Tag: Sergey Lavrov

  • Russia’s Lavrov hails Moscow-Beijing relations, accusing the US of provocations

    Russia’s Lavrov hails Moscow-Beijing relations, accusing the US of provocations

    The top diplomat for Russia claims that the West is looking for opportunities to enrage China on a variety of topics, including Taiwan and Tibet.

    Sergey Lavrov, the foreign minister of Russia, has praised Moscow and Beijing’s joint military exercises as a step toward solidifying their newly formed strategic alliance.

    Speaking to reporters on Wednesday in Moscow, Lavrov also charged that the West was looking for opportunities to enrage China on a variety of topics, including the status of Tibet and Taiwan.

    He claimed that because China is far more powerful than the United States, Washington is compelled to “mobilize” the West to support its anti-Beijing agenda.

    As the war in Ukraine rages, China and Russia have put aside decades of mutual distrust and stepped up military exercises to align their foreign policies.

    They signed a “no limits” partnership last February, days before Moscow sent its armed forces into Ukraine and their economic links have boomed as Russia’s connections with the West have shrivelled.

    However, Beijing is treading carefully.

    President Vladimir Putin has publicly acknowledged that his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, has “concerns” over Russia’s actions in Ukraine.

    Lavrov warned that Russia’s showdown with the West over Ukraine was part of a global policy shift that will evolve over a long period.

    “The process of forming a multipolar world order will be long; it will take an epoch,” he said. “And we are in the middle of that process now.”

    He cited Western efforts to hamper the widening cooperation between Russia and China, maintaining they would not success.

    Russia’s relations with the West “will never be the same”, he said, as he accused the West of failing to observe signed agreements with Moscow.

    “Never again there will be a situation when you lie, sign documents and then refuse to fulfil them,” he said.

    Last month, the Chinese and Russian navies held joint drills in the East China Sea.

    According to China’s Eastern Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, the exercises were designed to demonstrate “the determination and capability of the two sides to jointly respond to maritime security threats”.

    Meanwhile, Russia and China are also said to be “sharing a toolkit” of approaches and strategies to undermine NATO, according to Julianne Smith, US ambassador to NATO.

    “Those two are increasingly sharing a toolkit that should concern the NATO alliance, Smith told the Financial Times in an article published in December.

    “There’s just no question that the [People’s Republic of China] and Russia are both working to divide … the transatlantic partners. And we are now very aware, we all have a deeper appreciation of those efforts and are intent on addressing them,” Smith said in an interview.

    NATO in June listed China among its strategic challenges for the first time, saying Beijing’s ambitions and “coercive policies” undermined the Western military bloc’s “interests, security and values”.

    Lavrov compares West’s approach to Hitler’s ‘final solution’

    Elsewhere in his speech on Wednesday, Lavrov said the US had assembled a coalition of European countries to solve “the Russian question” using Ukraine as a proxy, in the same way Adolf Hitler had sought a “final solution” to eradicate Europe’s Jews.

    “Just as Hitler wanted a ‘final solution’ to the Jewish question, now, if you read Western politicians … they clearly say Russia must suffer a strategic defeat,” he said.

    Al Jazeera’s Ali Hashem, reporting from Moscow, said Lavrov’s news conference was an attempt to contextualise the war into the “Russian-Western confrontation”.

    Source: Aljazeera.com

  • What we know about the explosion in Poland

    The missile blast has intensified global fears about the Ukraine war spiralling even further.

    A blast in NATO member Poland, near the Ukraine border, on Tuesday sent shockwaves across the world, with fears of a direct confrontation between the alliance and Russia.

    After the incident, Polish President Andrzej Duda said the explosive, which killed two people in the eastern village of Przewodow, was “most likely Russian-made”.

    But on Wednesday, he said it was “very likely” that the missiles were from Ukraine’s air defence.

