Tag: Dominic Ayine

  • Financial support from individuals does not compromise my integrity – AG Ayine

    Financial support from individuals does not compromise my integrity – AG Ayine

    The Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Dr Dominic Akuritinga Ayine, has stated that financial support from individuals does not compromise his integrity.

    According to him, his 2024 parliamentary campaign in the Bolgatanga East Constituency was supported by contributions from several individuals.

    However, “It doesn’t compromise me. Let me say this, all the political parties receive donations, either in cash or kind, from companies, from individuals, and so on. I am no exception,” he remarked in an interview on GHOne TV on Thursday, January 15, 2026.

    For his 2024 parliamentary campaign, Mr Ayine disclosed that he spent between GH¢3 million and GH¢4 million to finance it.

    “I can’t put an exact figure on it, but certainly between GH¢3 million and GH¢4 million,” he stated.

    He also revealed that, not only do they receive financial aids from people but they also invest so much in people to attain victory.

    “Almost every rally, we give people small amounts, like GH¢20,000 for water or transport. If you don’t have the money, you might have the intellect, but politics requires resources,” he explained.

    In 2023, fundraising Manager at Ghana Integrity Initiative (GII), the local chapter of Transparency International, Michael Boadi, highlighted the importance of overseeing the financial aspects of political campaigns.

    His comment is in a bid to bolster the fight against corruption.

    “We cannot successfully combat corruption without controlling the financing of political parties. We must establish mechanisms to regulate political campaign finance,” stated Boadi during a session at the Ghana News Agency’s Boardroom Dialogue in the Tema Regional Office.

    The event centered around the theme, “The fight against corruption in the Fourth Republic: A Mirage or Reality?”

    Boadi pointed out that political campaign financing had become a significant catalyst for corruption, often leading to misappropriation of the country’s abundant resources if left unchecked.

    “The situation is becoming increasingly perilous. According to research by the Centre for Democratic Development-Ghana, winning a parliamentary seat costs approximately US$300,000.00, a figure that continues to rise,” he noted.

    Questioning the source of substantial funds required for political campaigns, Mr Boadi raised concerns over transparency and accountability.

    “If a parliamentary seat in a smaller constituency demands $300,000.00, one must ponder the source of even larger sums spent by presidential candidates,” he commented.

    Boadi stressed the urgency of disclosing the origins of funding for political parties and their candidates at both the presidential and parliamentary levels.

    He warned that the failure to scrutinize funding sources could potentially lead to criminal entities such as money launderers, drug traffickers, and terrorists wielding influence over the country’s political landscape.

    The efficacy of anti-corruption efforts, Michael Boadi argued, hinges on addressing these challenges and ensuring greater transparency.

    He cautioned against the politicisation of corruption investigations, which has, in some instances, impeded the functionality of relevant institutions and dampened public interest in their proceedings.

    To remedy this, Boadi suggested that corruption investigations be conducted transparently and without external interference. Such an approach, he believed, would encourage citizens to actively participate in the fight against corruption in Ghana.

    In 2023, member of Parliament for Keta constituency in the Volta Region, Kwame Dzudzorli Gakpey, disclosed that it cost him a whopping GH¢1.4 million to run his campaign for the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Parliamentary primaries which took place across the country on Saturday, 13 May 2023.

    According to the lawmaker, politics has become expensive and not an easy enterprise to fund.

    Speaking on Talk of the Nation on Class91.3FM on Tuesday, 16 May 2023, Mr Gakpey said “It cost me GH¢1.4 million to run the campaign.”

    Asked by show host Klem Setumte if the money was from his own resources, he said “From my own funds, friends and family”.

    Mr Gakpey explained further, “Now posters are very expensive, the economy is hard” and quizzed rhetorically “Do you know how much an A0 poster costs now? One is GH¢20, GH¢25 that one is even impression…do you know how much T-shirt costs now? GH¢45, and then, do you know how much fuel costs? You have to empower teams to go house to house, it’s not an easy task and then [on election day], you have to convey all the people to the election ground, how to feed them and all that, it’s not an easy task.”

    He continued that “Politics is expensive, campaigning is expensive, but the resources are from multiple sources, genuinely, that is what is happening, campaigning cost, it’s not an easy task”.

    He added that “conveying 1,200 people to a ground to vote and feed them and all that, and then radio advert and all that, is not an easy task, I must be sincere with you, politics is becoming a very expensive business now.”

    Asked about his motivation for wanting to be a parliamentarian when it has to cost him this much, Mr. Gakpey noted that his motivation is to save lives.

    “My motivation is to save lives and people that’s it so that your name will remain in the books that you also saved lives because I [have] human-centered policies for my people. So money is not everything, caring for the aged, the needy ones are things you can see. If you ask me the benefits of this to me, it is that I see my people being healthy, I see my people being happy that I’ve impacted their lives.”

  • Wesley Girls not obliged to accommodate other religious practices – A-G

    Wesley Girls not obliged to accommodate other religious practices – A-G

    Attorney General (A-G) and Minister, Dr. Dominic Ayine, has declared his support for the religious policy practiced at Wesley Girls’ Senior High School (SHS).

    Reacting to a case filed in December 2024 by lawyer Shafic Osman, the A-G stated that Wesley Girls’ School is not obliged to accommodate other religious practices. He added that Wesley Girls’ Senior High School, being a Methodist Church of Ghana institution, has the right to uphold its Methodist values.

    In 2024, Wesley Girls’ Senior High School faced a lawsuit for allegedly restricting Muslim students’ ability to practice their religion. The suit accused the school of consistently blocking Muslim students from engaging in religious activities.

    The plaintiff is requesting several legal rulings, including a declaration that the school’s policy against Islamic practices violates the 1992 Constitution.

    “A declaration that the 1st defendant’s policy compelling and requiring the practice of a compulsory school religion in a public school is contrary to and inconsistent with Articles 21(1) (b) (c) and Article 26.”

    “A declaration that the limitations on Muslim students in 1st defendant school undermines the welfare of Muslim students under international human rights of the child cognizable under Article 33(5) of the constitution of Ghana, 1992.”

    The plaintiff is also requesting a court order for the Ghana Education Service to create and implement guidelines that are in line with the Constitution, regulating religious practices and observances in all public schools in Ghana.  According to him, the school’s policies violate several constitutional provisions, including:

    Freedom of thought and conscience (Article 21(1)(b) of the 1992 Constitution), Freedom to practice any religion (Article 21(1)(c)), Right not to be discriminated against on grounds of religion (Article 17(2)) and Prohibition against the state (or public institutions) imposing a religious program (Article 56). Meanwhile, the Supreme Court, is yet to give a verdict on the matter.

    This is not the first time a Senior High School has been taken to court. In 2021, a first-year student, Tyrone Iras Marhguy, who gained admission to Achimota Senior High School, was denied enrollment because he refused to trim down his dreadlocks. The family of Tyrone Iras Marhguy won the case after the court ruled that rules in schools shouldn’t be inconsistent with students’ right to religion.

    Meanwhile, the Minister of Education has instructed the Ghana Education Service (GES) to fully implement the use of mother tongue as a medium of communication in Ghanaian schools.

    The Minister mentioned that the directive constitutes efforts to reform the education sector, while championing the use of local languages in teaching and learning.

    Speaking at the launch of the Free Tertiary Education Programme for Persons Living with Disabilities, Mr. Iddrisu stressed that the directive will enhance comprehension and learning outcomes in basic schools.

    “I am directing the DG of the GES and the GES that from today, teacher use of mother tongue instruction is now compulsory in all Ghanaian schools. The GES is to ensure strict enforcement of this…This is part of President Mahama’s reset agenda,” the Minister firmly stated.

    The country celebrates Ghana throughout March every year to commemorate its Independence. The historian thinks that people’s enthusiasm for the celebration is depleting as the years pass.

    He believes people’s interest is dwindling because most designers in recent times are adding foreign products to their designs.
    The historian also indicated that opinion leaders can be blamed for the low interest of the people, as they have failed to insist on the involvement of local languages in the school curricula.

