Tag: Manslaughter

  • Former Mentor contestant sentenced to life imprisonment for manslaughter

    Former Mentor contestant sentenced to life imprisonment for manslaughter

    A former contestant of a television reality show (Mentor) has been sentenced to life imprisonment after he was found guilty for manslaughter by a seven-member jury.

    Bismark Ato Foster was charged for two counts namely; murder and use of offensive weapon which led to the death of one Razak Mohammed, at Nungua Coco-Beach on September 26, 2016.

    Though he pleaded not guilty to the two charges, the jury found him guilty for manslaughter instead of murder, seven years after the incident.

    The jury had returned a 6-1 guilty verdict against him for both charges but upon further deliberations, returned again with a guilty verdict against him for manslaughter and use of offensive weapon.

    Justice Mary Maame Ekue Yanzuh, presiding at the Criminal Court ‘3’ accordingly imposed a life sentence on him after the jury were discharged.

    For the charge of the use of offensive weapon, he was sentenced to 25 years, with both punishment set to run currently.

    Plea for mitigation

    With his plea for mitigation, his counsel had prayed the court to tamper justice with mercy and hand the convict with the minimum punishment since he was a first time offender.

    Counsel also drew the court’s attention to the fact that the convict had properly conducted himself throughout the trial and was available anytime the case was called.

    It was his prayer again that the convict is a very young man who has great future ahead of him and only became a victim of circumstance.

    He said his client had shown remorse throughout the trial and the judge should use her motherly instinct to give him minimum punishment.

    Counsel said the convict did not intentionally cause the death of the deceased as found by the jury and prayed that looking at his age, his demeanor through out the trial, the incident was purely accidental.

    Counsel said, the convict was the only one left to protect the property of his family.

    Prosecution

    The plea for mitigation by the defence counsel was opposed by the prosecution.

    It was the case of the prosecution that the offense committed is severe and should be given the maximum punishment of life imprisonment to serve as a deterrent to others.

    The prosecution pointed out that the gun went off twice and that could not be said to be not intentional.

    To this end the prosecution invited the court to impose the maximum sentence on the convict to serve as punitive measure to deter others accordingly.

    Justice Mary Maame Ekue Yanzu after hearing the parties sentenced the convict into life in prison.

    EIB Network’s Legal Affairs Correspondent, Murtala Inusah, who was in court reports that lawyers of the convict have indicated their intention to appeal against the conviction and the subsequent sentencing.

    Brief facts

    Per the summary of evidence to the jury, the complainant, Ebenezer Ekow Ayaim, who was the first prosecution witness is a businessman and he had acquired two plots of land at Nungua Coco Beach area.

    According to him, he has been living on one plot with his family for the past 6 years whilst the other plot of land is undeveloped.

    The complainant indicated that he knew the accused person because he occasionally weeds his undeveloped plot without his consent.

    The complainant said following that he reported the incident to the police on about two occasions.

    He, on September 24, 2016, again reported the incident to the police and two police officers followed him to the plot of land.

    He said the police officers advised the complainant to build a fence wall around the undeveloped land and one of the police officers by name Caesar recommended the deceased, Razak Mohammed and his colleagues to supply the complainant with sand and stones for the construction of the fence wall.

    The evidence indicated that the complainant contacted Razak and his colleagues and on September 26, 2016 at about 5:45 pm, they came to the complainant’s house to inspect the plot.

    The complainant said he together with Razak and his colleagues went outside to inspect the plot of land but the complainant went back inside the house briefly to pick his slippers because he was then only wearing a pair of socks.

    He, whilst in his house he heard a gunshot and quickly ran out to see Razak shot dead and one of his colleagues, Stephen Ansah’s arm bleeding.

    The complainant said he called the police for assistance and rushed Stephen Ansah to the Police Hospital for treatment and later lodged a complaint at the Nungua Police Station.

    Building contractor’s account

    It was the case of Stephen Ansah, the building contractor, the second prosecution witness in the case that on September 24, 2016, he paid a visit to his police officer friend, Caesar at the Nungua police station.

    He said, when he got to the station, Razak (now deceased) was also with Caesar and whilst at the Police Station, the complainant came to the station and reported that he had property he wanted to develop.

    According to him, Caesar recommended him and the deceased to do the work and they visited the complainant in his house at Coco Beach Nungua, the following day at about 6pm and discussed the work they would be undertaking.

    He said on Monday September 26, 2016 at about 6.00pm, he and the deceased went to the complainant’s house and they proceeded to the land to see where they would deposit the sand and stones to be used for the construction.

    It was his case that they noticed someone had erected some boards on the land so they decided to remove them so that the vehicle that would deliver the sand and stones could have easy access to the land in order to deposit the sand and stones.

    He said, whilst removing the boards, the accused person came out of his house and the accused person upon seeing them, went back into his house.

    Gunshots

    He said, a few minutes later, the accused person came out of his house holding a pump action gun and from a distance, fired at the deceased who fell on the ground.

    He said he attempted to offer assistance to the now deceased who had been hit by the bullet by lifting him up and in the process of offering assistance, the accused person fired again and the shot hit his right arm.

    The evidence of the contractor was that he ran towards the complainant’s house and the complainant rushed him to the 37 Military Hospital for treatment.

    But, Razak was pronounced dead upon arrival.