    “Absolutely nothing indicates that this was an intentional attack on Poland,” he said. “It’s very likely that it was a rocket used in anti-missile defence, meaning that it was used by Ukraine’s defence forces.”

    Washington and NATO have made similar statements, suggesting the blast was unintentional.

    An investigation is ongoing.

    Russia immediately denied its missiles struck Poland while Ukraine was quick to blame Moscow.

    Here’s what you need to know.

    What do we know about the explosion?

    First news of the incident was reported by Polish Radio ZET, which said on Tuesday that two missiles had hit Przewodow, a village in eastern Poland about six kilometres (3.5 miles) from the border with Ukraine, killing two men.

    Residents of the village, with a population in the hundreds, told local media that a missile had hit a grain drying facility, near a school.

    President Duda said “it was most likely a Russian-made missile” but noted Warsaw had no conclusive evidence on who fired it and that the incident was still under investigation.

    He also described the incident as “a one-off event” and said there was “no indication” it would be repeated.

    A day later, he said there was no evidence the blast was an intentional attack, and, in line with NATO, claimed the missile was likely part of Ukraine’s defensive air systems.

    What was happening in Ukraine at the time?

    The explosion in Poland came on a day of sustained Russian shelling in Ukraine.

    Moscow’s forces launched 110 missiles and 10 Iranian-made attack drones throughout the country, the general staff of Ukraine’s armed forces said, leaving millions of households without power.

    Ukraine said more than 70 missiles were shot down, but some hit the city of Lviv, near the border with Poland to the west.

    Al Jazeera’s Jonah Hull, reporting from Kyiv, said it had been a “hugely kinetic” day.

    “The explosion in Poland … only added to a sense of crisis,” Hull said.

    The turmoil started “receding” on Wednesday, as information suggested the blast was the result of a Ukrainian attempt to down a Russian missile.

    “NATO member after NATO member is now standing back and urging caution and saying they are awaiting the outcome of an investigation [into the incident],” Hull said.

    How did Ukraine and Russia react?

    Ukraine was quick to blame Russia for the missile blast.

    President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Tuesday, without producing evidence, that Russian missiles hit Poland in a “significant escalation” of the conflict.

    “The longer Russia feels impunity, the more threats there will be to anyone within reach of Russian missiles. To fire missiles at NATO territory. This is a Russian missile attack on collective security. This is a very significant escalation. We must act,” Zelenskyy said in his nightly video address.

    Russia said the explosion was caused by a Ukrainian air defence missile.

    “The photos published in the evening of November 15 in Poland of the wreckage found in the village of Przewodow are unequivocally identified by Russian defence industry specialists as elements of an anti-aircraft guided missile of the S-300 air defence system of the Ukrainian air force,” the Russian defence ministry said in a statement on Wednesday.

    The ministry also said that Russian attacks in Ukraine on Tuesday had been 35km (22 miles) from the Polish border at their nearest point to the NATO member state.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov accused a number of countries of having made “baseless statements” about Russia’s involvement “without having any idea of what had happened”.

    In rare praise for Washington, he lauded its “measured” response after United States President Joe Biden said it was “unlikely” the missile had come from Russia.

    As fears of an escalation eased, Ukraine said it wants access to the site of the explosion and to see the information that provided the basis for its allies’ conclusions.

    What have the US and NATO said?

    The US and its NATO were cautious in their early responses.

    Asked whether it was too early to say that any missile was fired from Russia, Biden said that the trajectory suggested otherwise.

    “There is preliminary information that contests that,” he told reporters at the G20 summit in Indonesia. “I don’t want to say that until we completely investigate it but it is unlikely … that it was fired from Russia, but we’ll see.”

    NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance’s member states were “monitoring” the situation and “closely consulting” with one another.

    “[It is] Important that all facts are established,” he tweeted on Tuesday.

    On Wednesday, NATO said the blast was most likely the result of a Ukrainian accident but ultimately blamed Russia as the aggressor force.

    Was the incident talked about at the G20?

