Tag: Donald Trump

  • Trump ordered to testify to January 6 committee

    The congressional panel investigating last year’s Capitol riot has issued a legal summons ordering former President Donald Trump to testify to lawmakers.

    Addressing him, the document reads: “You were at the center of the first and only effort by any US President to overturn an election.”

    It goes on: “You knew this activity was illegal and unconstitutional.”

    A lawyer for Mr Trump accused the lawmakers on the committee of “flouting norms”.

    The former president has lambasted the inquiry as a ruse designed to distract voters from the “disaster” of Democratic governance with US midterm elections looming next month.

    Mr Trump could face criminal charges if he does not comply with the subpoena.

    He has until 4 November to provide documents to the 6 January committee, and must appear for deposition testimony on or about 14 November.

    If Mr Trump refuses to testify to Congress or hand over the requested material, the committee could refer the matter to the Department of Justice – potentially triggering criminal proceedings.

    The subpoena was issued just hours after former Trump strategist Steve Bannon was fined $6,500 (£5,800) and sentenced to four months in jail for contempt of Congress.

    He was convicted after refusing to give the committee testimony or documents.

    Another Trump aide, Peter Navarro, is due to stand trial for contempt of Congress next month after refusing to co-operate with a similar subpoena.

    The select committee is looking into Trump supporters’ violent storming of the US Capitol building on 6 January, 2021.

    The panel’s seven Democrats and two Republicans unanimously voted last week to force the Republican to testify about his role in the riot.

    Lawmakers say Mr Trump egged on his supporters to reject the 2020 presidential election result, leading them to storm the halls of Congress in an effort to prevent Joe Biden from being certified as the winner.

    In a letter that accompanied the subpoena, chairman Bennie Thompson and vice-chairwoman Liz Cheney said the committee had “assembled overwhelming evidence, including from dozens of your former appointees and staff, that you personally orchestrated and oversaw a multi-part effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election”.

    “You took all of these actions despite the rulings of more than 60 courts rejecting your election fraud claims and other challenges to the legality of the 2020 presidential election, despite having specific and detailed information from the Justice Department and your senior campaign staff informing you that your election claims were false, and despite your obligation as President to ensure that the laws of our nation are faithfully executed,” the letter added.

    Mr Trump’s legal team slammed the subpoena.

    “We understand that, once again, flouting norms and appropriate and customary process, the Committee has publicly released a copy of its subpoena,” said lawyer David Warrington.

    “As with any similar matter, we will review and analyse it, and will respond as appropriate to this unprecedented action.”

    If Republicans retake control of the House of Representatives after November’s midterm elections – which is widely expected – the 6 January committee’s work will come to an end and the panel will be disbanded.

    Ms Cheney – the top Republican on the panel and the daughter of former Republican vice-president Dick Cheney – will leave in January after losing a primary race in August to a Trump-backed challenger. The committee’s only other Republican member, Adam Kinzinger, plans to retire at the end of this congressional session.

    Source: BBC

  • Trevor Noah Explains Why He’s ‘Totally On Trump’s Side’ In Latest Scandal

    “The Daily Show” host on Monday delved into the former president’s latest scandal, which involves his beleaguered Truth Social platform. The co-founder of the social media company, Will Wilkerson, came out as a whistleblower, alleging the firm had violated federal securities laws and that Trump had pressured executives to hand over shares to his wife, Melania Trump.

    Wilkerson was fired from his role as an executive of Trump Media and Technology Group last week after coming forward.

    Noah was unsympathetic.

    “I am totally on Trump’s side in this story,” Noah said. “Yeah, it’s the year 2022. If you go into business with Donald Trump, and you’re surprised that you got scammed, that’s on you. What were you thinking? ‘Well, I know the last guy that Trump worked with almost got hanged by an angry mob, but I think I’m going to turn out fine. I don’t know what could go wrong.’”

    Source: yahoo.com

  • Trump accuses US for ‘almost forcing’ Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

    Former US President Donald Trump is blaming his side for “almost forcing” Russian President Vladimir Putin to orchestrate Ukraine’s invasion.

    According to him, should he have won the 2020 election and not President Joe Biden, the war between Russia and Ukraine would never have happened.

    During an interview on Saturday morning on Real America’s Voice, a right-wing network, the former president said “Ukraine and Russia would not be fighting. It doesn’t mean they’d love each other, but there’s no way they’d be fighting, and there’s no way Putin would have actually gone in.”

    “They actually taunted him, if you really look at it, our country and our so-called leadership taunted Putin,” Trump said. “I would listen, I would say, you know, they’re almost forcing him to go in with what they’re saying. The rhetoric was so dumb,” he added.

    Trump did not provide any examples of how the US or President Joe Biden “taunted” Putin or what was the supposedly “dumb” rhetoric.

    In the build-up to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Trump made the same baseless claim that Putin would not have invaded if he was still in power. He cited his positive relationship with the Russian leader.

    “I knew Putin very well. I got along with him great. He liked me. I liked him,” Trump said during a “Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show” appearance on February 22. “I mean, you know, he’s a tough cookie, got a lot of the great charm and a lot of pride, and he loves his country.”

    Trump also controversially described Putin’s justification for invading as “savvy” and “genius.”

  • Biden issues federal pardons for ‘simple possession’ of marijuana

    All those who were found guilty of national marijuana possession convictions have received pardons from President Joe Biden.

    About 6,500 people with federal convictions for basic marijuana possession are expected to benefit, according to officials.

    No one is currently in federal prison solely for possession of marijuana. Most convictions occur at the state level.

    But the federal pardons will make it easier for people to get employment, housing, and education, Mr Biden said.

    As a presidential candidate, Mr Biden promised to decriminalise cannabis use, as well as expunging convictions.

    “Sending people to prison for possessing marijuana has upended too many lives and incarcerated people for conduct that many states no longer prohibit,” Mr Biden said on Thursday.

    He added that non-white people were statistically far more likely to be jailed for cannabis.

    As a White House candidate, Mr Biden was criticised for writing a 1994 crime bill that stiffened penalties for drug crimes and led to more incarceration of minorities.

    The Democratic president said he would call upon all state governors to issue their own marijuana pardons.

    He is also directing the Department of Justice and the Department of Health to review how cannabis is classified under federal law.

    “We classify marijuana at the same level as heroin – and more serious than fentanyl,” said Mr Biden. “It makes no sense.”

    Recreational marijuana is already legal in 19 states and Washington DC. Medical use is legal in 37 states and three US territories.

    However, the drug remains illegal at the federal level, even in states where it can be legally bought and used, meaning people there could still be convicted for possession in certain circumstances.

    The pardons come a month before November’s congressional mid-term elections, which will determine the power balance in Washington for the last two years of Mr Biden’s term.

    Life for Pot, a website advocating for the release of non-violent marijuana offenders, noted that there are no known federal prisoners that will be affected by Mr Biden’s measure, tweeting: “This is window dressing.”

    Cannabis company shares jumped on the stock market by around 20% with news of Mr Biden’s pardons.

    Mr Biden is not the first US president to pardon cannabis offenders.

    On his final day in office, Donald Trump pardoned 12 marijuana offenders, including some who had been jailed for life under the three-strikes rule created by Mr Biden’s 1994 crime bill.

     

     

  • Donors spending millions on Trump’s legal battles

    As Donald Trump’s legal woes mount, donors and the Republican party have paid millions in dollars of his legal fees.

    His newest legal headache saw him and three of his children hit with a fraud lawsuit, which alleges they lied about the value of property “by billions”.

    Financial data shows that he has already spent more than $1m (£890,000) of donations fighting the case in 2022.

    The latest lawsuit, announced by New York state Attorney General Letitia James, was the culmination of a long-running civil investigation which began in 2019.

    Funded by supporters’ donations

    Millions of dollars spent combatting these charges have come from Mr Trump’s Save America political action committee (PAC) – which takes donations from Trump supporters across the country – Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings show.

    Save America has paid more than $1.12m this year alone to law firms hired to defend Mr Trump in the New York case. As a so-called “Leadership PAC”, it can use money to pay for expenses that cannot be funded by campaign committees, such as some personal travel or some leadership expenses.

    The website of Save America’s Joint Fundraising Committee – which contributes both to Save America and a second Trump PAC, Make America Great Again – makes no mention of legal bills, saying only that “the future of our Country [sic] is at stake and President Trump is calling on all Patriots to join his fight to Save America”.

    Of the $1.12m spent, more than $942,000 has gone to the firm of Alina Habba, a New Jersey-based attorney who has doubled as a Trump spokeswoman.

    Another lawyer, New York-based Alan Futerfas, received nearly $185,000 in July. Mr Futerfas is representing Mr Trump’s children – Don Jr, Ivanka, and Eric – in the New York fraud case.

    It is unclear how much of his own money Mr Trump has spent on his legal cases.

    One donor told the BBC the idea of funding the lawsuits didn’t bother him at all.

    “In my opinion, he can do whatever he wants with the money,” said Rom Solene, a Republican from Arizona.

    “The non-stop nonsense and antics being conducted by the Democrats on a man who no longer holds political office shows the extent to which the Democrats are willing to go to persecute a political opponent. Not to mention, it shows how much the Democrats and other Washington insiders fear Mr Trump.”

    The fraud investigation is just one of several expensive legal challenges facing the former president, however.

    The other cases include:

    • A criminal investigation into possible property crimes, which is linked to the civil fraud case in New York. The state attorney general referred evidence to federal prosecutors and the Internal Revenue Service. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office is also investigating.
    • Allegations Mr Trump mishandled classified documents, which saw FBI agents search his Mar-a-Lago property on 8 August. He is also being investigated for obstruction of justice.
    • The chief prosecutor of Georgia’s Fulton County is investigating potential state election crimes related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Part of this revolves around a phone call, in which the former president told a top state election official to “find 11,780 votes”.
    • A congressional committee has accused Mr Trump of inciting “an insurrection” when his supporters ransacked the Capitol on 6 January 2021. There have been no charges arising from this investigation, which is ongoing.
    • Various lawsuits by police officers who have accused Mr Trump of inciting the 6 January attack in which they suffered injuries.

    In August alone, Mr Trump spent more than $3.8m on legal fees in the wake of the FBI’s search of his Palm Beach estate, Mar-a-Lago, the bulk of which – about $3m – went to a nearby Florida firm.

    Smaller amounts went to lawyers involved in his other legal issues, including a Georgia investigation into whether he and his allies tried to illegally overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

    But there is no indication the former president’s method of settling his legal bills violates any statute.

    Erin Chlopak, a campaign finance expert at the Campaign Legal Center, a Washington DC-based non-profit, told the BBC that legal expenses often fall into a “grey area”, where it is left up to the Electoral Commission to decide if the expense is “personal” or whether it would exist “irrespective of a person’s status as a candidate or officeholder, in which case the money can be used”.

    “That’s a real problem in campaign finance law,” Ms Chlopak said. “We’ve seen that not just in the context of legal expenses, but in even more blatant personal uses, like personal travel, dining out at expensive restaurants and staying in hotels.”

    In Mr Trump’s case, Ms Chlopak added, the subject is complicated by the array of legal issues he is currently facing.

    “The results of applying the same standard would likely be different in circumstances related to business dealing that has nothing to do with one’s status as a former president, as opposed to actions that someone took based on their status as an officeholder.”

    In the past, the Republican National Committee (RNC) has also helped pay for some of Mr Trump’s legal bills, including some related to the New York attorney general’s investigation.

    In late August, however, Politico reported that the RNC would not pay legal fees related to the Mar-a-Lago search – and that it would completely stop paying legal fees if Mr Trump were to formally announce his intention to run for president in 2024.

    Ms Chlopak noted that the RNC is free to use funds as it sees fit.

    While he has hinted at the prospect, Mr Trump is yet to announce that he’ll run for the White House again in 2024.

    Source: BBC

  • Why New York state is suing Trump instead of charging him with crimes

    After a three-year investigation, New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a civil lawsuit against Donald Trump, three of his children and his real-estate company, claiming they “engaged in numerous acts of fraud and misrepresentation” for at least a decade. The suit claims the Trumps knowingly and consistently overstated the value of at least 23 commercial properties, for the purpose of getting lower interest rates and cheaper insurance. James wants the family and the company to disgorge $250 million, the amount they supposedly saved by duping banks and insurers.

    Um, okay? If Trump’s business practices were crooked, it’s appropriate for the correct authorities to hold him accountable. And there’s widespread evidence Trump has pushed the bounds of legality in his long career as a showman and real-estate developer. A 2018 New York Times exposé, aided by leaks of family documents, claimed that Trump participated in a variety of “dubious tax schemes… including instances of outright fraud.” Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, has likewise accused Trump of criminal activity, including some crimes Cohen participated in and went to prison for.

    And yet, the New York AG’s suit seems …underwhelming? The presumed victims in James’s suit aren’t customers Trump defrauded, contractors he stiffed, or shareholders he lied to. The victims are banks and insurance companies that supposedly undercharged Trump for loans and insurance policies, because Trump told them his properties were more expansive and valuable than they actually were.

    The government doesn’t usually sue on behalf of big businesses that have their own well-staffed legal departments. Financial firms rely to some extent on customers telling the truth. But they also do their own underwriting, for the explicit purpose of assuring they don’t commit money based on bogus information. When ordinary people apply for a mortgage, the bank doesn’t write a blank check with no questions asked. Instead, it does a thorough credit check, values the property and prices the loan according to the risk it believes it is taking.

    It’s harder to do due diligence on a complex business like Trump runs, but that’s what investment banks and other large lenders do for a living. James’s lawsuit, for instance, argues that Trump’s longtime lender Deutsche Bank repeatedly gave Trump favorable interest rates and other loose lending terms because of “the improper, repeated and persistent use of fraudulent and misleading financial statements.” Terrible. But isn’t that Deutsche Bank’s problem? Shouldn’t the bank be the one suing, rather than the New York AG? What harm did Deutsche suffer?

    ‘There doesn’t have to be a loss’

    James seems to be taking this approach, as opposed to a criminal indictment, because New York law empowers the AG to seek damages caused by fraudulent business behavior as a form of consumer protection. The law doesn’t require the AG to identify a victim or even demonstrate anybody suffered harm. Plus, the burden of proof is lower in civil cases than in criminal ones.

    “What makes this statute particularly powerful is that there doesn’t have to be a loss,” Will Thomas, a law professor at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, told Yahoo Finance. “This statute has been used to disgorge profits illegally gained. The government can be allowed to claw back all of those profits. Provable nature is lower, and you don’t have to prove intent or willfulness.”

    A civil suit also prevents James from bumping into the criminal case against Trump’s company that the Manhattan district attorney is prosecuting. Those two offices sometimes work together on criminal cases, as they’re doing on the recent indictment of former Trump adviser Steve Bannon. With regard to Trump, however, they seem to be pursuing complementary approaches instead of overlapping ones.

    Trump, of course, claims the AG’s lawsuit is a politically motivated “witch hunt,” his umbrella phrase for every inquiry into crimes or abuses he may have committed. As Trump points out, James is an elected Democrat in one of the most anti-Trump blue states. But that doesn’t mean James is hassling Trump just because she hates him. Prosecutors and other public officials have an obligation to investigate potential wrongdoing if they become aware of it. Media exposés, allegations by former Trump associates and loads of circumstantial evidence provide James plenty of fodder for a lawsuit. Trump’s primary company is based in New York, giving her jurisdiction. James can plausibly say she’s acting on behalf of the New Yorkers who elected her.

