Tag: Buckinghamshire

  • Former student of a grammar school admits going to Syria to join ISIS

    Former student of a grammar school admits going to Syria to join ISIS

    A British man has admitted to going to Syria nine years ago to join the so-called Islamic State.

    In 2014, Shabazz Suleman, a 19-year-old resident of High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, vanished while traveling with his family to Turkey.

    The former grammar school student was detained on September 29, 2021, at Heathrow Airport and charged with a number of terrorism-related offenses.

    He was due to face trial at the Old Bailey on May 15, but on Friday he pleaded guilty to preparing acts of terrorism by travelling from the UK to Turkey in order to join IS in Syria in August 2014.

    Image of Shabazz Suleman, 18, via private messaging on Twitter. Shehryar Mirza says he went to school with Shabazz for seven years and sat next to him for two years. The friend, who is now studying in the US, has sent me a picture of Shabazz from when he was carrying out aid work on the Turkey/Syria border last summer (see below). He is not in contact with Shabazz at the moment but says that he had spoken about going back out there again. He said he was definitely against ISIS and sympathetic to the views of the Free Syrian Army, which has been fighting Assad and received Western funding. Shabazz, who was a member of the school's debating society, was planning to start a degree course at Queen Mary University in London. According to the friend: 'He was interested in debating and current affairs. Was quite quiet, but hardworking. He was interested in football and cricket, but didn't support teams.'
    Suleman feld across the Syrian border while on a family holiday in Turkey

    The defendant, now 27, was also charged with being a member of IS, a proscribed organisation, between 2014 and 2017, and receiving training in the use of firearms.

    Prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC said his guilty plea addressed the two other charges which he asked to be left on the court file.

    Referring to the defendant’s basis of plea, Judge Mark Lucraft KC agreed and noted Suleman had gone to join IS ‘even if not becoming a member of it’.

    He ordered a pre-sentence report on the defendant’s dangerousness and adjourned sentencing to May 26.

    Remanding the defendant into custody, Judge Lucraft said: ‘This morning you have pleaded guilty to the preparation of terrorist acts. You will know a custodial sentence is inevitable.’

    Suleman, who wore a blue suit, with a white shirt and yellow tie, had entered his guilty plea in the dock of the Old Bailey.

    The prosecution had alleged that while attempting to travel to Syria, he had been held by Turkish forces before opting to be part of a prisoner swap with IS.

    On joining the terrorist group in Syria, he became active on social media and posted about his experiences in IS territory while engaged with members of the media.

    After the collapse of IS, he was taken captive by a faction of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) before being transferred to Turkey and then Pakistan.

    In an interview with The Times newspaper, he said he had become disillusioned with jihadism and chose to desert the terrorist group.

    Via encrypted messages he told the newspaper he went through ‘intense’ indoctrination by the group, adding: ‘I never thought I was being brainwashed until I saw the way they treat other Sunnis.’

    In October 2017, he was also interviewed by Sky News while in the hands of FSA, the court heard.

    Suleman arrived back in the UK on September 29 2021 and was arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000.

    In a police interview, Suleman denied choosing to join IS while held in Turkey and said he had changed his mind about going but was handed over anyway as part of a deal with IS.

    He also denied membership of the terrorist group, saying he never swore allegiance and was just a civilian.

    He claimed he had tried to leave IS territory from mid-2015 and did not handle guns.

    It can now be reported that Suleman’s defence team had tried unsuccessfully to get his earlier account in his Sky News interview ruled inadmissible.

    The defendant claimed he had been forced into doing it by the FSA and told to say he had fought with IS in battles.

    There was no accusation that the broadcaster was in any way complicit.

    The defendant also claimed FSA had beat him and caused him to fear for his life after witnessing others being waterboarded.

    However, Mr Atkinson, for the prosecution, had asserted that there was no evidence of duress or that Suleman had suffered ill treatment while being held by the FSA.

    He argued that the defendant had even told the interviewer that he had access to a phone and could speak to his family on a regular basis.

