A prominent legal practitioner, Bobby Banson, has expressed his disagreement with the notion that the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, serves as a mere tool of the executive branch of government.
He asserted that such claims are unjust, as the Supreme Court’s responsibilities encompass more than just constitutional cases.
Critics have voiced concerns regarding the appointment of judges during the current administration led by President Akufo-Addo.
For instance, former President John Dramani Mahama, while addressing a National Democratic Congress (NDC) annual lawyers conference on September 2, 2023, pointed out that President Akufo-Addo has appointed a substantial number of judges in Ghana.
Mahama alleged that these judges have a bias toward the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and accused the government of “packing” the court to evade accountability after leaving office.
In response, President Akufo-Addo strongly criticized these comments, labeling them as “extremely dangerous” to the judiciary’s independence and characterizing them as an audacious attack on the judiciary by allegedly responsible politicians.
Speaking on TV3’s Key Points on Saturday, October 28, Mr. Bobby Banson discussed a proposal by former Justice of the Supreme Court William Atuguba to reevaluate the process of appointing judges.
“Not only are these concepts new in our public discourse but they are also extremely dangerous and represent the brazen attack on the independence of the judiciary by allegedly responsible politicians.”
“I do not even think that the so-called political cases that the SC engages in are up to 30 percent of the work of the Supreme Court. and so to suggest or to always give the narrative as if the Supreme Court exists to do the so-called political ses or to a large extent the constitutional interpretation cases, I think it is a bit problematic because the role of the Supreme Court to dispense justice is not limited to those constitutional cases.
“The reason why I am saying this is that the politicians as we have it do not make up the majority of the populace of Ghana and so to say if the judiciary exists to do the bidding of the executive which is the political class is very unfair.”
Mr Banson highlighted that the Supreme Court’s work is not limited to politically oriented cases or constitutional interpretation.
The court also handles appeals and cases involving the interpretation of the constitution.
Banson emphasized that it is misleading to suggest that the Supreme Court primarily exists to address politically charged cases or constitutional interpretation issues, as these do not constitute the majority of its workload.
He argued that such a perspective is problematic because it implies that the judiciary’s role is predominantly to serve the interests of the executive, which represents the political class.
In his view, this characterization is unfair given that politicians are not the majority of Ghana’s population.























































