    Putting the pressure on other prosecutors

    James also seems to be priming the pump for other possible criminal prosecutions of Trump, by other agencies. She’s overt about referring evidence of crimes obtained during the AG civil investigation to federal prosecutors and the Internal Revenue Service.

    Do they really need the help? The Justice Department already has detailed information on Trump’s business operations, from the Cohen case and other events. Trump was eventually identified as “Individual 1” in documents related to Cohen’s 2018 guilty plea on charges of tax evasion, fraud and campaign finance violations. Individual 1 was complicit in some of the same crimes Cohen went to prison for. In 2019 Congressional testimony that named Trump as “Individual 1,” Cohen further detailed the types of financial shenanigans James is now suing Trump for.

    The IRS has supposedly been auditing Trump’s taxes for years. How could it not be? Given the many public charges of tax evasion—whether legal or illegal—the agency would be negligent not to look into whether it’s true that Trump is bilking the tax man.

    Maybe James feels it’s necessary to pressure other prosecutors into doing their jobs. The Justice Department reportedly dropped its inquiry into the campaign-finance violations Trump ordered Cohen to commit. The Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, has scaled back his criminal probe into Trump. Criminal proceedings against the company will begin in October, but those won’t focus on Trump personally, even though a prominent prosecutor who left the DA’s office has said there’s ample evidence Trump himself committed crimes.

    Other Trump prosecutions seem to be moving briskly. In Georgia, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis seems to be on course to bring criminal charges of election fraud against Trump and others working with him to overturn the 2020 election results. The Justice Department has hinted at possible obstruction of justice charges related to its lightning raid of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property in August, when it recovered troves of classified documents Trump wasn’t supposed to have.

    Allen Weisselberg, former chief financial officer of the The Trump Organization, has already pleaded guilty to more than a dozen felonies as part of the Manhattan DA’s probe. Weisselberg will testify against Trump’s company—but not against Trump himself—when that trial kicks off on Oct. 24.

    James could end up settling the civil lawsuit against the Trumps, though she would probably insist they agree to harsh terms that make it look like she won. If there’s no settlement, the case will likely go before a jury. But the suit alone, and the evidence it has produced, may already be a form of victory for prosecutors seeking to punish Trump for years of transgressions.

    Source: yahoofinance

  • Seth Meyers pinpoints moment Trump ‘lost his mind’ on Fox News

    According to Seth Meyers, “Donald Trump went on Fox News last night and lost his mind.”

    The moment in question? When the former president declared to Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he could simply declassify government documents with his mind when he was in the White House.

    “There doesn’t have to be a process, as I understand it. You know, there’s different people say different things, but as I understand there doesn’t have to be,” Trump said. “If you’re the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying, ‘It’s declassified.’ Even by thinking about it.”

    Meyers was aghast.

    “Despite being served softball question after softball question, [Trump] fully disintegrated into a sweaty, red-faced, rambling, incoherent mess,” he said.

    “It’s amazing that Trump continues to have the confidence of a man who is ready for anything while being prepared for nothing. If Trump was on ‘Family Feud,’ he would buzz in before he got asked a question.”

  • Jimmy Kimmel shows Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump what Dad really thinks of them

    Jimmy Kimmel torched Donald Trump’s two adult sons on Thursday by offering his own interpretation of what the ex-president said in a wild Fox News interview earlier this week.

    During the interview, Trump claimed he had the power to declassify documents with his mind when he was president.

    “You can declassify just by saying, ‘It’s declassified.’ Even by thinking about it,” Trump told Sean Hannity.

    Kimmel called him “Harry Hou-dummy” over the claim.

    “If Trump actually had the power to change things just by thinking about them, Don Jr. would’ve turned into a Big Mac 30 year ago,” Kimmel cracked.

    In the same interview, Trump said the FBI took his will when they executed a search warrant at his home last month.

    “That could cause a lot of problems if that gets published from people that won’t be so happy or maybe will be very happy,” Trump said.

    “It would cause a lot of problems,” Kimmel conceded. “Because you’d have to explain to Eric why he’s not in it.”

    Source: Huffpost

  • Stephen Colbert spots new Trump claim ‘so crazy’ even Sean Hannity was confused

    Stephen Colbert spotted what may have been the wildest moment in a Donald Trump interview. His comment was truly bizarre ― even by the former president’s standards ― and it wasn’t even the one getting all the attention.
    During an interview this week with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Trump claimed that he had the power to declassify documents with his mind. But Colbert noted that Trump said something even crazier, telling Hannity that the FBI may have searched his Mar-a-Lago home looking for former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s emails.“That’s so crazy, he confused Sean Hannity,” Colbert said. “And Sean comes pre-confused.”

    Colbert added:

    “At this point, he’s just throwing out magnetic conspiracy theories at the refrigerator to see what they spell out: ‘Um, maybe they were looking in my basement for the Sasquatch who shot JFK with Hunter Biden’s laptop with his partner the chupacabra who hung Jeffrey Epstein with Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate chemtrails.’”

    Source: Huffpost

     

  • Donald Trump mansplains to Letitia James how to do her job after she sues him

    Donald Trump on Thursday told New York Attorney General Letitia James how to do her job after she sued the ex-president and his three eldest children for allegedly wrongly valuing assets to cheat lenders and tax officials. James called the scope of fraud “astounding.”
    The former president, in friendly territory with Sean Hannity on Fox News for part two of an interview, made a wild segue from claiming he intimidated the Taliban to attacking James. He said crime in New York has been “the worst we’ve ever had.” (NYPD stats show homicides are down 13% from the previous year, while rapes, robberies and assaults are up.)“Letitia James, she should focus on murder and crime in New York, where they walk into stores with axes and they start swinging the axes at people,” Trump said, perhaps referring to a man who destroyed furniture at a Manhattan McDonald’s last week with a hatchet.

    “That’s where she ought to be focused, not on how much is Mar-a-Lago worth,” he continued.

    James’ pursuit of Trump’s alleged scamming appears to fall squarely within her jurisdiction.

    “The Attorney General’s Office is charged with the statutory and common law powers to protect consumers and investors, charitable donors, the public health and environment, civil rights, and the rights of wage-earners and businesses across the State,” the AG’s website says.

    Source: HuffPost.com

  • Donald Trump thinks Presidents can declassify documents ‘By Thinking About It’

    In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, former President Donald Trump said that presidents can declassify documents “by thinking about it.”

    “Different people say different things but as I understand it, if you’re the President of the United States you can declassify just by saying it’s declassified, even by thinking about it,” he told Hannity in an interview that marked his first TV appearance following the FBI raid of his Florida home last month. “Because you’re sending it to Mar-a-Lago or wherever you’re sending it. There doesn’t have to be a process. There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be. You’re the president, you make that decision.”

    His comments come just a day after New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Trump, his company, and his three eldest children over alleged business fraud. Speaking with Hannity, Trump called the lawsuit a politically motivated “witch hunt,” in a comment that echoes one he’s maintained against many of his critics over the years. He said that if there was any discrepancies in his business finances, then the banks should have done their job better. Trump has been accused of either inflating the value of his properties in order to gain more favorable loan rates, or deflating the value in order to pay less taxes.

    Following the FBI raid, it has been alleged that Trump mishandled classified documents. However, he told Hannity that he “declassified everything” and that he did not personally pack boxes of documents as he left the White House, pinning the blame on the General Services Administration employees.

    Source: Complex.com

  • You are insensitive – Nigerians slam Aisha Buhari

    Nigerians have referred to the First Lady, Aisha Buhari, as “insensitive”  following a post she shared on social media.

    According to reports, the First Lady posted pictures of herself at her daughter-in-graduation law’s in the United Kingdom.

    Aisha Buhari congratulated her daughter-in-law Zahra on receiving First Class Honors in Architectural Science on her verified Instagram page.

    She wrote; “Congratulations to Mrs. Zahra B Buhari on your graduation with First Class Honors in Architectural Science. Wishing you all the best!”

    Following the ongoing ASUU strike in Nigeria, which has lasted more than nine months, the images have since drawn a number of criticisms from citizens of that nation.

    Reacting to her post, many took to Twitter to share their thoughts.

    @PoojaMedia: ASUU was on strike for over 9 months & Aisha Buhari still posted their daughter’s graduation in the UK.

    The height of taking citizens for granted.

    So insensitive. Na wa

    @henryshield: Thousands of students are at home because our schools are shut, but 1st Lady Aisha Buhari is sharing pictures of her graduating family member. This isn’t about being insensitive, Aisha has drunk a full dose of the visible madness that has disconnected Asorock from the people.

    @JamiluSufi: Dear H.E Aisha Buhari, your husband has achieved everything failure can offer, name them… Destruction of Nigerian Educational System…

    Musa Ahmed: Aisha Buhari’s tweet on her daughter-in-law’s graduation ceremony at a time when the public Universities are on strike is insensitive and very unfortunate.

    Check out Aisha Buhari’s Instagram page;

     

     

    Read some reactions below:

     

  • Trumps inflated net worth by billions – NY state lawsuit

    Former US President Donald Trump and three of his children have been hit with a fraud lawsuit.

    This comes after a New York investigation into their family company – the Trump Organization.

    Investigations reveal that the family lied “by billions” about the value of real estate, which permitted to get loans and pay less tax.

    Prosecutors say the Trump Organization committed numerous acts of fraud between 2011-21.

    Mr Trump has dismissed the lawsuit as “another witch hunt”.

    The former president’s eldest children, Donald Jr, Ivanka and Eric Trump, were also named as defendants alongside two executives at the Trump Organization, Allen Weisselberg and Jeffrey McConney.

    The lawsuit has been brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is the state’s most senior lawyer, after a three-year civil investigation.

    Her office does not have the power to file criminal charges, but is referring allegations of criminal wrongdoing to federal prosecutors and to the Internal Revenue Service.

    “With the help of his children and senior executives at the Trump Organization, Donald Trump falsely inflated his net worth by billions of dollars to unjustly enrich himself and cheat the system,” Ms James said in a statement.

    She said Mr Trump’s own apartment in Trump Tower, which was valued at $327m (£288m), was among the properties whose values were allegedly misrepresented.

    “No apartment in New York City has ever sold for close to that amount,” Ms James added.

    “White collar financial crime is not a victimless crime,” the attorney general said.

    “When the well-connected break the law to take in more money than they are entitled to, it reduces resources available to working people, to regular people, to small businesses and to all tax payers.”

    Ms James is asking a court to bar the former president and his children from serving as officers or directors in any New York business.

    She also wants the Trump Organization banned from engaging in real estate transactions there for five years.

    The announcement comes after Ms James – a Democrat who is running for re-election in November – rejected at least one offer to settle the long-running civil investigation into the company’s business practices.

    Blasting the lawsuit on his Truth Social site, Mr Trump branded Ms James, who is black, a racist.

    “Another Witch Hunt by a racist Attorney General, Letitia James, who failed in her run for Governor, getting almost zero support from the public,” he wrote.

    The Trumps have previously accused Ms James of pursuing a political vendetta, citing remarks she made before being elected as attorney general in 2018 in which she vowed to sue Mr Trump and branded him an “illegitimate president”.

    Donald Trump Junior, Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump pictured at a 2019 press conference
    Image source, AFP via Getty Images Image caption, Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump are named as defendants in the lawsuit

    On Twitter, Donald Trump Jr accused Ms James of “weaponising her office to go after her political opponents”.

    While Mr Trump is not on the ballot in November’s midterm elections, he remains the dominant force in the Republican Party – and is stoking speculation about another run for the White House in 2024.

    In August Mr Trump declined to answer questions during an interview at the attorney general’s office connected to this civil investigation. Ms James said he repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right to not self-incriminate, confirming only his name.

    Ms James said that Eric Trump did the same more than 500 times in a 2020 deposition.

    Tristan Snell, a lawyer and former prosecutor who worked on a separate case against Trump University, told the BBC that the lawsuit could take a year to go to trial.

    But the potential of such a trial could severely restrict Mr Trump’s ability to do business in New York and profit from his marquee real estate holdings in New York City. It could trigger a series of financial consequences that would make it harder for him to raise capital and maintain credit, Snell said.

    “It definitely could be ruinous for him,” Snell said.

    Which properties were allegedly misrepresented?

    The lawsuit lists some of the most well-known Trump properties:

    Image shows exterior of Trump TowerImage source, Getty Images

    Prosecutors allege that the value of an apartment Trump had in Trump Tower in New York was listed at $327m after its “wildly overstated” size was tripled and given an “unreasonable” price per square foot. The record sale in the entire tower was $16.5m.

    Image shows exterior of Mar-a-LagoImage source, Getty Images

    The Mar-a-Lago club in Florida was valued as high as $739m by the Trump Organization. The attorney general’s office alleges the real value was closer to $75m and that it generated less than $25m per year.

    Ms James’s announcement that she would pass the findings of her investigation to other law enforcement agencies was “an ominous signal” for Mr Trump, according to Miriam Baer, vice-dean at Brooklyn Law School.

    “The New York attorney general went one step further today,” she told the BBC. “It announced that in addition to filing this civil complaint, it was also making a referral to federal law enforcement authorities for a criminal investigation.”

    The lawsuit is one of a number of legal issues the former president is facing.

    On 8 August, the FBI conducted a search warrant at his home in Mar-a-Lago as part of an investigation into his handling of classified records.

    Federal investigators were then ordered by another judge to freeze their probe while a court-appointed official decides if any of the records should be private.

    But on Wednesday a federal appeals court ruled that the justice department can resume reviewing the classified documents.

    The decision reactivates the inquiry into whether Mr Trump withheld US national secrets after leaving office.

    He is also being investigated in Georgia in relation to efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

    He has denied any wrongdoing in both those investigations.

    Source: BBC

  • Donald Trump sued for fraud over family business

    Donald Trump and three of his children have been hit by a fraud lawsuit after a New York investigation into their family business.

    It alleges that the Trump Organization committed “numerous” acts of fraud between 2011 and 2021.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James is asking a court to bar Mr Trump and his children from serving as officers or directors in any New York business.

    The Trump Organization has denied any wrongdoing.

    Mr Trump and the Trump Organization are accused of misstating the value of real estate to get banks to lend on more favourable terms.

    “With the help of his children and senior executives at the Trump Organization, Donald Trump falsely inflated his net worth by billions of dollars to unjustly enrich himself and cheat the system,” Ms James said in a statement.

    Ms James, who is New York’s most senior lawyer, is pushing for the Trump Organization to be barred from engaging in any future real estate transactions in the state.

    She added that she is referring several criminal charges to federal prosecutors and to the Internal Revenue Service.

    In addition to Donald Trump, Ms James named his three eldest children – Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka and Eric – as allegedly complicit in the fraud.

    The announcement comes after Ms James rejected at last one offer to settle the long-running civil investigation into the company’s business practices.

    The attorney general said she is aiming to recover an estimated $250m (£220m) that she said was the result of the fraud.

    Source: BBC

  • Donald Trump refuses to answer questions in New York investigation

    Former US President Donald Trump has declined to answer questions as part of a New York state investigation into his family’s business practices.

    Mr Trump had sued in an effort to block the interview at the New York attorney general’s office on Wednesday.

    State officials accuse the Trump Organization of misleading authorities about the value of its assets in order to get favourable loans and tax breaks.

    Mr Trump denies wrongdoing and has called the civil probe a witch hunt.

    • Katty Kay: Will an FBI ‘raid’ supercharge Trump?
    • Could Trump investigation stop him running in 2024?