    As to whether the late Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah would have maintained the country’s heritage if he were alive, Nana Osei-Bonsu said, “Who knows that he would have kept doing what he was doing because politicians are dictated to.”

    However, Ghanaians are encouraged to project the culture globally by wearing locally made designs, eating Ghanaian food, and speaking the local languages among others, throughout the month of March.

    Currently, there is a debate over a video that circulated on social media showing a first-year female student looking unhappy while having her hair cut in a barbershop as part of preparations to begin school.

    Dressed in a Yaa Asantewaa Girls’ Senior High School uniform, she appeared visibly displeased as her long hair was trimmed.

    Following the video, scores of Ghanaians have called on the government to scrap what they describe as a “barbaric” act, arguing that a student’s hair length does not determine academic success.

    Others, however, believe that allowing students to wear long hair to school could distract them from their studies. However, Kofi Asare, speaking to the media on Sunday, October 26, noted that parents and students who are against the hairstyle policy can pursue legal redress. He argued that such a policy should not violate students’ personal rights or freedom of expression, although its motive is to instill discipline in schools.


    “It’s not always about indiscipline or discipline. I align with the law, and I encourage anyone who feels unfairly treated to engage the law. Society grows and so should the law grow,” he said.


    Kofi Asare noted that parents taking the matter to court would not be the first, as a precedent has already been set.

    “Marhguy argued that maintaining his Rasta was linked to his belief in Rastafarianism. And that denying him admission based on Rasta meant that his rights to religion and culture were being impugned on account of the school regulations…It was necessary for him to be allowed to manifest his religion by wearing his hair, which he related directly to his belief in Rastafarianism, and the court upheld that.

    He added, “The court simply said, yes, schools may set their rules for regulating dress codes, including hairstyles. But in setting those rules, they shouldn’t be inconsistent with their right to religion.


    “In the Marhguy case, culture and religion erupted. Before, all of us believed that it was unconscionable for the Ghana Education Service to deny people admission based on their hairstyles. That was our position.


    “Then, the Marhguy’s case came, and the court made a pronouncement, and so we all aligned with the law until there is a contrary pronouncement by the court.”

    But speaking at the 75th anniversary celebration of Mawuli Senior High School in the Volta Region on Saturday, October 25, the Minister of Education, Haruna Iddrisu emphasized that the secondary school environment is not a place for beauty contests to entertain such practices.


    “There is an ongoing debate about hair cuts, and size and length of hair in secondary schools.We will not tolerate it today or we will not tolerate it tomorrow, in so long as molding character.


    “If we give in to hair today, tomorrow it will be shoes, and the next day it will be the way they [students] dress.Therefore, as part of our disciplinary measures, headmasters and GES, you are accordingly empowered to take full control of how students behave on your campuses.”


    “So anybody who thinks that your child will walk into any institution of learning, as if that child, forgive my words, was to attend a beauty contest, the school environment will not for that purpose and not cut for that purpose and we will not tolerate that as an institution,” the minister stated.

  • Ghana needs enough evidence to bring Ofori-Atta  home for trial – A-G

    Ghana needs enough evidence to bring Ofori-Atta home for trial – A-G

    Attorney General (A-G), Dr. Dominic Ayine, has indicated that extraditing former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta to Ghana cannot be done solely based on a formal request.

    Speaking at the Government Accountability Series in Accra on Wednesday, October 22, Dr. Ayine emphasized that one of the key requirements for extradition is a comprehensive docket containing documents, evidence, and details related to the charges against the former Finance Minister.

    The Attorney-General, who also serves as the Minister for Justice, noted that his office is yet to receive the docket from the Special Prosecutor, Kissi Agyebeng.

    However, he added that the Office of the Attorney-General has already begun the formal processes and will conclude arrangements for Ofori-Atta’s return to Ghana once the Office of the Special Prosecutor finalizes its part.

    “Without the docket, we cannot make a request, so we’re still waiting for the docket. I have read everything said by the Special Prosecutor [Kissi Agyebeng] and his office. I respect his office and the autonomy of the office. But we in the Attorney General’s department cannot begin an extradition request with a letter. We need the evidence to do so. So, the formal processes have started,” he stated.

    The clarification comes at a time when there are speculations that the Office of the Special Prosecutor and the Attorney General are dragging their feet on the matter. In June, Prof. Mrs. Angela Ofori-Atta, wife of the former Finance Minister, Ken Ofori-Atta, indicated that her husband will return to Ghana after his doctor’s approval.


    Speaking to Joy News, she noted that Ofori-Atta’s absence is not an attempt to escape scrutiny, but a result of his current health condition.


    “He has never not been accountable. This is not Ken Ofori-Atta, who runs away from accountability. I don’t think there is any other home but Ghana, no, Ghana is home,” she stated. “So why are we holding back on the investigation? Why would he [the OSP] not give the video?” she added.


    Ofori-Atta continues to be a central figure in a legal battle, despite his current health condition. Ofori-Atta appeared on Interpol’s website for “using public office for profit” after being declared wanted by the OSP.


    This was after he failed to appear before the Office of Special Prosecutor (OSP) on Monday, June 2. His lawyers are said to have formally communicated the development to the OSP and the Human Rights Court, submitting medical reports that detail his current condition and outline scheduled surgical procedures.


    The OSP during an engagement with the press on Tuesday, June 3, noted the failure of the former minister to inform the OSP of changes in medical procedure that were to have happened in March of this year.


    “He has failed to show any medical report that shows he is a medical risk.We want him physically, and we insist on it,” the OSP said, while noting that Mr Ofori-Atta cannot indicate the mode of investigation. His conduct is totally unacceptable. We will no longer tolerate him,” the OSP noted.


    In February, the OSP declared Ofori-Atta wanted for causing financial loss to the state in several dealings, which include the following:


    Contractual arrangement between Strategic Mobilisation Ghana Limited and the Ghana Revenue Authority for the stated objective of the enhancement of revenue assurance in the downstream petroleum sector, upstream petroleum production, and minerals and metals resource value chain.


    Termination of a distribution, loss reduction, and associated network improvement project contract between the Electricity Company of Ghana Limited and Beijing Xhao Chen Technology BXC.


    Procurement of contractors and materials, activities, and payments in respect of the National Cathedral project
    Activities and payments in respect of a contract awarded by the Ministry of Health initially commenced by the Ministry for Special Development Initiative to service Ghana Auto Group Limited for purchases and after-sales service and maintenance of 307 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 304 5 CDI Ambulances for the National Ambulance Service.


    Payments out of and utilization of the tax refund account of the Ghana Revenue Authority. Later, the legal representatives of the former finance minister informed the OSP that their client is currently undergoing medical treatment in the United States and is unable to honor an invitation for questioning.


    Ofori-Atta then assured the OSP of its commitment to appearing for questioning on a fixed date, which influenced the OSP’s decision to take his name off the list in March.


    However, the office stressed that he is legally obligated to show up on June 2. Failure to do so, an Interpol Red Notice would be issued and extradition proceedings would be initiated in any country where he may be located.


    Ken Ofori-Atta then took legal steps to block the OSP from re-declaring him wanted. His lawsuit argues that the agency’s actions are baseless and unjustified.


    Ofori-Atta has dismissed allegations of financial misconduct and corruption, insisting that he has been cooperating with investigators through his legal representatives.


    In his court filing, he contends that the OSP’s actions have inflicted serious harm on his reputation and personal life. He is seeking a legal injunction to prevent further declarations against him until the case is fully resolved.


    The Human Rights Court has adjourned to June 18 for a ruling on the motion filed by the former Finance Minister, seeking to restrain the OSP from declaring him wanted, among other reliefs.


    INTERPOL Red Notice


    A Red Notice is a request to law enforcement worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person pending extradition, surrender, or similar legal action.


    It is based on an arrest warrant or court order issued by the judicial authorities in the requesting country. Member countries apply their own laws in deciding whether to arrest a person.


    INTERPOL cannot compel the law enforcement authorities in any country to arrest someone who is the subject of a Red Notice.
    Each member country decides what legal value it gives to a Red Notice and the authority of their law enforcement officers to make arrests.