    Police officer’s account

    A police officer, G/CPL Dei-Ofori Ceaser, who was the 3rd prosecution witness, told the Court that, on September 24, 2016 at about 11.30am, the Complainant made a complaint to him that someone was encroaching on his land.

    He said he and one Chief Inspector, Kwame visited the land and met the accused person on the land but he was not doing anything criminal.

    He added they left and went back to the police station after the complainant informed him that he wanted to develop the land.

    He said, at that time, the deceased and one Kojo had visited him at the Police Station and heard the intention of the complainant to develop the land and they expressed interest in taking the contract to develop the said land.

    CID’s evidence

    It was the evidence of Detective Chief Inspector Osei Yeboah, stationed at the Kpeshie Divisional CID headquarters that on September 26, 2016, the case was referred to him for investigation.

    According to him, on the same day, a team of police officers led by the crime officer Superintendent, Yaw Ohene-Takyi visited the crime scene at Nungua Coco-Beach.

    He said, they found the body of a male adult aged about 46 years lying in a pool of blood in a prone position in between a house and a portion of land raised to footing level.

    He said they inspected the body and a gunshot wound was found at the right part of the chest and the deceased’s body was identified by neighbors as Razak Mohammed.

    According to him, photographs of the body of the deceased and the crime scene were taken and the body was conveyed to the Police Hospital mortuary for preservation and autopsy.

    He said investigations led to the arrest of the accused person and statements taken from him.

    The accused was eventually directed by the office of the Attorney General to charge the accused with murder and use of offensive weapon, which he did.

  • Alec Baldwin: Manslaughter charges in connection with shooting dropped

    Alec Baldwin: Manslaughter charges in connection with shooting dropped

    Alec Baldwin no longer faces criminal charges in connection with a fatal on-set shooting in October 2021.

    In connection with the event that occurred while Rust was being filmed in New Mexico, the Emmy Award-winning actor was charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter.

    Halyna Hutchins, a cinematographer, was murdered by a real bullet fired from a pretend gun that Baldwin was using.

    The development comes less than two weeks before a trial was set to begin.

    A statement released by New Mexico special prosecutors Kari Morrissey and Jason Lewis said that “over the last few days… new facts were revealed” in the case, requiring further investigation.

    “This decision does not absolve Mr Baldwin of criminal culpability and charges may be refiled,” the statement continued, adding: “Our follow-up investigation will remain active and ongoing.”

    Hutchins
    Image caption,Cinematographer Halyna Hutchins (right)

    A lawyer for Mr Baldwin praised the move by prosecutors.

    “We are pleased with the decision to dismiss the case against Alec Baldwin and we encourage a proper investigation into the facts and circumstances of this tragic accident,” his lawyer, Luke Nikas, told the BBC in a statement.

    Mr Baldwin had been practising firing the gun on set at a ranch near Santa Fe when it went off, fatally striking 42-year-old Ukrainian-born Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.

    The actor denied pulling the trigger, although an FBI report later concluded that the gun could not have been fired without the trigger being pulled.

    He had been due in court for a preliminary hearing on 3 May.

    The film’s armourer, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, is also facing two counts of involuntary manslaughter. The statement from the special prosecutors says the charges against her remain unchanged.

    A lawyer for Ms Gutierrez-Reed told BBC News that they “fully expect at the end of this process that Hannah will also be exonerated”.

    The rust set

    According to the LA Times, prosecutors had recently learned that the gun used in the shooting, a .45 Colt revolver, had been modified with a new trigger in a way that could have made a misfire more likely.

    Thursday’s statement by prosecutors made no mention of the gun, but said that the newly revealed facts “demand further investigation and forensic analysis”.

    Prosecutors had accused Mr Baldwin, 65, of showing a “reckless” disregard for the safety of his colleagues.

    Mr Nikas, a lawyer for the star of The Hunt for Red October, previously called the initial decision to charge his client “a terrible miscarriage of justice”.

    “Mr Baldwin had no reason to believe there was a live bullet in the gun – or anywhere on the movie set,” Mr Nikas said.

    “He relied on the professionals with whom he worked, who assured him the gun did not have live rounds.”

    In an Instagram post after the announcement was made, the 30 Rock actor thanked his lawyer and his wife, Hilaria Baldwin.

    “I owe everything I have to this woman. (and to you, Luke),” he posted.

    The post

    In order to have been found guilty prosecutors would have had to convince a jury that he had acted with “criminal negligence”.

    If convicted, he could have faced up to 18 months in prison.

    The Santa Fe district attorney had initially added a firearm enhancement charge, which could have added five years to his sentence.

    But it was dropped after prosecutors determined that the enhancement law was not in place at the time of the shooting.

    The decision to drop the charges comes on the same day that Rust resumed filming – 18 months after the shooting.

    Melina Spadone, a lawyer for Rust Movie Productions, said new rules on the set “will bar any use of working weapons and any form of ammunition”.

    “Live ammunition is – and always was – prohibited on set.”

    According to Variety magazine, Mr Baldwin is currently filming Rust on location in Montana.

    Hutchins’ widower, Matthew, will be an executive producer. Baldwin last October reached a settlement in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by her family.

    Rust Movie productions, which Baldwin is part of, said in February the scene that was being rehearsed when Hutchins was shot has now been rewritten.