    An hour after he was pictured arriving at the Manhattan office where he was questioned under oath, Mr Trump released a statement in which he criticised New York Attorney General Letitia James and the broader investigation.

    “Years of work and tens of millions of dollars have been spent on this long simmering saga, and to no avail,” he said. “I declined to answer the questions under the rights and privileges afforded to every citizen under the United States Constitution.”

    Ms James’ office confirmed that the interview took place on Wednesday and that “Mr Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination”.

    “Attorney General James will pursue the facts and the law wherever they may lead,” the statement added. “Our investigation continues.”

    His deposition comes just days after the FBI executed an unprecedented search warrant at his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, as part of a separate investigation that is reportedly linked to his handling of classified material.

    While the attorney general’s investigation is a civil one, a parallel investigation is being carried out by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office which could result in criminal charges.

    Legal analysts suggest Mr Trump may have declined to answer questions on Wednesday because his answers could have been used against him in that criminal investigation. The former president invoked the Fifth Amendment, which protects people from being compelled to be a witness against themselves in a criminal case.

    Media caption,

    Trump on people pleading the Fifth Amendment: ‘Disgraceful’

    The questioning lasted around four hours, and included lengthy breaks, his lawyer Ronald Fischetti told US media.

    Mr Trump began by reading a statement into the record condemning the attorney general and her investigation and invoking his Fifth Amendment rights.

    He proceeded to say “same answer” to every question he was asked.

    Ms James’ office has said that the depositions – a legal term that means testimony not given in court – were among the last remaining investigative procedures to be carried out.

    Letitia JamesImage source, Getty Images
    Image caption,

    New York Attorney General Letitia James

    Once the investigation concludes, the state attorney general could decide to bring a lawsuit seeking financial penalties against Mr Trump or his company.

    Ms James had sought Mr Trump’s deposition – and that of two of his children, Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr – for more than six months while the family resisted subpoenas through the New York court system.

    Lawyers for Mr Trump had also attempted to sue Ms James in a bid to prevent her from questioning the former president and his children.

    But in February, a New York Supreme Court judge ruled that all three must sit for depositions. Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr were questioned earlier this month.

    The judge said the investigation had uncovered “copious evidence of possible financial fraud” giving the attorney general a “clear right” to question under oath the former president and two of his children involved in the business.

    Ms James hailed the judge’s decision as a victory, saying that “justice has prevailed”.

    The investigation, which was first opened in 2019, seeks to prove that Mr Trump and the Trump Organization misrepresented the value of assets in order to obtain favourable loans and tax breaks. The alleged fraud is said to have taken place before Mr Trump took office.

    Source: BBC

  • Donald Trump sued for fraud over family business

    It alleges that Trump Organization committed “numerous” acts of fraud between 2011 and 2021.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James is asking a court to bar Mr Trump and his children from serving as officers or directors in any New York business.

    The Trump Organization has denied any wrongdoing.

    “With the help of his children and senior executives at the Trump Organization, Donald Trump falsely inflated his net worth by billions of dollars to unjustly enrich himself and cheat the system,” Ms James said in a statement.

    Ms James, who is New York’s most senior lawyer, is pushing for the Trump Organization to be barred from engaging in any future real estate transactions in the state.

    She added that she is referring several criminal charges to federal prosecutors and to the Internal Revenue Service.

    In addition to Donald Trump, Ms James named his three eldest children – Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka and Eric – as allegedly complicit in the fraud.

    She specified several instances in which the valuations of properties were allegedly misrepresented. Among them was his own apartment in Trump Tower, which was valued at $327m (£288m).

    “No apartment in New York City has ever sold for close to that amount,” Ms James added.

    The announcement comes after Ms James rejected at least one offer to settle the long-running civil investigation into the company’s business practices.

    The attorney general said she is aiming to recover an estimated $250m (£220m) that she said was the result of the fraud.

    In the past, Mr Trump has criticised the investigation and characterised it as a politically motivated witch hunt by Ms James, a Democrat who is up for re-election in November.

    In a statement following Ms James’ announcement, Alina Habba, an attorney for Mr Trump, said that the lawsuit “is neither focused on the facts nor the law – it is solely focused on advancing the Attorney General’s political agenda.”

    “We are confident that our judicial system will not stand for this unchecked abuse of authority, and we look forward to defending our client against each and every one of the Attorney General’s meritless claims,” Ms Habba added.

    On Twitter, Donald Trump Jr also accused Ms James of “weaponising her office to go after her political opponents”.

    On 11 August Mr Trump declined to answer questions during an interview at the attorney general’s office. Ms James said he repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right to not self-incriminate whether he was aware of false or misleading statements while president.

    Ms James said that Eric Trump did the same more than 500 times in his 2020 deposition.

    Tristan Snell, a lawyer and former prosecutor who worked on a separate case against Trump University, told the BBC that the lawsuit could take as much as a year to go to trial.

    But the potential of such a trial could severely restrict Mr Trump’s ability to do business in New York and profit from his marquee real estate holdings in New York City. It could trigger a series of financial consequences that would make it harder for him to raise capital and maintain credit, Snell said.

    “It definitely could be ruinous for him,” Snell said.

    The lawsuit is one of a number of legal issues facing the former President.

    On 8 August, the FBI conducted a search warrant at his home in Mar-a-Lago as part of an investigation into his handling of classified records. He is also being investigated in Georgia in relation to efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

    He has also denied any wrongdoing in those investigations.

     

    Source: BBC

  • Donald Trump sued for fraud over family business

    Donald Trump and three of his children have been hit by a fraud lawsuit after a New York investigation into their family business.

    It alleges that the Trump Organization committed “numerous” acts of fraud between 2011 and 2021.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James is asking a court to bar Mr Trump and his children from serving as officers or directors in any New York business.

    The Trump Organization has denied any wrongdoing.

    Mr Trump and the Trump Organization are accused of misstating the value of real estate to get banks to lend on more favourable terms.

    “With the help of his children and senior executives at the Trump Organization, Donald Trump falsely inflated his net worth by billions of dollars to unjustly enrich himself and cheat the system,” Ms James said in a statement.

    Ms James, who is New York’s most senior lawyer, is pushing for the Trump Organization to be barred from engaging in any future real estate transactions in the state.

    She added that she is referring several criminal charges to federal prosecutors and to the Internal Revenue Service.

    In addition to Donald Trump, Ms James named his three eldest children – Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka and Eric – as allegedly complicit in the fraud.

    The announcement comes after Ms James rejected at last one offer to settle the long-running civil investigation into the company’s business practices.

    The attorney general said she is aiming to recover an estimated $250m (£220m) that she said was the result of the fraud.

    Source: BBC

  • Joe Biden says Trump ideology threatens US democracy

    Supporters of Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (Maga) agenda are a threat to democracy, President Joe Biden has said.

    “Maga forces are determined to take this country backwards,” he said in a primetime speech in Pennsylvania.

    Top Republican Kevin McCarthy gave his own address, saying Mr Biden had “severely wounded America’s soul”.

    The duelling speeches come two months before mid-term elections, which will decide the power balance in Washington.

    The Democratic president delivered his speech on Thursday night from Independence Hall in Philadelphia, where the US Declaration of Independence was signed. He picked up his 2020 campaign theme of restoring the “soul of America”.

    He said he was not condemning all 74 million Americans who voted for Mr Trump two years ago. “Not every Republican, not even a majority of Republicans, are Maga Republicans,” he said.

     

    “But there’s no question,” Mr Biden continued, “that the Republican party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the Maga Republicans, and that is a threat to this country.”

    Mr Biden said Trump supporters thought of the mob who stormed the US Capitol last year as patriots rather than insurrectionists.

    “For a long time,” he continued, “we told ourselves that American democracy is guaranteed. But it’s not. We have to defend it. Protect it. Stand up for it. Each and every one of us.”

    In response, Mr Trump posted a defence of his Maga slogan and said his rival had “threatened America”.

    Throughout Mr Biden’s speech someone was heard heckling and sounding a bullhorn, according to a BBC reporter at the scene.

    Mr Biden addressed the disruption twice, saying the second time: “They’re entitled to be outrageous. This is a democracy.”

    The president, who came into office pledging to unite the country, has recently sharpened his rhetoric against supporters of Mr Trump.

    Last week Mr Biden equated what he called “extreme” Republicans with “semi-fascism”.

  • Trump ideology threatens US democracy – Joe Biden

    United States President Joe Biden has stated that those in support of Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (Maga) agenda are a threat to the country’s democracy.

    Speaking in a primetime speech in Pennsylvania, he said “Maga forces are determined to take this country backwards.”

    The Democratic president delivered his speech on Thursday night from Independence Hall in Philadelphia, where the US Declaration of Independence was signed. He picked up his 2020 campaign theme of restoring the “soul of America”.

    According to President Biden, his comment is not to condemn all 74 million Americans who voted for Mr Trump two years ago.

    “Not every Republican, not even a majority of Republicans, are Maga Republicans. But there’s no question that the Republican party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the Maga Republicans, and that is a threat to this country,” he said.

    Mr Biden said Trump supporters thought of the mob who stormed the US Capitol last year as patriots rather than insurrectionists.

    “For a long time,” he continued, “we told ourselves that American democracy is guaranteed. But it’s not. We have to defend it. Protect it. Stand up for it. Each and every one of us.”

    In response, Mr Trump posted a defence of his Maga slogan and said his rival had “threatened America”.

    Throughout Mr Biden’s speech someone was heard heckling and sounding a bullhorn, according to a BBC reporter at the scene.

    Mr Biden addressed the disruption twice, saying the second time: “They’re entitled to be outrageous. This is a democracy.”

    The president, who came into office pledging to unite the country, has recently sharpened his rhetoric against supporters of Mr Trump.

    Last week Mr Biden equated what he called “extreme” Republicans with “semi-fascism”.

    The duelling speeches come two months before mid-term elections, which will decide the power balance in Washington.

    Top Republican Kevin McCarthy gave his own address, saying Mr Biden had “severely wounded America’s soul”.

    Republican calls for Biden apology

    Mr McCarthy, who is Republican minority leader in the US House of Representatives, spoke shortly beforehand from Mr Biden’s hometown of Scranton, Pennsylvania.

    The California congressman said the president “has chosen to divide, demean, and disparage his fellow Americans”.

    “Why? Simply because they disagree with his policies. That is not leadership.”

    He called on Mr Biden to “apologise for slandering tens of millions of Americans as fascists”.

    The top Republican said the Biden presidency had saddled America with soaring inflation, open borders, Covid school shutdowns that damaged children’s learning, the “botched” withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the deadliest national crime wave in two decades.

    “In the past two years,” he said, “Joe Biden has launched an assault on the soul of America, on its people, on its laws, on its most sacred values. He has launched an assault on our democracy. His policies have severely wounded America’s soul, diminished America’s spirit and betrayed America’s trust.”

    Mr Trump added his own criticism of Mr Biden’s speech in a post on his Truth Social platform.

    “If he doesn’t want to Make America Great Again, which through words, action, and thought, he doesn’t, then he certainly should not be representing the United States of America,” he wrote.

    Republican Kevin McCarthy speaking to reporters last month
    IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES Image caption, Republican Kevin McCarthy speaking to reporters last month

  • Trump’s estate: Judge orders release of redacted search court papers

    A US judge has ordered for the release of a redacted version of court papers that convinced him to authorise a search of Donald Trump’s estate.

    The redacted version of court papers are to be provided by the investigators.

    According to the search warrant, the FBI wanted to see if Mr Trump committed a crime by improperly handling government records when he took them from the White House to Mar-a-Lago as his administration ended.

    The public version of the affidavit, a document that includes the evidence gathered by prosecutors, could reveal new details about the inquiry.

    The Department of Justice had opposed releasing an uncensored version amid its ongoing investigation.

    The FBI search was part of a probe into the potential mishandling of documents.

    US presidents are required to transfer documents and emails to the National Archives when they leave office.

    The former US president has denied wrongdoing and insists the classified files that investigators say were found in Florida had already been declassified by himself.

    On Thursday, US Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart ordered the affidavit to be released with redactions by noon (17:00 BST) on Friday.

    He said prosecutors had demonstrated a “compelling reason” to black out parts of the document, which would reveal the identities of witnesses, law enforcement agents and uncharged parties, as well as “the investigation’s strategy, direction, scope, sources and methods”.

    His ruling came shortly after the justice department confirmed that it had submitted to the judge a copy of the affidavit with proposed redactions.

    Even in redacted form, the affidavit could provide clues as to why Mr Trump allegedly took classified documents with him in the chaotic final days of his presidency and what he did with them while they were stored in Palm Beach.

    The rest may have to wait for when – or if – any criminal charges are filed.

    The warrant itself was released on 12 August alongside an inventory of recovered items that showed 11 sets of classified files were removed from the estate.

    Several news organisations have applied for the affidavit to be unsealed, citing public interest given the historic nature of the search of a former president’s home.

    The Department of Justice, however, had resisted the move, arguing that its release could cause “irreparable damage” to its continuing investigation. It also said the necessary redactions would render the document “meaningless”.

    Mr Trump and his lawyers – who have characterised the Mar-a-Lago search as politically motivated and unlawful – have called for the unredacted affidavit to be released.

    A spokesman for Mr Trump, Taylor Budowich, said that efforts to “hide” its contents were “cynical” and could be used to “hide government corruption”.

    Earlier this week, Mr Trump’s legal team asked that the investigation be frozen and that an independent third-party attorney, known as a special master, be brought in to oversee the documents that the FBI took during the search.

  • Trump Organization: Allen Weisselberg pleads guilty to tax crimes

    The long-time financial chief of Donald Trump’s company has pleaded guilty to fraud and tax evasion charges at a New York court.

    Allen Weisselberg, who served as The Trump Organization’s chief financial officer, had been charged with concealing more than $1.7m (£1.4m) in off-the-books income.

    He is expected to be sentenced to five months at the notorious Rikers Island jail and must pay back the owed money.

    Mr Trump has not been charged.

    The former president – who is not accused of wrongdoing – has described the Manhattan district attorney’s criminal investigation into his family’s real estate company as a witch hunt.

    The case relates to a 15-year scheme that prosecutors said helped executives at The Trump Organization avoid paying taxes on corporate benefits such as rent, luxury car payments and private school fees.

    The inquiry focused on whether Weisselberg and other executives received these benefits without reporting them properly on their tax returns.

    And at the plea hearing on Thursday, the 75-year-old admitted his involvement in the scheme and to receiving private school tuition for his grandchildren, BMW cars and a home in Manhattan.

    “[He] decided to enter a plea of guilty today to put an end to this case and the years-long legal and personal nightmares it has caused for him and his family,” his lawyer said in a statement shortly after.

    Weisselberg, who is seen as one of Mr Trump’s most loyal business associates, worked for the former president for almost 50 years. He left his job as chief financial officer which he had held since 2005 when he was arrested last year.

    The Trump Organization is also a defendant in this case and its lawyers have entered a not guilty plea.

    Weisselberg must now testify against the company at a criminal trial later this year, after agreeing to a plea deal that was first reported by The New York Times.

    But he refused to co-operate with prosecutors in their wider investigation into Donald Trump and his business practices, reports say.

    That means any testimony he provides at the trial – which is scheduled for late October – will only relate to this case and will not implicate the former president directly.

    Weisselberg had faced intense pressure from prosecutors to co-operate against Mr Trump, The New York Times reported, but resisted and accepted jail time.

