Dr. Kyeremeh Atuahene expressed worry about the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

    He said that the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, in its current form, poses a lot of challenges to HIV and AIDS response in the country.

  • LGBTQ+ Bill: Akufo-Addo has no choice than to assent – NPP MP

    LGBTQ+ Bill: Akufo-Addo has no choice than to assent – NPP MP

    The Member of Parliament (MP) for Asante Akim North, Andy Appiah-Kubi, has expressed confidence that President Akufo-Addo will sign the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill once it is presented to him by Parliament.

    The Bill, officially known as the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill 2021, was received and commenced debate in Parliament on July 5th, with Speaker Bagbin presiding over the proceedings.

    Appiah-Kubi, who made the initial submission on the Bill, stated that it accurately represented the views of the broader Ghanaian society regarding same-sex relationships, and he believed that all 275 Members of Parliament supported it.

    In an interview with Oyerepa FM after the deliberations, he said:

    “The clergy, civil society even the Muslim community, so the whole Ghana is unanimous in the rejection of such invitation to engage in LGBT, so the president has no option. He has no option but to assent to the Bill.

    “I am very positive and hopeful that the president will assent to it and then we can have it as law” he added.

  • Parliament to debate anti-LGBTQ+ bill today

    Parliament to debate anti-LGBTQ+ bill today

    Today, July 5, parliament is scheduled to discuss the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill 2021, referred to as the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    The proposed legislation aims to outlaw LGBTQ+ activities and prohibit the promotion or advocacy of such activities.

    It also includes provisions for the protection and support of children and individuals involved in LGBTQ+ activities.

    The Member of Parliament (MP) for Ho West and a supporter of the bill, Emmanuel Bedzrah, expressed optimism that it would receive bipartisan support from lawmakers.

    “We have agreed with the Speaker, Alban Bagbin and leaders of the house, that the second reading of the bill will be taken today. It is our expectation that after today the consideration will also follow as well. And so we are very optimistic that we will have the reading, which is long overdue.”

    “The committee has agreed by consensus that this bill should be passed. And so there will not be any struggle at all. I would have loved that those who are against it should be bold enough and tell Ghanaians, but you will be surprised that everybody will support this bill today,” Member of Parliament for Ho West expressed hope.

  • It’s a big lie – Dafeamekpor reacts to Akufo-Addo’s claim that anti-LGBTQ+ Bill has been modified

    It’s a big lie – Dafeamekpor reacts to Akufo-Addo’s claim that anti-LGBTQ+ Bill has been modified

    The Member of Parliament for South Dayi, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, has refuted the assertion of President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo that the Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, 2021 (Anti-LGBTQI bill) has been ‘substantially modified’.

    According to him, the final draft of the anti-LGBT bill which has now been laid before Parliament, remains essentially the same as the draft submitted to the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee of Parliament.

    Speaking in an interview on JoyNews on Thursday, monitored by GhanaWeb, the MP added that the only variation is the change in the name of the bill and the reduction in the number of years for offenders to 3 years to match the existing sentencing laws.

    “That (the claim the bill has been modified) is a big lie, the president has been misadvised. The Attorney General brought an advice in the form of a memo just like the other 150 persons and CSOs who have sent memos.

    “The president says there have been substantial changes, we proposed the bill, if we say “Proper Human Values” and it is changed to “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values” is that significant? That is immaterial.

    “We proposed five years as penalty but the existing laws say it should be three… and that is not any drastic change because you will still be imprisoned for engaging in conducts like this,” he said.

    The MP went on to list some of the clauses in the final draft anti-LBGT bill, which Parliament is expected to debate and pass today, Friday, March 31, 2023.

    “If you go to clause 3, a person commits an offence if the person:”

    A. Names or purposes to marry a person who is of the same sex as that person.

    B. Knowingly marries or purposes to marry anybody who has undergone gender or a sex reassignment except in the case of a person who has undergone a surgical procedure to correct a biological anomaly including intersex.

