Tag: University of California

  • How often should you poop? Experts weigh in on

    How often should you poop? Experts weigh in on

    Although everyone poops, it turns out that not everyone needs to poop every day.

    That is incorrect, according to gastroenterologist Dr. Folasade May, an associate professor at the University of California, Los Angeles’ David Geffen School of Medicine.

    “I even have people who try and make appointments, because they say, ‘Oh, I stopped having a bowel movement every single day a few years ago,’” May said. “And I have to remind people that there’s really not a fixed or normal number of bowel movements.”

    That notion probably stems from a Victorian-era belief that having a bowel movement daily makes you healthier, said Dr. Michael Camilleri, a consultant and professor in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota.

    Not necessarily. “Most people will have anywhere between a bowel movement up to three times a day to three times per week,” May added. “Anywhere in that range, we consider normal.”

    Frequency is merely one crucial aspect when using bowel movements as a health indicator. Diet, hydration, stress, age, medication use, social conditions, and stress all have an impact on how frequently we poop, according to Dr. Trisha Pasricha, a gastroenterologist at Massachusetts General Hospital and a Harvard Medical School lecturer of medicine.

    It’s helpful to know what your poop looks like in addition to just how often you poop.

    “The stool form, appearance or consistency of the bowel movement is actually a much better criterion than the simple numbers to frequency,” Camilleri said.

    Using a chart that divides stools into seven groups, the Bristol Stool Chart is used by medical experts to evaluate the quality of stools. The three and four varieties of stools—sausage-shaped with fissures on the surface or snake-shaped and smooth—are the healthiest.

    If your quality of life hasn’t changed and you’re pooping three times per week, it can be okay, according to Pasricha, if the consistency is firm or pebble-like. However, if you feel like you haven’t completely emptied your bowels or are straining excessively when trying to defecate, you may need to make changes to either poop more frequently or have healthier stool quality, according to specialists.

    Putting your feet on a toilet stool — or even a stack of books — could help. Doing so raises your knees above your hips, relaxing the pelvic floor muscles that support your bowel and allowing poop to pass through more easily, Pasricha said.

    “We did not evolve to have our bowel movements sitting with our hips at 90 degrees on a chair, which is what we do now. We used to all have bowel movements squatting,” she said. “Sitting at that sort of upright, 90-degree angle actually closes off the passageway.”

    Just like we need to make good choices to get restful sleep, we need to make wise food and drink choices to keep our bowels healthy.

    Eating enough fiber from vegetables, fruits, whole grains and nuts can help prevent constipation, experts said. Total fiber intake should be at least 25 grams daily, according to the US Food and Drug Administration.

    Some studies have found kiwis and prunes can be especially helpful for relieving constipation, experts said. But don’t eat too much fiber, as that has been linked with abdominal bloating or loose stools, experts said.

    Being sufficiently hydrated softens the stool so you can pass it without straining, May said.

    “Coffee, or caffeinated beverages, have also been shown to stimulate the contractions of the colon,” Camilleri said, noting they can induce bowel movements.

    A high-fat diet, on the other hand, can slow your digestive system down, May added.

    Movement also matters. Many people in the US live sedentary lifestyles, May said, but exercising helps your digestive tract massage and move food, promoting the passage of stool.

    How fast or slow food moves through the digestive tract can also depend on genetics, May said, and our digestive systems tend to slow down as we age.

    Medical conditions such as hypothyroidism, irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bowel disease or ulcerative colitis can affect regularity, as well as some medications, such as opioids and antidepressants. Having a baby or gaining and losing a lot of weight can also cause pelvic floor dysfunction, making poop difficult to expel, May said.

    Stress can also affect our bowel movements. When we eat our stomachs stretch, sending a message from there to the brain then down the spinal cord, the nerves of which induce colon contractions, Camilleri said — resulting in a bowel movement. But if we’re stressed, hormones and nervous system changes can prevent poop from moving toward the rectum, resulting in constipation. Some people experience the other extreme — diarrhea — when stressed.

    Bowel regularity can also be influenced by not responding to urges to poop due to not having easy or private access to bathrooms, experts said. Some people might feel embarrassed to poop around others at work or school.

    But don’t delay — the right time to poop is when you’re feeling the urge to do so, experts said.

    If you have to sit on the toilet for more than five to 10 minutes, you should discuss the issue with your doctor, Camilleri said. Bloating or abdominal distension or pain are other signs that your bowel movement frequency is negatively affecting your health.