    Al Jazeera’s Rob McBride, reporting from the G20 summit in Indonesia, said the explosion in Poland was “very much overshadowing” the last day of the meeting – Wednesday – which is being attended by Sergey Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister.

    Western leaders convened an emergency roundtable in Bali after reports of the blast on Tuesday.

    “I think the point that will be made by the US and its allies, even if it is determined to have been a Ukrainian missile, is that it was fired as a direct result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,” McBride said.

    What will happen next?

    The explosion has sparked concern that NATO, which Poland joined in 1999, might be drawn into the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

    Poland, which has put its military on heightened alert following the blast, is protected by NATO’s commitment to collective defence enshrined in Article 5 of its founding treaty.

    If it is determined that Moscow was to blame for the blast, which seems very unlikely following NATO’s statement on Wednesday, it could trigger Article 5, starting deliberations on a potential military response.

    While the situation was less clear, Warsaw was expected to request urgent consultations under Article 4 of the NATO Treaty, which is invoked when any member state feels their “territorial integrity, political independence or security” are at risk.

    Any response by the alliance will be heavily influenced by whether the incident was accidental or intentional – and for now, the former seems the most probable scenario.

    Even so, Ukraine is still demanding more investigations.

    Source: Aljazeera.com 

     

  • India will continue to purchase oil from Russia as ties strengthen

    India’s foreign minister says purchasing oil from a “steady and time-tested partner” is economically advantageous.

    Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said during his first visit to Russia since it invaded Ukraine that India will continue to buy Russian oil because it is beneficial to the country, a move that runs counter to Western efforts to cripple Russia’s economy with sanctions.

    On Tuesday, Jaishankar met with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov in Moscow, accompanied by senior officials in charge of agriculture, petroleum and natural gas, ports and shipping, finance, chemicals and fertiliser, and trade, emphasizing the importance of relations with Russia.

    “Russia has been a steady and time-tested partner. Any objective evaluation of our relationship over many decades would confirm that it has actually served both our countries very, very well,” Jaishankar said in a joint news conference.

    “As the world’s third-largest consumer of oil and gas, a consumer where the levels of income are not very high, it is our fundamental obligation to ensure that the Indian consumer has the best possible access on the most advantageous terms to international markets,” he said.

    “We have seen that the India-Russia relationship has worked to advantage. If it works to my advantage, I would like to keep that going,” the Indian foreign minister added.

    India, which has not explicitly condemned what Russia calls its “special military operation in Ukraine”, has emerged as Russia’s largest oil customer after China following a boycott by Western buyers.

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in Moscow.
    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar shake hands during a news conference in Moscow. [Maxim Shipenkov/Pool via Reuters]

    Jaishankar’s announcement came ahead of United States Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s visit to New Delhi later this week, when she is expected to discuss a Group of Seven (G7) plan to cap the price of Russian oil with Indian officials.

    US officials and G7 countries have been in intense negotiations in recent weeks over the unprecedented plan to put a price cap on sea-borne oil shipments, which is scheduled to take effect on December 5 to ensure European Union and US sanctions do not throttle the global oil market.

    Both New Delhi and Beijing have so far refused to join Western sanctions against Russia.

    Lavrov praised the position of Russia’s “Indian friends” on Ukraine and accused Western countries of trying to consolidate a “dominant role in world affairs” and prevent “the democratisation of international relations”.

    Russia and India are also considering joint production of modern defence equipment, the foreign minister was quoted by TASS news agency as saying. Last year, the two countries inked a $677m deal to produce AK-203 assault rifles in India as part of New Delhi’s push for self-reliance in defence manufacturing. India is one of the world’s largest buyers of defence equipment.

    Moscow has been New Delhi’s biggest supplier of military equipment for decades. India imported Russian defence equipment worth more than $20bn between 2011 and 2021.

    According to Lavrov, Russia and India also want to cooperate more closely in the fields of nuclear energy and space travel.

