The Supreme Court is expected to deliver its verdict today, Wednesday, December 18, on two pivotal lawsuits questioning the constitutionality of the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the anti-gay bill.
The ruling is anticipated to have far-reaching consequences for the country’s legal framework and human rights landscape, following months of contentious public debate and political division.
Supporters and critics of the bill are eagerly awaiting the decision, with both sides voicing their strong positions on the matter.
The proposed law, which seeks to criminalize activities related to LGBTQI advocacy, has been heavily criticized by human rights organizations, who argue that it infringes on freedoms such as expression and association.
However, the bill has received significant backing from religious and traditional groups, who view it as essential to protecting Ghana’s cultural and family values from the perceived imposition of foreign ideologies.
Should the bill become law, it would impose penalties on those who promote or financially support LGBTQI activities, and extend criminal liability to individuals offering indirect support, intensifying the debate about the rights of the LGBTQI community in the country.
While proponents believe the bill is crucial for preserving societal morals, opponents argue it violates basic human rights and contradicts the principles of equality under the law.
The legal challenges were brought by Richard Dela Sky, a journalist and lawyer, and Amanda Odoi, a lawyer and advocate for inclusion, who assert that the bill’s passage was unconstitutional. They argue that Parliament failed to meet the required quorum, as stipulated in Articles 102 and 104 of the Constitution, during the legislative process.
The plaintiffs maintain that the lack of a valid quorum during the bill’s passage renders it legally invalid and unconstitutional.