    He will be sentenced at the end of The Trump Organization trial, Judge Juan Merchan said on Thursday. He could be freed from a likely five-month sentence after 100 days if time is credited for good behaviour, a number of sources told US media.

    That is far shorter than the many years in state prison he could have faced if – rather than plead guilty – he were convicted at trial.

    Weisselberg’s guilty plea – which legal experts suggest will strengthen the case against The Trump Organization – comes as Mr Trump is investigated on several fronts.

    Just last week, he declined to answer questions as part of a separate New York state investigation into his family’s business practices. That inquiry is a civil one, meaning it will not result in criminal charges.

    Mr Trump, who denies wrongdoing, had sued in an effort to block the interview at the attorney general’s office. But the questioning lasted around four hours and Mr Trump – who invoked his Fifth Amendment rights – said “same answer” throughout.

    There are also separate investigations into the former president’s handling of classified documents – which led the FBI to search his Florida home – and others related to his efforts to undermine the result of the 2020 election.

    Source: BBC

  • Top market prices on oil, gold and natural gas as at 17th August 2022

    Markets

    UK markets
    UK markets % change Value
    Change
    +0.36%
    7536.06
    +26.91
    -0.23%
    20336.41
    -46.35
    Europe markets
    Europe markets % change Value
    Change
    -0.11%
    728.11
    -0.77
    +0.34%
    6592.58
    +22.63
    +0.68%
    13910.12
    +93.51
    +0.41%
    3805.22
    +15.60
    +1.01%
    8511.90
    +84.90
    US markets
    US markets % change Value
    Change
    +0.71%
    34152.01
    +239.57
    -0.19%
    13102.55
    -25.50
    +0.19%
    4305.20
    +8.06
    Asia markets
    Asia markets % change Value
    Change
    +0.58%
    60190.14
    +347.93
    +0.72%
    19974.04
    +143.52
    +1.23%
    29222.77
    +353.86
    As of 07:01 17 Aug 2022

    Currencies

    GBP
    % change One £ buys
    Change
    +0.06%
    $1.2102
    +0.0007
    GBP against Euro
    +0.14%
    €1.1909
    +0.0017
    GBP against Yen
    +0.17%
    ¥162.7010
    +0.2780
    USD
    % change One $ buys
    Change
    -0.03%
    £0.8263
    -0.0002
    +0.08%
    €0.9840
    +0.0008
    USD against Yen
    +0.11%
    ¥134.4370
    +0.1530
    Euro
    % change One € buys
    Change
    -0.11%
    £0.8397
    -0.0009
    -0.08%
    $1.0162
    -0.0008
    Euro against Yen
    +0.04%
    ¥136.6235
    +0.0535
    Yen
    % change One ¥ buys
    Change
    +0.13%
    £0.0061
    0.0000
    -0.10%
    $0.0074
    -0.0000
    Yen against Euro
    -0.03%
    €0.0073
    -0.0000
    As of 07:01 17 Aug 2022

    Commodities

    Oil
    Commodity % change dollars per barrel
    Change
    +0.69%
    92.98
    +0.64
    WTI Crude Oil Futures
    +1.06%
    87.45
    +0.92
    Gold
    Commodity % change dollars per ounce
    Change
    No value
    1776.15
    No value
    Gold (Forex Index pm fix)
    No value
    1774.85
    No value
    Natural Gas
    Commodity % change pence per therm
    Change
    +4.63%
    436.00
    +19.59

     

    Source: BBC

  • Trump search warrant: FBI took top secret files from Mar-a-Lago

    The FBI seized top secret files in a search of former US President Donald Trump’s estate in Florida this week, according to a search warrant.

    Agents removed 11 sets of documents, including some marked “TS/SCI”, a designation for material that could cause “exceptionally grave” damage to US national security.

    Mr Trump denied any wrongdoing and said the items were declassified.

    It was the first time an ex-president’s home was searched in a criminal probe.

    The list of items was made public on Friday afternoon after a judge unsealed a seven-page document that included the warrant authorising the search of Mr Trump’s Palm Beach residence, Mar-a-Lago.

    It said more than 20 boxes of items were taken on Monday, including a binder of photos, a handwritten note, unspecified information about the “President of France” and a clemency letter written on behalf of long-time Trump ally Roger Stone.

    As well as four sets of top secret files, the cache includes three sets of “secret documents” and three sets of “confidential” material.

    The warrant indicates that FBI agents were looking into potential violations of the Espionage Act, which makes it illegal to keep or transmit potentially dangerous national security information.

    The removal of classified documents or materials is prohibited by law. Mr Trump increased the penalties for the crime while in office and it is now punishable by up to five years in prison.

    The warrant notes that the locations searched at Mar-a-Lago include an area called the “45 office” and storage rooms, but not private guest suites being used by Mr Trump and his staff.

    The justice department had asked a court to make it public on Thursday, a move considered rare amid an ongoing investigation.

    It was approved by a judge on 5 August, three days before it was carried out on Monday, 8 August.

    On Friday night, Mr Trump’s office issued a statement maintaining that he had used his authority while president to declassify the documents.

    “He had a standing order that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken into the residence were deemed to be declassified,” the statement said.

    “The power to classify and declassify documents rests solely with the President of the United States.

    “The idea that some paper-pushing bureaucrat, with classification authority delegated by the president, needs to approve of declassification is absurd.”

    Legal experts have told US media it is unclear whether this argument would hold up in court. “Presidents can declassify information but they have to follow a procedure,” Tom Dupree, a lawyer who previously worked in the justice department, told the BBC.

    “They have to fill out forms. They have to give certain authorisations. They can’t simply say these documents are declassified. They have to follow a process [and it is] not clear that was followed here.”

    A spokesman for Mr Trump, Taylor Budowich, said the administration of President Joe Biden “is in obvious damage control after their botched raid”.

    Mr Budowich accused the administration of “leaking lies and innuendos to try to explain away the weaponisation of government against their dominant political opponent”.

    Mr Trump’s conservative allies have also condemned the raid as a political hit job as he considers another run for the presidency in 2024.

    Law enforcement agencies around the country are reportedly monitoring online threats against government officials that have emerged in the wake of the FBI search.

    US Attorney General Merrick Garland, who personally approved the warrant, defended federal agents on Thursday as “dedicated, patriotic public servants”.

    “I will not stand by silently when their integrity is unfairly attacked,” he told reporters.

    Source: BBC

  • From Dos Santos to Mugabe – the burial disputes over ex-leaders

    In our series of letters from African journalists, Ghanaian Elizabeth Ohene writes about the disputes that break out over the final resting sites of African leaders.

    I am not sure I can offer a categorical theory yet, but it does look to me that being a president in Africa means there will be some controversy about your resting place when you die.

    I have been following the dispute over where to bury Angola’s former President José Eduardo dos Santos who died in Spain on 8 July.

    Current President João Lourenço and Mr Dos Santos’s fourth wife want to bring his body home for a state funeral and burial in a mausoleum – what we would call here in Ghana a befitting burial.

    But his daughter Welwitschia “Tchizé” dos Santos wants a private funeral and a discreet grave site in Spain, where his children can visit.

    She says she has the support of some of her siblings who face accusations of corruption in Angola and could be arrested if they return.

    One of the Dos Santos children says the state has no constitutional obligation to assume responsibility for his father’s burial and the decision must rest with the family.

    That argument about the state’s rights to a dead president’s body seems to be a recurring one.

    Back in 2019 there was an eerily similar situation in Zimbabwe when Robert Mugabe died almost two years after his 37 years in power was ended by the current President Emmerson Mnangagwa, with the backing of the military.

    Everybody thought Mr Mugabe would be laid to rest at the national Heroes’ Acre in the capital, Harare.

    After all, Heroes’ Acre had been built by him and he had supervised the burial there of many of his former comrades in the liberation struggle, including Sally, his first wife.

    Mr Mnangagwa started building an impressive mausoleum for the independence leader, but Mr Mugabe’s family would have none of it, not after he had been chased out of power and betrayed by his lieutenants.

    The body, they argued, belonged to the family and after weeks of argument, the family won and Mr Mugabe, the undisputed hero of Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle, was buried in his home village, without any representatives of officialdom present.

    Former Zambian President Kenneth Kaunda (L) sits next to Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe in Harare - 17 June 2004

    Even Kenneth Kaunda, Zambia’s first post-independence president and the ultimate peacenik, could not find a resting place last year without a dispute breaking out.

    According to the family, he wanted to be laid to rest next to his wife and not at the official site the government had designated.

    For the moment, the family has not insisted on their rights and “KK” – as the late Mr Kaunda is affectionately known – is lying at the Embassy Memorial Park in the capital, Lusaka.

    From exile to honours

    These disputes about restless dead bodies are not new. Over here in Ghana we are well practised in such matters.

    Our first leader – Kwame Nkrumah – died while receiving medical treatment in Bucharest in Romania.

    He was first buried in Conakry in Guinea, where he had been living in exile. His body was later brought to Ghana. There was a state funeral in the capital, Accra, and he was laid to rest in his home village of Nkroful.

    Years later, a befitting mausoleum was built in Accra and the body was brought and interred there.

    Kwame Nkrumah mausoleum (1909-1972), Accra, Ghana, 20th century

    Every once in a while, there are murmurs from his family in Nkroful asking for his body to be returned to them.

    In 2012, our President John Evans Atta-Mills died in office and finding a resting place for him was not a straightforward issue.

    Some members of his family wanted the body to be sent to his home village for burial, that argument did not find much traction at the time.

    The first place where the government dug a grave for his interment was abandoned as unsuitable. He was eventually laid to rest in a park.

    The understanding then was that the park would serve as the resting place for all presidents of Ghana.

    Since then, another former president – Jerry Rawlings – has died.

    Jerry Rawlings (September 1999)

    Not only was he not taken to where President Atta-Mills lies, but his family in his home village accused the government of having appropriated the body.

    He was buried at a military cemetery in Accra, with full military honours.

    A few weeks ago, we marked the 10th anniversary of the passing of Atta-Mills.

    There are still arguments about his tomb: who should look after it, and what should be inscribed on it.

    There are also members in his family who still want the body exhumed from the state-sponsored park in Accra and taken to his home village to be laid to rest.

    So I have to conclude that one of the hazards of being a president in Africa is that there will be no resting place for your body when you die.

     

    Source: BBC

  • Republican uproar over FBI raid on Trump’s home

    Furious allies of former President Donald Trump are demanding an explanation for the FBI’s raid on his Florida home, Mar-a-Lago.

    The FBI and Department of Justice have yet to comment on the search, which Mr Trump disclosed on Monday evening.

    It is reportedly linked to an investigation into his handling of classified and sensitive material.

    It was the first time a former US president’s home has ever been searched by law enforcement.

    Reports suggest the FBI activity is connected to an investigation into whether Mr Trump, a Republican, removed classified records from the White House and took them to Mar-a-Lago.

    The search was approved at the highest levels of the Department of Justice (DoJ), an unnamed US official told CBS News, the BBC’s US partner.

    Republicans have depicted the investigation as politically motivated, with leading figures demanding a briefing from Attorney General Merrick Garland, head of the DoJ.

    Mr Trump’s former Vice-President, Mike Pence, who has subtly distanced himself amid speculation they may both launch 2024 White House runs, called on the attorney general to give “a full accounting” of why the search warrant was carried out.

    “No former President of the United States has ever been subject to a raid of their personal residence in American history,” he wrote on Twitter.

    Mr Trump’s allies in Congress, meanwhile, vowed to launch an investigation if they win back control of the House of Representatives and Senate in November’s mid-term elections, when the balance of power in Washington will be decided.

    White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters on Tuesday that President Joe Biden was given no advance notice by the FBI of the raid, and that he “learned about this from public reports”.

    “The president was not briefed and was not aware of it. No-one at the White House was given a heads-up,” she said.

    She told reporters that Mr Biden had gone to great lengths to preserve the independence of the justice department, adding: “President Biden believes in the rule of law.”

    An anti-Trump protester outside Trump Tower in Manhattan on Tuesday
    IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES Image caption, An anti-Trump protester outside Trump Tower in Manhattan on Tuesday

    The raid was first announced on Monday evening in a statement by the former president, who was at Trump Tower in New York City.

    Lindsey Halligan, a lawyer for Mr Trump, said she had received a call around 10:00 local time (14:00 GMT) that the FBI had a search warrant for Mar-a-Lago and that she should come to the property.

    She said she saw 30 to 40 gloved FBI agents, some in suits and others dressed casually, and around 10 to 15 FBI vehicles, including a rental truck.

    Ms Halligan told CBS she and another lawyer for Mr Trump were barred from entering the complex, and that the search was divided into three sections: a bedroom, office and storage area.

    “Complete overkill,” she said. “If they needed documents, they could have asked.”

    The Secret Service agents protecting Mr Trump were notified shortly before the warrant was served, an unnamed law enforcement official told CBS.

    In a fundraising email to supporters on Tuesday, Mr Trump – who is currently at his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club – said he and other Republicans were being targeted because of his political influence and “my dominance in all polls”.

    “They are trying to stop the Republican Party and me once more,” he said, adding: “The lawlessness, political persecution, and Witch Hunt, must be exposed and stopped.”

    Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell released a statement on Tuesday saying the justice department “should already have provided answers to the American people and must do so immediately”.

    While many Democrats welcomed the raid, several urged the DoJ to provide more information. Some aired concerns that it could boost support for the former president.

    “This could be very useful to him as many people rally around him during this time,” Dave Aronberg, the state attorney for Palm Beach, where Mar-a-Lago is based, told the BBC. “Trump will use this to regain his martyr status.”

    Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said she first learned of the “visit” by FBI agents through public reports on her phone.

    “To have a warrant, you need justification,” she told NBC News. “And that says that no-one is above the law, not even a president or former president of the United States.”

    Source: BBC

  • Donald Trump reports that FBI officers raided his Florida home in Mar-a-Lago

    Former US President Donald Trump claimed that the FBI searched his Florida property and that a safe was forced open during the search.

    Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, according to Mr. Trump, was “occupied by a huge group of FBI investigators.”

    According to reports, the search on Monday was related to a probe into how Mr. Trump handled official documents.

    “These are dark times for our nation,” Mr. Trump’s statement said. “Nothing like this has ever happened to a President of the United States before.”

    The FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) and the justice department have not commented on the reported search.

    American presidents are required by the Presidential Records Act (PRA) to transfer all of their letters, work documents, and emails to the National Archives (NA).

    There are also other federal laws regarding the handling of classified documents.

    In February, the National Archives said it had retrieved 15 boxes of papers from Mar-a-Lago, which Mr. Trump should have turned over when he left the White House.

    The agency later told Congress the boxes included “items marked as classified national security information”.

    Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Christina Bobb, told NBC News that some papers had been seized during the search.

    The dramatic escalation of law enforcement scrutiny of Mr. Trump comes as the Republican prepares for possible another presidential run in 2024.

    News of the search has mobilized some of Donald Trump’s supporters. A group of fans gathered outside Mar-a-Lago to wave flags and express their anger.

    House of Representatives Republican minority leader Kevin McCarthy said: “I’ve seen enough. The Department of Justice has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicization.”

    Meanwhile, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican, tweeted: “Using government power to persecute political opponents is something we have seen many times from 3rd world Marxist dictatorships.”

    Mr. Trump said he had co-operated with all relevant government agencies and so the “unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate”.

    He said it amounted to “prosecutorial misconduct” and “the weaponization of the justice system” to prevent him from running for the White House again.