  • Wontumi risks arrest if he fails to report to Accra today – Dominic Ayine says

    Wontumi risks arrest if he fails to report to Accra today – Dominic Ayine says

    The Ashanti Regional Chairman of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Mr. Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, risks arrest if he fails to report to the authorities in Accra on today, October 6, 2025.

    This was announced by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General, Dr. Dominic Akuritinga Ayine.

    Chairman Wontumi faces prosecution over his alleged involvement in illegal mining activities linked to Akonta Mining, a company he owned.

    According to the Attorney General, his office has completed processes to formally charge Chairman Wontumi, Akonta Mining, and five others following investigations that revealed encroachment on forest reserves without the necessary permits.

    Addressing civil society organisations at a meeting convened by President John Dramani Mahama at the Flagstaff House in Accra on Friday, October 3, 2025, Dr. Ayine disclosed that the case had been delayed because crucial dockets were concealed under the previous administration.

    “I am happy to announce that in 2022, the police conducted a very diligent investigation in terms of Akonta Mining, but the dockets were hidden until we came to power.

    It was when I came in and began the investigation with the Minister for Lands and Natural Resources and the Forestry Commission, we were finding it difficult to get information on the case.

    It was then that the police themselves owned up and presented that docket to my office two months ago,” he revealed.

    Dr. Ayine explained that while Chairman Wontumi’s lawyers requested a Tuesday appearance, he had directed that the accused appear on Monday instead.

    “As we speak, the charges against Chairman Wontumi and Akonta Mining and five others have been signed.

    Currently, we are waiting for his rights to be read to him, and he has the right to remain silent before he is brought from Kumasi.

    “His lawyers asked that he be brought on Tuesday, October 7, 2025, but I insisted that he be here on Monday, October 6, 2025.

    If he does not come on Monday, I am going to order his arrest so that he is brought to Accra and then we can start the prosecution,” Dr. Ayine stated.

    On April 21, 2025, the John Mahama-led government revoked Akonta Mining’s license after revelations by Lands Minister, Mr. Emmanuel Armah-Kofi Buah, that the company, though licensed to operate off-reserve, had been engaged in galamsey operations within the Aboi and Tano Nimiri Forest Reserves in the Western North Region.

    Officials of the Economic and Organised Crime Office on May 27 arrested the New Patriotic Party (NPP)’s Ashanti Regional Chairman on , Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, after he appeared before the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) of the Ghana Police Service at 3pm.

    He was apprehended after leaving the CID headquarters in Accra.

    Presently, supporters of the opposition party have massed up at the EOCO office, demanding the release of Wontumi.

    The Ashanti Regional Chairman voluntarily made an appearance at the CID headquarters on 26th May alongside his legal team, including former Attorney General Godfred Dame, after an invitation from the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) of the Ghana Police Service.

    He was cautioned on the following allegations: undertaking mining operations without a license, entering a forest reserve without authorisation and pollution of water bodies.

    However, according to sources, Chairman Wontumi denied these claims during his interrogation, presenting documents to authenticate his claims.

    He insists he was not involved in any illegal mining activities or operating in any forest reserve.

    Following the interrogations, the CID granted him bail with two sureties, though the exact amount has not yet been disclosed.

    Article image 1

    This followed a failed attempt by a joint team of national security operatives and police officers to arrest him at his residence on May 23.

    After the failed search attempt, Mr Boasiako expressed his displeasure over a search that was orchestrated by national security operatives at his residence.

    The Ashanti Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party, Bernard Antwi Boasiako better known as Chairman Wontumi has arrived at the CID headquarters, following an invitation by the police.

    Article image 2

    The search comes after Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, Emmanuel Armah Buah, ordered the immediate revocation of Akonta Mining’s licenses, citing allegations of illegal mining and other violations.

    During the press briefing, he accused the company of being involved in galamsey operations and breaching mining regulations.

    Buah also claimed that Akonta Mining was illegally selling mining concessions within the Aboi Forest to unauthorized miners, charging up to GH₵300,000 per concession, with some payments reportedly made in gold royalties.

    Akonta Mining Company Limited, owned by Chairman Wontumi, has taken legal action against the Minerals Commission and the Minister of Lands, Emmanuel Armah Kofi Buah, claiming GH₵20 million in damages.

    The company alleges that during a press conference on April 22, Minister Buah made defamatory remarks, accusing Akonta Mining of illegal mining activities within the Tano Nimiri Forest Reserve.

    The company has strongly denied these accusations, asserting that its mining leases, which were granted in 2021, cover areas outside of the protected reserve.

    The lawsuit, filed at the Accra High Court on April 24, 2025, argues that the minister’s statements were false and damaging to its reputation.

  • Torkornoo’s suspension cannot be lifted – AG replies Commonwealth Lawyers

    Torkornoo’s suspension cannot be lifted – AG replies Commonwealth Lawyers

    Attorney General (AG) Dr. Dominic Ayine has responded to a recent by the Bar Council of England and Wales and the Commonwealth Lawyers Association regarding the suspension of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo.


    On Thursday, August 14, the Bar Council of England and Wales and the Commonwealth Lawyers Association have called for the immediate reinstatement of Ghana’s Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude by President John Dramani Mahama and the Executive arm of government.


    “Immediately and without delay, reinstate the Chief Justice of Ghana to her Office. consistent with both the hitherto strong attachment to the rule of law demonstrated by Ghana and also, the constitutional duties incumbent upon them.

    “And afford the Chief justice due and fair process in the investigation and determination of the disciplinary matters brought against her, including but not limited to) full and transparent access to that process by her legal representatives,” the group demanded in a joint statement issued on August 14.


    The group has further asked the government for a proper and impartial investigation of the disciplinary charges against her, with her lawyers given full and transparent access to the proceedings.


    In addition to the demands by both groups, is the establishment of transparent procedural rules to guide the disciplinary process, including a definite timeframe within which the investigative committee must conclude its work and communicate its decision.


    However, Attorney General Dr. Dominic Ayine has emphasised that his outfit can only intervene after the committee concludes its work and submits a report to President John Dramani Mahama.


    “The suspension will, therefore, remain in effect until the inquiry committee completes its work and submits its report, to which His Excellency, the President will adhere,” he said.


    A five-member committee has been constituted to carry out the inquiry. It is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang and includes Justice Samuel Kwame Adibu Asiedu, former Auditor-General Daniel Yaw Domelevo, Major Flora Bazwaanura Dalugo of the Ghana Armed Forces, and Professor James Sefah Dzisah of the University of Ghana.


    Justice Torkornoo was suspended on Tuesday, April 22, by President John Dramani Mahama following the establishment of a prima facie case based on separate petitions calling for her removal. The action was in accordance with Article 146(6) of Ghana’s 1992 Constitution and comes after consultations with the Council of State.

    In July, an application for review regarding an ‘abuse of court processes’ by the embattled Chief Justice, Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, was dismissed by the Human Rights Division of the Accra High Court.

    The court presided over by Justice Amoako on Thursday, July 31,  revealed that several claims, such as illegal composition of the committee and wrongful conduct of adversarial proceedings, were already before the Supreme Court.

    Justice Amoako argued that relitigating these issues would result in duplication of litigation and abuse of court processes. As such, such claims were dismissed.

    The judge also dismissed reliefs such as an order of certiorari to quash the committee’s proceedings and nullify its sittings on the basis that the Chief Justice did not receive a fair hearing, on jurisdictional grounds.

    The judicial review application filed on June 9 this year sought nine reliefs, which included a series of declarations that the Article 146 committee set up to probe her removal from office had acted unlawfully. 

    She wanted the court to prevent the committee from proceeding with its work without providing her with authenticated copies of the petitions seeking her removal and the subsequent responses.

    The Chief Justice notes that the president’s purported prima facie determination contained no reasons or justification and was entirely devoid of the elements of judicial or quasi-judicial reasoning expected under the Constitution.