  • Lavrov says Russia is ready to discuss prisoner swap with US after Griner conviction

    A day after basketball star Brittney Griner was convicted of drug smuggling and sentenced to nine years in prison for carrying less than a gram of cannabis oil through a Moscow airport. The US and Russia have indicated they are ready to hold talks over a prisoner swap.

    A day after basketball player Brittney Griner was found guilty of marijuana smuggling and given a nine-year prison term for bringing less than a gram of cannabis oil through a Moscow airport, the US and Russia made it known that they were prepared to hold negotiations over a prisoner swap.

    Russia’s foreign minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters in Cambodia that the Kremlin is “ready to discuss this topic, but within the framework of the channel that has been agreed by the presidents,” state news agency RIA Novosti reported.
    “There is a specified channel that has been agreed upon by [Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Joe Biden], and no matter what anyone says publicly, this channel will remain in effect,” Lavrov reportedly said Friday at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations summit.
    Shortly later, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said at the same summit that the US will “pursue” talks with Russia.
    Brittney Griner is facing a 9-year sentence in a Russian jail following conviction. Here's what could come next for the WNBA star

    Brittney Griner is facing a 9-year sentence in a Russian jail following her conviction. Here’s what could come next for the WNBA star
    “We put forward, as you know, a substantial proposal that Russia should engage with us on.
    And what Foreign Minister Lavrov said this morning and said publicly is that they are prepared to engage through channels we’ve established to do just that. And we’ll be pursuing that,” Blinken told reporters at a press briefing.
    The comments from each side suggest that a negotiation process, which has already proven complex, could accelerate in the coming days.
    Russian government officials requested last month that a former colonel from the country’s domestic spy agency, who was convicted of murder in Germany last year, be included in the US’ proposed swap of notorious arms dealer Viktor Bout for Griner and Paul Whelan, multiple sources familiar with the discussions told CNN.
    Whelan, a US citizen, has been held by Russia since 2018 and was convicted by a Russian court in 2020 on espionage charges that he has strenuously denied. Griner’s conviction has raised similar concerns that she is being used as a political pawn in Russia’s war against Ukraine.
    The US State Department classifies the pair as wrongfully detained.
    Griner, a Women’s National Basketball Association star, pleaded guilty to carrying cannabis oil in her luggage as she traveled through a Moscow airport on February 17.
    She testified in court that she was aware of Russia’s strict drug laws and had no intention of bringing cannabis into the country, saying she was in a rush and “stress packing.”
    Griner inside a defendants' cage before the court's verdict was announced on Thursday.

    Prior to the verdict on Thursday, Griner apologized to the court and asked for leniency in an emotional speech.
    “I never meant to hurt anybody, I never meant to put in jeopardy the Russian population, I never meant to break any laws here,” she said.
    “I made an honest mistake and I hope that in your ruling that doesn’t end my life here. I know everybody keeps talking about political pawns and politics, but I hope that that is far from this courtroom,” she continued.
    Griner’s lawyers had hoped that her guilty plea and statements of remorse would result in a more lenient sentence.
    Her conviction, Blinken told reporters, “puts a spotlight on [Washington’s] very significant concern with Russia’s legal system and the Russian government’s use of wrongful detentions to advance its own agenda using individuals as a political pawn.”
    “The same goes for Paul Whelan,” Blinken added.
    Earlier Friday, a US State Department official told reporters there had been no “serious response” from Russia on a proposed swap. The same official said Blinken and Lavrov had not met while at the Cambodia summit, and that Blinken had no plans to do so.
    Before the start of Thursday’s WNBA game between Griner’s Phoenix Mercury and the Connecticut Sun, members of both teams linked arms around the center court, and a 42-second moment of silence was held for Brittney Griner.
    Near the end of those 42 seconds, members of the crowd started chanting, “Bring her home! Bring her home!”
    This story has been updated with additional developments.
    Source: cnn.com