    But if you’re taking too long on the toilet because you’re using your phone, stop letting that distract you, Camilleri said.

    If lifestyle changes don’t work, a doctor would be able to prescribe medications, supplements or laxatives that can aid in regularity.

  • 26-year-old Nigerian entrepreneur becomes youngest black woman to raise $10 million

    Olamide Olowe, a 26-year-old Nigerian businesswoman, is the youngest black woman to raise $10 million in venture capital.

    Her skincare company, Topicals, which creates safe, effective products for all skin tones, received the capital injection in its most recent funding round led by consumer-focused investment firm CAVU Consumer Partners.

    Olowe, a serial entrepreneur who recently graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), is the former co-founder of SheaGIRL, a Sundial Brands subsidiary now owned by Unilever. She is also the youngest Black woman to raise $1 million and $2.6 million in venture funding.

    According to a Forbes report seen by Billionaires. Africa today, the news follows Olowe’s inclusion in the Forbes 30 Under 30 list for 2022 after Topicals, the fastest-growing skincare brand at Sephora, raised $2.6 million.

    Olowe will use the $10 million in funding to expand the company and fuel brand awareness through an effective product campaign on TikTok and Instagram, as the firm continues to raise awareness about the link between mental health and skin conditions.

    The funds will also be used to develop products to treat chronic skin conditions such as hyperpigmentation, eczema, and psoriasis.

    Topicals have now raised a total of $15 million in venture funding since its inception in August 2020, as it continues to transform the way people feel about their skin through effective products and mental health advocacy, which continues to appeal to Gen-Z consumers.

    In keeping with its commitment to raising awareness about the link between mental health and skin conditions, the brand has donated more than $50,000 to nonprofits that provide mental health resources to marginalized communities.

    As it continues to develop products to address chronic skin issues such as hyperpigmentation, eczema, and psoriasis, the recent funding will put Topicals on track to launch a 12-month accelerator program to support nonprofits in the mental health space.

    Olowe, who spent much of her childhood dealing with chronic skin conditions such as hyperpigmentation, advises young people with entrepreneurial aspirations not to wait.

    “Don’t even consider what you can’t do,” she advised, “just ask why not me?”

    Source: Ghanaweb

  • Harvard and UNC race cases present test for U.S. Supreme Court

    The U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider whether colleges may continue to use race as a factor in student admissions in two cases that give its conservative majority a chance to ban policies often employed to boost Black and Hispanic enrollment and perhaps overturn its own precedents allowing such practices.

    The justices, confronting another contentious issue in U.S. American society, are scheduled to hear arguments on Monday in appeals by a group backed by a conservative activist of lower court rulings upholding affirmative action admissions policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.

    Many U.S. colleges and universities place a premium on achieving a diverse student population not simply to remedy racial inequity and exclusion in American life but to bring a range of perspectives onto campuses with the goal of a richer educational experience for everyone. Critics argue that these policies themselves amount to unlawful racial discrimination.

    According to Harvard, around 40% of U.S. colleges and universities consider race in some fashion in admissions.

    Latest Updates

    The Supreme Court has been upheld such policies, most recently in a 2016 ruling involving a white woman who sued after the University of Texas rejected her. The court has shifted rightward since then. Its 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices who dissented in that 2016 decision and three appointed by Republican former President Donald Trump.

    The Harvard and UNC lawsuits were filed in 2014 by a group called Students for Fair Admissions founded by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, who also backed the University of Texas plaintiff. Blum said he is not taking a ruling against the schools for granted, adding, “Trying to foretell what the court is going to do is a fool’s errand.”

    Ruling in favor of the plaintiffs could require the court to overturn its 2016 ruling and earlier decisions.

    The court in 1978 ruled in a case called Regents of the University of California v. Bakke that race could be considered as one of several admissions factors including academic and extracurricular criteria but barred racial quotas. It reaffirmed that in a 2003 ruling in a case called Grutter v. Bollinger.

    The court’s conservative bloc has shown a willingness to abandon precedent, as illustrated in the June decision to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that had legalized abortion nationwide.

    ‘DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION’

    The lawsuits accused UNC of discriminating against white and Asian American applicants and Harvard of discriminating against Asian American applicants.