    Additionally, President Mahama set up a five-member committee to probe her removal petitions, including Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang—Supreme Court Justice (Chairman), Justice Samuel Kwame Adibu-Asiedu—Supreme Court Justice, Daniel Yaw Domelevo—Former Auditor-General Major Flora Bazwaanura Dalugo, Ghana Armed Forces Representative Prof. James Sefah Dzisah, and Associate Professor at the University of Ghana.

    As the proceedings of the Article 146 committee are to be held in-camera in accordance with Article 146(8) of the Constitution, the court noted that it could not inquire into matters raised by the suspended Chief Justice.

    In response, Justice Gertrude Torkornoo proceeded to the ECOWAS Community Court in Abuja, Nigeria seeking compensation worth $10 million over her suspension from office by His Excellency President John Dramani Mahama.

    This forms part of 10 reliefs being requested. The Chief Justice’s recent suit follows several unsuccessful cases at the Supreme Court this year after her suspension.

    The suspended Chief Justice wants the court to ensure she continues to enjoy the paraphernalia and entitlements of her office as the Chief Justice of Ghana pending the hearing and determination of the case.

    The measures are;

    “That the Republic of Ghana suspend the disciplinary/ removal from office as Chief Justice process against the Applicant, pending the hearing and determination of the complaint on the merits.”

    “That Ghana refrains from taking any other measures that may harm the rights claimed by the Applicant and /or aggravate or extend the dispute submitted to the Court, or compromise the implementation of any decision that the Court may render.”

    “Given the urgency of the situation, the Applicant respectfully requests the Court to hold a hearing on this request as soon as possible, and that the President of the Court ask Ghana to act in order to allow any order that the Court may issue on the Request for Assignment of Precautionary Measures to have its appropriate effect.”


    The other reliefs are as follows;

    “A declaration that the panel instituted by the Respondent (Ghana) to investigate and determine the allegations of misconduct against the Applicant was not constituted to guarantee its independence and impartiality and as such has violated the Applicant’s human right to fair hearing guaranteed by Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.”

    “A declaration that the purported suspension of the Applicant as the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana by the President of the Respondent State on 22 April 2025, constitutes a violation of her human right to fair equitable and satisfactory conditions guaranteed by Article 15 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.”

    “A declaration that the purported suspension of the Applicant as the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana by the President of the Respondent State on 22 April 2025 has exposed her to public ridicule and odium locally and internationally and the said act constitutes a violation of her human right to dignity guaranteed by Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.”

    “A declaration that by subjecting the Applicant to an illegal and unfair investigation and trial since April 2025, the Respondent has inflicted injuries on her professional standing and image, thereby ‘exposing her and her family to immeasurable public ridicule.”

    “An order to the Respondent Republic to act immediately to prescribe the rule of procedure to govern the investigation of allegations of misconduct against the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana in conformity with the right to fair hearing guaranteed by the Constitution of Ghana and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.”

    “An order directing the Respondent to immediately lift the suspension and restore the Applicant to full office until the conclusion of fair constitutional proceedings.”

    “An order restraining the Respondent from continuing with the purported inquiry for the removal of the Applicant as the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana in its current form, until it conforms to fair hearing guarantees.”

    “An award of USD 10 million as compensation for moral and reputational damages suffered by the Applicant as a result of her illegal suspension and unfair investigation, and lastly,

    “Any other relief(s) as the Honourable Court deems just.”

    The suspended Chief Justice wants the court to ensure she continues to enjoy the paraphernalia and entitlements of her office as the Chief Justice of Ghana pending the hearing and determination of the case. The applicant has also requested the ECOWAS Court to assign four precautionary measures to the country.

    Meanwhile, the government’s spokesperson, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, has refuted claims made by Justice Torkornoo, noting that the Chief Justice’s suspension aligns with the constitution.

  • President Mahama hands over election violence report to AG for legal review

    President Mahama hands over election violence report to AG for legal review

    Attorney General, Dr. Dominic Ayine, has received a detailed report on violent incidents that occurred during the 2020 and 2024 general elections for examination and possible sanctions from President John Dramani Mahama.

    The report was made available by the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Dr. Christian Tetteh Yohuno on the occurrences during the period.

    The 2020 and 2024 general elections were marred by shootings and clashes between political party supporters and security forces, leading to multiple fatalities and injuries.

    2020 and 2024 polls reportedly claimed the lives of eight and three, respectively.

    In response, President Mahama tasked the IGP earlier this year, to follow up on these events for accountability and transparency.

    Justice is expected to be served on perpetrators whose activities resulted in chaos during this period.

    Electoral violence in Ghana has since been a challenge to the country. On Friday, July, the Electoral Commission (EC) held an election in 19 polling stations of the Ablekuma North to provide its constituents with a representative after the 2024 parliamentary elections.

    However, the election, which was intended to be peaceful, turned chaotic a few hours in.

    In a viral video, it is unknown what exactly transpired between the reporter and a group of police officers that led to him being slapped.

    In line with internal disciplinary procedures, he was interdicted and referred to the Police Professional Standards Bureau (PPSB) for investigation.

    The Police officer’s action has been condemned by all, including the mayor of Accra, Michael Kpakpo Allotey, who witnessed the unfortunate incident.

    Engaging the media after the assault, Banahene Agyekum expressed distress and pain.

    “Yes, (I won’t be able to continue work today) because my right eye is shaking and I don’t know what happened to my forehead. I have to go for a medical checkup,” he stated.

    In line with internal disciplinary procedures, he was interdicted and referred to the Police Professional Standards Bureau (PPSB) for investigation.

    The officer concerned has been withdrawn from the ongoing election duty at Ablekuma North.

    The Police have assured the public that a thorough investigation will be conducted into the matter and further updates will be communicated.

    It is unknown what exactly transpired between the reporter and a group of police officers that led to him being slapped.

    The Police officer’s action has been condemned by all, including the mayor of Accra, Michael Kpakpo Allotey, who witnessed the unfortunate incident.

    Engaging the media after the assault, Banahene Agyekum expressed distress and pain.

    “Yes, (I won’t be able to continue work today) because my right eye is shaking and I don’t know what happened to my forehead. I have to go for a medical checkup,” he stated.

    After the 2024 polls, Ablekuma North remained the only constituency in Ghana without a sitting MP, due to unresolved disagreements over the outcome of the parliamentary vote.

    On December 10, 2024, three days after the national polls, the EC declared Ewurabena Aubynn of the NDC the winner of the Ablekuma North parliamentary seat, defeating the New Patriotic Party’s (NPP) Nana Akua Owusu Afriyieh.

    However, the EC later revoked the announcement, revealing that results from 62 of the 281 polling stations had not been included in the initial collation.

    Efforts to restart the collation in January 2025 were disrupted by multiple challenges.

    These included interruptions due to the submission of unverified pink sheets and a violent intrusion at the collation centre that heightened security concerns.

    The Electoral Commission (EC), after extensive deliberations, in July noted that it will hold the rerun election because the 19 scanned polling station results used for the collation, though approved by agents of both political parties, were not verified by the presiding officers responsible for those polling stations.

    The EC arrived at this decision after it met with the representatives of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and New Patriotic Party (NPP) on Tuesday, July 1.

    Ahead of today’s election, the EC called on the Ghana Police Service to provide the needed security to ensure a safe environment for the conduct of the election.

    Meanwhile, the Minister for the Interior, Mubarak Muntaka, has vowed to go after individuals who contributed to chaos during the Parliamentary rerun in the Ablekuma North constituency.

    According to him, justice will be served regardless of the perpetrators’ political affiliation. He pledged while addressing the media on Monday, July 14, as part of the ‘Government Accountability Series’ programme.

    “I can assure you that not my party, not any group, will we sit and allow to see the resurgence of vigilantism. I have spoken to the IGP firmly about the happenings in the Ablekuma North. Videos have been forwarded to him, and we have instructed him to act swiftly to bring the perpetrators to book.

    “We’re not going to condone any actions by individuals within or outside our party going around to do the untoward. I can assure the public that we will ensure that under the leadership of H.E. John Dramani Mahama, no such group will be allowed to form,” he assured.