    In his ruling that the interview could be considered by a jury at trial, Judge Lucraft stated: ‘In my assessment, the defendant appears at ease throughout the whole of the interview process.

    ‘When this interview video recording is considered, the whole way it was conducted does not show any oppression or coercion on the part of the interviewer to what takes place.’

    The charges against him alleged that in August 2014, he engaged in preparation for acts of terrorism by travelling from the UK to Turkey in order to join the Islamic State in Syria, contrary to Section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

    The second charge of membership of IS related to his time in Syria between August 1 2014 and June 1 2017 with weapons training in the nine months after his arrival in the country.

    In the course of the investigation, evidence was uncovered of messaging between the defendant and his friends and family, statements he gave to the media and his social media posts.

    The prosecution had asserted that the material revealed his activities and his extreme mindset.

  • Mother gets £1,500 after son misses 5 months of school

    Mother gets £1,500 after son misses 5 months of school

    A Buckinghamshire mum will receive more than £1,000 and an apology from the council after her son, who has special educational needs, missed out on five months of education.

    The issue has been described ‘frustrating’ by the mother, whose son was out of school from September 2020 to February 2021 due to delays in securing provisions for him.

    Buckinghamshire Council admitted it made mistakes in its failure to provide education for the boy and has since undertaken a review of its provision for children with special educational needs.

    This came as the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO), a councils watchdog, found fault with the way Bucks Council responded to the boy’s situation.

    The boy has Autism and reached school age in September 2020.

    Bucks Council agreed to conduct an education health and care assessment.

    The mother, anonymised as Ms B, told the Council she wanted her son to attend a school with an additional resource provision.

    An additional resource provision is designed to provide specialist and targeted support for children with long-term special educational needs.

    The Council consulted with three schools in June 2020. Two said they could not meet C’s needs. School 1 said it felt it was unable to take C and School 1 did not have an additional resource provision.

    As such, Ms B said she would not send C to School 1 because it could not meet his needs.

    The Council consulted with schools that had additional resource provisions in September 2020. The mother’s preference was for Schools 2 or 3 because they had additional resource provisions for autism. Neither school said it could not offer C a place.

    The Council emailed School 3 in January 2021 and confirmed it would fund an extra member of staff to support C.

    C started at School 3 in February 2021 on a reduced timetable for three mornings a week. His time in school increased each week and in May 2021 he started to attend full-time.

    School 3 told the Council it arranged the gradual increase in C’s attendance with Ms B.

    In October 2021, Ms B complained to the Council that it did not undertake adequate statutory assessments before it issued C’s final EHC plan in December 2020, failed to request a social care assessment for C, did not specify the number of hours of occupational therapy C needed in his 2020 EHC plans, failed to provide SALT from September 2020 to September 2021, failed to provide occupational therapy from February 2020 to October 2021 and did not secure education provision for C between September 2020 and January 2021.

    The report found that the Council’s delays meant C missed education provision and EHC provision between October 2020 and February 2021.

    In total, he missed eleven term-time weeks of provision. Although four of these weeks were when schools were closed between January and March 2021, C could have accessed online learning, or attended School 3 in person as Ms B was a keyworker.

    Ms B paid for C to have weekly tutoring sessions during this period. She was also put to time and trouble chasing the Council to fulfil its statutory responsibilities.

    Anita Cranmer, Buckinghamshire Council’s Cabinet Member for Children’s Services said: “Buckinghamshire Council apologises for the difficulties the family experienced through the failure to secure provision for their child and has reviewed this case to make sure that the findings support continuous improvement to services for the benefit of children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities.”

    As a result of these admissions, the council took the following actions:

    • Pay the mother £700 for the seven term-time weeks of education provision C lost.
    • Pay £200 for the four term-time weeks of education provision C lost.
    • Reimburse the mother for the term-time tutoring sessions.
    • Pay £250 for the time and trouble she was put to chasing the Council and the frustration caused by its delays.

    Source: Free Buck Press