    “Such an assault could only take place in broken, Third-World countries,” he said. “Sadly, America has now become one of those countries, corrupt at a level not seen before.

    “They even broke into my safe!”

    According to CBS News, the BBC’s US partner, Mr. Trump was in Trump Tower in New York City at the time of the reported raid.

    Eric Trump, the president’s second-oldest son, told Fox News that the FBI’s execution of the search warrant on Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate was related to an investigation into the handling of National Archives records.

    In February, the NA asked the justice department to investigate Mr. Trump for his handling of official papers.

    NA officials say the former president illegally ripped up many documents. Some of them had to be taped back together, they said.

    Mr. Trump at the time rejected reports that he had mishandled official records as “fake news”.

    A senior Trump adviser in Palm Beach told CBS the new search by federal agents on Mar-a-Lago was about the presidential records.

    “This is about the PRA,” said the Trump source, who only agreed to speak on condition of anonymity.

    “When have you ever heard about a raid because of PRA?”

    The source added: “They [the FBI] just left and they left with very little.”

    A federal search warrant must be signed by a judge. Though such a warrant does not suggest that criminal charges are expected, law enforcement agencies must first demonstrate they have probable evidence of illegality.

    An unnamed law enforcement official told CBS that the Secret Service was notified shortly before the warrant was served around 10:00 local time on Monday (14:00 GMT) and that agents protecting Mr. Trump helped the FBI investigators.

    Several boxes were taken away, the source said, adding that no doors were kicked down and that the raid had concluded by the late afternoon.

    In a forthcoming book, Confidence Man, New York Times journalist Maggie Haberman reports that staff at the White House residency sometimes found wads of paper clogging a toilet and that they believed Mr. Trump was the flusher.

    Ms. Haberman has posted photos that she says show paper in a toilet bowl at the White House.

    A senior White House official has told CBS that President Joe Biden’s administration was given no notice of the FBI search.

    “No advance knowledge,” said the senior official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter. “Some learned from old media, some from social media.”

    The White House has said it is limiting its interactions with top justice department officials to avoid any hint of political pressure or impropriety.

    Mr. Biden pledged during his White House campaign to stay out of justice department affairs. The Democratic president and his family are also waiting to see whether federal prosecutors will indict his son, Hunter Biden, on tax evasion or other federal charges.

    There is a school of thought that the timing of this search is designed to avoid the long-held maxim that the justice department does not engage in actions that are deemed politically sensitive, near the time of an election.

    We are exactly three months away from the poll that will determine the makeup of the next Congress and rarely has there been such a sensitive time in American politics.

    Mr. Trump certainly believes the motives behind the “raid” were entirely political, a move designed to scupper his chances of running for the White House in 2024.

    There is much that we do not know, but Trump’s supporters are apoplectic with rage at what’s happened.

    It is an open question why a search warrant was needed to enter Mar-a-Lago when the former president said he had been cooperating with the relevant government agencies, but it is a hugely significant move by the justice department.

    In addition to the NA inquiry, a US House of Representatives select committee is investigating Mr. Trump’s actions surrounding the US Capitol riot on 6 January 2021 – when a horde of his supporters rioted at Congress as lawmakers met to certify Mr. Biden’s election victory.

    The US justice department is examining Mr. Trump’s challenge to the results of the 2020 presidential election. Attorney General Merrick Garland has said he intends to hold “everyone” accountable.

    And a prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia, is also investigating whether Mr. Trump and his associates tried to interfere in that state’s results from the 2020 election.

  • Biden administration working behind the scenes to convince Pelosi of the risks of traveling to Taiwan

    National security officials are quietly working to convince House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of the risks her potential trip to Taiwan could pose during a highly sensitive moment between the self-governing island and China.

    Sources familiar with the speaker’s plans say she is planning to visit in the coming weeks as part of a broader trip to Asia and has invited both Democrats and Republicans to accompany her. If she goes, she would be the first House speaker to visit in a quarter century.
    The possible trip is highlighting the concerns within President Joe Biden’s administration over China’s designs on Taiwan as Beijing has stepped up its rhetoric and aggressive actions toward the island in recent months, including sending warplanes into Taiwan’s self-declared air defense identification zone several times.
    US officials have expressed concern that those moves could be precursors to even more aggressive steps by China in the coming months meant to assert its authority over the island.
    The war in Ukraine has only intensified those worries, as Biden and other top officials nervously watch to see what lessons China may be taking from the Western response to Russia’s aggression.
    Meanwhile, China’s President Xi Jinping — with whom Biden expects to speak this week — is believed to be laying the groundwork for an unprecedented third term as president in the fall, contributing to the tense geopolitics in the region. Biden’s call with Xi was in the works before Pelosi’s potential visit to Taiwan became public, officials noted.
    Administration officials have shared their concerns not only about Pelosi’s security during the trip, but also worries about how China may respond to such a high-profile visit.
    With China recently reporting its worst economic performance in two years, Xi finds himself in a politically sensitive place ahead of an important meeting regarding extending his reign and could use a political win, multiple officials told CNN.
    Source: cnn.com
  • Capitol riots: Prosecutors probe Trump role in election challenge – report

    Federal prosecutors have reportedly asked witnesses directly about the behaviour of the former US president.

    So far, they have chosen not to open a formal criminal investigation into Mr Trump himself.

    Rioters stormed the US Capitol on 6 January 2021 in an effort to overturn the president’s election defeat.

    No former US president has ever been indicted for criminal conduct.

    Mr Trump has publicly praised those who attacked the building, but denies any personal wrongdoing.

    The investigation is separate to the high-profile, televised Congressional hearings that have taken place over the past few weeks on the same subject – which Mr Trump has characterised as a political witch hunt.

    According to a report in the Washington Post, federal prosecutors questioned witnesses before a grand jury about their conversations with Mr Trump and his inner circle in the months leading up to the 6 January riot.

    The witnesses were reportedly asked about instructions given by Mr Trump in connection to any attempts to prevent President Joe Biden’s election victory from being certified by Congress.

    Some of those questioned included senior members of former Vice President Mike Pence’s staff, multiple US outlets report.

    Until now the Justice Department has refused to say whether or not it would weigh charges against Mr Trump for any alleged role in trying to overturn his defeat in the 2020 presidential election.

    When the department’s top official, Attorney General Merrick Garland, was asked on Tuesday whether he was concerned about indicting a former president – he simply responded that he intends to hold “everyone” accountable.

    Federal officials would prosecute anyone “criminally responsible for interfering with the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to another,” Mr Garland told NBC News.

    The Justice Department’s probe into what happened on 6 January 2021, he said, is the “most wide-ranging investigation its history”.

    Any decision by federal prosecutors to bring charges against a former president – and potential candidate in the 2024 election – would have significant constitutional and political consequences.

    In addition to federal prosecutors, a powerful US congressional committee has also been holding its own separate investigation into the armed storming of the Capitol building.

    The congressional committee, made up of five Democrats and two Republicans, called dozens of witnesses last week in an attempt to build a case that Mr Trump launched an illegal bid to overturn his defeat by Mr Biden in the 2020 presidential election – culminating in the riot.

    Some of the most explosive testimony delivered at the televised hearings came from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former top aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

    Appearing as a surprise witness during the sixth hearings, Ms Hutchinson said Mr Trump personally knew that members of the crowd at his morning rally near the White House were armed because they were being turned away by Secret Service officers.

    “I don’t [expletive] care that they have weapons. They’re not here to hurt me,” Ms Hutchinson said she heard the president say. “Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here.”

    Her testimony offered the committee something they had been seeking to establish from the very beginning of proceedings – that Mr Trump allegedly knew there was a very real threat of violence and did nothing to stop it.

    Its panel of members of Congress has suggested there might be enough evidence to bring criminal charges against Mr Trump, but it does not itself have the power to do that.

    Any suggestion that the Justice Department could be looking into the former president’s personal role is therefore significant.

    Source: BBC

  • Donald Trump’s first wife, Ivana Trump, dies at 73

    Ivana Trump, Donald Trump’s first wife and the mother of three of his children, has died aged 73.

    “She was a wonderful, beautiful, and amazing woman, who led a great and inspirational life,” Mr Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social.

    Ms Trump, who was born in what is now the Czech Republic, married the former president in 1977. They divorced 15 years later in 1992.

    They had three children together – Donald Jr, Ivanka and Eric Trump.

    Police believe the cause of death may be accidental, according to the Associated Press.

    Sources told the news agency Ms Trump was found unconscious near a staircase at her New York City home, and it is believed she may have fallen.

    Donald and Ivana Trump were notable public figures in New York in the 1980s and 1990s, and their split was the subject of intense public interest.

    After their separation, Ms Trump went on to launch her own lines of beauty products, clothing and jewellery.

    She took credit for bringing up their children in her 2017 memoir Raising Trump, saying she “made the decisions about their education, activities, travel, child care, and allowances” until college.

    In the book, she added that her relationship with Mr Trump had improved since their divorce, and said she spoke to him about once a week.

    The Trump family lauded her in a statement as “a force in business, a world-class athlete, a radiant beauty, and caring mother and friend”.

    “Ivana Trump was a survivor. She fled from communism and embraced this country,” the statement added. “She taught her children about grit and toughness, compassion and determination.”

    Ivanka Trump, who was said to be very close to her mother, said in an Instagram post she was “heartbroken”.

    “Mom was brilliant, charming, passionate and wickedly funny. She modelled strength, tenacity and determination in her every action. She lived life to the fullest – never forgoing an opportunity to laugh and dance,” she wrote.

    Mr Trump was Ivana’s second husband. Her first, Alfred Winklmayr, was an Austrian ski instructor and friend who she reportedly married in order to obtain Austrian citizenship.

    That marriage allowed her to leave her communist home country – which was then Czechoslovakia – without defecting.

    A long-time skier, Ms Trump is said to have skied competitively in the country.

    But Mr Trump’s claims that she was an alternate on the 1972 Winter Olympics team were refuted in 1989 by a local Olympic official.

    While living in Canada in the 1970s, she worked as a ski instructor and model.

    On a work trip to New York City in 1976, she met Mr Trump while with a group of models. They were married the following year and quickly became a tabloid fixture.

    Ivana and Donald Trump at the 1985 Met Gala
    IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES Image caption, Ivana and Donald Trump at the 1985 Met Gala

    Over the course of their marriage, Ms Trump held several roles within the Trump Organization, including as manager of the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan.

    But Mr Trump reportedly locked her out of her office at the hotel in 1990 as they sparred over four pre-nuptial agreements.

    When the divorce settlement was finalised in 1992, Ms Trump had signed a non-disclosure agreement but also received $14m (£11.8m) and a mansion in Connecticut among other things.

    She was also married twice more: to Italian businessman Riccardo Mazzucchelli, from 1995-97; and to Italian actor Rossano Rubicondi, from 2008-09.

    Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani wrote on Twitter that Ms Trump was “a truly talented, creative and beautiful person”, who had “contributed greatly” to his city.

    “She lived the American Dream,” said Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a top Trump ally.

    In 2017, Ms Trump told ABC’s Good Morning America that she didn’t want to make Mr Trump’s current wife Melania jealous by calling him at the White House. “I’m basically first Trump wife. OK? I’m first lady,” she said.

    It was one of many memorable quotes from the former model. In a cameo role in the 1996 movie The First Wives Club, she told disgruntled divorcees: “Ladies, you have to be strong and independent. And remember, don’t get mad, get everything.”

    Source: BBC

  • Capitol riot hearing: Trump dismisses daughter Ivanka’s testimony

    Former US President Donald Trump has hit back at his daughter Ivanka after she distanced herself from his unfounded claims of mass voter fraud.

    A probe into the 2021 US Capitol riots on Thursday aired a previously unseen clip of Ms Trump rejecting the claims.

    Mr Trump said Ivanka had not been looking at election results and “had long since checked out”.

    Democrats argue the mob attack on Congress was the culmination of a months-long attempted coup by Mr Trump.

    Graphic footage and testimony of the 6 January 2021 raid on the Capitol in Washington, DC was televised on Thursday by the US House of Representatives select committee.

    The prime-time hearing drew 20 million viewers on the TV networks.

    The broadcast included a clip of testimony by former US Attorney General Bill Barr saying he had repeatedly dismissed the outgoing president’s claims that mass voter fraud had caused him to lose the election.

    Another excerpt was aired of Ivanka Trump’s interview from April with the committee, when she was asked about her reaction to Mr Barr’s assessment.

    “It affected my perspective,” Ms Trump said. “I respect Attorney General Barr, so I accepted what he was saying.”

    Mr Trump responded on his social media site, Truth Social, on Friday, labelling the inquiry a “WITCH HUNT!”

    “Ivanka Trump was not involved in looking at, or studying, Election results,” he added.

    “She had long since checked out and was, in my opinion, only trying to be respectful to Bill Barr and his position as Attorney General (he sucked!).”

    The president also lambasted Mr Barr as a “coward”, while continuing to insist the election was “rigged”.

    Ms Trump was a presidential adviser in her father’s administration and accompanied him to the rally that he hosted outside the White House just before the US Capitol attack unfolded.

    A handful of voter fraud cases have been prosecuted since the November 2020 election, but no concrete evidence has emerged of such criminal activity on any scale that could have swayed President Joe Biden’s victory.

    The House select committee will hold another five hearings over the coming fortnight.

    Next Monday’s session will attempt to show that Mr Trump and his inner circle knew he had lost the election, but spread claims of voter fraud anyway.

    The panel has conducted 1,000 interviews and gathered 140,000 documents over the year-long inquiry.

    Source: bbc.com 

  • Somalia: President Biden reverses Trump’s withdrawal of US troops

    US officials say President Biden has approved the redeployment of US troops in Somalia, reversing a decision by his predecessor Donald Trump.

    The deployment was requested by the Pentagon to support the fight against militant group al-Shabab.

    President Trump withdrew about 700 US troops from Somalia in 2020.

    The move to re-establish a military presence in the East African country comes as long-overdue elections delivered a new president.

    Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, a former peace activist, promised to work closely with international partners as he took office on Monday.

    Somalia has suffered from decades of chronic insecurity, and the Islamist militants who once controlled the country still hold large swathes of it and continue to collect taxes in places.

    Many in the country expressed deep concern when former president Donald Trump ordered the withdrawal of US troops, who had long been relied on as well as more than 19,000 peacekeepers from African Union nations.

    This time around, fewer than 500 US troops will be deployed, which has been described as “a repositioning of forces already in theatre who have travelled in and out of Somalia on an episodic basis” by US National Security spokeswoman Adrienne Watson.

    Her statement appeared critical of the Trump administration, calling its decision to withdraw troops “precipitous”.

    Al-Shabab militants regularly carry out attacks in the capital Mogadishu, which they stepped up in the run-up to May’s election in the hopes of derailing it.

    Somalia faces other formidable challenges including a drought that has left millions in urgent need of aid.

    Source: BBC

  • These 10 House Republicans voted to impeach Trump on Wednesday

    The House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump on Wednesday afternoon charging him with “incitement of insurrection.”

    Among the vote were 10 House Republicans. That includes:

    1. Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois

    2. Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming

    3. Rep. John Katko of New York

    4. Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan

    5. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington

    6. Rep. Dan Newhouse of Washington

    7. Rep. Peter Meijer of Michigan

    8. Rep. Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio

    9. Rep. Tom Rice of South Carolina

    10. Rep. David Valadao of California

    Source: cnn.com

  • Trump’s turbulent and lawless presidency will end with historic second impeachment

    The fateful moment when the House of Representatives on Wednesday impeaches President Donald Trump for a second time will rank among the defining moments of America’s story long after the citizens enduring these harrowing, tragic days are gone.