    He urged security personnel who will be deployed to oversee the upcoming by-election in Akwatia constituency, Eastern Region, to remain alert while executing their duties.

    The Minister for the Interior advised that they reflect on the recent violence that occurred during the parliamentary election rerun in the Ablekuma North constituency and work proactively to prevent a recurrence.

    According to him, the government will work to ensure that such dramatic events do not repeat themselves in future elections.

    “This is also a wake-up call for our security agencies to know that probably what happened [in Ablekuma North]…gives our security agencies the opportunity to even plan better towards Akwatia.

    “All I can assure the people of Akwatia is that we will use Ablekuma North as a case study to review how we operate in Akwatia—to make sure that the citizens are free to cast their votes and express their will without fear or favour,” Muntaka added.

  • LIVESTREAMING: A-G updates public on probe into ORAL report

    LIVESTREAMING: A-G updates public on probe into ORAL report

    Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Dr. Dominic Ayine, is providing a media update today on the progress of the Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) initiative.

    This was announced by Minister of Government Communications, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, through a social media post.

    The upcoming briefing follows the ORAL Committee’s report submission to President Mahama in February, which outlined over 2,000 cases of alleged corruption.

    In response, the President ordered Dr. Ayine to begin immediate investigations, reaffirming that Ghana will no longer be a safe haven for corruption.

    Today’s briefing follows findings from the Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) Committee, which has identified approximately $21.19 billion in potential recoveries from misappropriated state assets and undervalued land transactions.

  • Godfred Dame was advised to drop charges against new BoG Governor, Dr. Johnson Asiama – A-G

    Godfred Dame was advised to drop charges against new BoG Governor, Dr. Johnson Asiama – A-G

    Attorney General Dr. Dominic Ayine has revealed that before he assumed office, the Prosecutions Division of the Attorney General’s Department had recommended that criminal charges against the current Bank of Ghana Governor, Dr. Johnson Asiama, be dropped.

    However, his predecessor, Godfred Yeboah Dame, ignored the advice and proceeded with the case.

    “This was the advice from the Prosecutions Division of the Attorney General’s Department to the former Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, which recommended that the charges should be dropped,” Dr. Ayine stated.

    Speaking at a press conference in Accra, Dr. Ayine explained that the legal counsel provided by the department made it difficult for him to justify continuing the prosecution.

    “Based on these revelations, it was difficult for me to press ahead with the prosecution of the current Governor of the Bank of Ghana, and that is why I dropped all the charges against him,” he said.

    Citing Rule 40(2)(a) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 2020 (L.I. 2423), Dr. Ayine defended his decision, stating:

    “In coming to this decision, I am fortified by the Rule 40(2)(a) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 2020 (L.I. 2423) which provides that, in a criminal case, a prosecutor shall refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by the facts.”

    Dr. Johnson Asiama, then the Second Deputy Governor of the Bank of Ghana, was among several individuals prosecuted by the state in 2020. The charges included fraudulent breach of trust, money laundering, conspiracy to commit crime, and violations of the Bank of Ghana Act.

    Specifically, Dr. Asiama was accused of unlawfully granting a GH₵300 million facility to Universal Merchant Bank and causing financial loss to the state amounting to GH₵150 million.

    Addressing concerns over financial loss, Dr. Ayine disclosed that a significant portion of the funds had been recovered.

    “I did not see the need to pursue the case. Evidence adduced so far fell significantly short of what was required to convict the accused. I therefore find it interesting that the state pressed ahead with prosecution, which I consider as a total waste of time,” he said.

    However, he clarified that not all cases had been abandoned.

    “I have not yet dropped the charges against the remaining accused persons because I am currently in discussions with the receivers in order to understand the financial implications of any decision I may take in these cases,” he added.

  • LIVESTREAMING: A-G engages public on discontinuation of cases

    LIVESTREAMING: A-G engages public on discontinuation of cases

    Attorney-General Dr. Dominic Ayine is providing an update on the recent decision to discontinue several high-profile cases that the state had been pursuing for years. 

    The Attorney-General’s recent withdrawal of criminal charges in multiple cases, includes the Democracy Hub protesters’ case and the Saglemi Housing Project case. These actions have sparked public criticism, and many, including private legal practitioner Martin Kpebu, have called for clarity regarding the reasoning behind these decisions.

    In the case of the Democracy Hub protesters, who were arrested during an anti-galamsey protest in September 2024, all charges were dropped, clearing activists like Oliver Barker-Vormawor, lawyer Elorm Ama Governor-Ababio, and media personality Felicity Nelson. 

    Similarly, charges in the Saglemi Housing Project case were dropped, involving figures like Collins Dauda and Kweku Agyeman-Mensah, who were accused of financial mismanagement in connection with a $200 million affordable housing project.

    Dr. Ayine had also previously discontinued the ambulance case involving former Majority Leader and Finance Minister, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, and businessman Richard Jakpa, relating to an alleged €2.37 million financial loss to the state.

    Amid the controversy, the government has defended its actions, describing some of the cases as politically motivated. 

  • Dr. Ayine is a perfect fit for the Attorney General portfolio – Appiah-Kubi

    Dr. Ayine is a perfect fit for the Attorney General portfolio – Appiah-Kubi

    Former New Patriotic Party (NPP) Member of Parliament for Asante Akyim North, Andy Appiah-Kubi, has described Dr. Dominic Ayine as a “perfect fit” for the role of Attorney General and Minister for Justice, citing his professionalism, patriotism, and integrity.

    Speaking on Joy News’ Upfront on Thursday, January 9, Appiah-Kubi commended President John Mahama’s decision to nominate the Bolga East MP for the position, emphasizing Ayine’s commitment to justice above political affiliations.

    “Dr. Ayine is a perfect fit for the Attorney General and Minister for Justice portfolio. He has an unblemished record, and he is so patriotic. He’s always on point—you wouldn’t find him being too political or partisan. That’s exactly the kind of person Ghana needs right now to lead the advocacy of justice,” Appiah-Kubi stated.

    The former MP further highlighted Dr. Ayine’s reputation for prioritizing legal principles over political interests, emphasizing his non-partisan approach to justice.

    “Even in situations where one might expect him to lean politically, he remains steadfast as a lawyer’s lawyer. He’s someone who prioritises justice above all else, and that makes him an extraordinary choice,” he noted.

    Appiah-Kubi also praised Dr. Ayine’s integrity, describing it as a key quality that would guide his leadership at the Ministry of Justice.

    “Dr. Ayine is a man of high integrity. I have no doubt that his moral compass will guide him in office. He will not be motivated by political or partisan considerations, and Ghana will undoubtedly be the winner with him at the helm of the Ministry of Justice,” he affirmed.

    He expressed confidence that Ayine’s patriotism would ensure his decisions remain in the best interest of the nation.

    “He is not swayed by political considerations. That’s why I say he is the angel that has come at the appropriate time,” Appiah-Kubi stated passionately.

    He further emphasized Dr. Ayine’s suitability for the role, particularly in addressing critical national issues such as the protection of state resources.

    “I expect him to interrogate contracts and ensure that Ghana’s resources and properties are safeguarded. With him, I know we can be confident that the state purse is in safe hands. His level of diligence and professionalism will make a huge difference,” he said.

    Reflecting on past experiences, Appiah-Kubi shared personal anecdotes of working with Dr. Ayine on the Subsidiary Legislation Committee, where Ayine served as chairman and he as ranking member.

    “He was my chairman when I served as his ranking member. In all situations, he exhibited quality leadership and an unwavering commitment to justice. Ghana needs someone of his calibre now more than ever,” he recalled.

    Concluding his remarks, Appiah-Kubi extended his prayers and best wishes to the Attorney General-designate.

    “I’m very proud of him. He was my professor, and I’ll continue to pray for him. If I ever need to discuss anything, I know I can count on him. Ghana is fortunate to have him in this role,” he concluded.

  • Ex-Deputy AG endorses shoot-to-kill method in galamsey fight

    Ex-Deputy AG endorses shoot-to-kill method in galamsey fight

    Former Deputy Attorney General Dr. Dominic Ayine has called for a more forceful approach in the fight against illegal mining, also known as galamsey.