    C. Marries or purposes to marry any animal or an object.

    B. Holds out as a lesbian, a gay, transgender, transsexual, a bisexual, an align, a non-binary and all the categories under the LGBTQI+ concept.

  • This is undemocratic – Speaker Bagbin reacts Kamala Harris’ LGBTQ+ comments

    This is undemocratic – Speaker Bagbin reacts Kamala Harris’ LGBTQ+ comments

    Speaker Alban Bagbin has accused the US Vice President for meddling in the affairs of the country following her comments on the country’s position on LGBTQ+.

    This was after Kamala Harris was asked about the development at the Jubilee House on Monday. Madam Harris did not directly address the Anti-gay bill in Ghana’s Parliament but restated her stance on human right violation against minorities adding that her position remains unchanged.

    However, the Speaker has described the comments as undemocratic.

    “This thing should not be tolerated. That is undemocratic. That someone else would have to dictate as to what is good and what’s bad? It’s unheard of,” he said during a meeting with some religious leaders.

    He further criticised President Akufo-Addo for saying that he will “come in” after Parliament decides on the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

    Speaker Alban Bagbin has categorically stated that President Akufo-Addo cannot overturn the outcome of the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill should Parliament pass it.

    “The Bill is going through the Parliament [and] the Attorney has found it necessary to speak to the committee about it regarding the constitutionality, otherwise, of several of its provisions and the Parliament is dealing with it.

    “At the end of the process I will come in but in the meantime the Parliament is dealing with it. And then I have no doubt that the Parliament of Ghana will show as it’s done in the past, first of all its sensitivity to human rights issues as well as to the feelings of our population and we’ll come out with a responsible response to the proposed Bill,” the President added. 

    However, it appears this comment has triggered anger buttons of some personalities in the country, of which the Speaker is among. 

    In reaction, the Speaker called President’s bluff, insisting he (President Akufo-Addo) has no say after Parliament decides on the Bill. 

    “The Bill will be passed…That answer he gave that it’s now before Parliament and when it gets to a stage that he has to he will come in. Hey, please , this is Legislation, this is not Execution.

    “Wait until we pass it and we direct you to execute it . That is when you come in, that’s why we are the representatives of the people. So in terms of Law which is part of policy, we finalise it and then the Executive now has the authority to implement it.

    “Let’s get this clear, while this Bill is before here, he’s not in charge , I am in charge,” he added.

  • Parliament to deliberate on Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill on Friday

    Parliament to deliberate on Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill on Friday

    On Friday, March 24, 2023, the Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee will present its findings on the Promotion of Appropriate Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, 2021, better known as the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill, according to Bernard Ahiafor, the committee’s ranking member.

    According to him, the committee has considered the concerns of Ghanaians after they received over 200 memoranda on the bill.

    Speaking in an interview with GhanaWeb’s Nimatu Yakubu Atouyese, he said, “…We are at a stage that the committee’s report and the recommended amendments on the LGBTQ+ bill is ready, so it likely tomorrow we will lay the report on the LGBTQ+ bill by which it has now moved from the committee to the plenary for consideration.

    “So, it will be for a second reading then after the second reading when the bill passes through the second reading, then it moves to a consideration stage, the third reading, then it is passed. And will be referred to the president for accent in line with the constitutional imperatives.”

    The Anti-LGBTQ+ bill sponsor, Sam George has hinted that the bill will be presented before the house in March 2023.

    This comes after the committee on the bill met with the Attorney General Wednesday, February 22, 2023, after which he indicated that he was okay with the bill.

    “I can see that we now have a light at the end of the tunnel. We have reached the end of the tunnel. And we’ll be bringing that report hopefully before the end of March or before this house rises and laying it before the house for debates on the floor. And so watch this space. We are in a good place. And we’ll be looking forward to you giving us all the support to pass this landmark bill, which will be the first of its kind. Yesterday the Attorney General made that point the first of its kind on African continent. Nigeria has a bill banning same sex marriages. That’s all. It doesn’t have all the other things our bill has. And so we’re excited about this,” Sam George added.