    “These challenges are a part of a broader attack on the importance and value that the Constitution and that American society place on diversity and inclusion in the core institutions of our society,” said Sarah Hinger, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which has filed briefs in the cases supporting the schools.

    Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration is backing the schools.

    Students for Fair Admissions cited Harvard data showing that Asian American applicants were less likely to gain admission than white, Black or Hispanic applicants with similar qualifications. It said UNC’s admissions data showed “stark” racial disparities in acceptance rates among similarly qualified applicants, with Black and Hispanic students preferred over white and Asian American ones.

    Blum’s group has argued that Harvard’s policies ran afoul of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which bars racial discrimination under any program receiving federal financial assistance, and that UNC’s violated the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law.

    The lower courts disagreed. For instance, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that Harvard’s use of race was “meaningful” and not “impermissibly extensive” because it prevented diversity from plummeting.

    Chief Justice John Roberts is seen as the conservative justice least inclined to overturn precedent. But he dissented in the 2016 ruling alongside fellow conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

    Thomas, one of the court’s two Black justices, has been outspoken against racial preferences.

    “The Constitution abhors classifications based on race, not only because those classifications can harm favored races or are based on illegitimate motives, but also because every time the government places citizens on racial registers and makes race relevant to the provision of burdens or benefits, it demeans us all,” Thomas wrote in a Grutter v. Bollinger ruling dissent.

    Michaele Turnage Young, a lawyer with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which has filed briefs supporting the schools, said the court could rule more narrowly than its 6-3 ideological split might suggest, particularly after the political backlash from the abortion ruling.

    “The court might be wary of overturning another longstanding federal line of precedent,” she said.

    David Bernstein, a professor at George Mason University’s law school who has filed a brief supporting Blum’s group, said he would be watching to see if the three liberal justices can find “some escape hatch or limit” to allow some form of racial preferences to remain.

    Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the court’s other Black member, has recused herself from the Harvard case but is set to participate in the UNC one. Jackson, the newest justice, attended Harvard and previously served on its Board of Overseers.

    Sources: Reuters.com

  • Philippines lottery: Raised brows as hundreds win jackpot

    lottery in the Philippines that saw 433 winners has surprised and sparked the investigation.

    It was the highest number of people to have ever won the Grand Lotto’s top prize, according to local media.

    The winning combination for last weekend’s 236m pesos ($4m; £3.5m) jackpot was a series of numbers that were all divisible by nine.

    Philippines senate minority leader Koko Pimentel has called for an inquiry into the “suspicious” results.

    One expert told the BBC, on the assumption that 10m bets had been placed, he had estimated that the probability of having this many winners was “1 out of 1 followed by 1,224 zeros”.

    “I don’t know a name for this number since it is so large. The number of molecules in the known universe has 80 zeros,” said Guido David, a mathematics professor at the University of the Philippines.

    Participants in the Grand Lotto select six numbers from 1 to 55. To win the jackpot all six of a player’s numbers have to match those drawn by the lottery’s operator.

    “These lotto games are authorized by the Republic of the Philippines. Therefore, we need to maintain and protect the integrity of these gambling games,” Mr Pimentel said as he called for an investigation into the lottery’s unusual outcome.

    On Sunday, Melquiades Robles, general manager of the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO), said there were no irregularities and highlighted that people in the Philippines tended to bet on number sequences.

    “Many have held on to their numbers. It’s not only good to be loyal to your wives and husbands, it’s also good to be loyal to your numbers,” Mr Robles told a news conference.

    The winning combination for Saturday's draw.
    IMAGE SOURCE,PHILIPPINE CHARITY SWEEPSTAKES OFFICE Image caption, The winning combination for Saturday’s draw

    The PCSO also shared photographs and videos of people collecting their prize money at its office in Mandaluyong city, close to the capital Manila.

    “I’ve been betting on pattern 9, pattern 8, pattern 7, and pattern 6 for many years and I’m thankful I just won,” one winner said.

    Terence Tao, a maths professor from the University of California, Los Angeles told the BBC that a pattern like this being a winning series of numbers is rare “for any single lottery.”

    “But there are hundreds of lotteries every day around the world, and statistically it would not be surprising that every few decades, one of these lotteries would exhibit an unusual pattern,” he said.

    “It’s similar to how in any given hand of poker it would be unlikely to draw a straight flush, but if one looks at hundreds of thousands of hands at once then it actually becomes quite likely that a straight flush would be drawn,” he added.