    The MP for Bolgatanga East has suggested adopting a “shoot on sight” policy, which he believes would strengthen the government’s initiatives to combat this urgent problem.

    His comments arise amid increasing worries about the ecological destruction linked to illegal mining, especially concerning Ghana’s forest reserves.

    Speaking on Newsfile on Saturday, Dr. Ayine expanded on his proposal, advocating for the deployment of drones equipped with assault capabilities to target those involved in illegal mining activities near water sources.

    “I have been discussing with a brother of mine… he has been proposing radically that we should actually send drones with either bullets or bombs with heat detection technology so that if we detect human activity in that area, they should just fire.”

    “If that is what will save us from this environmental genocide, I will support it,” he added.

    In contrast, Dr. Mensa-Bonsu, an Associate Professor and Head of Ashesi Law, opposes this approach.

    She argues that it could result in the loss of innocent lives of individuals who are not involved in illegal mining activities.

  • We’ll repeal draconian taxes when NPP MPs boycott Parliament – NDC MP

    We’ll repeal draconian taxes when NPP MPs boycott Parliament – NDC MP

    Dominic Akuritinga Ayine, Member of Parliament for Bolgatanga East, has stated that the National Democratic Congress (NDC) will move to repeal draconian taxes, including the controversial e-levy, if New Patriotic Party (NPP) MPs follow through with their plan to boycott parliamentary proceedings.

    This follows an announcement by Effutu MP and leader of government business, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, on Thursday, October 17, that NPP MPs would indefinitely boycott all parliamentary activities in protest against Speaker Alban Bagbin’s ruling, which declared four parliamentary seats vacant.

    Speaking on the Citi Breakfast Show with Bernard Avle on Friday, October 18, Ayine emphasized that parliamentary business would continue as scheduled, regardless of the NPP’s participation.

    “We will sit, and we have more than half the members of Parliament on our side. We will start implementing our manifesto even on Tuesday, so they [the NPP] should stay off and we will go ahead and repeal the e-levy,” Ayine declared. He also pointed out that Article 108 of the Constitution allows private members’ bills to be used to amend or repeal tax laws.

    Ayine, a former Deputy Attorney General, underscored that the NDC, with its numerical advantage in the House following the Speaker’s ruling, is now the Majority party, while the NPP has become the Minority. “Majoritarian determination is by numbers and we [NDC] have more numbers than them [NPP] and it is as clear as daylight. We are the Majority and they are the Minority,” he said.

    He further asserted that the Speaker’s ruling means the four affected MPs—Cynthia Mamle Morrison (Agona West), Kwadjo Asante (Suhum), Peter Kwakye-Ackah (Amenfi Central), and Andrew Amoako Asiamah (Fomena)—are no longer members of Parliament, and their seats would remain vacant.

    In addition, Ayine hinted that should the president refuse to acknowledge such actions from Parliament, it could constitute “high treason,” opening the door for potential impeachment proceedings against him. “The president cannot continue to disrespect certain things, and if he refuses such things, they constitute high treason and we can begin impeachment proceedings against him,” Ayine added.

  • Dominic Ayine’s law firm linked to GPGC amid $134m judgment debt scandal

    Dominic Ayine’s law firm linked to GPGC amid $134m judgment debt scandal

    Recent revelations have sparked concerns regarding the involvement of Dominic Ayine’s law firm in the controversial GPGC (Ghana Power Generation Company) contract.

    Documents obtained indicate that the law firm of Ayine & Felli, where Edudzi Tamekloe now practices, was the registered office for GPGC when it signed a contract with the Government of Ghana (GoG) in 2015 under the John Mahama administration.

    Some individuals are questioning the potential conflict of interest given Dominic Ayine’s role as Deputy Attorney-General at the time. Ayine was involved in brokering numerous energy deals, including the Ameri Power deal, and now, his firm’s close association with GPGC raises eyebrows.

    This development has birthed speculation as to whether the terms of the GPGC agreement were deliberately designed to favor the company, especially given the harsh financial penalties involved in its termination.

    Conflict of Interest?

    The firm representing GPGC at the time of the Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with GoG in June 2015 per the letter was Ayine & Felli, a law firm linked to Dominic Ayine, then serving as Deputy Attorney-General under the NDC government. In recent weeks, the loud voices from some NDC-affiliated lawyers, particularly Edudzi Tamekloe, in defending the GPGC judgment debt issue have sparked debates. Many are asking if their vested interest stems from the fact that the firm’s association with GPGC was established while the contract was in force.

    According to a letter dated July 2, 2015, the firm’s address was listed as the official office for GPGC. This close link raises questions about whether the negotiation of the GPGC contract, which resulted in Ghana paying substantial termination fees, was compromised due to insider influence.

    Judgment Debt Scandal

    Documents from 2015 reveal that Ayine & Felli, the law firm of Dominic Ayine, was listed as the registered office of GPGC Limited when it entered into an Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with the Government of Ghana. This association has come under scrutiny following a judgment debt awarded against the country, with many questioning whether the poor negotiation of the contract’s termination terms was deliberate.

    With Ayine playing a critical role in Ghana’s energy deals as Deputy Attorney-General, some critics argue that the law firm’s involvement with GPGC may have influenced the terms of the deal, resulting in the substantial financial burden Ghana now faces.

    Ghana’s Regina House in London, one of the nation’s key commercial properties, has been taken over by Trafigura’s Ghana Power Generation Company (GPGC) due to the government’s failure to settle a $134 million judgment debt.

    This development follows a prolonged four-year effort by Trafigura to recover funds after Ghana abruptly terminated a power purchase agreement with the energy firm.

    Despite repeated attempts to secure payment, Trafigura was forced to obtain a ruling from a U.S. District Court, adding $111.4 million in mandatory interest to the arrears. This legal outcome compounded Ghana’s debt, exacerbating its financial obligations.

    The legal dispute began on January 26, 2021, when a UK tribunal awarded GPGC $134.3 million after determining that Ghana had breached its contractual obligations by terminating a power purchase agreement on February 18, 2018. Ghana had argued that GPGC failed to meet certain contractual conditions, but the tribunal disagreed, awarding GPGC damages based on an Early Termination Payment formula.

    The tribunal’s award included an interest rate of six-month USD LIBOR plus 6% and reimbursement of GPGC’s arbitration costs amounting to $3.3 million. Although Ghana made partial payments totaling $1.89 million, a significant balance remains unpaid.

    In a bid to recover the remaining funds, GPGC filed a case in the U.S. District Court in January 2024 under the New York Convention, seeking to enforce the arbitral award. Ghana failed to respond to the court’s petition and missed the March 29, 2024 deadline, leading to a ruling in GPGC’s favor. Chief Judge James E. Boasberg confirmed that the U.S. court had jurisdiction under the New York Convention, which requires member states to recognize and enforce arbitral awards, regardless of location or nationality.

    While the U.S. court did not grant pre-judgment interest, it awarded post-judgment interest at a rate specified under U.S. law, further increasing Ghana’s financial burden. As a result, Trafigura now controls Regina House until Ghana can resolve the debt crisis.

    Recent development

    Trafigura has petitioned Ghana’s Finance Minister, Dr. Mohammed Amin Adam, threatening to seize Ghana’s assets in South Africa if the debt remains unsettled.

    In its petition submitted on September 23, the energy firm requested an immediate settlement and warned of further legal action to recover the funds if the government fails to comply.

    The petition expresses frustration over the government’s delay in resolving the debt, despite multiple attempts at negotiation.

    “We would nevertheless like to reiterate the message of our previous correspondence, that we would prefer not to take any further enforcement action and instead to resolve the matter amicably by fully executing the settlement agreement, as soon as possible, ideally within this week, and receiving payment in accordance with the agreed schedule,” the letter read.

    Per the letter in question, it is not public knowledge of the exact assets in South Africa that the company seeks to secure.

