Sean “Diddy” Combs is set to remain behind bars until his sex-trafficking trial scheduled for May 2025.
This comes after the court rejected yet another attempt to secure bail, marking the third unsuccessful bid by the defence to free the 54-year-old music mogul with the latest ruling handed down on Wednesday.
This comes after the “Last Night” hitmaker was arrested on September 16, 2024, in New York City. He was taken into custody following a federal grand jury indictment.
The charges against him include racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation for prostitution. The indictment also includes allegations of kidnapping, forced labour, and bribery.
Diddy has denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The defence had previously presented a $50 million bail package in an effort to convince the court. The proposal included strict conditions such as house arrest with GPS tracking at a New York City residence, a restricted list of approved visitors—excluding women who are not family members—and round-the-clock monitoring by a private security team.
However, federal prosecutors rejected the plan over concerns of altering witnesses, arguing that the release of Combs would be a threat to others even while incarcerated.
After careful consideration, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian ultimately sided with the prosecution. The judge had initially planned to issue his ruling during a hearing on November 22 but took additional time to deliberate before making his decision.
“The Court finds that the government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community,” Subramanian wrote, denying Combs’s motion for bail.
It’s reported that ‘Diddy’ Combs’ had sent handwritten jailhouse notes; they were the subject of a heated hearing last week. Prosecutors gained access to them after an Oct. 28 sweep of the Metropolitan Detention Centre (MDC) in Brooklyn, N.Y.
The government claimed it showed that the entrepreneur was trying to pay off witnesses from jail. Combs’s defence team argued that the notes viewed were “attorney-client privileged material”; they included the defence’s legal strategy.
Subramanian said at the Nov. 19 hearing that he’d review whether the notes contained privileged information, which could take weeks, but that he would not take the notes into consideration when ruling on the issue of bail.
However, he had some questions for the defence at the Nov. 22 hearing about if the defence retroactively wrote “legal” on the notes in question.
The defence team said it was trying to get to the bottom of when “legal” was written on some of the notes, according to the Inner City Press.