    A cascade of bewildering episodes starting with Trump’s refusal to accept his election defeat and encompassing his incitement of a mob assault on Congress has shattered long-held assumptions of the unassailability of government by the people, for the people. Save for the fracturing of the union before the Civil War, this country’s system of political checks and balances has never before been under the kind of strain imposed by an autocratic President desperate to cling to power.

    A sense of unfolding history is magnified by growing evidence that America is fighting for democracy itself in a struggle that will endure after Trump leaves office next week at the latest. New warnings of violence by pro-Trump extremists in 50 states and militias on the march toward Washington are instigating the most oppressive sense since 9/11 that the homeland is under threat. But this time the danger to US freedom comes not from a foreign terrorist group but radicalized Americans.

    In a break with the political alignments of the entire Trump term, several Republicans, meanwhile, say they will join House Democrats in impeaching Trump. There are also the first signs that Trump’s power base in the Senate, represented by Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, is fraying, leaving the President as vulnerable as he has ever been on Tuesday night.

    The sole article of impeachment that the House is expected to pass Wednesday charging Trump with high crimes and misdemeanours is damning. Its simple clarity explains why this impeachment is no mere futile partisan ritual in the waning days of the most aberrant presidency in history.

    “Donald John Trump, by such conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national security, democracy, and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law,” the article reads.

    It is an extraordinary mark of turbulent times and a lawless term that Trump will become the first president to be impeached twice only 13 months after the House first resolved that his abuses of power merited removal from office.

    In a poetic twist, the vote will take place in the very same chamber that lawmakers fled a week ago in fear of their lives from an invading mob seeking to harm Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and to thwart the transfer of power to President-elect Joe Biden.

    In time, the events of this disorienting week will take their place alongside milestones — including the Declaration of Independence, the abolition of slavery, Pearl Harbor and the assassination of President John Kennedy that make up America’s sweeping narrative. But history is experienced in retrospect. Current events are lived forward in all their alarming intensity and are frightening because no one knows how they will end. And the country’s nerves were already at breaking point nearly a year into a once-in-a-century pandemic that has brought death and sickness and further deepened stark political divides.

    ‘Armed combat’ in the Capitol

    The formal impeachment vote in the House is far from the only barely believable twist leading up to Biden’s inauguration in seven days.

    The horror of last week’s events and their grave implications are becoming even clearer as more details emerge about the day when a sitting President incited partisans to assault another branch of government in the act of finalizing his election defeat.

    The idea that the rampage in which five people died was just a political outburst that got out of control was debunked Tuesday by the serious tone of a news conference held by the acting district attorney in Washington.

    “I think people are going to be shocked with some of the egregious contact that happened within the Capitol,” Michael Sherwin said, referencing “mind-blowing” cases and charges including sedition and conspiracy. He said that some of those charged had military backgrounds.

    One federal law enforcement official said the videos and other information viewed by investigators paint a scary picture of events inside the Capitol as police and federal agents battled to save lawmakers and staff.

    “It was armed combat in that building,” the official said.

    Some of the hardening of opinion among lawmakers against Trump may be attributed to briefings on those events and the pending threats to the inauguration.

    After emerging from an all-senators briefing on inauguration security, Sen. Chris Van Hollen raised the specter of a “million militia march” on Washington.

    “We have no idea how many will come. We need to be prepared,” the Maryland Democrat said.

    A warning to the troops

    In another unfathomable moment on Tuesday, America’s most senior military leaders warned there was no place for extremism in the ranks and that the troops must support and defend the Constitution. The statement was remarkable in itself. But that the Joint Chiefs decided it needed to be issued in the first place was one of the more frightening events of recent days.

    In a simultaneous political earthquake, McConnell, who tethered his now-destroyed Republican majority to the bucking bronco of Trump’s presidency, made it known he was glad the President would be impeached.

    McConnell’s unexpected move, first reported by The New York Times, came amid his disgust at the attack on the Capitol by Trump supporters and in the belief that another impeachment would help Republicans purge the stain of this presidency from the party.

    McConnell didn’t say how he would vote in a Senate trial. But his shift keeps open the long-shot chance that sufficient Republicans could join a two-thirds majority to secure the first-ever conviction in a presidential impeachment.

    In the House, Wyoming’s Rep. Liz Cheney, a staunch conservative, announced that she would vote for Trump’s impeachment, enshrining the split with her fellow members of the GOP House leadership.

    “There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution,” Cheney said.

    Two other Republicans, Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois and John Katko of New York, also said they would vote to impeach, with a number of their GOP colleagues expected to follow suit in a vote that will echo through history, sources told CNN.

    In another development that exacerbated the feeling of history unspooling at a breakneck pace, Pence wrote to the House to formally refuse to join the Cabinet in invoking the 25th Amendment to declare Trump no longer able to fulfill the duties of his office.

    “I do not believe that such a course of action is in the best interest of our Nation or consistent with our Constitution,” Pence wrote, after Democratic leaders had warned that an intervention by the vice president would be the only step that could hold off Wednesday’s impeachment vote.

    Trump delivers an ominous warning

    Action inside the Capitol came as security forces poured into Washington to secure Biden’s inauguration and Trump noticeably dodged an opportunity to cool tensions.

    While he said he never wants violence, the President used a trip to his border wall in Texas on Tuesday to reinforce the falsehoods and inflammatory language that ultimately led to his second impeachment.

    He branded the process “a continuation of the greatest witch hunt in the history of politics” and warned it was “causing tremendous anger” and was “dangerous” for America at a “very tender time.”

    In more ominous comments, Trump said talk of using the 25th Amendment to oust him from office bore no peril for him but could come back to haunt Biden.

    “Be careful what you wish for,” the President warned.

    Trump also defended his remarks last week at a rally close to the White House that ended with his crowd marching on the Capitol.

    With only seven days left in office, the President’s mind is also turning again to a controversial raft of pardons that would constitute yet another abuse of power.

    CNN’s Jamie Gangel, Pamela Brown and Kara Scannell reported Tuesday that the President is continuing to discuss pardons for himself and his adult children. One source said such a move was considered even more likely since last week’s events, although there was concern among some aides and allies about the public perception of pardons after the deaths of five people in the riot.

    Such a move by the President would be seen in the United States and around the world as yet another insult to democracy. The historic damage that Trump has already inflicted upon America’s reputation in this regard is incalculable.

    But the stakes surrounding Wednesday’s vote and what will be a prolonged struggle during the Biden administration to bolster US political institutions can be seen in remarks coming out of authoritarian Russia the American adversary that interfered in the 2016 election in a bid to help Trump.

    “Following the events that unfolded after the presidential elections, it is meaningless to refer to America as the example of democracy,” said Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the lower house of the Russian Parliament and a supporter of President Vladimir Putin.

    “We are on the verge of reevaluating the standards that are being promoted by the United States of America, that is exporting its vision of democracy and political systems around the world. Those in our country who love to cite their example as leading will also have to reconsider their views.”

    Source: edition.cnn.com

  • Trump banned from Facebook, Instagram for two weeks — Zuckerberg

    Facebook Co-Founder, Mark Zuckerberg, says United States President, Donald Trump, is banned from Facebook and Instagram till the end of his tenure on January 20, 2020.

    Zuckerberg said this in a post on Facebook while reacting to the violence perpetrated at the Capitol by Trump supporters who wanted to stop the US Congress from certifying the election which Joe Biden won.

    The billionaire said for years Facebook and Instagram had allowed Trump to use the platform to say all sorts but this time, it was time to implement desperate measures since it had become obvious that Trump was instigating violence.

    The statement read in part, “Following the certification of the election results by Congress, the priority for the whole country must now be to ensure that the remaining 13 days and the days after inauguration pass peacefully and in accordance with established democratic norms.

    “Over the last several years, we have allowed President Trump to use our platform consistent with our own rules, at times removing content or labelling his posts when they violate our policies. We did this because we believe that the public has a right to the broadest possible access to political speech, even controversial speech. But the current context is now fundamentally different, involving use of our platform to incite violent insurrection against a democratically elected government.

    “We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great. Therefore, we are extending the block we have placed on his Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until the peaceful transition of power is complete.”

    Source: punchng.com

  • Pro-Trump mob storm US Capitol

    Police are clearing supporters of President Donald Trump from the US Capitol after they breached one of the most iconic American buildings, engulfing the nation’s capital in chaos after Trump urged his supporters to fight against the ceremonial counting of the electoral votes that confirmed President-elect Joe Biden’s win.

    Shortly after 1 p.m. ET hundreds of pro-Trump protesters pushed through barriers set up along the perimeter of the Capitol, where they tussled with officers in full riot gear, some calling the officers “traitors” for doing their jobs. About 90 minutes later, police said demonstrators got into the building and the doors to the House and Senate were being locked. Shortly after, the House floor was evacuated by police.

    An armed standoff took place at the House front door as of 3 p.m. ET, and police officers had their guns drawn at someone who was trying to breach it. A Trump supporter was also pictured standing at the Senate dais earlier in the afternoon. A woman is in critical condition after being shot in the chest on the Capitol grounds, according to two sources familiar with the matter. The sources could not provide further details on the circumstances of the shooting. Multiple officers have been injured with at least one transported to the hospital, multiple sources tell CNN.

    Smoke grenades were used on the Senate side of the Capitol, as police work to clear the building of rioters. Windows on the west side of the Senate have been broken, and hundreds of officers are amassing on the first floor of the building.

    The Senate floor was cleared of rioters as of 3:30 p.m. ET, and an officer told CNN that they have successfully squeezed them away from the Senate wing of the building and towards the Rotunda, and they are removing them out of the East and West doors of the Capitol.

    It’s not clear if any of the individuals have been taken into custody.

    Vice President Mike Pence was also evacuated from Capitol, where he was to perform his role in the counting of electoral votes.

    The stunning display of insurrection was the first time the US Capitol had been breached since the British attacked and burned the building in August of 1814, during the War of 1812, according to Samuel Holliday, director of scholarship and operations with the US Capitol Historical Society.

    Trump has directed the National Guard to Washington along with “other federal protective services,” according to White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany.

    The entire DC National Guard has been activated by the Department of Defense following a pro-Trump mob breaching the United States Capitol.

    “The D.C. Guard has been mobilized to provide support to federal law enforcement in the District,” said Jonathan Hoffman, the chief Pentagon spokesman. “Acting Secretary Miller has been in contact with Congressional leadership, and Secretary McCarthy has been working with the D.C. government. The law enforcement response will be led by the Department of Justice.”

    The Department of Defense had earlier received a request from the US Capitol Police for additional DC National Guard forces but a decision has not been made, according to a senior defense official.

    The official said DC National Guard was not anticipating to be used to protect federal facilities, and the Trump administration had decided earlier this week that would be the task of civilian law enforcement, the official said.

    The shocking scene was met with less police force than many of the Black Lives Matter protests that rolled across the country in the wake of George Floyd’s killing at the hands of Minneapolis police officers last year. While federal police attacked peaceful protesters in Lafayette Square outside the White House over the summer, clearing the way for Trump to take a photo in front of a nearby church at the time, protesters on Wednesday were able to overrun Capitol police and infiltrate the country’s legislative chambers.

    House and Senate leadership is safe and in an undisclosed locations, according to a person familiar. A separate lawmaker said House members have been evacuated to a location that this source would not disclose.

    The US Capitol Police are working to secure the second floor of the Capitol first, and will then expand from there. Outside the Capitol, the DC Metropolitan Police Department continues to mass, but no major move has been made yet toward the crowd.

    The Capitol police officer in the House chamber told lawmakers that they may need to duck under their chairs and informed lawmakers that protesters were in the building’s Rotunda. Lots of House members were seen wearing gas masks as they move between Capitol buildings. Members were calling family to say they are OK.

    Trump finally called on his supporters to “go home” hours after the riot started, but spent a large amount of time in the one-minute video lamenting and lying about his election loss.

    In one stunning line, Trump told the mob to “go home,” but added, “We love you. You are very special.”

    Trump struck a sympathetic tone to the rioters he himself unleashed saying, “I know your pain, I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it. Especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace.”

    Others inside the President’s orbit tweeted their calls for calm as the mob repeatedly attempted to take over the building.

    Donald Trump Jr., the President’s son, said that his supporters who mobbed the Capitol were “wrong and not who we are.”

    “Be peaceful and use your 1st Amendment rights, but don’t start acting like the other side. We have a country to save and this doesn’t help anyone,” he tweeted.

    The protesters have breached exterior security barriers, and video footage shows protesters gathering and some clashing with police near the Capitol building. CNN’s team on the ground saw a number of protesters trying to go up the side of the Capitol building. Several loud flash bangs have been heard.

    Protesters could be seen pushing against metal fences and police using the fences to push protesters back, while other officers reached over the top to club people trying to cross their lines.

    Flash bangs could be heard near the steps of the Capitol as smoke filled the air. In some instances officers could be seen deploying pepper spray. Tear gas has been deployed, but it’s not clear whether by protesters or police, and people wiped tears from their eyes while coughing.

    Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser just announced a citywide curfew from 6 p.m. ET on Wednesday until 6 a.m. ET Thursday.

    Federal and local law enforcement are responding to reports of possible pipe bombs in multiple locations in Washington DC, according to a federal law enforcement official. It’s unclear if the devices are real or a hoax, but they’re being treated as real.

    A pipe bomb was found at the Republican National Committee’s headquarters earlier Wednesday, an RNC official told CNN. The device was found on the ground outside, along the wall of the headquarters. It was safely detonated by the police, the RNC official said.

    At least two suspected pipe bombs have been rendered safe by law enforcement, including the one at the building that houses RNC offices and one in the US Capitol complex, a federal law enforcement official told CNN. The official said these were real explosive devices and they were detonated safely.

    The Democratic National Committee was also evacuated after a suspicious package was being investigated nearby, a Democratic source familiar with the matter told CNN.

    The party had preemptively closed the building ahead of the protests, the source said, but a few security and essential personnel were evacuated.

    Source:  CNN.com

  • Trump sends delegation to Ghana for Akufo-Addos investiture

    US President, Donald John Trump has announced the designation of a Presidential Delegation to attend the second inauguration of President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, on Thursday, January 7, 2021, in Accra, Ghana.

    A statement by the White House said the Honorable Dr J. Peter Pham, Ambassador, United States Special Envoy for the Sahel Region of Africa, will lead the delegation.

    The Honorable Stephanie S. Sullivan, United States Ambassador to the Republic of Ghana will also be part of the delegation.

    President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo delivered his last State of the Nations Address(SONA) today, January 5, 2021, at the Parliament House.

    Source: 3 News

  • Trump extends freeze on some work visas until March

    US President Donald Trump has extended a suspension on issuing certain work visas and green cards through the end of March, justifying the measure as a means to shore up jobs for US citizens amid the coronavirus pandemic.

    Allowing immigrant workers into the country would “pose a risk of displacing and disadvantaging United States workers during the economic recovery following the COVID-19 outbreak,” a presidential proclamation released on Thursday said.

    Therefore, measures imposed in April and June that significantly restrict legal immigration to the US should remain in place for now, it said.
    The limits are now set to remain in place as president-elect Joe Biden replaces Trump in the White House in January.

    The Labor, Homeland Security and State departments are to periodically review whether changes to the measures are necessary.