  • I am responsible for L.I permitting MPs use sirens – Dominic Ayine

    I am responsible for L.I permitting MPs use sirens – Dominic Ayine

    Chairman of the Subsidiary Legislation Committee of Parliament, Dominic Ayine, has taken responsibility for the controversial proposed amendment to the Road Traffic Regulations that would have allowed Members of Parliament (MPs) to use sirens and be exempt from speed limits.

    The proposal sparked widespread public backlash and criticism from various quarters, prompting Ayine to clarify the committee’s role in the matter.

    In an interview on Citi FM’s Eyewitness News, Dr Ayine emphasized that the amendment was merely a proposal and not a directive to the Transport Minister.

    He acknowledged the public outcry and accepted responsibility on behalf of his committee for the inconvenience caused by the proposal.

    Dr Ayine stated, “I didn’t say that personally, my position is that MPs must be given sirens and be exempted from the speed limit. I never held any position. The point is that it came before my committee and I’m the chairman of the committee so I will take responsibility on behalf of my members. As Chairman of the committee, I take responsibility for everything that the committee has done.”

    The proposed amendment, part of the Legislative Instrument (LI) on Road Traffic Regulations Amendment, faced strong opposition from Ghanaians and the minority caucus in Parliament.

    Critics argued that such privileges for MPs would create inequality on the roads and undermine road safety measures.

  • A committee led by NDC MP made siren proposal not gov’t – Dep. Transport Minister

    A committee led by NDC MP made siren proposal not gov’t – Dep. Transport Minister

    Deputy Minister of Transport, Hassan Tampuli, has clarified that the Ministry of Transport played no part in proposing amendments to the Legislative Instrument (L.I.) that would have granted the use of sirens and exemption from speed limits to Members of Parliament, Ministers, and judges.

    According to Mr Tampuli, the proposal originated from the Subsidiary Legislation Committee, chaired by Dominic Akuritinga Ayine, a Member of Parliament from the Minority National Democratic Congress (NDC).

    He explained that during discussions, the Minister of Transport expressed strong objections, foreseeing potential chaos and disorder if such privileges were granted.

    “The Minister disagreed that if that happens it was going to create some amount of chaos in the society,” Tampuli stated during an interview. He recounted how the Ministry’s efforts to lay the Instrument in Parliament were halted when the Committee chairperson intervened, prompting further scrutiny before submission.

    Dr. Dominic Ayine, the Chairman of the Subsidiary Legislation Committee, defended the proposal, citing the need for MPs to handle unforeseen emergencies. He argued that the use of sirens could mitigate delays caused by traffic congestion, thus justifying the proposal.

    Dr Dominic Ayine, Chairman of the Subsidiary Legislation Committee and Member of Parliament for Bolga East

    While the Legislative Instrument was withdrawn following public outcry, Tampuli emphasized that the blame should rest with the Subsidiary Legislation Committee, not the government.

    He clarified that the original intent of amending the Road Traffic Regulations 2012 was to update regulations to accommodate contemporary needs, particularly regarding electric cars.

    “The Ministry of Transport and the government had no appetite at all for including Ministers, MPs to use sirens and drive without speed limit,” Tampuli asserted. He highlighted that such provisions did not align with government policy, especially close to election periods.

  • Leaving home early won’t save MPs from traffic congestion – Dominic Ayine

    Leaving home early won’t save MPs from traffic congestion – Dominic Ayine

    The Bolgatanga East Member of Parliament, Dr Dominic Ayine, has defended the introduction of a new Legislative Instrument (L.I.) that seeks to amend parts of the Road Traffic Regulations 2012.

    The proposed L.I., currently before Parliament, aims to grant Members of Parliament (MPs) and Ministers of State certain privileges previously reserved for emergency and specialized vehicles.

    The amendment to Regulation 74 of L.I. 2180 will allow the installation of sirens or bells as warning devices on vehicles owned by Supreme Court justices, MPs, and Ministers of State.

    This legislative change is intended to facilitate the movement of these officials, who often face demanding schedules requiring travel to multiple locations for meetings and official duties.

    The proposed amendment has sparked debate among various stakeholders, with some advocating for its potential benefits in improving governmental efficiency, while others raise concerns about the broader implications of extending such privileges to elected officials.

    Mounting to its defense, Dr Ayine noted that the assertion that MPs should set off home early to address their administrative businesses does not hold.

    In an interview on GTV, he noted that there are emergencies that are unforeseen which cannot be catered for by leaving home early.

    He believes that the only way out of this would be to use the siren in order to deal with any traffic congestion they might encounter.

  • Cannabis can be a blessing to Ghana’s economy – Dominic Ayine

    Cannabis can be a blessing to Ghana’s economy – Dominic Ayine

    Chairman of the Subsidiary Legislation Committee and Member of Parliament for Bolga East, Dr. Dominic Ayine, has underscored the potential economic advantages associated with legalizing the industrial use of cannabis.

    Referring to studies conducted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade and Development, Dr. Ayine pointed out the positive impacts observed in countries that have legalized cannabis cultivation.

    These benefits include economic growth, industrial development, increased foreign exchange, employment opportunities, and medicinal applications.

    “Mr. Speaker, studies conducted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade and Development indicate that the industry has potential benefits for countries that have legalized its cultivation and management. These include economic, industrial, foreign exchange, employment, and medicinal benefits. Every part of the industrial hemp plants, from the roots to the flowers and seeds, has potential industrial and medicinal benefits, which can be beneficial to the economy of the country,” he said.

    Dr. Dominic Ayine’s comments were made in response to the recent development of a Legislative Instrument designed to regulate the cultivation and management of cannabis for medicinal and industrial purposes, following the passage of the parent law by parliament.

    Meanwhile, Minority Chief Whip, Governs Kwame Agbodza, has raised concerns about the potential negative impact on mental health and questioned the feasibility of regulating cannabis use.

    “Unfortunately, the young man taking weed in this country is not going to take what he has to the laboratory to test HPC content before taking it. And none of you is talking about the potential for abuse or how badly it would degenerate the mental health we already have in the country. Why are we pretending that this is going to solve our problems in the country? Minister, do you even know how many people are taking weed illegally, to the extent that you are going to license the people and show them where to store the weed?”

  • Ofori-Atta’s censure motion: Ad-hoc committee exonerates Minister of any wrongdoing

    The Ad-hoc committee which was established and mandated to probe allegations in a censure motion filed against the Finance Minister, Ken ofori-Atta, has exonerated the Finance Minister, Ken Ofori-Atta of any wrongdoing.

    According to a Co-chair of the Committee, K.T Hammond, the committee did not adduce any evidence that suggest that Mr Ofori-Atta is guilty of the claims leveled against him.

    He made this known on the floor of Parliament on Thursday, December 8, 2022, when the House sat to debate on the report presented by the Committee.

    “The committee was not able to come out with any findings,” he said.

    This claim however contradicted that of his co-chair, Dominic Ayine’s.

    Making his case on the floor of Parliament, Dr. Dominic Ayine, who was also a co-chair of the ad-hoc committee insisted that they had “unassailable evidence” but were compelled to build consensus on the motion.

    “In terms of substantive content, we could not make definite findings of facts and recommendations on the censure motion. I had thought that the mandate of the committee was a fact finding committee and therefore we could make findings of fact [but] that was vehemently opposed by the Majority, and because of that you’ll notice that in terms of its substantive content, the report does not have real findings of fact definite findings of fact as well as recommendations,” Dr Ayine contended.

    This follows a censure motion that was filed by the Minority in Parliament On October 25, 2022, against Ken Ofori-Atta.

    Some Members of the Majority caucus, numbering about 80, also made a case against the Minister, calling for his dismissal from office due to the economic hardships.

    The committee presented the report to the House and the debate on the report commenced yesterday, December 8, 2022.

    Making his case in Parliament on Thursday, Dr Ayine maintained that the committee obtained “unassailable evidence” of misconduct on the part of Finance Minister, Ken Ofori-Atta.

    He explained that on ground one – which is the funding of the National Cathedral – it was very clear that the minister exceeded what was appropriated.

