Senegal’s Ministry of the Interior has declined the request of the Autonomous National Electoral Commission (Cena) to reinstate opposition politician Ousmane Sonko on the electoral roll and provide essential candidacy documents for the 2024 presidential election.
In a response to Cena’s letter, the Directorate General of Elections (DGE) stated that it lacks the jurisdiction to act on the electoral roll but did not specify who holds that authority.
Cena had previously written to DGE, urging that Mr. Sonko should be reinstated on the electoral roll with all the rights associated with voter registration.
Mr. Sonko’s removal from the electoral roll prevented him from participating in the presidential election, with the government citing his conviction in absentia on a vice-related case in June as grounds for his removal. However, Mr. Sonko has claimed that these cases are part of a plot to exclude him from the presidential race.
A judge in Ziguinchor ordered on October 12 that Mr. Sonko, a prominent political figure in Senegal, should be reinstated on the lists.
However, the Ministry of the Interior has thus far refused to provide him with the official forms required for collecting sponsorships, an essential step in the candidacy process.
The Cena has urged DGE to take the necessary measures to ensure the prompt provision of sponsorship forms to Mr. Ousmane Sonko’s representative.
In its response, DGE maintained that the forms were not provided to Mr. Sonko’s representatives because he was not on the lists, a position affirmed by the Supreme Court on October 6.
While the Cena oversees and supervises the electoral process from registration to provisional result proclamation, the Ministry of the Interior is responsible for organizing elections.
However, a Cena spokesperson acknowledged that the commission lacks the authority to compel the interior ministry.
On Tuesday, Mr. Sonko’s legal team challenged the refusal to provide sponsorship forms in the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of African States (ECOWAS). The regional court has given itself until November 6 to resolve any disputes related to this case.