    The orders apply only to aliens who are currently outside the country and do not yet have permission to enter. Those who already have permanent residency are not affected, and there are exceptions for people including spouses and children of US citizens.

    The US economy is struggling and the number of people receiving unemployment benefits is now 19.6 million, compared with only about 1.8 million a year ago. The large number of daily new Covid-19 infections gives little hope for a quick recovery.

    Whilst the government painted a pessimistic picture to justify the measures in the proclamation, Trump claimed in a video message released on Thursday that the country had weathered the pandemic “dramatically better” economically than experts had predicted.

    Source: GNA

  • Nissan joins GM in exiting auto group backing Trump

    Japanese automaker Nissan Motor Co on Friday joined General Motors Co in exiting a group of automakers that had backed U.S. President Donald Trump in his bid to prevent California from imposing its own vehicle emissions rules.

    GM last week reversed course in an ongoing court fight and abandoned the outgoing Republican president, winning praise from Democratic President-elect Joe Biden, who takes office on Jan. 20.

    “We are confident that productive conversations among the auto industry, the Biden administration and California can deliver a common-sense set of national standards that increases efficiency and meets the needs of all American drivers,” Nissan said in a statement.

    Source: reuters.com

  • Trump fires top US election security official who contradicted fraud claims

    US President Donald Trump announced in a tweet on Tuesday that he had fired Chris Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

    CISA, which falls under the Department of Homeland Security, was established by the Trump administration in 2018 after accusations of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

    In a series of tweets, Trump said that Krebs’ recent statement defending the security of the recent election was “highly inaccurate.”

    Trump has so far refused to recognize the victory of Democratic President-elect Joe Biden and has repeatedly made unfounded claims of widespread fraud and glitches in voting machines.

    CISA and state election officials released a statement last week that said there was “no evidence” of compromised ballots or voting machines, saying the 2020 election was one of the “most secure” in the country’s history.

    ‘Honored to serve’

    Krebs appeared to confirm his removal from the post in a Tweet on his personal account.

    “Honored to serve. We did it right. Defend Today, Secure Tomorrow,” he wrote. He was also prompt to change his bio description on Twitter to “1st Director @CISAgov (former)”.

    According to local media reports, Krebs reportedly found out about his dismissal from Trump’s tweet. Mark Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, supported Krebs after the news of his dismissal.

    “Chris Krebs is an extraordinary public servant and exactly the person Americans want protecting the security of our elections. It speaks volumes that the president chose to fire him simply for telling the truth”, said Warner.

    The CISA is tasked with securing voting and ballot-counting machines from foreign and domestic interference.

    Debunking site sparks Trump ire
    Krebs also reportedly angered the White House over a CISA-run website called “Rumor Control” which debunked misinformation about the election.

    In the past few days, he had regularly fact-checked claims regarding the election, posted by Trump and his supporters — often using the red siren emoji. On the day of the election, Krebs had asked Americans to “treat all sensational and unverified claims with scepticism.”

    This is the second dismissal by Trump this month through Twitter. Last week, the president fired Defense Secretary Mark Esper the same way.

    President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris are yet to comment on Krebs’ dismissal.

    Source: dw.com

  • Trump’s ousting of Pentagon Chief sends shockwaves through Washington

    The U.S. President, Donald Trump abruptly fired Defense Secretary, Mark Esper on Monday, sending shockwaves through Washington.

    “Mark Esper has been terminated,” Trump tweeted. “I would like to thank him for his service.”

    The announcement came only days after a Pentagon spokesman said, Esper “has no plans to resign, nor has he been asked to submit a letter of resignation.”

    Mark Meadows, the White House Chief of Staff, reportedly called Esper to give him a heads-up that the president’s tweet was going to be sent out.
    In a letter to Trump on Monday, Esper said he accepts the President’s decision to replace him as he serves “the country in deference to the Constitution,” while stressing his efforts to keep the Pentagon “out of politics.”

    Esper, 56, began to lead the U.S. Department of Defense in mid-2019, after serving as Secretary of the Army. During his tenure at the Pentagon, Esper played a major role in implementing the Trump administration’s National Security Policies and mobilising military resources to help the country address the COVID-19 pandemic.

    However, he was at odds with the White House on several occasions over domestic issues. This summer, when demonstrations against police brutality and racial injustice swept across the country and Trump threatened to deploy active-duty troops to respond to violence arising from the events, Esper held a press conference in Pentagon making clear his opposition to the idea.
    “The option to use active-duty forces in a law enforcement role should only be used as a matter of last resort, and only in the most urgent and dire of situations,” Esper said in June. “We are not in one of those situations now.”

    Recently, Esper reportedly helped lawmakers on Capitol Hill craft legislation to pull the names of Confederate leaders from military bases, after the national reckoning over police brutality, racism, and slavery, despite public opposition from Trump.
    Nancy Pelosi, top Congressional Democrat, said in a statement that “it is concerning that reports show that this firing was an act of retribution,” arguing that the move could put the country’s national security at risk.
    A flurry of other Democrats, including House Armed Services Committee Chairman, Adam Smith, also lashed out at the firing of Esper and its timing.

    Democrat and former U.S. Vice President, Joe Biden has declared victory for the 2020 presidential election, while sitting President Trump hasn’t conceded and is pushing for legal challenges. “In the national security community, it is well known that periods of presidential transition leave our country exposed to unique threats,” Smith said in a statement. “It is imperative that the Pentagon remain under stable, experienced leadership.”

    Trump tweeted on Monday that Christopher Miller, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, will be the Pentagon’s Acting Chief “effective immediately.”

    Miller, 55, was sworn in as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, aligned under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, in August this year. Most recently, he served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for special operations and combating terrorism.
    Jim Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican and Chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, tweeted he is looking forward to “working with him to ensure that these priorities remain paramount and to working with President Trump to maintain stability at the Pentagon, particularly as we work to enact the 60th annual NDAA. “Inhofe was referring to the National Defense Authorization Act, a bill authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2021 and setting forth policies for the department’s programmes and activities.

    James Mattis, the Trump administration’s first Defense Secretary, resigned in late 2018 over policy disagreements with the President. In May 2019, Trump announced intention to tap Patrick Shanahan, then Acting Defense Secretary, to formally lead the department but the decision was reversed a month later when Shanahan said he was withdrawing.

    Days later, the President said he would name Esper for the post in a permanent capacity. The nomination quickly passed the Senate with a bipartisan support. Before joining the Trump administration, Esper was the Vice President for Government Relations at Raytheon, a major U.S. defense contractor.

    Source: GNA

  • Race for the White House narrows as votes are counted in key battlegrounds

    Vote counters worked all night in the crucial states that will decide the cliffhanger election with margins narrowing in Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania as former Vice President Joe Biden edged toward the 270 electoral votes needed to win and President Donald Trump pinned his hopes on a more uphill route back to the White House.

    Two days after Election Day, the slow churn of results is expected to offer more clarity Thursday on who will lead America for the next four years and when that final result will become known. Biden currently leads with 253 electoral votes to Trump’s 213. The race is coming down to tight vote counts in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

    If the former vice president wins Pennsylvania, the race will be over. Thousands of mostly mail-in votes remain uncounted so far, with Biden trailing by just over 160,000 votes. The Keystone State’s Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, a Democrat, told CNN that the result could come as early as Thursday and that he believed outstanding ballots in areas that favor Democrats would deliver a clear win for Biden.

    The Democratic nominee has also been making a run in Georgia, which has 16 electoral votes, where the President’s lead dwindled to about 18,500 votes overnight as results came in from Fulton County around Atlanta with 96% of the state vote count reported.

    The story was reversed in Arizona, where several tranches of votes from Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix, narrowed Biden’s lead to just under 69,000 votes with Trump’s team insisting the President will eventually prevail and keep his hopes of a path to 270 alive.

    There is also a close contest in Nevada, which released very little information on Wednesday with an estimated 200,000 ballots outstanding. The state is expected to report another batch of results around midday Thursday. Democrats had the state down as a likely win but it is closer than expected.

    The final result will come down again to mail-in votes, which could favor Biden since thousands are outstanding in Clark County, around Las Vegas which is usually Democratic territory. If Biden holds leads in Arizona and Nevada, he will get to 270 and will be able to claim the presidency.

    Trump’s team, seeking to keep his slim path to victory alive, has launched a flurry of sometimes contradictory legal challenges and political offensives, demanding vote counts continue in states where he is behind and wanting them shut down in those where he leads.

    Trump did not appear in public on Wednesday after accusing Democrats of trying to steal the election even though continuing vote counts are working through legally cast ballots.

    Biden did come before the cameras, and while stopping short of claiming victory, he sought to present an image of momentum and confidence and made a thematic pivot from the partisanship of the campaign trail to the calls for unity expected of an incoming president. He dismissed Trump’s attempts to undermine the results, stating that “the people rule. Power can’t be taken or asserted.”

    “There will not be blue states and red states when we win. Just the United States of America,” Biden said Wednesday afternoon as he promised to bring the country together. “We are not enemies. What brings us together as Americans is so much stronger than anything that can tear us apart.”

    CNN projects Biden will win at least three of Maine’s four electoral votes, plus Wisconsin, Michigan, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Virginia, California, Oregon, Washington state, Illinois, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Delaware, Washington, DC, Maryland, Massachusetts and one of Nebraska’s five electoral votes. Nebraska and Maine award two electoral votes to their statewide winners and divide their other electoral votes by congressional districts.

    CNN projects Trump will win Montana, Texas, Iowa, Idaho, Ohio, Mississippi, Wyoming, Missouri, Kansas, Utah, Louisiana, Alabama, South Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota, Arkansas, Indiana, Oklahoma, Kentucky, West Virginia and Tennessee and four of Nebraska’s five electoral votes.

    Trump mounts aggressive legal strategy to contest results

    As one piece of his legal strategy, the Trump campaign plans to ask the Supreme Court to intervene in a case challenging a Supreme Court decision that allowed Pennsylvania ballots to be counted after Election Day. The justices had refused to expedite the appeal before the election and are considering whether to take up the case.

    Trump and his campaign team also sought to raise doubts about how Biden made a late surge to victory in the vital state of Wisconsin, where the Democrat rose on the strength of mail-in and early votes that were counted after most of the ballots cast in person on Election Day.

    The Trump campaign said Wednesday that it will demand a recount in Wisconsin while mounting legal challenges in Michigan and Georgia.

    “The President is well within the threshold to request a recount (in Wisconsin) and we will immediately do so,” Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien said in a statement.

    Stepien noted that results show “a razor thin race as we always knew that it would be” and claimed that there were irregularities in several Wisconsin counties, but did not specify what the campaign believes those irregularities are.

    The campaign’s state-by-state approach revealed the glaring inconsistencies in its strategy: it appears to be trying to stop vote counts in states where Trump is trailing, like Pennsylvania and Michigan, while demanding that all the votes are counted in states where it believes the President has a chance of catching up to Biden, like Arizona and Nevada.

    Candidates can ask for a recount in Wisconsin if they are within 1% of the winner’s vote total — but the recount cannot be formally requested until completion of the canvass, which could be as late as November 17. It seems highly unlikely that a margin the size of Biden’s lead in Wisconsin, about 20,000 votes, could get reversed on a recount. But because the margin is less than 1%, the Trump campaign is well within its rights to request a recount.

    With CNN’s Kevin Liptak reporting that even Trump himself appears to skeptical of the thin basis for some of the challenges that his campaign is filing, the campaign said it plans to file a lawsuit in Georgia claiming that a Republican poll observer in that state witnessed 53 late absentee ballots “illegally added to a stack of on-time absentee ballots in Chatham County.”

    Trump offered a less-than-enthusiastic endorsement of his team’s legal strategy in phone calls with some of his allies on Wednesday, sounding resigned to the plan falling short and questioning why his team hadn’t successfully challenged voting rules before the election, even as he remained willing to see it through, CNN reported.

    The Trump campaign also said it is filing a lawsuit in Michigan asking the state to halt its count because it has “not been provided with meaningful access to numerous counting locations to observe the opening of ballots and the counting process, as guaranteed by Michigan law.”

    Ryan Jarvi, a spokesperson for Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, responded to the threat of the lawsuit by saying in a statement that “Michigan’s elections have been conducted transparently, with access provided for both political parties and the public.”

    Trump campaign officials said Wednesday afternoon that they believe the President can hold his lead in Pennsylvania, but they are also suing the commonwealth, claiming that Democratic election officials are “hiding the ballot counting and processing” from Republican poll observers.

    Trump Deputy Campaign Manager Justin Clark said the aim of the lawsuit is “to temporarily halt counting until there is meaningful transparency and Republicans can ensure all counting is done aboveboard and by the law.”

    The President is making baseless claims that the election, which had looked more favorable to him late on Tuesday before hauls of early votes started being tabulated, is being stolen from him and demanding that vote counting in some areas should stop. An appearance in the White House East Room in the early hours of Wednesday in which he falsely claimed victory represented his most brazen threat yet to the democratic principles that underpin the US political system.

    “As far as I’m concerned, we already have won it,” Trump said, painting a picture at odds with the true state of the race. Earlier, Biden had warned each side needed to wait for the votes to be counted, saying, “We’re going to have to be patient until we the hard work of tallying the votes is finished.”

    And while the President has long threatened legal challenges to the election, the voting itself largely went peacefully, without violence at polling places or intimidation of people casting their ballots as had been widely feared, especially given Trump’s attempts to discredit voting procedures ahead of time.

    But the election did not turn into the wholesale repudiation of the President and his wrecking ball presidency that Democrats had hoped for. Trump demonstrated a remarkable bond with his base of mainly White voters in rural areas and a new connection with groups of Latino voters in some states.

    A blue wave many Democrats were looking for to end Mitch McConnell’s GOP Senate majority has so far not been realized, though some key races are still undecided. And despite aiming to expand their House majority, Democrats lost several seats and some threatened Republicans clung to theirs.

    Source: edition.cnn.com

  • Trump campaign files lawsuit in Georgia

    US President Donald Trump’s campaign and Republicans in Georgia have filed a lawsuit in the state, marking Trump’s third legal challenge around vote counting.

    The lawsuit asks a judge to order Democratic-leaning Chatham County in Georgia to “secure” and store ballots that were received after 7 pm on Election Day.

    The lawsuit alleges that a county worker added mail-in ballots that were not “properly processed” with other ballots, raising concerns that some ballots received after 7 pm could be intermixed.

    In Georgia, all ballots must be received by 7 pm on Election Day to be counted.

    Georgia has not yet been called for either Trump or his rival Joe Biden.

    Source: GNA

  • Trump, Biden speak as results show tight race

    Donald Trump accused Democrats of an attempt to commit fraud as he trailed challenger Joe Biden in early results.

    The US president provided no evidence to back his allégations.

    Speaking from the White House, Trump vowed to seek a court order to halt vote counting.

    “This is a major fraud on our election. We want the law to be used in a proper manner. So we’ll be going to the US Supreme court. We want all voting (he means counting) to stop. We want them to find any ballots at 4 o clock in the morning and add them to the list,” Trump said.

    As of 09:00GMT, Trump had garnered 213 electoral votes against Biden’s 238. 270 votes are needed for one to be declared the winner.

    Joe Biden was the first to speak. He told supporters from Delaware that he was confident of a Victory.

    “We’re feeling really good about Wisconsin and Michigan. And by the way, it’s going to take time to count the votes. We’re going to win Pennsylvania,” said the 77-year-old.

