Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cape Coast (UCC), Prof. Johnson Nyarko Boampong, has been reinstated to his role following a ruling by the Cape Coast High Court, which granted a stay of execution on an earlier injunction.
This prior injunction had temporarily prevented him from performing his official duties.
Additionally, the court has issued an interlocutory injunction against the University, its Governing Council, and its Chairman, preventing them from discussing or making decisions about the Vice-Chancellor’s removal.
The injunction also stops the university from taking any actions that could influence his reappointment until a final court ruling is made.
This ruling comes in the midst of a heated dispute between Prof. Boampong and the UCC Council Chairman over the extension of his term.
The conflict began when a UCC alumnus filed a legal challenge to Prof. Boampong’s reappointment. Tensions escalated on July 31, 2024, when the UCC Council Chairman attempted to terminate his renewed two-year term, set to run from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2026, despite its prior approval by the Council.
The Chairman’s action met with significant opposition from Council members and the University Teachers Association of Ghana (UTAG), who labeled it unlawful and a unilateral move.
UTAG argued that Prof. Boampong’s reappointment followed due process according to the university’s statutes and that the Chairman’s letter interfered with an ongoing court case.
Legal Developments
Initially, the Cape Coast High Court had imposed an interlocutory injunction, barring Prof. Boampong from his Vice-Chancellor duties. However, the court’s recent decision to grant a stay of execution allows him to resume his position while the case is still being heard. This ruling temporarily resolves leadership uncertainties within the university.
UTAG’s Response
UTAG has voiced strong support for Prof. Boampong, insisting that his reappointment followed legal procedures and should not be reversed. They have called for the Council Chairman’s letter to be retracted and for the government to review his appointment. In their statement, UTAG urged calm among university staff and assured them that the institution’s governance would remain lawful and free from external influence.
Conclusion
The court’s decision to grant Prof. Boampong a stay of execution is a crucial development in the ongoing leadership dispute at UCC. It provides temporary relief, allowing him to continue in his role as the case proceeds, with potential wide-ranging implications for the university’s governance.