    “In other words he engaged in expenditure in excess of appropriation. That’s because according to the Minister (in the report) he took money from other government obligations and it was a contingency vote.  Now if you look at the other obligations and the vote that this house passed on government obligations for that fiscal year, it was very clear that the Minister by his own evidence that he submitted to us exceeded appropriation,” he said.

    He also mentioned that the Minister spent GHC 339 million on the Cathedral and that was far in excess of the envelope of resources that we appropriated for other government obligations.

    Also speaking on the report of misreporting of data to Parliament, he said the committee found out that “the Minister misreported matters to Parliament.”

    Source: The Independent Ghana| Jessie Ola-Morris 

  • ‘I don’t buy fuel, I don’t have a car’: KT Hammond makes U-turn, clarifies viral comment

    Kobina Tahir Hammond, Member of Parliament for Adani Asokwa in the Ashanti Region has clarified widely reported comments claiming he does not buy fuel because he doesn’t own a car.

    The comment was apparently made in jest at the ad hoc committee of Parliament probing a vote of censure motion brought against the embattled Minister of Finance Ken Ofori-Atta.

    Hammond is a co-chair of the committee along with Dominic Ayine.

    In rebutting a point about rising fuel costs raised by Minority Leader Haruna Iddrisu on day one of the committee sitting, November 15, the Adansi Asokwa MP said, “I don’t buy fuel, I don’t have a car, so I don’t buy fuel.”

    At the beginning of Day Two of sitting, KT Hammond made clarifications to his earlier statement: “On the Tuesday, I did not make any categorical such statement as to whether I buy fuel or I don’t, you should be able to distinguish various segments of what anybody speaks.

    “Any sentence should be able to be broken down into its minutiae to be clear what the person is saying,” he stressed before adding that all MPs bought their own fuel because they did not have any coupons or rebates.

    The fuel price situation is one plank of the general rise in cost of living bedeviling the Ghanaian economy. Price hikes have affected especially transportation fares which have increased steadily across the year.

    Incidentally, the MP, only weeks ago had shared an experience where he nearly fought a fuel attendant after he though he had been shortchanged only to be alerted to the new prices of the commodity.

    “We appreciate it, it’s been put on record many times, we all know what is going on, it is not a matter that anybody is running away from, we are all in it together. How we get out of it is also in the hands of all of us, let us get the reportage fairly right,” he stressed.

  • MPs buy fuel, we’re suffering like every Ghanaian – KT Hammond laments

    Kobina Tahir Hammond, Member of Parliament for the Adansi-Asokwa Constituency has explained that contrary to public perception, MPs pay for their fuel without any subsidy.

    The comment was made as he clarified a recent comment to the effect that he had said he did not buy fuel because he didn’t own a car. The said comment was apparently made in jest on Day One (November 15) of the ad-hoc committee of Parliament probing a vote of censure motion brought against the embattled Minister of Finance Ken Ofori-Atta.

    Hammond is a co-chair of the committee along with Dominic Ayine.

    At the beginning of Day Two of the committee’s sitting (November 17), KT Hammond made clarifications to his earlier statement: “On Tuesday, I did not make any categorical such statement as to whether I buy fuel or I don’t, you should be able to distinguish various segments of what anybody speaks.”

    He tasked the media to do better by reporting comments with context and capturing the full import of what is said.

    “Let me get it on record, Members of Parliament buy fuel, we don’t have any coupons, we don’t have rebates, we don’t have anything, we are suffering the same way every Ghanaian is suffering.

    The fuel price situation is one plank of the general rise in the cost of living bedeviling the Ghanaian economy. Price hikes have affected especially transportation fares which have increased steadily across the year.

    Incidentally, the MP, only weeks ago had shared an experience where he nearly fought a fuel attendant after he thought he had been shortchanged only to be alerted to the new prices of the commodity.

    “We appreciate it, it’s been put on record many times, we all know what is going on, it is not a matter that anybody is running away from, we are all in it together. How we get out of it is also in the hands of all of us, let us get the reportage fairly right,” he stressed.

    In rebutting a point about rising fuel costs raised by Minority Leader Haruna Iddrisu on day one of the committee sitting, November 15, the Adansi Asokwa MP said, “I don’t buy fuel, I don’t have a car, so I don’t buy fuel.”

  • You are attacking my ruling, you don’t have that authority – Bagbin fails to rein in Muntaka

    Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin defended a ruling he handed down in the matter of a vote of censure filed against Minister of Finance Ken Ofori-Atta by the Minority Caucus.

    In doing so, he also schooled Minority Chief Whip Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka, who Bagbin accused of attacking the ruling he gave despite not having the authority so to do.

    It started when Muntaka rose to second the motion of censure vote as moved by Minority Leader Haruna Iddrisu, he started off by quoting Order 106 of the Standing Orders which Bagbin relied on to rule that the censure motion be referred to a committee before it comes back to the plenary.

    Muntaka in disagreeing made comments the Speaker deemed an attack on his ruling.

    Bagbin interjected the Asawaase MP’s submission stating: “Hon, you are completely, completely out of order. Hon. Member, I don’t take my rulings lightly, please. You are attacking my ruling and I think you don’t have that authority to do so. If you want to attack my ruling, come by a substantive motion.

    “Your understanding of ‘during the debate,’… debate of matters before the House is not only during the plenary session. At the committee level, what you do there is to debate. That is why when you agree at the committee level and you come and put the matter here, you don’t waste time to debate again,” he stressed.

    Muntaka proceeded to seek to drum home his point that it was solely the decision of 275 MPs to decide on the issue but Bagbin explained that a House cannot be properly constituted without a Speaker.

    “Move away from the understanding that you are the makers of everything here, I have been listening to you, don’t give me that temptation,” he said before demanding a withdrawal and apology for Muntaka’s pronouncements.

    The MP’s refusal forced Bagbin to order that the latter part of his submissions be expunged from the Hansard.

    “Hon. Members, I direct that all what the Minority Chief Whip has said after I have told him to withdraw and apologize, be expunged from the records. I so direct. Hansard expunge everything from the record.

    “Minority Chief Whip, you’ll have a difficulty in catching my eye again,” Bagbin warned.

    How motion of censure against Ofori-Atta was argued

    The Minority Leader filed a motion of censure late last month against Minister for Finance Ken Ofori-Atta.

    The motion was duly admitted by Speaker Alban Bagbin and on November 10, the motion was moved by Haruna Iddrisu to trigger debate and a vote on the same.

    Speaker Bagbin, however, in his interpretation of the rules the Minority relied on referred the issue to an 8-member ad hoc committee formed to probe the Minority’s claims against the Finance Minister.

    The committee co-chaired by Dominic Ayine (NDC) and KT Hammond (NPP) is expected to present their report in seven days, following which the House will proceed with the censure process or otherwise.

  • Case challenging Amidus eligibility as Special Prosecutor adjourned to May 13

    The decision of the Supreme Court on the eligibility and the capacity of Martin Amidu to occupy the position of Special Prosecutor has been adjourned.

    The decision, which was expected to be delivered today, Wednesday, April 29, 2020, was moved to the 13th of May by the judges without reasons.

    The suit was filed by a former Deputy Attorney General, Dr. Dominic Ayine who contends that Mr. Amidu, being 66 years [at the time the suit was filed in 2018], was too old to hold public office, and as such could not be the Special Prosecutor.

    In his writ, Dr. Ayine sought a declaration that per the interpretation of Articles 190(1)(d), 199(1), 199(4), and 295 of the 1992 Constitution, the retirement age of all holders of public offices created pursuant to Article(1)(d), is 60 years, thus Mr. Amidu is not qualified or eligible to be nominated as the Special Prosecutor.

    Dr. Dominic Ayine filed the case in February 2018.

    In the course of the suit, the Supreme Court struck out Martin Amidu, as a defendant in the case.

    According to the court, Mr Amidu was not a proper party to the case as the position in question was one which falls under Article 88 of the Constitution.

    The Supreme Court said, per the constitution, the Attorney General is required to represent public officials sued as a result of their office.

    Mr. Amidu expressed his displeasure with this course of events saying he would have done a better job in defending himself in the case than the Attorney General or any other lawyer.

     

    Source: citinewsroomÂ