    Trump won the state of Florida, a big prize with 29 electoral votes, denying Biden an early win. Arizona was called for Biden by AP, the first state to flip from Red to Blue in this election, a massive boost for the Democrats.

    Police are deployed in several cities as fears of a possible explosion of clashes grew after the tense vote.

    Source: africanews.com

  • Livestreaming: Who wins the race to the White House?

    In what has been projected to be the highest turnout in a century, Americans choose their president today.

    Polls project a tight race to the White House between incumbent Republican President Donald Trump and Democratic candidate, Joe Biden.

    U.S. media report that some 100 million Americans have cast a ballot using early voting, which far outstrips the over 47 million voters that did so in 2016.

    Get full coverage of the U.S. elections in the live stream below.

    Source: www.ghanaweb.com

  • US Polls: I shall pursue a PhD in Psychology if Trump wins Gabby declares

    A powerful member of the governing New Patriotic Party (NPP), Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko has declared that he will abandon his career as a lawyer and politician and pursue a Doctor of Philosophy degree(PhD) in Psychology iA powerful member of the governing New Patriotic Party (NPP) Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko has declared that he will abandon his career as a lawyer and politician and pursue a Doctor of Philosophy degree(PhD) in Psychology if Donald Trump is retained as the President of the United States of America.

    His PhD will focus on the psychology of the American voter.f Donald Trump is retained as the President of the United States of America. His PhD will focus on the psychology of the American voter.

    The New Patriotic Party(NPP) of which Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko is a member, tends to see a win for the Republicans, led by Donald Trump now, as a win for them. It is unclear why Mr Otchere-Darko seems to not support a win for Mr Trump.

    Americans are voting today to elect a President for the next four years. Joe Biden of Democrats and President Donald Trump are the key contenders in the election, described by many pollsters as too close to call.

    While some abhor the retention of Donald Trump as President for his apparently unpresidential actions and inactions, others are yearning for his reelection based on his stellar performance in growing the American economy. Donald Trump has had support from Black celebrities in America, who typically support the Democrats.

    Meanwhile, both leading presidential candidates have expressed confidence in their ability to win the election.

    Source: My News GH

  • It’s Election Day in America

    It’s Election Eve.

    96 million people have already voted.

    9.3 million people have been infected with Covid-19.

    Americans get their last chance Tuesday to judge the presidency of President Donald Trump.

    You can tell he’s nervous because he made the final moments of his reelection argument about excluding people’s votes from being counted.

    We don’t know who will win this election, but we have already learned something very important about US politics in 2020, and that’s this: One party has been actively and openly trying to get people’s votes thrown out.

    It is literally anti-democratic.

    If this were being done quietly, it would be a scandal. Done out loud by the President, it has the veneer of policy. Or at least that’s the way it’s being treated. But it’s no less corrosive to people’s faith in the system. Damn the torpedoes. I’ve been a little surprised not to feel more urgency from Democratic nominee Joe Biden or his campaign.

    Former President Barack Obama was nailing three-pointers before a speech over the weekend. Biden was out with Lady Gaga in Pittsburgh. Those interludes felt like normal-year retail politics, regular get-out-the-young-vote moves at a time when the whole democratic system could be teetering. It’s clear that Biden is trying to project a steady hand when everyone’s shaking. Then again, this is the turnout portion of an election. It’s a few extra people in each neighborhood that make winners.

    There’s a pit in my stomach tonight. I honestly wonder what comes next and I can’t shake the unease.

    Will there be violence if Trump wins?

    Will there be violence if Trump loses?

    Cities, states and businesses have all been preparing for the possibility of civil unrest.

    They’re erecting a “non-scalable fence” around the White House.

    Coordinated attack. Trump’s warnings that any result that does not end with him in the White House must be “rigged” are working in tandem with Republican efforts to have hundreds of thousands of votes thrown out. Those efforts have faltered in key state and federal courts.

    Too far. Not even the all-Republican Texas state Supreme Court or the Republican-appointed federal court judge were buying the argument of conservative activists and legislators that more than 100,000 votes cast at drive-in polling places should be invalidated. Details here.

    Steve Vladeck, a CNN analyst and constitutional law professor at the University of Texas, ripped the lawsuits brought by Republicans in Texas and elsewhere. He argued in The Washington Post they were functionally about invalidating votes Republicans think will be damaging to them:

    “Like so many 11th-hour voting-related suits filed by Republicans in recent weeks, this suit has almost nothing to do with voter fraud. Rather, it’s the latest in a consistent and cynical line of suits — in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, among others — that appear motivated by partisan gain, assuming that the exclusion of any set of ballots from Harris County, the third-largest in the country and one of Texas’s key Democratic strongholds, is good for Republicans.”

    It’s the voters’ turn. Anything less than a blowout seems destined to be a legal battle. “I don’t think it’s fair that we have to wait for a long period of time after the election … We’re going in the night of — as soon as the election is over — we’re going in with our lawyers,” Trump promised. Polling suggests Joe Biden is in the stronger spot. But polling deceived us four years ago. And if there are only two real options, either one could win. Make no mistake that come Wednesday (or later), we could be talking about Trump’s reelection.

    Historical notes — Trump should be winning. Only three incumbent presidents in Trump’s lifetime have lost their bid for a second term. And Gerald Ford was never himself elected, so he gets a huge asterisk. That Trump is in a place of weakness, according to polls, is evidence, maybe, that division, discord and a failure to do even basic leadership like pushing mask mandates during a pandemic have turned voters off.

    The other way to end an election — Today I watched the speech Ronald Reagan gave on Election Eve in 1980. It was, to my 2020 ears, incredibly hokey. But it was also hopeful. He sat in a chair and told Americans to believe in their ability to come together.

    “Let us resolve they will say of our day and our generation that we did keep faith with our God, that we did act worthy of ourselves; that we did protect and pass on lovingly that shining city on a hill,” he said in closing.

    Act worthy of yourself. Trump, for comparison, is tweeting his approval of a caravan of pickup trucks endangering a Biden campaign bus in Texas. And he’s trying to poison faith in elections to ward off the humility of a possible loss.

    Read this from CNN’s Kevin Liptak, who spent the weekend on the campaign trail with Trump.

    The Covid election and a changing US state — And read this from CNN’s Dan Merica, who spent time in Arizona’s key Maricopa County, trying to figure out how coronavirus and Trump’s leadership would affect his chances. He found a lot of people willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt despite the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have died.

    What’s next? Both Trump and Biden wrapped up their arguments in Pennsylvania. It’s not a bad bet we’ll be talking about that state late into the night on Tuesday.

    And if it’s not that close, that might be a good indicator of what’s to come.

    But don’t expect a decision on election night. In Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, both key states, officials have said many ballots will not be fully counted. This thing, as we’ve said repeatedly, will take a while.

    What to watch in exit polls

    I’m going to be watching exit polls and results on election night and try to identify themes about why either side won or lost and what it says about the country right now.

    That said, I’m no polling expert. And exit polls are one of the most misunderstood tools in political journalism. They’re also among the first things we’ll hear about on election night.

    So I’ll be leaning heavily on the people at CNN who are. I asked Ryan Struyk, who does know quite a bit about polls and who normally works with Jake Tapper on the State of the Union staff, for his thoughts. He sent over a lot more than I expected. I’ll put the entire guide below: The exit polls will offer us some key clues about whether Trump or Biden are winning over the voters they need to clinch the White House. Here’s what I’m watching: The key groups to watch for Trump:

    White voters without a college degree: This group propelled Trump to the presidency four years ago, but now, Biden hopes to narrow the gap. Trump won White voters without a college degree by 31 points in Michigan, 32 points in Pennsylvania and 28 points in Wisconsin. Trump needs to try to hold those margins again.

    White women: Pre-election polls suggest Trump is losing ground with this group, but he needs to stop the bleeding to have a fighting chance. A gaping gender gap could be fatal to Trump’s reelection bid. Trump won White women by 9 points in 2016.

    Independent voters: Independent voters haven’t given either candidate a double-digit advantage in more than 30 years. Could Biden break the streak? Trump narrowly won independent voters by 4 points in 2016, and he’ll need to keep things close with this group to win again.

    The key groups to watch for Biden:

    Seniors: Trump won voters over 65 years old by 7 points in 2016, but amid a pandemic that is disproportionately killing older Americans, Biden may win them back in key states like Florida. Plus, Trump won White seniors by 19 points. Can Biden break even?

    Trump-to-Biden voters and former third party voters: How many former Trump voters can Biden convince to cross party lines? In a tight race, even picking off 5-10% of them could make a difference. Plus, almost 6% of voters went third party in 2016. Where will they fall now?

    White voters with a college degree: One of the big surprises of 2016 came when White voters with a college degree backed Trump by 3 points. Polls suggest they will likely go for Biden in 2020, but Biden needs to run up the score, especially among college-educated women.

    Black and Latino voters, especially men: Trump has been pushing to make inroads with Black and Latino men, where even a small shift could help make up losses with other groups. Hillary Clinton won Black men by 69 points and Latino men by 31 points in 2016.

    Source: CNN

  • Trumps COVID-19 post deleted by Facebook and hidden by Twitter

    Facebook has deleted a post in which President Trump had claimed Covid-19 was “less lethal” than the flu.

    Mr Trump is at the White House after three days of hospital treatment having tested positive for the virus.

    He wrote the US had “learned to live with” flu season, “just like we are learning to live with COVID-19, in most populations far less lethal!!!”

    Twitter hid the same message behind a warning about “spreading misleading and potentially harmful information”.

    Users have to click past the alert to read the tweet.

    “We remove incorrect information about the severity of Covid-19, and have now removed this post,” said Andy Stone, policy communications manager at Facebook.

    An exact mortality rate for Covid-19 is not known, but it is thought to be substantially higher possible 10 times or more than most flu strains, according to Johns Hopkins University.

    The President has reacted by posting: “REPEAL SECTION 230!!!”

    This is a reference to a law that says social networks are not responsible for the content posted by their users.

    But it allows the firms to engage in “good-Samaritan blocking”, including the removal of content they judge to be offensive, harassment or violent.

    If the law were to be repealed, social media companies would face being sued over the edits and changes of user content they made.

    Source: bbc.com

  • Tax bombshell throws Trump on defensive ahead of debate

    President Donald Trump reeled Monday on the eve of his first televised debate against challenger Joe Biden after a bolt-from-the-blue report showed he has been avoiding paying almost any federal income tax for years.

    The scoop from The New York Times, reporting that Trump paid only $750 in federal income tax in 2016 and 2017, and none at all for 10 of the previous 15 years, was a shot to the jugular of the self-described billionaire.

    Throughout his unlikely rise to power, Trump has portrayed himself as a hard-nosed businessman on a mission to drain the Washington swamp and represent what he calls “the forgotten man and woman.”

    Trump calls the Times’ story — which the newspaper says is based on his long secret tax returns — false.

    “The Fake News Media, just like Election time 2016, is bringing up my Taxes & all sorts of other nonsense with illegally obtained information,” he tweeted Monday.

    But with several new polls on Sunday once again suggesting Biden has the upper hand, the Republican goes into the debate in Cleveland on Tuesday ever more on the defensive.

    A Washington Post/ABC News poll put Biden 10 points ahead of Trump nationally, at 53 to 43 percent support among registered voters, while an NBC News-Marist poll gave the Democrat a similar lead, of 54 to 44, in key swing state Wisconsin — which Trump had carried in 2016.

    Trump’s Democratic challenger is homing in on the president’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic and his controversial rush to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the late liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

    But the tax report threatens the core of Trump’s political identity — that vaunted ability to connect with blue collar voters.

    Biden, who frequently touts his early boyhood years in the hardscrabble Pennsylvania town of Scranton, has been trying to reframe the populist leader as a spoiled playboy from Manhattan.

    Though its impact on voters was still far from clear, the Times’ report — which purports to reveal information that prosecutors and congressional investigators have been trying fruitlessly to obtain for years — hands Biden piles of new ammunition.

    And the Democrat’s campaign immediately opened fire.

    In a quickly crafted new ad, haunting piano music accompanies a montage of faces representing Americans in relatively low wage but admired jobs, listing the income tax they typically pay: $7,239 for teachers, $5,283 for firefighters, $10,216 for nurses.

    Switching to footage of the president, the text then reads: “Federal income taxes paid: Donald Trump $750.”

    – Billionaire or bust? –

    The Times story raises new doubts about whether Trump is really the man with the Midas touch that he portrays or a hapless spendthrift owing a lot of people money.

    Among his many unique traits, Trump makes boasting about his wealth a major part of his stump speech.

    The empire of golf resorts bearing his name is even woven into the fabric of the presidency, with Trump taking his vast entourage to the properties on a regular basis.

    But with Trump the first president in years to refuse to make public his tax returns, questions have long been asked.

    Trump claims he can’t release the returns because he is under audit. In his trademark brash style, he also once boasted that getting out of taxes “makes me smart.”

    On Monday, he tweeted “I paid many millions of dollars in taxes but was entitled, like everyone else, to depreciation & tax credits.”

    But according to the Times, Trump’s tax returns show he managed large-scale tax avoidance partly because his supposedly successful businesses — particularly the golf courses — are such money losers.

    The Times said that Trump benefited from a $72.9 million tax refund now subject to an official audit. He also reportedly took tax deductions on residences, aircraft and $70,000 in hairstyling for television appearances.

    In a detail that raises the issue of potentially serious conflicts of interest for a sitting president, the Times said that loans personally guaranteed by Trump are soon due for repayment.

    – Drug test demand –

    Even without the fresh fuel of the tax story, Tuesday’s Trump-Biden debate was destined to be a brutal affair.

    Trump is doubling down on attempts to smear his rival’s mental state. Biden “doesn’t know he’s alive,” is one of his new catchphrases.

    As the debate nears, Trump has said they should both take a drug test.

    “Joe Biden just announced that he will not agree to a Drug Test. Gee, I wonder why?” Trump tweeted Monday.

    When asked by reporters about the demand over the weekend, Biden laughed before declining to comment.

    But his deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield had a blunt riposte: “Vice President Biden intends to deliver his debate answers in words. If the president thinks his best case is made in urine he can have at it.”

    Source: france24.com

  • US imposes visa restrictions over Nigeria elections

    The US has imposed visa restrictions on a number of people in Nigeria accused of undermining democratic principles ahead of elections in Edo and Ondo states.

    The state department said the individuals – who have not been named – had operated with impunity at the expense of the Nigerian people.

    It urged all parties – including the security forces – to ensure free and fair elections.

    The US also announced visa restrictions on individuals involved in elections in two other states that were marred by violence last year.

    In August the US had expressed concern over the deteriorating political climate in Edo State. It said it was disappointed with the role played by some political actors in the state, especially with regards to allegations of interference by security forces in political matters.

    Source: bbc.com

  • Trump vows response on any ‘plot to kill diplomat in SA’

    The US President Donald Trump has vowed a response that will be “1,000 times greater in magnitude,” to any attack by Iran.

    This is after reports that Iran was plotting to kill the US ambassador to South Africa, Lana Marks.

    “Any attack by Iran, in any form, against the United States will be met with an attack on Iran that will be 1,000 times greater in magnitude!” Mr Trump tweeted on Monday.

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh has dismissed the report on the planned assassination that was first reported by Politico.

    It reported that Iran was planning to assassinate the US ambassador, a long-time friend of President Trump, in retaliation for the assassination of General Qasem Soleimani in January.

    Gen Soleimani was killed in a US drone strike on an airport in Baghdad in January.

    Source: bbc.com